Benton RSS Feed

Source 
Coverage Type 

MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow blasted Fox News as a “subsidiary of the Romney campaign” that even right-leaning viewers “might object to.” Maddow highlighted the recent Media Matters report stating four Fox News contributors — John Bolton, Jay Sekulow, Walid Phares and Elaine Chao — also serve as surrogates or advisers to Mitt Romney’s campaign.

(Fox News indicated to The Huffington Post that Chao, who serves as a Romney national chair, is no longer a contributor.) “You can object to the idea that a purported news organization is paying people to report on and analyze their own work. They’re working for a campaign and they’re also analyzing that campaign for an organization that at least still has the word ‘news’ in its name — and that can sometimes seem cockamamie,” Maddow said. Maddow also pointed out to viewers that Karl Rove works as a Fox News contributor and is the co-founder of the pro-Romney, anti-Obama super PAC American Crossroads. But it’s not just those on the left that might find the overlap between the Romney campaign and Fox News unacceptable, Maddow said.


Maddow: Fox a Romney camp 'subsidiary' The Members Of Romney's Campaign Who Work For Fox (Media Matters for America)
Source 
Author 
Coverage Type 

Twitter expanded its Washington presence with the hire of William Carty, a longtime Republican aide on Capitol Hill. Carty began working for the Republicans on the Senate Commerce Committee last year. Before that, he spent about 10 years as an aide on the House Commerce Committee. Carty will be just the second Twitter staffer working on public policy issues, joining Colin Crowell, a Democrat with experience at the Federal Communications Commission and on Capitol Hill.


Twitter hires GOP congressional staffer

National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors Annual Conference 2012

Broadband, Cable & All That Jazz
September 27 - 29, 2012
Sheraton New Orleans
New Orleans, LA
http://natoa.org/events/annual-conference/2012/

See the agenda http://natoa.org/events/annual-conference/2012/

Source 
Coverage Type 

Free Press, Public Knowledge, and the New America Foundation’s Open Technology Institute have informed AT&T that they intend to file a complaint with the Federal Communications Commission against the wireless carrier for violating network neutrality rules.

The complaint will address AT&T’s plan to keep certain subscribers from using Apple’s FaceTime video calling on the AT&T cellular network. The move was expected, but the timing on when the FCC responds is unclear. AT&T justified this move in two ways: first it said by being open and transparent about the move it was following the rules that the FCC had implemented with regard to network neutrality on wireless networks. Two, it made a complicated argument around preloaded apps that basically boiled down to, “you can use anything you want on AT&T’s handsets over Wi-Fi, thus we aren’t blocking anything.” AT&T said it was not violating the Open Internet rules that forbid a carrier from blocking services that compete with its own services. This move is designed to do two things for AT&T. One, it pushes users to the newer shared data plans that help AT&T offset the loss in revenue from users deciding to dump texting and even voice plans. Two, it seeks to conflate Wi-Fi networks with cellular networks for purposes of abiding by the network neutrality rules.


AT&T will be slapped with network neutrality complaint over FaceTime blocking Public Interest Groups to File Net Neutrality Complaint Against AT&T for Blocking FaceTime on iPhones and iPads (Free Press) Groups Prepare to Fight AT&T Over FaceTime Restrictions (NYTimes) AT&T faces complaint over iPhone FaceTime blocking (WashPost) Public interest groups to file net-neutrality complaint against AT&T's FaceTime plans (The Hill) Groups: AT&T to Be Target of Net Neutrality Complaint (B&C) AT&T faces formal FCC complaint for blocking cellular FaceTime use (ars technica) Groups Take AT&T App-Blocking Complaint to FCC (National Journal) Net Neutrality Battle: AT&T Under Fire for iPad, iPhone FaceTime Rules (The Wrap)
Source 
Author 
Coverage Type 

[Commentary] The people who buy iPhones and subscribe to AT&T should be protected from AT&T's capricious actions. They should be able to use FaceTime, or any other app of their choice, to call their friends and loved ones.

Apps like FaceTime can be more convenient than traditional calling, and can save users money on overages or international calls. And, as we've learned, AT&T's actions hit the deaf community especially hard, as FaceTime is well-suited to conversations in sign languages. But AT&T would have you believe that because FaceTime is more capable than its voice product, it gets less protection. In January of 2010, Public Knowledge asked for exactly the enforcement procedures we now plan to use. Before we file, we want to give AT&T every opportunity to correct its mistake and roll back its customer-unfriendly action. But if it doesn't, we're going to ask the Federal Communications Commission to enforce its rules.


