Benton RSS Feed
A US judge has approved an antitrust agreement with dozens of states in which consumers will receive more than $69 million from book publishers to settle allegations of price-fixing of e-books. The approval follows a consent last week given by the judge to a separate but related federal antitrust settlement involving similar allegations. The settlement involving the states, which received preliminary approval in an order made public Friday, would resolve litigation by 49 states, the District of Columbia and several U.S. territories against Lagardere SCA's Hachette Book Group, CBS Corp.'s Simon & Schuster Inc. and News Corp.'s HarperCollins Publishers LLC. A hearing on whether to grant final approval is set for next February.
Judge Approves E-Book Price-Fixing Settlement
The U.S. International Trade Commission in an initial finding said Apple’s iPhones, iPods and iPads don’t violate Samsung’s patents, handing the mega tech firm another victory in a contentious patent war between the world’s biggest handset makers. The decision was preliminary and must be voted on by the whole commission. But it set Samsung back another step as the ITC both defended and fired its own shots at Apple. ITC Judge James Gildea disagreed with Samsung’s allegations that Apple violated four of its patents being used in the iPhone, iPod and iPad. The ITC handles global patent disputes and has the ability to block imports of infringing products.
ITC hands Apple initial victory in Samsung’s patent suit ITC judge rules that Apple doesn't infringe Samsung patents (IDG News Service) Apple did not violate Samsung patents: U.S. trade judge (Reuters)
Google’s online video service YouTube said it’s restricting access to an anti-Islam film in India and Indonesia in order to comply with local laws. The video about the Prophet Muhammad, which Google earlier restricted in Libya and Egypt, triggered demonstrations against the film across several Islamic countries. “This video -- which is widely available on the Web -- is clearly within our guidelines and so will stay on YouTube,” YouTube said. “However, we’ve restricted access to it in countries where it is illegal, such as India and Indonesia, as well as in Libya and Egypt, given the very sensitive situations in these two countries.”
Google’s YouTube Expands Anti-Islam Film Restriction in Asia Google decides to leave video on YouTube (Politico) Google rejects White House request to pull Mohammad film clip (Reuters) What to Make of Google's Decision to Block the 'Innocence of Muslims' Movie (The Atlantic)
Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski circulated an order on September 14 declining to renew the prohibition on exclusive contracts for another five years, according to a highly placed source.
Friday marked three weeks before the FCC's Oct. 5 deadline to weigh in on the rules. The commissioners must all still vote on the item. In launching its review of the rules last March, the FCC pondered dropping the outright ban but retaining access mandates for satellite-delivered regional sports nets and other unique programming for which the FCC decides there is no substitute. The FCC chairman decided not to go that route, according to a source. Instead, as the FCC said last March when teeing up its various options, it decided to "sunset the exclusive contract prohibition in its entirety and instead relying solely on existing protections." Specifically the case-by-case consideration of complaints about exclusive contracts under current prohibitions on "deceptive practices."
FCC Source: Prohibition on Exclusive Contracts to Sunset
The Federal Communications Commission plans to designate 100 MHz of spectrum for small use, which would go a long way in encouraging the deployment of a dense layer of mobile broadband capacity for our smartphones to romp around in. But there’s a catch: carriers don’t just get to buy this spectrum and lock it into their networks — they have to share it with the government agencies already occupying it. The FCC’s plan is part of a larger, and quite controversial, proposal first put forth by the President’s Council of Advisors on Policy and Technology (PCAST) to clear 1000 MHz of airwaves for mobile broadband use. That’s far more than the Obama administration is aiming for in its broadband plan, but PCAST’s recommendations all come with the sharing caveat: instead of booting the feds out of their airwaves, the public and private sectors must find a way to coexist. The FCC is chipping away at the recommendation one spectrum band at a time, and it’s choosing to start with the 3.5 GHz band.
