Public-safety network tees up House, Senate showdown
Lawmakers are laying the groundwork for a showdown between the chambers on the question of how to build a communications network for police and firefighters to talk to one another, as was recommended by the 9/11 Commission Report in 2004. After months of politicking on the issue, it's clear that the battle won't be fought along party lines but rather in a standoff between the House and Senate.
The top House Commerce Committee Democrat, Rep Henry Waxman (D-CA), revealed during a subcommittee hearing that he wants to team up with Republican committee members to create a House proposal. That means Democrats are just as divided on this issue as Republicans, who have been feuding over it for months.
Rep Waxman said in his opening statement: "Last month, I approached Chairman [Fred] Upton [R-MI] and Chairman [Greg] Walden [R-OR] and suggested that we emulate our Senate counterparts and work together on a bipartisan House bill that would provide for a nation-wide public safety network and make new spectrum available through incentive auctions. I hope they will take us up on this offer."
Rep Waxman was presumed to favor the auction of a valuable block of spectrum to commercial providers, rather than the reallocation of that block to public-safety agencies. He paired up with Republicans to draft a bill accomplishing that last year. But after saying little in public on the issue since his party assumed the minority, it was unclear whether Rep Waxman and a handful of other Commerce Committee Democrats would lend their support to a Senate proposal in order to help isolate the committee's Republicans, who favor a less expensive option.
Communications Subcommittee Chairman Greg Walden, House Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-MI) and everyone else in the hearing room regardless of party affiliation were in agreement that first responders needed such a network, but the disagreement was over how to do it and how to pay for it.