Benton RSS Feed
The National Security Agency sweeps up data on millions of cellphones and Internet communications under secret court orders. But as it mounts a rigorous defense of its surveillance, the agency has disclosed new details that portray its efforts as tightly controlled and limited in scope, while successful in thwarting potential plots.
On June 16, officials said that though the NSA is authorized to collect "geolocational" information that can pinpoint the location of callers, it chooses not to. The NSA chooses not to collect such data as the nearest cellphone tower used to place or receive a mobile call, U.S. officials said. In a statement released this weekend, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence said the NSA program doesn't collect "any cell phone locational information." Such information has been found to be of value to criminal investigators, who can use it to link suspects with crime scenes. However, the U.S. official said the data doesn't provide sufficient intelligence value to justify the resources that would be required to use it.
Officials: NSA Doesn't Collect Cellphone-Location Records
Silicon Valley companies are seeking to further distance themselves from government surveillance, though they don't agree on the best approach.
Facebook, Microsoft and Apple each disclosed figures on data requests from U.S. government and law enforcement entities—though in a form that shed little light on how many of the information transfers were associated with intelligence agencies. Google, however, questioned the value of such disclosures without being permitted by the government to offer more details on classified requests. Google called the disclosures by its rivals a step back for users. "Our request to the government is clear: to be able to publish aggregate numbers of national security requests, including FISA disclosures, separately," a spokesman said in a statement, referring to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
Tech Firms Disclose Certain Data Apple reveals US government data requests (FT – Apple) Facebook and Microsoft reveal US data requests (FT – Facebook, Microsoft) Facebook, Microsoft allowed to reveal more about government data requests (CSM - Facebook, Microsoft) Apple Joins Facebook, Microsoft in Outlining Data Requests (Bloomberg – Apple)
[Commentary] If the United States ever faced a genuine conflict in cyberspace, with decisions having to be made at network speed against adversaries unknown or hard to find, who would be in charge?
A major attempt to sort this out at the highest levels is evident in President Policy Directive 20, which President Obama signed last October. Presidential approval is required for cyber-operations if they might result in “significant consequences,” which include loss of life, serious levels of retaliation, damage to property, adverse foreign policy consequences or economic impact on the country. Wisely, cyberweapons are being put in a category with nuclear weapons, not to be fired off by a field commander without authority. There’s an exception for emergency actions.
The directive is still classified as top secret but was among the papers spilled into public view by Edward Snowden, the contractor for the National Security Agency who also revealed classified materials on Internet and telephone surveillance. Certainly, this leak must have pained the White House. But on balance, it is a good sign that the imponderables of fighting a cyberwar are being examined and clarified. Better now, before trouble arrives, than in the midst of crisis or after conflict has broken out.
Taking the mystery out of cyberwar
Even as he defends controversial government surveillance programs, the head of the National Security Agency is asking Congress for another authority sure to inflame critics — legal immunity for companies that help the feds fight cyberattackers.
Gen. Keith Alexander has petitioned Capitol Hill for months to give Internet service providers and other firms new cover from lawsuits when they rely on government data to thwart emerging cyberthreats. That may be a powerful perk to persuade companies to work with Washington toward bolstering the country’s digital defenses. But it’s also a source of alarm for some civil liberties advocates, who are already peeved with the NSA’s vast electronic spying regime. Those critics’ new fear: Companies acting with the government’s blessing in cyberspace could skirt legal accountability if they hit the wrong target.
NSA’s Keith Alexander seeks cyber shield for companies
In a period marked by Supreme Court deliberations on the subject, the news media coverage provided a strong sense of momentum towards legalizing same-sex marriage, according to a new study by the Pew Research Center.
Stories with more statements supporting same-sex marriage outweighed those with more statements opposing it by a margin of roughly 5-to-1. In the coverage studied, the central argument among proponents of same-sex marriage was one of civil rights. Arguments against were more varied, but most often voiced the idea that same-sex marriage would hurt society and the institution of traditional marriage.
News Coverage Conveys Strong Momentum for Same-Sex Marriage Study Finds Supportive Tilt to Gay Marriage Coverage (New York Times)
Americans' confidence in newspapers fell slightly to 23% this year, from 25% in 2012 and 28% in 2011. The percentage of Americans saying they have "a great deal" or "quite a lot" of confidence in newspapers has been generally trending downward since 1979, when it reached a high of 51%.
Newspapers rank near the bottom on a list of 16 societal institutions Gallup measured in a June 1-4 survey. Television news is tied with newspapers on the list, with 23% of Americans also expressing confidence in it. That is up slightly from the all-time low of 21% found last year. The only institutions television news and newspapers beat out this year are big business, organized labor, Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs), and Congress.
