April 2010

How does Google view Network Neutrality now?

[Commentary] Has Google's thinking on network neutrality changed? Or has it just become more nuanced?

There are probably two factors at work altering Google's thinking concerning Internet regulation.

First, the Internet and broadband networks are increasingly being tasked to carry video alongside garden-variety Web pages, e-mail and chat. Google understands the complexity of employing a single network infrastructure to deliver widely varying traffic types while still meeting consumer quality expectations. Doing so without robust traffic management capabilities may not be technically possible. Yet the most strident of Net neutrality proponents insist networks should be stupid. With announced plans to develop set-top boxes, Google may have concluded that Net neutrality purists could hinder its plans to own the television.

Second, Google is preparing to roll out fiber-to-the-premises broadband access networks to as many as 500,000 homes. It would not be a stretch to conclude that, in doing its homework, Google encountered many of the same traffic management challenges often cited by telcos and cablecos as reasons to think more deeply about the need for Internet regulation. Certainly deeper thought than slogans like "Just deliver the bits, stupid!" imply.

[Kevin Walsh is Vice President of Marketing and Product Management at Zeugma Systems, a privately held telecommunications equipment supplier.]

Noam Chomsky Listens to Talk Radio

Noted linguist Noam Chomsky has been hearing some shocking things from America's shock jocks — and their audience.

"I listen to talk radio," Chomsky said. "I don't want to hear Rush Limbaugh. I want to hear the people calling in. They are like [suicide pilot] Joe Stack. What is happening to me? I have done all the right things. I am a God-fearing Christian. I work hard for my family. I have a gun. I believe in the values of the country and my life is collapsing."

In case you think Chomsky's ire is limited to conservatives, however, think again! "Chomsky reserves his fiercest venom for the liberal elite in the press, the universities and the political system," notes ex-New York Times reporter Chris Hedges, "Who serve as a smoke screen for the cruelty of unchecked capitalism and imperial war. He exposes their moral and intellectual posturing as a fraud. And this is why Chomsky is hated, and perhaps feared, more among liberal elites than among the right wing he also excoriates."

"I don't bother writing about Fox News," Chomsky says. "It is too easy. What I talk about are the liberal intellectuals, the ones who portray themselves and perceive themselves as challenging power, as courageous, as standing up for truth and justice. They are basically the guardians of the faith. They set the limits. They tell us how far we can go. They say, 'Look how courageous I am.' But do not go one millimeter beyond that. At least for the educated sectors, they are the most dangerous in supporting power."

Illinois Approves Frontier Communications' Acquisition of Verizon Local Wireline Operations

The Illinois Commerce Commission Wednesday voted to approve Frontier Communications' petition to acquire Verizon North and Verizon South service areas as part of a major reorganization, as long as the company complies with specific conditions aimed at improving service quality and expands broadband service to all parts of the company's territory. Finding the company met the financial, managerial and technical qualifications to provide the service, the Commission agreed to allow Frontier to acquire and operate Verizon North and Verizon South's service area. Frontier's total access lines will increase from 97,000 in Illinois currently to more than 670,000 access lines as Verizon leaves the state. The Commission determined that the reorganization would not harm competition in the service area, but added a number of conditions to the terms of the reorganization to ensure that service quality to customers does not erode as a result of the acquisition of the Verizon access lines.

Among the conditions in the order are requirements that Frontier:

  • Be prohibited from paying dividends or otherwise transferring any Illinois cash balances to its parent company if Frontier Illinois fails to meet or exceed service quality standards such as toll and assistance answer time, information answer time, repair office response, installation requests greater than five business days, interruptions of service greater than 24 hours and trouble reports per 100 lines;
  • Keep available exclusively for Illinois operations an aggregate amount equal to or higher than $50 million;
  • Shall deploy digital subscriber line (DSL) broadband facilities so that by December 31, 2013 85 percent of households within the service territory are able to access broadband service provided by the company at speeds of 3 Mbps download speed;
  • Cap all regulated noncompetitive retail rates for the former Verizon operating companies for three years from the date of the closing of the transaction. After three years, Frontier may propose non-competitive retail rate increases; and
  • Assume all obligations under Verizon's current interconnection agreements, interstate special access tariffs and intrastate tariffs, commercial agreements, line sharing agreements and other existing arrangements with wholesale customers, and shall not change the rates, terms or conditions, nor terminate those agreements for the term of those agreements or 30 months from the closing of the reorganization.
  • Conduct an annual internal audit to document the procedures performed and conclusions to determine that cost allocations between regulated and non-regulated activities are in compliance with Frontier's cost allocation manual filed with the Commission and that the cost allocation manual is correct and complete.

