Benton RSS Feed

Coverage Type 

QUESTION: WHO IS MEDIANEWS'S DEAN SINGLETON?
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Katharine Seelye]
A look at William Dean Singleton. At 54, he is thought of as something of a magician in the newspaper world -- having transformed himself from the son of a ranch hand in a tiny town in Texas to a media baron who now controls a newspaper empire that sprawls from coast to coast. His company, the privately held MediaNews based in Denver, owns 55 dailies including The Denver Post, The Detroit News, The Daily News of Los Angeles and The Berkshire Eagle, plus more than 100 nondailies. With the addition of the Knight Ridder papers -- The San Jose Mercury News, The Contra Costa Times and The Monterey County Herald, all in California, and The St. Paul Pioneer Press -- MediaNews has become the nation's fourth-biggest newspaper company, up from seventh.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/22/business/media/22singleton.html
(requires registration)


Who Is MediaNews's Dean Singleton?

Benton's Communications-related Headlines For Monday May 22, 2006

To view Benton's Headlines feed in your RSS=20
Aggregator, paste=20
http://www.benton.org/index.php?q=3Dtaxonomy/term/6/all/feed into your read=
er.
For upcoming media policy events, see http://www.benton.org

LEGISLATION
Hard Path to New Terrain for Telecom
Compromise may be in Sight on Video Franchising
Snowe, Senate Democrats Offer Net Neutrality Bill
Google's Search for Political Influence

INTERNET
Let more of the world access the Internet
FCC Delays Spectrum Auction
US Internet Contract with ICANN
Digital Turf War

QUICKLY -- Attorney General Threatens to Go After=20
Reporters; NSA Scoop Has Top Journos Buzzing; Who=20
Is MediaNews's Dean Singleton?, FCC Reports Spike=20
in Indecency Complaints; Surfing the Future of=20
News 2.0; NYC TV; Open Student TV Network

LEGISLATION

HARD PATH TO NEW TERRAIN FOR TELECOM
[SOURCE: Los Angeles Times, AUTHOR: Jim Puzzanghera]
A push by the nation's leading phone companies=20
for major telecommunications legislation could=20
end up being the biggest dropped call of the=20
year. Once on a fast track, congressional=20
measures that would make it easier for Verizon=20
Communications, AT&T and other companies to offer=20
TV services -- and possibly lower consumers'=20
bills -- have become bogged down by controversial=20
side issues and Capitol Hill turf wars. Because=20
of a shortened election-year session and a=20
legislative calendar overstuffed with immigration=20
reform, domestic spying and other controversial=20
issues, the telecom legislation's prospects have=20
dimmed. "There was once a movie entitled "8=20
Million Ways to Die," said Blair Levin, an=20
analyst at investment bank Stifel, Nicolaus &=20
Co., referring to the 1986 Hal Ashby movie about=20
Los Angeles. "What you're seeing is a movie '8=20
Million Ways to Die' in D.C., but it's not about=20
a person, it's about a bill." Levin adds, "This=20
is a bill that needs to clear a lot of hurdles in=20
a relatively short period of time. And the hurdles look a lot higher."
http://www.latimes.com/business/printedition/la-fi-telecom22may22,1,6486...
.story?coll=3Dla-headlines-pe-business
(requires registration)

COMPROMISE MAY BE IN SIGHT ON VIDEO FRANCHISING
[SOURCE: Cox News Service, AUTHOR: Marilyn Geewax]
Cable, phone and consumer groups testifying at a=20
Senate hearing Thursday appeared to be inching=20
toward agreement on the national franchising of=20
subscription television services. National=20
franchising, as opposed to approval by thousands=20
of individual communities, would speed the way=20
for telephone companies to compete against cable=20
operators in offering video services. That would=20
guarantee "competitive choices for consumers,"=20
said Walter McCormick, chief executive of the=20
U.S. Telecom Association, a trade group. Kyle=20
McSlarrow, chief executive of the National Cable=20
& Telecommunications Association, told the=20
lawmakers to ignore the phone executives who=20
insist "they need special rules" to enter the=20
video marketplace with "a regulatory advantage=20
over their competitors." But McSlarrow also laid=20
out a path toward compromise. He said the cable=20
industry could accept national franchising if=20
Congress would do three things: 1) Speed up the=20
time it takes local franchising authorities to=20
consider an application to provide subscription=20
TV. 2) Allow an incumbent cable provider the=20
right to opt into any new franchise agreement=20
that offers better terms to a competitor. 3)=20
Continue to allow local governments to decide=20
when a franchisee is meeting community needs.=20
Consumers Union vice president Gene Kimmelman=20
testified that changes are needed to protect=20
consumers. He noted that the local franchising=20
process now forces cable operators to serve all=20
neighborhoods, and a national franchise might=20
leave phone companies "free to offer service to=20
only wealthy neighborhoods, leaving behind=20
middle- and low-income consumers who most need cable-rate relief."
http://www.rockymounttelegram.com/news/content/shared/news/stories/TELEC...
9_COX_W0021.html