Americans' Confidence in Newspapers Continues to Erode
Given his calm and reasoned academic demeanor, it is easy to miss just how provocative Erik Brynjolfsson’s contention really is. Brynjolfsson, a professor at the MIT Sloan School of Management, and his collaborator and coauthor Andrew McAfee have been arguing for the last year and a half that impressive advances in computer technology—from improved industrial robotics to automated translation services—are largely behind the sluggish employment growth of the last 10 to 15 years. Even more ominous for workers, the MIT academics foresee dismal prospects for many types of jobs as these powerful new technologies are increasingly adopted not only in manufacturing, clerical, and retail work but in professions such as law, financial services, education, and medicine. That robots, automation, and software can replace people might seem obvious to anyone who’s worked in automotive manufacturing or as a travel agent. But Brynjolfsson and McAfee’s claim is more troubling and controversial. They believe that rapid technological change has been destroying jobs faster than it is creating them, contributing to the stagnation of median income and the growth of inequality in the United States. And, they suspect, something similar is happening in other technologically advanced countries.
How Technology is Destroying Jobs
Obama Boosts Wireless Broadband with Spectrum-Sharing Plan
For a second straight week, government surveillance of American’s telecommunications dominated the Headlines – and, also for a second week in a row, the Obama Administration made a major announcement about expanding access to high-speed broadband in the U.S. [See “ConnectED: Here Comes E-rate 2.0” for last week’s major announcement]
On June 14, President Barack Obama issued a Presidential Memorandum that establishes a set of measures that federal agencies, in collaboration with industry and other stakeholders, will take to more aggressively enhance spectrum efficiency and enable access to more spectrum for consumer services and applications. Under the Memorandum, an agency that requests a new spectrum assignment or that seeks to procure a spectrum-dependent system will have to document its consideration of alternative approaches and verify that it is pursuing the most spectrum-efficient method, in consideration of all relevant factors including cost and agency mission.
Other aspects of the Memorandum build on existing strategies, particularly with respect to advancing collaboration with the private sector and other stakeholders. Since 2010, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), which manages Federal agency spectrum assignments, has been implementing the President’s directive to identify 500 megahertz of spectrum for wireless broadband by convening agency-industry working groups that are engaged in unprecedented discussions aimed at increasing spectrum efficiency and providing access to certain federally assigned spectrum bands for consumer wireless broadband.
The new Memorandum directs NTIA to expand that collaborative process to encompass additional bands. Toward this end, NTIA and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) will develop policies and best practices to promote and facilitate greater collaboration among agencies, the private sector, and academia with respect to research, development, testing, and evaluation of spectrum sharing technologies.
NTIA and NIST will establish a National Center for Advanced Communications in Boulder (CO). The two agencies recently signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to collaborate on the establishment of the center. The MOU states that the center will leverage the “critical mass of NIST and NTIA research and engineering capabilities concentrated in Boulder” to form a “unique national asset,” and includes the infrastructure and collaborative environment needed to address a wide range of advanced communications challenges. This joint effort will increase the impact of existing efforts already under way in both agencies. A key focus of the center will be to promote interdisciplinary research, development and testing in radio frequency technology and spectrum sharing for public safety and commercial broadband applications. Examples of the specific types of research, facilities and other activities at the new center may include:
- multi-user test beds that allow government and industry researchers to realistically measure and evaluate the performance of new advanced communications technologies;
- targeted interdisciplinary research, development and testing projects in fields such as digital information processing, interoperability and quantum communications; and
- outreach to international standards development organizations to help ensure compatibility of U.S. advanced communications efforts with the global marketplace.
The NTIA now has six months to create an inventory of all federal airwaves that could be tapped for sharing and to develop a plan with the industry to test whether sharing in those bands would be feasible.
Helping accelerate the pace of technological change, the White House announced $100 million in upcoming and proposed federal investments in public-private research and development of spectrum sharing and other advanced communications technologies. By September, the National Science Foundation will award $23 million in spectrum sharing research and development (R&D) grants and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency will announce the first of an expected $60 million in spectrum sharing contracts to be awarded over the next five years. In FY ’14, the NTIA and the NIST will devote another $17.5 million toward spectrum and advanced communications research as well as accelerate public-private collaboration at federal laboratories.
The President’s agenda has also been informed by Realizing the Full Potential of Government-Held Spectrum to Spur Economic Growth, a July 2012 report by the President’s Council of Advisers on Science and Technology (PCAST). That report significantly shifted the discussion within spectrum policy circles to place a much greater emphasis on spectrum sharing as a means of dealing with the finite nature of spectrum and the growing demands for spectrum among commercial and government users. The idea is that federal users would be prioritized over the shared airwaves, but whenever and wherever there are no government transmissions present, commercial users would have free reign to operate their devices and networks. For instance, satellite communications bands might be off-limits for commercial use in and near military installations, but open to operators everywhere else.
