Benton RSS Feed

Author 
Coverage Type 

On June 14, the White House will announce a $100 million, multi-prong initiative to free up more government spectrum via spectrum sharing and spectrum efficiency that could also allow for relinquishing spectrum.

At the same time, the Administration is releasing a report promoting the advances and investment in broadband under the Obama Administration.

The new initiatives include a Presidential directive to federal agencies "to enhance the efficiency of their use of spectrum and make more capacity available to satisfy the skyrocketing demand of consumer and business broadband users." The memorandum creates a White House-based Spectrum Policy Team to oversee implementation and make further recommendations. The President is also pledging $100 million in R&D support. By September, the National Science Foundation will award $23 million in spectrum-sharing research and development grants and DARPA will announce the first of a planned $60 million in contracts for federal spectrum sharing efforts over the next five years. The National Telecommunications & Information Administration and the National Institute of Standards and Technology will spend another $17.5 million on spectrum and advanced communications research and to encourage more public-private collaboration.


White House Investing $100 Million in Government Spectrum Initiative
Source 
Author 
Coverage Type 

With school districts rushing to buy computers, tablets, digital white boards and other technology, a new report questions whether the investment is worth it.

In a review of student survey data conducted in conjunction with the federal exams known as the National Assessment of Educational Progress, the nonprofit Center for American Progress found that middle school math students more commonly used computers for basic drills and practice than to develop sophisticated skills. The report also found that no state was collecting data to evaluate whether technology investments were actually improving student achievement. “Schools frequently acquire digital devices without discrete learning goals and ultimately use these devices in ways that fail to adequately serve students, schools, or taxpayers,” wrote Ulrich Boser, a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress and the author of the report.

The analysis of the NAEP data found that 34 percent of eighth graders who took the math exams in 2011 used computers to “drill on math facts” while less than a quarter worked with spreadsheets or geometric figures on the computer. Only 17 percent used statistical programs. The federal survey data showed striking differences among racial groups and income levels. More than half of the black students who took the eighth-grade math exam in 2011 said they used computers to work on math drills, while only 30 percent of white students said they did. Similarly, 41 percent of students eligible for free and reduced lunches said they used computers for math drills, compared with 29 percent of students whose families earn too much for them to qualify for the lunches.


Study Gauges Value of Technology in Schools
Source 
Author 
Coverage Type 

Most journalists dream of uncovering government corruption, landing a big interview or winning a Pulitzer Prize. But those are not the goals that Thomas F. Secunda, who co-founded Bloomberg L.P. in 1982 with Michael R. Bloomberg, has in mind. “The only journalism that matters is the kind that moves markets,” Secunda told the senior staff of Bloomberg News during a recent discussion in the seventh-floor auditorium of the company’s Lexington Avenue headquarters, according to one former Bloomberg journalist in attendance.

The question of how exactly some of those Bloomberg reporters may have uncovered market-moving information has become a critical one for the company. In April, Goldman Sachs complained that a reporter had monitored an executive’s activities on the Bloomberg machine, the ubiquitous financial terminal that contains a mind-boggling array of information about economies, companies, markets and people, including Bloomberg’s own customers. The revelation prompted inquiries from more than 20 customers, including Bank of America, the Federal Reserve, the Treasury Department and the European Central Bank. Daniel L. Doctoroff, chief executive of Bloomberg, apologized, calling the reporting practice a “mistake.” Interviews with more than 30 current and former Bloomberg employees paint a picture of an aggressive, hyperkinetic organization that not only tolerated but encouraged an unusual symbiotic relationship between the company’s news operation and its business interests, including the use of the terminals to break news. Many of these reporters say they routinely used the terminal’s function, called the UUID command, to find background information on subscribers, including contact information, when the subscriber had last logged on, and weekly statistics on how often customers used a particular function, like equity shares or currency markets.


Bloomberg Reporters’ Practices Become Crucial Issue for Company
Source 
Author 
Coverage Type 

For many of its 38 years, the sober studio-interview format of the “PBS NewsHour” has served the program well, drawing viewers and corporate underwriters alike. But with a deep financing crisis forcing layoffs and other cutbacks, some public television employees believe that format — and a general unwillingness to embrace the digital realities facing journalism — may be jeopardizing the program’s future.

“NewsHour” came under criticism in a confidential May 2012 report commissioned by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, one of the program’s major supporters in recent years, that concluded bluntly that the program needed to aggressively “modernize news gathering production.” The report stressed the need for a major reorganization that included developing new digital platforms and clarifying its editorial focus. It also said more “decision-making transparency” was needed from MacNeil/Lehrer Productions, the profit-making company that co-produces the program for PBS. (The company is controlled by Jim Lehrer and Robert MacNeil, its founding anchors. Washington public television station WETA is the other producer.)


Venerable Format of ‘NewsHour’ Struggles With New Era of Media
Author 
Coverage Type 

Broadcast Music Inc., or BMI, filed a lawsuit in federal court against Internet radio giant Pandora Media over Pandora's attempt to lower its royalty obligations by buying a tiny radio station in South Dakota to qualify for the lower rates that terrestrial radio broadcasters pay to use music online.