NET NEUTRALITY FIELD IN CONGRESS GETS CROWED
[SOURCE: C-Net|News.com, AUTHOR: Anne Broache]
On Friday Sen Olympia Snowe (R-Maine), Byron=20
Dorgan (D-ND), Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii), Hillary=20
Clinton (D-NY), Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Barack=20
Obama (D-IL) and Ron Wyden (D-OR) introduced the=20
"Internet Freedom Preservation Act." The=20
nine-page measure contains a detailed list of=20
obligations for all broadband service providers.=20
Specifically, they would generally not be allowed=20
to "block, interfere with, discriminate against,=20
impair or degrade" access to content or to=20
prevent users from attaching devices of their=20
choosing to the network. Network operators would=20
also be barred from making special deals with=20
content providers to ensure speedier delivery or=20
improved quality of service and would be required=20
to offer all Internet material on an "equivalent"=20
basis. The new bill does outline carve-outs from=20
the rules for network management activities=20
related to security and other consumer protection=20
services. Also buried in the proposal is a=20
requirement that providers offer their customers=20
the option of standalone, or "naked" broadband=20
services without an obligation to subscribe to=20
cable television, telephone or Internet phone. It=20
would be up to the Federal Communications=20
Commission to enforce complaints and to furnish=20
Congress with a report on the state of the broadband market and competition.
http://news.com.com/Net+neutrality+field+in+Congress+gets+crowded/2100-1...
_3-6074564.html?tag=3Dhtml.alert
* See Snowe/Dorgan press release:=20
http://dorgan.senate.gov/newsroom/record.cfm?id=3D255904
* Internet bills butting heads
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=3D/c/a/2006/05/20/BUG56IV8DA...
TL&feed=3Drss.business
* Inouye Offers Senate Net-Neutrality Bill
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6336409.html?display=3DBreaking+News
* Snowe and Senate Dems to the Rescue on Net Neutrality
http://www.tpmcafe.com/node/30006
* Consumer Groups Praise Snowe-Dorgan Internet Freedom Preservation Bill
http://www.freepress.net/press/release.php?id=3D136

GOOGLE'S SEARCH FOR POLITICAL INFLUENCE
[SOURCE: Los Angeles Times, AUTHOR: Jim Puzzanghera]
Of the billions of searches conducted by Google,=20
potentially its most important is the quest for=20
influence in the nation's capital. The Silicon=20
Valley company's dominance of Internet search is=20
built on its mastery of advanced mathematical=20
algorithms. But like other fast-growing tech=20
titans before it, Google is finding Washington's=20
political calculus harder to solve. Since opening=20
its Washington office last summer, Google's=20
attempts to establish its presence has moved at=20
dial-up speed -- resulting in a slow and=20
sometimes balky connection with lawmakers that=20
has irritated both Democrats and Republicans. "I=20
think they've been a little bit too innocent in=20
how the game is played," said Robert Atkinson,=20
president of the Information Technology and=20
Innovation Foundation, a tech-focused Washington=20
think tank. Google's efforts to rally support for=20
rules guaranteeing open Internet access -- an=20
abstract issue known as Net neutrality -- has=20
been called largely ineffective by key Democratic=20
supporters. Heavily lopsided political=20
contributions to Democrats from Google employees=20
have annoyed the GOP majority. And in what=20
veteran lobbyists called a high-profile tactical=20
mistake, a Google executive called before a House=20
panel this year tried to engage subcommittee=20
members critical of the firm in a debate. The=20
head of Google's three-person Washington=20
operation is unapologetic for the unconventional=20
company's unconventional strategy. "Google will=20
always be Google," said Alan B. Davidson, the=20
company's Washington policy counsel. "We're not=20
going to hide. We're going to talk about what=20
we're doing. We think that being transparent and=20
open is the better long-run approach."
http://www.latimes.com/business/printedition/la-fi-googlobby22may22,1,56...
84.story?coll=3Dla-headlines-pe-business
(requires registration)