The steps outlined in the Memorandum will directly support the technological advances called for by PCAST, as well as advances outlined in a new report, Four Years of Broadband Growth, released by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy and the National Economic Council. That report notes that it is increasingly clear that the nation must augment clearing opportunities with research, development, and deployment of means to promote more spectrum sharing – part of an “all-of-the-above” approach.
Spectrum sharing can take several forms, the report notes, but all involve two or more users having the right to use the same spectrum band according to rules designed to avoid interference between users. Sharing by federal agencies maximizes spectrum efficiency and allows faster commercial access while avoiding relocation costs. Some types of sharing are already in common use, while other potentially more promising approaches are being developed and tested. They include:
- Temporal sharing, when one user is authorized to use a band of spectrum in some fixed geographic area at certain times and another user has access to the same band at other times.
- Geographic sharing, where the government designates particular protection zones restricting commercial access to a particular spectrum band in certain areas, e.g. in the proximity of a military base or a federal satellite receiver.
- Geo-location/database-enabled sharing, by which wireless broadband devices use available “white spaces,” or gaps, in bands and locations that are allocated to other uses, but only as directed by specific location-aware technologies and databases.
- Dynamic sensing, which is emerging as a commercially viable approach as it receives growing attention and investment, and allows networks and devices to react in real time, detecting and moving among a wide range of available spectrum bands in accordance with agreed-upon protocols and priorities.
NTIA and NIST will host a Technology Day later this summer to showcase some of these advances.
The Memorandum also encourages the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), in its role as steward of non-federal spectrum, to continue its efforts to promote efficient, innovative, and flexible use of spectrum, including by imposing network build-out requirements or other conditions to guard against wasteful spectrum warehousing. In addition, the Memorandum strongly encourages the FCC to take steps to encourage improved performance of radio receivers, a largely-untapped avenue for increasing spectrum efficiency.
The Memorandum establishes a White House-based Spectrum Policy Team to support NTIA and to report back to the President on implementation of the Memorandum. Among other things, the Memorandum specifically directs the Team to assess the role of unlicensed devices and related spectrum policies.
With the White House announcement came a good deal of reaction around Washington.
“The President’s action today confirms and strengthens the efforts of NTIA, working with other federal agencies, to allocate 500 megahertz of spectrum by 2020 for wireless broadband services while balancing the spectrum needs of federal agencies,” said NTIA Administrator Lawrence E. Strickling. “Spectrum is an important driver of economic growth and innovation. The Presidential Memorandum will encourage greater collaboration between industry and the government necessary to facilitate greater sharing of spectrum and ensure that agencies will utilize spectrum as efficiently as possible.”
Acting FCC Chairwoman Mignon Clyburn applauded the President’s leadership and said the Memorandum “will enable us to meet the challenge of unleashing spectrum for commercial use while also ensuring more efficient use of spectrum.” She pledged that the FCC will work closely with NTIA, other federal partners and all stakeholders to achieve the goals set forth by the President in this Memorandum.” Fellow FCC Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel added that the government’s “traditional three-step process for reallocating federal spectrum—clearing federal users, relocating them, and then auctioning the cleared spectrum for new use—is reaching its limits.” Commissioner Rosenworcel advocates building federal spectrum policy on “carrots, not sticks.” She endorsed using incentives as a catalyst for freeing more federal spectrum for commercial use.
Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) also applauded the President’s actions saying, “it represents an innovative new strategy to help meet our Nation’s growing spectrum needs. Providing greater transparency; directing federal agencies to be more efficient and to provide data on their actual spectrum use; calling for incentives for federal users to share or relinquish spectrum are all critical to identifying more spectrum.”
Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA), a former wireless executive himself, reiterated his call for an inventory of all public spectrum assets in order to gauge usage and improve efficiency. “Federal agencies should have the spectrum they need to protect the public, but no one should be warehousing spectrum," he said.
In the House, Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-MI) and Communications and Technology Subcommittee Chairman Greg Walden (R-OR) welcomed the announcement, but cautioned that carriers will need even more spectrum. The Commerce Committee plans a hearing later this month on freeing up more spectrum. The Committee’s ranking member, Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) also pledged to continue to explore additional incentives to encourage agencies to relinquish underutilized spectrum.
The response from the commercial sector was also positive. AT&T, Comcast, Sprint and T-Mobile all released supportive statements on the White House release, as did the National Cable & Telecommunications Association. Rick Boucher, honorary chair of the Internet Innovation Alliance and former chairman of the House Communications Subcommittee, said "For spectrum-strapped providers -- and the millions of customers they serve -- today's announcement is a great step toward keeping up with demand. But it's just that, a step. What is urgently needed is a concerted effort to have large swaths of government-owned and underutilized spectrum repurposed for commercial auction. Hopefully these new initiatives set us on a path to get there." Mobile carrier lobbying association CTIA issued a statement praising the President’s effort to make more spectrum available for industry use, but had little to say about the sharing proposal itself.