BMI is asking a federal "rate court"—a part of the U.S. District Court in Manhattan that sets music royalty fees when the parties involved can't agree—to determine the rates that Pandora must pay BMI members to use their work. The suit marks the first time that BMI has resorted to litigation over Internet music services. The suit comes two days after Pandora announced it had made a deal to buy KXMZ-FM, a radio station in Rapid City (SD) Pandora had said it believed that the move would allow it to pay the reduced rates that terrestrial radio broadcasters such as Clear Channel Communications pay to use music on their digital services, such as Clear Channel's iHeartRadio. In its lawsuit, BMI, which collects royalties for music publishers and songwriters when their works are played in public, called Pandora's radio-station acquisition a "stunt" and a "brazen effort to artificially drive down its license fees." BMI and its rival, the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, or Ascap, say that Internet radio doesn't benefit music-rights holders in the same way that terrestrial radio does. In the suit, BMI said it is willing to accept a lower royalty rate from terrestrial radio stations' online services because they pay such significant fees for on-air broadcasts.


BMI Sues Pandora Over Fees
Author 
Coverage Type 

Investors are getting the news: There is value for broadcasters in joining forces.

Gannett's announcement that it would acquire Belo Corp. for $1.5 billion, plus the assumption of $715 million in debt, is the latest example of consolidation among local-station owners. Among other recent moves: Sinclair Broadcast Group's April agreement to buy Fisher Communications and Media General's deal to merge with Young Broadcasting. This underscores that bigger is better when it comes negotiating with TV networks and pay-TV providers.

With Gannett and Belo, for example, the combination is expected to generate around $175 million in annual synergies within three years, with much of that coming from more favorable agreements with content owners and pay-TV distributors. Indeed, the acquisition would almost double the number of stations owned by Gannett, perhaps better known as a publisher than a broadcaster. It is already the No. 1 NBC-affiliate group. Owning the Belo stations will make it the No. 1 CBS-affiliate group and the No. 4 ABC-affiliate group.


Broadcasters Find Strength in Numbers
Source 
Author 
Coverage Type 

[Commentary] The Republican Party’s failure to invest in high-level technology and analytics in 2012 has become shorthand code for the party’s woes: this alone wasn’t the reason Mitt Romney lost, but it was emblematic of a party whose leaders had stopped innovating — in policy, messaging, or campaign tactics.

Last week, the Republican National Committee hired Andy Barkett, a senior Facebook engineer, as its new chief technology officer. The party is also pressing the reset button on its previously close relationship with Liberty Works, a Silicon Valley-led consortium that was to manage access to the GOP’s voter file. Barkett’s hiring — along with the RNC’s other reform-minded hires — shows that the party may finally be serious about stopping the brain drain of recent years and closing the innovation gap with the Democrats. Yet, while the broad outlines of the RNC’s technology initiatives have been greeted favorably, many of the details are still being defined. Ask most political operatives what those details should be, and you’ll get wildly different responses. One of the key promises made following the release of the party’s 2012 postmortem report was opening up the voter file to outside developers and allied groups to access and contribute back to in real time. This small technical change could go a long way towards solving the data sharing problems campaign staff have griped about for ages. Done right, it could seed a whole new technology ecosystem on the right.

[Ruffini is president of Engage, a digital strategy firm in Washington]


The GOP's digital opportunity
Source 
Author 
Coverage Type 

ViaSat next week will add voice service to its Exede high-speed broadband offering, enabling the company to offer a triple play of voice, video and data over satellite. The addition of voice service to a satellite-based broadband service is likely to be viewed positively by policymakers who have been struggling with how to help cover the cost of bringing broadband to rural areas with high deployment costs.

Exede’s broadband service supports 12 Mbps speeds, making it comparable to DSL. But there is a downside to satellite-based broadband services from Exede and its key competitor Hughes Network Systems in comparison with DSL and other landline-based alternatives such as fiber-to-the-home and cable modems. Unlike those services, the satellite-based offerings have usage caps.


Why Regulators Will Like ViaSat Satellite Voice and Broadband Offering

House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) announced that the House Commerce Committee hearing room will be named in honor of former Committee Chairman John D. Dingell (D-MI). Rep Dingell has served in the U.S. House of Representatives since December 1955. Dingell served as Chairman from 1981 to 1994 and again from 2007 to 2008.


House Commerce Committee Hearing Room to be Named after Distinguished Former Chairman John D. Dingell
Author 
Coverage Type 

[Commentary] This month, Jordan blocked local access to about 300 domestic websites. Ironically, this action coincided with the rollout of Abdullah's "democratic empowerment" project.

Putting aside the incongruous timing, the assault on Internet freedom had been legislated months ago. Still, not surprisingly, publishers of these websites accused the palace of implementing the law now to silence dissent. After all, many of the blocked sites are critical of the government and focus reportage and commentary on anti-government demonstrations, news of the tribal opposition movement known as the Hirak and alleged corruption. During a protest outside the journalists union headquarters June 3, Basil Okoor, the publisher of jo24.net — whose site is among those blocked — described the government measures as "political and not legal," and warned that "tomorrow, the state will extend its powers over print journalism." Given the ongoing turmoil in the region, it would be unwise to press for radical political reform in Jordan now. Indeed, the majority of Jordanians are not clamoring for such change. But rolling back the nation's already limited freedoms is not a recipe for enhanced stability. As Abdullah works to insulate Jordan from domestic and foreign threats, the last thing he needs — at home and abroad — is to associate his benign and traditionally enlightened monarchy with the region's most repressive regimes.

[Schenker is director of the Program on Arab Politics at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy]


Jordan's Web policy mistake