INTERNET

LET MORE OF THE WORLD ACCESS THE INTERNET
[SOURCE: Financial Times, AUTHOR: Eric Schmidt, Google]
[Commentary] For centuries access to the world=92s=20
information =96 and the ability to communicate it =96=20
was controlled by the wealthy and the well=20
educated. Today the Internet has broken down many=20
of the barriers that exist between people and=20
information: effectively democratizing access to=20
human knowledge. The democratization of=20
information has empowered us all as individuals.=20
We no longer have to take what business, the=20
media or indeed politicians say at face value.=20
Where once people waited to be told what the news=20
was, they can now decide what news matters to=20
them, and increasing numbers are actually=20
commenting on events themselves =96 creating blogs=20
every second of every day. It is the first rule=20
of the Internet: people have a lot to say. They=20
no longer want to be passive recipients of=20
information. People want control over their media=20
-- not to be controlled by it. In just a few=20
years the Internet has moved from the periphery=20
to the center of our lives. We have not seen such=20
a life-changing communications technology since=20
the invention of television. As a result it is=20
often easy to forget that the world wide web is=20
still in its infancy: today just 10 per cent of=20
the world=92s information is available online.=20
Like any child, the Internet is pushing at the=20
perimeters of established systems =96 business=20
models from the last century, traditional media,=20
long-accepted notions of national jurisdiction,=20
even old concepts of control. This is a challenge=20
for everyone. Some of the =93pushed=94, most likely=20
governments with the power to regulate and=20
legislate, will inevitably feel the need to push=20
back. But rather than focus on how to control the=20
web, legislators should concentrate on how to=20
give Internet access to more people in more=20
countries. The prize is a world in which every=20
human being starts life with the same access to=20
information, the same opportunities to learn and=20
the same power to communicate. I believe that is worth fighting for.
http://news.ft.com/cms/s/fbc969aa-e8f2-11da-b110-0000779e2340.html
(requires subscription)

FCC DELAYS SPECTRUM AUCTION
[SOURCE: Federal Communications Commission]
The FCC's auction of spectrum for Advanced=20
Wireless Services will now begin August 9 rather=20
than June 29. In it's public notice the=20
Commission said the change was made to give=20
auction applicants additional time for=20
preparation and planning for the auction." In a=20
statement, Commissioner Jonathan Adelstein said,=20
"It is disappointing that the Commission has=20
allowed the designated entity (DE) proceeding to=20
affect the timing of the upcoming Advanced=20
Wireless Services (AWS) auction." Nine months=20
ago, Commissioner Adelstein proposed closing a=20
loophole in Commission rules that allows large=20
wireless companies to invest in DEs. The change=20
was never adopted, but the FCC did adopt some=20
changes in auction rules on April 25. Adelstein=20
concluded: "And now it appears that the changes=20
that the Commission did adopt may actually do=20
more harm than good to the DE participation in=20
the upcoming auction, notwithstanding this=20
last-ditch effort to cure this troubled proceeding."
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265462A1.doc

US INTERNET CONTRACT WITH ICANN
[SOURCE: National Telecommunications and=20
Information Administration press release]
The Commerce Department=92s National=20
Telecommunications and Information Administration=20
published a notice of its intent to award a sole=20
source contract to the Internet Corporation for=20
Assigned Name and Numbers (ICANN) to perform key=20
technical functions supporting the Internet=20
Domain Name System. The Department continues to=20
believe that ICANN is uniquely qualified to=20
perform these services that are critical to the=20
stability and security of the Internet.=20
ICANN has been performing the Internet Assigned=20
Numbers Authority (IANA) services since 2000.=20
They involve three technical coordinating=20
functions for the Internet domain name and=20
addressing system. These functions include=20
coordination of the assignment for technical=20
protocol parameters, administration of certain=20
responsibilities associated with Internet DNS=20
root zone management; and allocation of Internet=20
Protocol Version (IPv4) and Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) address spac=
e.
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/press/2006/IANAContract_05192006.htm