Public Knowledge applauded the move. PK Senior Vice President Harold Feld said, “Those who have constantly sought to politicize what should be an engineering issue by reflexively balking at the very idea of ‘spectrum sharing’ should consider that we cannot hope to clear more federal spectrum for auction unless we can accommodate more federal users in a smaller number of bands. That requires new sharing technologies. Those who care about supporting our growing wireless economy should recognize that all new spectrum access, whether open to a myriad of innovators and industries or exclusively auctioned to companies like AT&T and Verizon, is equally valuable. We need more of both.”
June 18 will be the next red letter day for spectrum policy as the Washington Post hosts a discussion on Spectrum Supply and Demand, the Department of Commerce’s Spectrum Management Advisory Committee meets and FCC Chair-nominee Tom Wheeler faces the Senate Commerce Committee. Tune in and we’ll see you in the Headlines.
President Barack Obama issued a Presidential Memorandum that builds on the Administration’s commitment to make additional spectrum available for wireless broadband to drive innovation, expand consumer services, and increase job creation and economic growth.
The memorandum establishes a set of measures that Federal agencies, in collaboration with industry and other stakeholders, will now take to more aggressively enhance spectrum efficiency and enable access to more spectrum for consumer services and applications. Under the memorandum, an agency that requests a new spectrum assignment or that seeks to procure a spectrum-dependent system will have to document its consideration of alternative approaches and verify that it is pursuing the most spectrum-efficient method, in consideration of all relevant factors including cost and agency mission. Other aspects of the memorandum build on existing strategies, particularly with respect to advancing collaboration with the private sector and other stakeholders. The National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) will develop policies and best practices to promote and facilitate greater collaboration among agencies, the private sector, and academia with respect to research, development, testing, and evaluation of spectrum-sharing technologies. Helping accelerate the pace of technological change, the White House announced $100 million in upcoming and proposed Federal investments in public-private research and development of spectrum sharing and other advanced communications technologies. The memorandum also encourages the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), in its role as steward of non-Federal spectrum, to continue its efforts to promote efficient, innovative, and flexible use of spectrum, including by imposing network build-out requirements or other conditions to guard against wasteful spectrum warehousing. In addition, the memorandum strongly encourages the FCC to take steps to encourage improved performance of radio receivers, a largely-untapped avenue for increasing spectrum efficiency.
Administration Advances Wireless Spectrum for Economic Growth Expanding America's Leadership in Wireless Innovation (Presidential Memorandum) Administration Provides Another Boost to Wireless Broadband and Technological Innovation (WH Fact Sheet) Statement (NTIA) Statement (FCC Chairwoman Clyburn) Statement (FCC Commissioner Rosenworcel) Statement (Sen Rockefeller) Statement (Reps Upton and Walden) Statement (Rep Waxman) White House will explore idea of sharing government spectrum (Washington Post) White House Aims to Loosen Grip on Government-Held Wireless Spectrum (WSJ) Obama orders agencies to free up frequencies (The Hill) White House Wireless Plan Draws a Crowd (B&C – reaction) White House: Let’s all hold hands and share the airwaves (GigaOm) Statement (AT&T) Obama issues a memo to open up the airwaves (Politico) Obama Issues Spectrum Sharing Directive; Report Notes Broadband Gaps (telecompetitor)
A fast, reliable Internet connection is as essential to the modern economy as electricity or phone service, and over the last four years, the country has made tremendous progress investing in and delivering high-speed broadband to an unprecedented number of Americans.
We are releasing a new White House report entitled that makes that case even clearer. The results speak for themselves: since 2009, average broadband speeds have doubled, and the percentage of Americans with access to high-speed wireless broadband has more than quadrupled (from under 20% to over 80%). We were the first nation to deploy next-generation 4G/LTE wireless broadband on such a scale, which has in turn helped fuel the demand for the 500 million Internet-connected devices we now own. This technology is doing more than just enriching lives; it is creating jobs. With the right incentives in place over the last four years, companies have invested over $250 billion in broadband infrastructure. The “App economy” that has sprung up in that same time is estimated to have created 500,000 jobs alone. And America is again leading the world in these innovations; six years ago, only 5 percent of the world’s phones ran an operating system that was Made in America – today, over eighty percent do. But there is much more to be done to make sure we fully unleash the potential of this revolution in the way we communicate, learn, and work.
Four Years of Broadband Growth Four Years of Broadband Growth (White House report)