The Commission tightened up the company's reporting requirements. Rather than annual reports, Frontier is required to report in January and July of each year on compliance measures for service quality and on its financial commitment to ensure that cash is available to meet the operational needs of the company in Illinois.

The Commission will continuously monitor the company's compliance with the order to ensure that Illinois telephone customers receive better service as a result of the merger.

Turner, CBS in 14-year NCAA pact (updated)

CBS and Turner's TNT, TBS and TruTV will split a new 14-year, $10.8 billion deal with the NCAA to air the Division I Men's Basketball Championship starting next year and running through 2024.

That means all March Madness games will be available on four national TV outlets -- a first for the tourney. New deal means opening- , first- and second-round games will be shown nationally on CBS, TBS, TNT and TruTV, the NCAA said. CBS and Turner will split coverage of the regional semi-final games. CBS will cover the regional finals, as well as the Final Four -- including the National Championship Game -- through 2015. Beginning in 2016, coverage of the regional finals will be split by CBS and Turner, and the Final Four and the National Championship game will alternating every year between CBS and TBS.

From AdAge:

The arrangement spotlights the difficulties facing broadcast networks in maintaining dominance over the nation's most-watched video properties. As broadcast TV sees ratings erode thanks to new digital methods for consumers to get news and entertainment, the networks are finding it more difficult to come up with the increased fees necessary to license big sports.

NCAA March Madness on Demand, the video player that provides live streaming video of the tournament, will continue to launch from NCAA.com and CBSSports.com. Turner has secured rights for any Time Warner digital property, with a video player to be operated and developed by Turner, and that gives Turner the ability to deliver content for multiple Turner and Time Warner media venues.

Public Knowledge
June 3, 2010
8am - 12:15
http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/3013

Agenda:

8:00 a.m. Coffee and Registration

8:45 a.m. Welcome (Gigi B. Sohn)

9:00 a.m. Overview Presentation: Averting The "Spectrum Crisis"

9:30 a.m. Panel 1: Federal Secondary Markets
Panelists will address the Public Knowledge white paper, "Federal Spectrum Secondary Markets: A Third Way Forward for Federal Spectrum Reform," released for the event.

Panelists:

  • Coleman Bazelon, Principal, The Brattle Group
  • Kathy Brown, Senior Vice President, Public Policy
  • Development, Verizon (invited)
  • Chris Dufus, Senior Vice President, Spectrum Bridge
  • Rick Whitt, Washington Telecom Counsel, Google (invited)
  • Jim Kohlenberger, Chief of Staff, Office of Science & Technology Programs (invited)

Respondents:

  • Harold Feld. Legal Director, Public Knowledge
  • Gregory Rose, Principal, Econometric Consulting

10:45 a.m. Networking Break

11:00 a.m. Panel 2: Increasing Transparency and Efficiency for Federal Spectrum
This panel will focus on the second white paper released by Public Knowledge, also writted by Harold Feld and Gregory Rose: "Transparency, Efficiency, Access: How To Reform Federal Spectrum Management."

Moderator: TBA

Panelists:

  • Kathleen Ham, Vice President for Federal Regulatory Affairs, T-Mobile
  • Janice Obuchowski, President, Freedom Technologies (invited)
  • Jessica Rosenworcel, Senior Counsel, Senate Commerce Committee (invited)
  • Karl Nebbia, Deputy Associate Administrator, NTIA

Respondents:

  • Harold Feld
  • Gregory Rose

12:15 p.m. Adjourn*



Verizon Profit Falls As Wireless Relies On Lower-End Customers

Verizon Communications posted a 29% decline in first-quarter earnings because of a charge related to the health-care bill as the telecommunications provider had to rely on lower-end customers to keep growth going in its wireless business.