DIGITAL TURF WAR
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John M. Higgins]
There was something conspicuously missing from=20
the hundreds of millions of dollars in=20
commitments for the upcoming fall season:=20
digital-rights deals between the studios and the=20
networks. ABC has no rights to stream Warner=20
Bros. Television Studio's The Nine on ABC.com.=20
NBC has no right to sell episodes of Sony=20
Pictures Television's Kidnapped on iTunes. CBS=20
can't offer episodes of 20th Century Fox=20
Television's Shark via cable operators'=20
video-on-demand (VOD) systems. The networks have=20
that flexibility only for new shows that come=20
from the studios that they actually own. When it=20
comes to deals outside the corporate family,=20
networks and the studios supplying shows remain=20
locked in a turf war, hardened in their financial=20
demands for creating digital =93windows=94 for=20
top-notch prime time programming. =93The new=20
business models are quickly evolving,=94 says Bruce=20
Rosenblum, president of Warner Bros. Television=20
Group, whose studio will again be the largest=20
supplier of prime time series next season. =93It's=20
incumbent, however, on the networks to share some=20
of the revenue from the new business=20
opportunities with their suppliers of their=20
content and, in some cases, to their [station]=20
affiliates.=94 But the potential revenues from=20
online-TV services are too uncertain to force the=20
issue right now. =93I don't think any of the=20
networks felt they wanted to take the risk of=20
trying to acquire digital rights from a studio=20
and risk not being able to close a show,=94 says=20
Gary Newman, co-president of 20th Century Fox Television.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6336396?display=3DNews

QUICKLY

ATTORNEY GENERAL THREATENS TO GO AFTER REPORTERS
[SOURCE: Associated Press]
Attorney General Alberto Gonzales said Sunday he=20
believes journalists can be prosecuted for=20
publishing classified information, citing an=20
obligation to national security. The nation's top=20
law enforcer also said the government will not=20
hesitate to track telephone calls made by=20
reporters as part of a criminal leak=20
investigation, but officials would not do so=20
routinely and randomly. "There are some statutes=20
on the book which, if you read the language=20
carefully, would seem to indicate that that is a=20
possibility," AG Gonzales said, referring to=20
prosecutions. "We have an obligation to enforce=20
those laws. We have an obligation to ensure that=20
our national security is protected."
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_con...
t_id=3D1002539901
Gonzales Says Prosecutions of Journalists Are Possible
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/22/washington/22gonzales.html

DISPUTE OVER 'USA TODAY' NSA SCOOP HAS TOP JOURNOS BUZZING
[SOURCE: Editor&Publisher, AUTHOR: Joe Strupp]
The USA Today phone records scoop, which is=20
drawing increased scrutiny as phone companies=20
dispute elements of the report, has also sparked=20
interest among those in the news business, as=20
well as longtime journalism observers. Editors=20
and veteran journalists are mixed on how the=20
situation has been handled by all involved, with=20
some claiming that the outcome could impact how=20
news outlets report sensitive intelligence=20
information in the future. "This is shaping up to=20
be a major test of the value of the press, the=20
watchdog function of the press," said Bill=20
Kovach, chairman of the Committee of Concerned=20
Journalists. "If the press turns out to be right,=20
they will have done a real service. If it turns=20
out to be wrong, it will be a real blow to all of us."
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_con...
t_id=3D1002539527

