Benton RSS Feed

Source 
Author 
Coverage Type 

Over the last few months, an international effort to give consumers more control over the collection of their online data has devolved into acrimonious discussions, name-calling and witch hunts.

The idea was to work out a global standard for “Do Not Track,” a computer browser setting that would allow Internet users to signal Web sites, advertising networks and data brokers that they did not want their browsing activities tracked for marketing purposes. But some industry executives involved in the negotiations have questioned the agenda of privacy advocates, saying their efforts threaten to undermine an advertising ecosystem that fuels free online products and services. At the same time, some technology experts and privacy advocates have accused industry executives of stalling and acting in bad faith. Into this rancorous battle steps a new mediator, Peter Swire, a professor of law at Ohio State University and a former White House privacy official during the Clinton administration. On Nov 28, the World Wide Web Consortium, or W3C, the international consortium that has been trying to develop technical Do Not Track standards, said that Mr. Swire would take over as co-chairman of its Tracking Protection Working Group.


Mediator Joins Contentious Effort to Add a ‘Do Not Track’ Option to Web Browsing
Source 
Author 
Coverage Type 

The conversion to electronic medical records — a critical piece of the Obama administration’s plan for health care reform — is “vulnerable” to fraud and abuse because of the failure of Medicare officials to develop appropriate safeguards, according to a sharply critical report to be issued by federal investigators.

The use of electronic medical records has been central to the aim of overhauling health care in America. Advocates contend that electronic records systems will improve patient care and lower costs through better coordination of medical services, and the Obama administration is spending billions of dollars to encourage doctors and hospitals to switch to electronic records to track patient care. But the report says Medicare, which is charged with managing the incentive program that encourages the adoption of electronic records, has failed to put in place adequate safeguards to ensure that information being provided by hospitals and doctors about their electronic records systems is accurate. To qualify for the incentive payments, doctors and hospitals must demonstrate that the systems lead to better patient care, meeting a so-called meaningful use standard by, for example, checking for harmful drug interactions.


Medicare Is Faulted on Shift to Electronic Records

The U.S. has strict privacy laws guaranteeing people access to traditional health files. But implants and other new technologies—including smartphone apps and over-the-counter monitors—are testing the very definition of medical records.

Some legal experts say the 1996 U.S. law governing patient access to their health files—HIPAA, or the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act—hasn't kept up with technology. The law gives patients the right to access information held by doctors and hospitals. However, the raw data gathered by an implant isn't held by a doctor or a hospital: Typically it goes directly to the device maker, which provides a summary report to the doctor. Because of this, the raw data falls outside the scope of HIPAA's patient-access requirements. In addition, Medtronic said, business agreements with doctors and hospitals restrict it to relaying information only to them.


Heart Gadgets Test Privacy-Law Limits
Source 
Author 
Coverage Type 

A federal law intended to protect children’s privacy may unwittingly lead them to reveal too much on Facebook, a provocative new academic study shows, in the latest example of how difficult it is to regulate the digital lives of minors.

Facebook prohibits children under 13 from signing up for an account, because of the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act, or Coppa, which requires Web companies to obtain parental consent before collecting personal data on children under 13. To get around the ban, children often lie about their ages. Parents sometimes help them lie, and to keep an eye on what they post, they become their Facebook friends. This year, Consumer Reports estimated that Facebook had more than five million children under age 13. That relatively innocuous family secret that allows a preteen to get on Facebook can have potentially serious consequences, including some for the child’s peers who do not lie.

The study, conducted by computer scientists at the Polytechnic Institute of New York University, finds that in a given high school, a small portion of students who lie about their age to get a Facebook account can help a complete stranger collect sensitive information about a majority of their fellow students. In other words, children who deceive can endanger the privacy of those who don’t.


For Children, a Lie on Facebook Has Consequences, Study Finds
Author 
Coverage Type 

For many District of Columbia government officials, the first e-mail they read at 6 a.m. has long been the overnight police report. But now there is new competition: finding out what citizens said about them the day before.

The local government in the nation's capital is paying hundreds of thousands of dollars to a startup to gather comments on Twitter, Facebook and other online message boards as well as the government's own website. The data help form a letter grade for the bureaucracies that handle drivers licenses, building permits and the like. These social-media analytics services are already common for businesses such as restaurants and hotel chains that want to go beyond the comment cards most customers ignore. The D.C. experiment suggests governments are beginning to mirror the private sector in seeking real-time unvarnished feedback.