The first quarter marks the first time that prepaid customers added through reseller partners outstripped Verizon Wireless's core service, underscoring a growing dilemma facing the national wireless carriers traditionally dependent on more lucrative contract customers. Wireless carriers increasingly are looking elsewhere to maintain their momentum. AT&T Inc. has sought to provide cellular services to nontraditional products like e-readers, while Sprint Nextel Corp. and Verizon Wireless have relied on prepaid customers, or those without a contract that pay on a monthly basis. Either way, the result is the same: Lower monthly bills that further pressure revenue growth. Verizon Wireless in the past has largely ignored the burgeoning market for prepaid wireless customers, instead focusing on post-paid subscribers who sign long-term contracts for fancier phones. But in the first quarter, the U.S.'s largest wireless carrier had to rely on its reseller partners for growth, throwing it into unfamiliar territory where its network reputation and premium pricing are no longer assets.

iPad Poised to Revolutionize Retail Industry

In the first weeks of the iPad launch, retailers have been largely left out of the conversation. But industry executives believe the device could have a major impact on everything from retailers' catalogs to e-commerce to enhancing the in-store experience.

So far, few retailers have embraced the new Apple device even though many already have iPhone apps. The first, most logical applications include e-commerce and interactive catalogs. But in time, the iPad could be used as a virtual sales assistant, allowing sales staff in the dress department to pull up coordinating accessories from the jewelry or shoe department. Car dealers could customize a vehicle, showing customers colors and finishes, all while standing in the parking lot. Transactions could be completed without visiting a register and special orders could be placed on the spot. Cumbersome, expensive kiosks could also be replaced. In-store uses of the iPad are where the real opportunity is, said several executives, though expense will be a hurdle initially.

Google Exec: Incumbent Telcos Welcome On Our Gigabit Network

Incumbent communications companies are welcome to set up shop on Google's experimental super-high speed Internet service once it's up and running, one of the company's executives said Wednesday during a discussion about rolling out fiber networks. "We definitely inviting the Comcasts, the AT&T service providers to work with us on our network, and to provide their service offering on top of our pipe - we're definitely planning on doing that," said Minnie Ingersoll, Google's product manager and co-lead for alternative access. "Our general attitude has been that there's plenty of room for innovation right now in the broadband space, and it's great what the cable companies are doing, upgrading to DOCSIS 3.0, but no one company has a monopoly on innovation."

Spectrum The Talk Of State Of the Mobile Net Forum

Representatives of top telecommunication companies, industry stakeholders and some government officials gathered on Capitol Hill Wednesday to discuss mobile Internet communications with much debate focused on how to ensure future growth and innovation is not stifled by limits on the availability of spectrum.

At the second annual State of the Mobile Net Conference, telecom experts chewed over the possibilities and constraints of the wireless industry, one of the fastest-changing sectors of the U.S. economy. "We are just scratching the surface of what you can wireless enable," Glenn Lurie, president of emerging devices at AT&T, said during a keynote address. Lurie outlined some of the mobile products AT&T will provide networking capacity for including a pet-tracking collar and a pill-bottle cap that will remind the user to take their medication. Much of the discussion, however, circled back to the growing demand for spectrum to accommodate the growth of the mobile Internet. "Integrating market mechanisms into the spectrum allocation process" is critical for the future, Blair Levin, executive director of the FCC's broadband task force, said. Allocating spectrum based on history, rather than markets, Levin stated, has been the traditional practice of government.

Patient access to e-record urgent, HHS panel told

When Regina Holliday needed her husband's electronic health record to help her care for him after a terminal cancer diagnosis it didn't arrive for days, was incorrect, and outdated when he was transferred to another provider. She later used the correct record to care for him until his death. "It's time to stop being incremental," Holliday, now an advocate for patient access to their EHRs, told a panel of the Health and Human Services' Health IT Policy Committee on April 20. "There's too much urgency to get the data to the patient." Dr. Paul Tang, chairman of the committee's meaningful use workgroup, said that was also the upshot of testimony from providers, vendors and other patient/consumer advocates. Patient access to their summary and discharge data is vital because nowadays they are "kicked out" of the hospital to continue recuperation at home, he said.