Small cells will get a band of their own
Microsoft’s latest version of its Internet Explorer browser, scheduled to be available to consumers in late October, comes with an option called “do not track.” It lets users indicate whether they’d like to see ads tailored to them by companies that track their online browsing histories — or whether they’d rather not have their online activities tracked, recorded, analyzed and stored for marketing purposes. But Microsoft is going further — by making privacy a more public issue. The new Internet Explorer 10 comes with the don’t-track-me option automatically enabled, a fact that the software makes clear. During installation, a notice will appear giving users the choice to keep that preselected don’t-track-me preference as is, or switch it off on a customization menu. It’s a radical move for a technology company, especially one like Microsoft, with an ad business of its own. “No one says today, when a consumer first loads a product, ‘Hey, by the way, there are some privacy choices you may want to consider,’ ” says Alex Fowler, the global privacy and policy leader at Mozilla. He believes that this may be the first time that privacy features so prominently “in the first-run experience of a consumer software product.”
When the Privacy Button Is Already Pressed
At two inches wide and one-third of an inch tall, a display ad shown on a smartphone isn’t much of a canvas for a creative marketer seeking to promote a product or service. That’s one reason smartphones are not working well as a medium for many advertisers. The evidence is telling: advertisers are willing to pay much more to reach a thousand pairs of eyes gazing upon a computer or tablet than a thousand pairs looking at a smartphone screen. Size isn’t the only problem. Advertisers are also limited by what they can find out about smartphone users. It’s not technically possible to use cookies with smartphone apps the way it is with a browser. On the Web, publishers typically record users’ actions so that advertisers can make an educated guess about a user’s identity and interests.
Smartphone Ads and Their Drawbacks
As a signpost on the road to the so-called Post-PC Era we’ve been hearing about for so many years, this one is pretty hard to argue with: As of this year, personal computers no longer consume the majority of the world’s memory chip supply. And while it may not come as a terrible surprise to anyone who’s been paying attention to personal technology trends during the last few years, there’s nothing like a cold, hard number to make the point crystal clear. As shifts in market share statistics go, it at first seems insignificant until you consider the wider sweep of memory chips in the history of the modern technology industry. PCs have consumed the majority of memory chips since sometime in the 1980s.
It’s Official: The Era of the Personal Computer Is Over
Complaints to the government are up sharply about unwanted phone solicitations, raising questions about how well the federal "do-not-call" registry is working.
The biggest category of complaint: those annoying prerecorded pitches called robocalls that hawk everything from lower credit card interest rates to new windows for your home. Government figures show monthly robocall complaints have climbed from about 65,000 in October 2010 to more than 212,000 this April. More general complaints from people asking a telemarketer to stop calling them also rose during that period, from about 71,000 to 182,000. At the same time, fewer telemarketers are checking the Federal Trade Commission list to see which numbers are off limits. In 2007, more than 65,000 telemarketers checked the list. Last year, only about 34,000 did so.
Complaints about illegal robocalls are rising
John Brennan, assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism, sent a letter to Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller (D-WV), in which he confirmed the White House is exploring a cybersecurity executive order, according to a copy of the letter released by Sen Rockefeller.
"Following congressional inaction, the President is determined to use existing executive branch authorities to protect our nation against cyber threats," including "exploring an executive order to direct executive branch departments and agencies to secure the nation's critical infrastructure by working with the private sector." Brennan said in his letter that he agreed with Chairman Rockefeller that cybersecurity guidelines to protect everything from airports to "national broadcast systems" should be worked out between government and industry. Brennan said that even if an executive order is issued, comprehensive legislation is still needed. "Executive branch actions under existing authorities cannot alter the reality that the United States Government will continue to be hamstrung by outdated and inadequate statutory authorities that the legislation would have addressed.
Sen Rockefeller: White House Confirms It's Exploring Cybersecurity Executive Order President's Counterterrorism Advisor Responds to Rockefeller on Critical Infrastructure Executive Order (Sen Rockefeller)