QUESTION: WHO IS MEDIANEWS'S DEAN SINGLETON?
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Katharine Seelye]
A look at William Dean Singleton. At 54, he is=20
thought of as something of a magician in the=20
newspaper world -- having transformed himself=20
from the son of a ranch hand in a tiny town in=20
Texas to a media baron who now controls a=20
newspaper empire that sprawls from coast to=20
coast. His company, the privately held MediaNews=20
based in Denver, owns 55 dailies including The=20
Denver Post, The Detroit News, The Daily News of=20
Los Angeles and The Berkshire Eagle, plus more=20
than 100 nondailies. With the addition of the=20
Knight Ridder papers -- The San Jose Mercury=20
News, The Contra Costa Times and The Monterey=20
County Herald, all in California, and The St.=20
Paul Pioneer Press -- MediaNews has become the=20
nation's fourth-biggest newspaper company, up from seventh.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/22/business/media/22singleton.html
(requires registration)

FCC REPORTS SPIKE IN INDECENCY COMPLAINTS
[SOURCE: TVWeek, AUTHOR: Doug Halonen]
The Federal Communications Commission said Friday=20
that 141,868 indecency complaints were filed with=20
the agency during the first quarter of the year,=20
up from the 44,109 filed during the fourth quarter of 2005.
http://www.tvweek.com/news.cms?newsId=3D10040
(requires free registration)
* See the FCC report
http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2006/db0519/DOC-265441A...
oc

SURFING THE FUTURE OF NEWS 2.0
[SOURCE: AlterNet, AUTHOR: John Gorenfeld]
[Commentary] Are we passive consumers of news no=20
more? A survey of innovative news sites that allow you to be the editor.
http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/35924/

HOUR AFTER HOUR, ONE STATION IS DEVOTED TO PULSE OF NEW YORK
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Winnie Hu]
A look at NYC TV. With an ever-growing roster of=20
programs that delve into previously uncovered=20
slivers of New York culture, this once-overlooked=20
station, whose bread and butter used to be City=20
Hall hearings, has soared in the ratings to=20
100,000 viewers for its most popular shows, and=20
scored 14 New York Emmys. NYC Media Group, formed=20
in early 2005, is the entity responsible for=20
managing and programming the City of New York=92s=20
media assets and forms an integral part of New=20
York City's Department of Information Technology=20
and Telecommunications. NYC Media Group oversees=20
one broadcast television station reaching=20
approximately 7.3 million households, five New=20
York City cable television networks reaching=20
approximately 1.8 million households each, one=20
full power FM radio station (WNYE 91.5FM), and=20
its Emmy award-winning production company, NYC TV Original Productions.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/22/nyregion/22nyctv.html
(requires registration)

OPEN STUDENT TV NETWORK
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Brooks Barnes brooks.barnes( at )wsj.com]
Open Student TV Network is part of a burst of TV=20
channels targeting college students, mostly over=20
the Internet. The network also provides a=20
distribution system for shows produced by students.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB114826584113159266.html?mod=3Dtodays_us_...
ketplace
(requires subscription)
--------------------------------------------------------------
Communications-related Headlines is a free online=20
news summary service provided by the Benton=20
Foundation (www.benton.org). Posted Monday=20
through Friday, this service provides updates on=20
important industry developments, policy issues,=20
and other related news events. While the=20
summaries are factually accurate, their often=20
informal tone does not always represent the tone=20
of the original articles. Headlines are compiled=20
by Kevin Taglang headlines( at )benton.org -- we welcome your comments.
--------------------------------------------------------------

http://jot.communication.utexas.edu/flow/?jot=view&id=1791

Location: University of Texas at Austin
Deadline for Abstracts: June 15
Lodging and Transportation information will be posted soon.

The is a series of roundtable discussions with topics created by Flow columnists, organized around the future of television and media culture and scholarship (see titles below).

The goal of the is conversation. There are no plenary sessions and participants are asked to submit short position papers (not full-length essays). We want to promote discussion amongst scholars, members of the media industries, media activists, fans, and policy-makers over crucial issues related to television and media. For more information about the format of the conference, visit the FAQ

Confirmed guests include: Belinda Acosta, John Caldwell, Steve Carr, Barbara Corday, Joy Fuqua, Joel Greenberg, Amelie Hastie, Julia Lesage, Jordan Levin, Amanda Lotz, Marti Noxon, Roberta Pearson, Jeffrey Sconce, Kelly Souders, Wendy West, Joe Wlodoredz, Justin Wyatt.