In DC, Social-Media Surveillance Pays Off
Source 
Author 
Coverage Type 

[Commentary] If you left a letter on your desk for 180 days, you wouldn’t imagine that the police could then swoop in and read it without your permission, or a judge’s. But that’s just what law enforcement officers can do with your e-mail. Using only a subpoena, government agents can demand that service providers turn over electronic communications they have stored, as long as those communications are more than six months old. Protections are even weaker for opened e-mail or documents stored in the “cloud.”

The advertisements that the Postal Service piles into your mailbox every day are legally sacrosanct; the medical notifications your health-insurance company sends to your Gmail account are not. This bizarre reality is thanks to the 1986 Electronic Privacy Communications Act, a law written before anyone dreamed that Americans would send, receive and store so much private information over third-party services such as Gmail or would draft documents using cloud computing that they intend to keep confidential. Now Sen. Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.), chairman of the Judiciary Committee and the 1986 law’s original author, wants to amend it into the 21st century.


Keeping e-mail private
Source 
Author 
Coverage Type 

There's good news and bad news for AT&T in Consumer Reports' latest annual cellphone service ratings. First the bad: the carrier finished last among the four major U.S. cellphone providers, behind Verizon Wireless, Sprint and T-Mobile.

But AT&T also had a silver lining. The company's 4G (fourth generation) wireless network performed the best, at least judging by the fact that it received fewer complaints than any of its rivals. That's notable considering more people surveyed use AT&T's 4G network with their smartphones. As the leader, Verizon received favorable scores for voice and data service quality and for its support staffers' knowledge and ability to solve problems. Consumer Reports says Sprint, T-Mobile and AT&T received mostly low to middle ratings on such attributes.


Mixed news for AT&T in Consumer Reports wireless survey
Source 
Author 
Coverage Type 

President Barack Obama won the nine counties of the Bay Area by margins ranging from 25 percentage points (in Napa County) to 71 percentage points (in the city and county of San Francisco). In Santa Clara County, home to much of the Silicon Valley, the margin was 42 percentage points. Over all, President Obama won the election by 49 percentage points in the Bay Area, more than double his 22-point margin throughout California.

Although San Francisco, Oakland and Berkeley have long been liberal havens, the rest of the region has not always been so. In 1980, Ronald Reagan won the Bay Area vote over all, along with seven of its nine counties. George H.W. Bush won Napa County in 1988. Republicans have lost every county in the region by a double-digit margin since then. But Democratic margins have become more and more emphatic. Obama’s 49-point margin throughout the Bay Area this year was considerably larger than Al Gore’s 34-point win in 2000, for example, or Bill Clinton’s 31-point win in 1992. The reason is that Democrats’ strength in the region is hard to separate out from the growth of its core industry — information technology – and the advantage that having access to the most talented individuals working in the field could provide to Democratic campaigns.

Companies like Google and Apple do not have their own precincts on Election Day. However, it is possible to make some inferences about just how overwhelmingly Democratic are the employees at these companies, based on fund-raising data. Over all, among the 10 American-based information technology companies on Fortune’s list of “most admired companies,” President Obama raised 83 percent of the funds between the two major party candidates.


In Silicon Valley, Technology Talent Gap Threatens G.O.P. Campaigns
Source 
Author 
Coverage Type 

Google, Facebook and Microsoft regularly take business risks to boost their bottom lines. But those companies were much less interested in taking political risks this election season and supporting congressional newcomers.

The three tech firms, combined, gave to only a few members of the incoming House and Senate freshman classes, even as telecom behemoths like AT&T, Verizon and Comcast together showered more than half of all newly elected lawmakers with big bucks in the 2012 cycle, according to a POLITICO analysis of campaign-finance data. The decision to avoid new congressional candidates is understandable for an industry that’s relatively new to the Washington influence game: Google only this year hit the gas on its election giving, and Facebook’s political action committee is not very old. Still, those three tech industry leaders are lagging behind other companies and sectors that long have used campaign dollars to develop policy champions on Capitol Hill.


Tech less generous to Hill newbies than telecoms
Source 
Coverage Type 

The UK’s self-regulated press waited on Nov 29 to discover what threats of further restrictions might be placed upon it following the behavior of some news organizations.

The 2,000-page report of a year-long judge-led inquiry into the culture, practice and ethics of the press was due to be published at 1330 GMT, crystallizing 16 months of evidence-gathering from more than 400 witnesses and sparked by phone hacking, the biggest scandal to hit the media since the second world war. Lord Justice Leveson is expected to deal not only with recommendations for future regulation of the press, but also to opine on how the earlier behavior of powerful titles, and their editors and proprietors, affected the conduct of politicians and the UK’s major police forces.
The report is likely to focus attention again on the illegal methods used by some newspapers in the decade leading up to the phone hacking scandal.


UK press awaits findings of Leveson report British Lawmakers Warn Against Press Restrictions (New York Times)