The Infrastructure Act and the Need for Continued USF Support

While the recent COVID-response programs are welcomed additions to the effort to connect all people, they are only one part of the total ecosystem required to achieve universal service. The Universal Service Fund continues to be an important part of that ecosystem. Specifically, the Lifeline program’s voice and data and voiceonly subsidies for consumers is not replicated elsewhere, and the Emergency Connectivity Fund program does not reach as far or cover as many needs as the E-rate program. One program does not serve all ends. That is why all of the programs that target vulnerable populations should work together to ensure that varying communication needs are met. For example, people may require voice access for 911 and mobile service for texting and communication on-the-go, robust broadband at home, well-connected schools and libraries, tools to reach K-12 schools as well as higher levels of education, devices, opportunities to learn about digital technology and more. None of the current programs can do all of those things, but all of them should integrate with each other to meet a range of needs.