Submissions

Below you will find descriptions of the scheduled roundtables. If you would like to join a particular roundtable:

Please submit a 250 word abstract identifying the roundtable in which you want to participate and detailing your response to the topic statement, with a short bio via email. The deadline for submissions is June 15, 2006.

Scheduled Roundtables

Television as an Advertising Medium
Chris Anderson, Indiana University

Consumers, Recording, and Playback in the Television and Recording Industries
Tim Anderson, Denison University

Public Sphere, Public Media in an Open Source Age
Patricia Aufderheide, American University

The Uses and Meanings of Television History
Aniko Bodroghkozy, University of Virginia

De-Westernizing Television Studies
Faye Ginsburg, New York University

Watching Television Off-Television
Jonathan Gray, Fordham University; Henry Jenkins, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Jason Mittell, Middlebury College; and Will Brooker, Richmond University

Mainstream Television and Alternative TV Practices
Mary Beth Haralovich, University of Arizona

Television's Future and the Role of TV Scholarship
John Hartley, Queensland University of Technology

Technologies of Transport and Communication
James Hay, University of Illinois at Urbana, Champaign

Televisual Representations of Gender and Sexuality after Buffy the Vampire Slayer
Heather Hendershot, Brooklyn College, CUNY and Allison McCracken, DePaul University

Selling To and Through Racial Identities on Contemporary Television
L.S. Kim, University of Santa Barbara

Teaching Critical Media Makers
Derek Kompare, Southern Methodist University

Comparative Approaches to Global Television
Shanti Kumar, University of Texas at Austin, and Joseph Straubhaar, University of Texas at Austin

Radical Television
Dan Leopard, University of Southern California

Television and Politics
Daniel Marcus, Goucher College and Douglas Kellner, University of California, Los Angeles

Diversity and Cultural Production Communities
Vicki Mayer, Tulane University and Sharon Ross, Columbia College

Television Studies and Television Policy Regulation
John McMurria, DePaul University

Feminist Television and Feminist Television Studies
Tara McPherson, University of Southern California

HBO's Legacy and Future
Walter Metz, Montana State University, Bosman

Globalizing TV Studies
Toby Miller, University of California, Riverside

Taste and Television
Jason Mittell, Middlebury College

Television as 'Cultural Center' in an Age of Audience Segmentation
Horace Newcomb, University of Georgia

Reality TV, Governmentality, and Citizenship
Laurie Ouellette, Queens College, CUNY and James Hay, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Media Professionals and the Media Studies Degree
Thomas Schatz, University of Texas at Austin

Programming in an Era of Video Abundance
Sharon Strover, University of Texas at Austin

Political Resistance and the Media
Frederick Wasser, Brooklyn College, CUNY

The Senate Committee on the Judiciary will hold a hearing on "Reconsidering Our Communications Laws: Ensuring Competition and Innovation" on Tuesday, May 23, 2006 at 9:30 a.m. in the Dirksen Senate Office Building Room 226.

http://judiciary.senate.gov/hearing.cfm?id=1910

Coverage Type 

At least three Democratic senators said they were concerned about moving too fast on the 135-age bill unveiled May 1. “I'm much more interested in getting it right, than I am in speed,” said Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-ND). Sen Stevens said the panel had held 15 hearings before May 1. “On this bill?” shot back Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ). Chairman Stevens, whose nickname is "The Hulk," replied, "This senator’s going to see this bill gets to the floor and it passes the Senate this year."


http://www.benton.org/index.php?q=node/2417
Coverage Type 

NO NEUTRAL GROUND WITH NET NEUTRALITY
[SOURCE: Internetnews.com, AUTHOR: Roy Mark]
From a formal Senate hearing to backroom intrigue in the House to political theater starring musician Moby, the issue of network neutrality swirled around Capitol Hill Thursday. As National Cable & Telecommunications Association President Kyle McSlarrow said, "This [net neutrality] is now the number one issue." Speaking at a Senate Commerce Committee on telecom legislation, McSlarrow called it a tough issue. "It's a fundamentally stark choice of some regulation of the Internet or no regulation of the Internet." In both the Senate and House telecom reform efforts, the question of discriminatory handling of network traffic would be left to the Federal Communications Commission. "If we don't get this right, we're going to have a lot of people in the slow lane," said Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA). She and other Democrats on the panel are expected to add net neutrality amendments to the Senate bill when it comes up for a committee vote in June.
http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article.php/3607371