Holding AT&T to Account for Blocking FaceTime on iPhones and iPads
Source 
Author 
Coverage Type 

[Commentary] On the most basic level, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act is responsible for saving and creating 2.5 million jobs. The majority of economists agree that it helped the economy grow by as much as 3.8 percent, and kept the unemployment rate from reaching 12 percent.

The stimulus is the reason, in fact, that most Americans are better off than they were four years ago, when the economy was in serious danger of shutting down. But the stimulus did far more than stimulate: it protected the most vulnerable from the recession’s heavy winds. Of the act’s $840 billion final cost, $1.5 billion went to rent subsidies and emergency housing that kept 1.2 million people under roofs. (That’s why the recession didn’t produce rampant homelessness.) It increased spending on food stamps, unemployment benefits and Medicaid, keeping at least seven million Americans from falling below the poverty line. It made crucial investments in neglected economic sectors that are likely to pay off for decades. It jump-started the switch to electronic medical records, which will largely end the use of paper records by 2015. It poured more than $1 billion into comparative-effectiveness research on pharmaceuticals. It extended broadband Internet to thousands of rural communities. And it spent $90 billion on a huge variety of wind, solar and other clean energy projects that revived the industry. Republicans, of course, only want to talk about Solyndra, but most of the green investments have been quite successful, and renewable power output has doubled.


Don’t Tell Anyone, but the Stimulus Worked
Source 
Coverage Type 

Sens. Chris Coons (D-DE) and Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) are calling on President Barack Obama to issue an executive order aimed at protecting the nation's critical infrastructure from cyberattacks.

In a joint letter sent to the White House, the two Democratic senators urged President Obama to direct Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano to form an inter-agency group that "will develop, in close collaboration with the private sector, voluntary standards for digital safeguards for our nation's critical infrastructure." Sens Coons and Blumenthal say the DHS secretary already has the authority under existing statutes to issue such advisory guidelines. They argue that the president should instruct Napolitano to take this action, especially because Congress is gridlocked on cybersecurity legislation after Senate Republicans blocked a sweeping bill by Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) in August.


Senators Coons and Blumenthal call on White House to issue cyber order
Source 
Author 
Coverage Type 

Apparently, European regulators plan to file an antitrust complaint against Microsoft for restricting users' choice of Web browsers. The complaint will allege that Microsoft violated a 2009 agreement that required them to offer Windows users a choice of Web browsers in addition to Microsoft's Internet Explorer. The complaint could lead to hefty fines.


Report: Microsoft faces EU antitrust complaint
Source 
Author 
Coverage Type 

[Commentary] If there's one thing that we should have learned in this era of social media, it's that people are being drawn to content not through publishers and pages, but through people and feeds. The best content is not what surfaces most often through search results, but what travels most often between people. When we look at the success of content these days, there is often an inverse relationship between how good it is vs. how much we had to pay for people to actually see it. What if instead of optimizing branded content to hit every marketing bullet point on a brief, we optimized it to maximize the amount it got shared? The former yields TV commercials; the latter, something completely different.

[Schafer is the CEO of Deep Focus]


Why It's Time Your Brand Invested in a Creative Newsroom
Source 
Author 
Coverage Type 

A network that allowed undercover police to use smartphones and tablets to monitor and communicate during protests at the Republican National Convention is giving new meaning to having “eyes on the ground.” Police have long maintained an undercover presence at major gatherings, including political protests — not to monitor free speech, they are quick to note, but to make sure everyone is safe.

At this year’s Republican National Convention in Tampa, police tried out a powerful new tool that can turn officers’ smartphones into multimedia surveillance and communication platforms. Emergency responders around the country think the use of this technology could be the wave of the future and Tampa provided what many see as a successful field test. Tools that are often featured in spy thrillers such as the Bourne Identity movies could eventually become widely available in local police stations. In Tampa, emergency responders used specialized apps and software to turn off-the-shelf smartphones and tablets into tools for sending real-time video, voice, and data. The effort involved an interoperable network that used technology from several private companies. That allowed undercover officers to transmit real-time video, for example, of protesters as they moved about the streets.


Undercover Police Used Smartphones to Keep Tabs on Protests in Tampa