* Rep. Markey, Moby Speak Out for Internet Freedom, Against Corporate Web Takeover
http://www.freepress.net/press/release.php?id=134


No Neutral Ground With Net Neutrality
Coverage Type 

HOUSE JUDICIARY PANEL IS DENIED REFERRAL
[SOURCE: Technology Daily, AUTHOR: David Hatch]
The House Judiciary Committee has been denied a referral of a major telecommunications bill approved late last month by the House Commerce Committee. But apparently House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-IL) is working on a plan to involve Judiciary Chairman James Sensenbrenner (R-WI) in the telecom bill process. There were indications that Rep Sensenbrenner would be granted one week to move his own telecom-related legislation through the Judiciary panel, which would then be given a chance to move either as an amendment to the Commerce Committee bill or as a stand-alone measure. But a Judiciary Committee source professed to be unaware of any such arrangement. Wednesday’s developments cap weeks of speculation over whether the Judiciary panel would be able to leave its imprimatur on the telecommunications legislation. The Energy and Commerce and Judiciary committees have a long history of turf battles; they also sparred a decade ago on jurisdiction of the legislation that eventually became the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Details of the House Parliamentarian's decision to deny referral to the Judiciary panel were expected to be published in Thursday’s Congressional Record. The House had originally planned to bring the telecom bill to the floor two weeks ago, but action was delayed as the Parliamentarian and Hastert’s office considered Sensenbrenner’s request for a referral. A congressional source said the Commerce Committee legislation, sponsored by Committee Chairman Joe Barton, R-Texas, and Rep. Bobby Rush, D-Ill., would not come to the floor next week. That means consideration by the full House will be bumped until at least the week of June 5, when Congress returns from a weeklong Memorial Day recess.
http://www.njtelecomupdate.com/lenya/telco/live/tb-FDEN1147958391830.html


House Judiciary Panel Is Denied Referral
Coverage Type 

SENSENBRENNER OFFERS NEUTRALITY BILL
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: Ted Hearn]
House Judiciary Committee Chairman James Sensenbrenner (R-WI) introduced a bill Thursday that would apply antitrust sanctions against cable and other broadband-access providers that discriminate against Web-based providers of content, services and applications. The bill would amend the Clayton Act to require broadband-access providers to interconnect their facilities on reasonable and nondiscriminatory terms; to operate their networks in a nondiscriminatory manner so that unaffiliated content, service and applications have an equal opportunity to reach consumers; and to refrain from interfering with consumer access to lawful content, services and applications. Under the Clayton Act, passed in 1914, injured parties may sue in federal court to obtain an injunction, recover treble damages and collect attorneys’ fees.
"This legislation is a necessary step to protect consumers and other Internet users from possible anti-competitive and discriminatory conduct by broadband providers,” Rep Sensenbrenner said of the bill offered the bill with bipartisan support from his panel's ranking Democrat, John Conyers (Mich.), and Rep. Rick Boucher (D-Va.). Sensenbrenner’s statement said he came forward with his bill because the House Commerce bill (H.R. 5252) fell "well short of ensuring that broadband-network providers do not abuse their market power.” Amazon.com, eBay, Google, InterActiveCorp, Microsoft and Yahoo! issued a statement in support of the Judiciary bill (H.R. 5417).
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6336026.html?display=Breaking+News

* Sensenbrenner Intros Net Neutrality Bill
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6336035?display=Breaking+News

* Politicos propose new action on Net neutrality
http://news.com.com/Politicos+propose+new+action+on+Net+neutrality/2100-...

* Consumer Groups Applaud Bipartisan Bill on Network Neutrality
http://www.freepress.net/press/release.php?id=135


http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6336026.html?display=Breaking%20News
Coverage Type 

STEVENS EASES PACE ON FRANCHISING BILL
[SOURCE: MediaWeek, AUTHOR: Todd Shields]
Facing Democrats worried about haste and cities concerned about losing privileges, Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) delayed by nearly two weeks initial votes on his broad telecommunications bill. Still, Sen Stevens predicted passage, saying he expects to send a modified bill to the Senate floor “with the full support of this committee.” He pledged to work with cities and other localities toward meeting their concerns about video franchising, or the process of granting approval for TV service over landlines. At least three Democratic senators said they were concerned about moving too fast on the 135-age bill unveiled May 1. “I'm much more interested in getting it right, than I am in speed,” said Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-ND). Sen Stevens said the panel had held 15 hearings before May 1. “On this bill?” shot back Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ). Chairman Stevens, whose nickname is "The Hulk," replied, “This senator’s going to see this bill gets to the floor and it passes the Senate this year.”
http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/news/recent_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=10025...

* Stevens sees US Senate passing communications bill
http://today.reuters.com/investing/FinanceArticle.aspx?type=bondsNews&st...

* Stevens Announces Revised Video Franchising Legislation
http://www.tvweek.com/news.cms?newsId=10034

* Senate Commerce Delays Telecom Markup
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6335963?display=Breaking+News

* Stevens: Senate Will Pass Telecom Bill
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6336053.html?display=Breaking+News

* Dorgan Plans Media Concentration Amendment
Sen Byron Dorgan (D-ND) said Thursday he would take aim at "big Media" in the telecom reform bill. He said that he planned to introduce an amendment on the already omnibus bill to slow the "orgy of concentration."
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6335898?display=Breaking+News

* Groups Testify for Choice and Access to Video and Internet
http://www.hearusnow.org/tvradiocable/16/


http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/news/recent_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1002538874
Coverage Type 

LOCAL GOVERNMENT CONCERNS LEAD SENATE COMMITTEE TO RETHINK TELECOM BILL
[SOURCE: National League of Cities press release]
Dearborn (MI) Mayor Michael A. Guido told the Senate Committee Commerce Thursday that the bill it is currently considering will hurt consumers, cities and counties by nationalizing video franchising instead of encouraging local competition. Speaking on behalf of a number of national organizations representing city, town and county officials, Mayor Guido voiced his opposition to many of the provisions in the Communications, Consumer's Choice and Broadband Deployment Act of 2006 (S. 2686), introduced by Commerce Committee Chairman Ted Stevens (R-Alaska). According to Mayor Guido, S. 2686 would undermine local franchising enforcement and compliance authority, threaten local budgets, limit the benefit of broadband-video competition to a few well-to-do neighborhoods, weaken provisions that ensure video providers meet each community's needs and interests, and undermine the ability of local governments to protect their residents and/or respond to cable customer service complaints. In commenting on the measure, Guido said, "While this bill appears to preserve local video franchising, it in fact strips that authority from thousands of elected mayors, commissions and councils across the country and unfairly places it in the hands of five un-elected commissioners of the Federal Communications Commission here in Washington, D.C. Communities across the country have seen the telephone companies bypass poorer neighborhoods while upgrading services in more affluent areas," Guido said. "Indeed, it has been reported that AT&T informed its Wall Street investors that in Michigan, the company was going to provide its video product to ninety percent of its 'high value' residents, but to only five percent of its 'low value' residents -- those customers who buy less than $110 a month in telecommunications services. It's not hard to see how such a business plan on a national scale will deprive millions of Americans of the benefits of increased competition and technological advances." Mayor Guido noted that new providers of video into residential markets should not be given a "blank check" and said that local governments are more than willing to work with them to increase competition. Recently, more than 600 local communities in Michigan asked AT&T to enter into their video marketplaces. Guido said, "But AT&T remained silent, leading Michigan's towns and cities to publicly ask AT&T, 'Can you hear us now? We want competition!' It was not until the media was alerted that AT&T finally began to respond." Due to the concerns raised by Mayor Guido and others at today's hearing, US Senator Ted Stevens (Ala-R) announced that the bill would be redrafted over Memorial Day and new hearings would take place in early June. Guido said the coalition was eager to work with the Senate Committee on key provisions of the bill. Members of the coalition to support local video franchising include: The U.S. Conference of Mayors, the National League of Cities, the National Association of Counties, the National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors, the Government Finance Officers Association, the International Municipal Lawyers Association and the National Conference of Black Mayors.
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=66053

* Senate Telecom Draft May Be "Too Tough" on Cities
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6335869?display=Breaking+News


http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=66053