Benton RSS Feed

Coverage Type 

CBS RADIO STATION ON THE BLOCK
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: Mike Farrell]
Just one day after announcing a deal to sell its Paramount Parks theme parks, CBS Corp. said Tuesday that it is exploring opportunities to divest its radio stations in 10 markets -- Austin and San Antonio (TX), Buffalo and Rochester (NY), Cincinnati and Columbus (OH), Fresno (CA), Greensboro-Winston/Salem (NC), Kansas City, and Memphis. CBS owns 39 stations in these markets. Just what price those stations could attract is anyone’s guess. However, earlier this year, Cumulus Media Inc. purchased 33 radio stations in large and small markets from Susquehanna Media Co. for about $1.2 billon. CBS Radio owns about 179 radio stations -- including those earmarked for sale -- across the country.
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6337318.html?display=Breaking+News


http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6337318.html?display=Breaking%20News

Benton's Communications-related Headlines For Wednesday May 24, 2006

GOVERNMENT & COMMUNICATIONS
A Sudden Taste for the Law
FCC Chief says Won't Probe NSA call Program
For Telecoms, a Storm of Lawsuits Awaits

MEDIA OWNERSHIP
Philadelphia Group Buys Inquirer, Daily News, Philly.com
Surrounded by Singleton
CBS Radio Stations on the Block

INTERNET/BROADBAND
Copps: FCC Can Impose Net Neutrality
Berners-Lee calls for Net Neutrality

BROADCASTING
Copps Calls Smut Bill 'Powerful Message'
PTC Willing to Accept Senate Indecency Bill
McCain Cable TV Measure Gets A Fuzzy Reception

QUICKLY -- Senate Judiciary Postpones Net=20
Neutrality Hearing; South Carolina Adopts=20
Statewide Franchise; Teens' Heavy Cellphone Use=20
Could Signal Unhappiness, Study Finds

GOVERNMENT & COMMUNICATIONS

A SUDDEN TASTE FOR THE LAW
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Editorial Staff]
[Commentary] It's hard to say which was more=20
bizarre about Attorney General Alberto Gonzales's=20
threat to prosecute The Times for revealing=20
President Bush's domestic spying program: his=20
claim that a century-old espionage law could be=20
used to muzzle the press or his assertion that=20
the administration cares about enforcing laws the=20
way Congress intended. Mr. Gonzales served as=20
White House counsel and as attorney general=20
during the period Mr. Bush concocted more than=20
750 statements indicating that the president=20
would not obey laws he didn't like, or honor the=20
recorded intent of those who passed them. Among=20
the most outrageous was Mr. Bush's statement that=20
he did not consider himself bound by a ban on=20
torturing prisoners. Mr. Gonzales was part of the=20
team that came up with the rationalization for=20
torture, as well as for the warrantless=20
eavesdropping on Americans' e-mail and phone=20
calls. If Mr. Gonzales has developed a respect=20
for legislative intent or a commitment to law=20
enforcement, he could start by using his=20
department's power to enforce the Voting Rights=20
Act to protect Americans, rather than challenging=20
minority voting rights and endorsing such=20
obviously discriminatory practices as the=20
gerrymandering in Texas or the Georgia voter ID=20
program. He could enforce workplace safety laws,=20
like those so tragically unenforced at the=20
nation's coal mines, instead of protecting=20
polluters and gun traffickers. He could uphold=20
the Geneva Conventions and the U.N. Convention=20
Against Torture, instead of coming up with=20
cynical justifications for violating them. He=20
could repudiate the disgraceful fiction known as=20
"unlawful enemy combatant," which the=20
administration cooked up after 9/11 to deny legal=20
rights to certain prisoners. And he could suggest=20
that the administration follow Congress's clear=20
and specific intent for the 1978 Foreign=20
Intelligence Surveillance Act: outlawing wiretaps=20
of Americans without warrants.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/24/opinion/24weds1.html
(requires registration)
* Gonzales Defends Phone-Data Collection
Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales said=20
yesterday that the government can obtain domestic=20
telephone records without court approval under a=20
1979 Supreme Court ruling that authorized the collection of business record=
s.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/23/AR200605...
1594.html

FCC CHIEF SAYS WON'T PROBE NSA CALL PROGRAM
[SOURCE: Reuters, AUTHOR: Jeremy Pelofsky]
The Federal Communications Commission will not=20
pursue complaints about a US spy agency's access=20
to millions of telephone records because it=20
cannot obtain classified material, the FCC=20
chairman said in a letter released on Tuesday.=20
Rep. Edward Markey (D-MA) had asked Commission to=20
investigate a newspaper report that AT&T, Verizon=20
Communications and BellSouth gave access to and=20
turned over call records to help the National=20
Security Agency fight terrorists. "The classified=20
nature of the NSA's activities makes us unable to=20
investigate the alleged violations," FCC Chairman=20
Kevin Martin, a Republican, said in the May 22=20
letter released by Rep Markey. AT&T was sued by=20
the privacy rights group Electronic Frontier=20
Foundation for violating customer privacy by=20
turning over telephone data to the government.=20
The Justice Department asked that the case be=20
dismissed, saying it could reveal military and=20
state secrets. The FCC's Martin said the=20
government's arguments in that case would prevent=20
the FCC from conducting an investigation. Such a=20
probe would require access to "highly sensitive=20
classified information" and the "commission has=20
no power to order the production of classified=20
information," Martin said. He said the National=20
Security Act of 1959 prevented the disclosure of the NSA's activities.
http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=3DpoliticsNews&storyID=
=3D2006-05-23T233824Z_01_N23187803_RTRUKOC_0_US-SECURITY-TELECOMS-FCC.xml&a=
rchived=3DFalse
* NSA secrecy makes investigation impossible, FCC says
http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20060524/a_nsa24.art.htm
* Martin: FCC Can't Probe Phone Flap
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6337234?display=3DBreaking+News
* Martin Won't Probe NSA-Phone Records Link
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6337214.html?display=3DBreaking+News
* FCC Won't Probe NSA-Phone Ties
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB114841352393360937.html?mod=3Dtodays_us_...
e_one
* FCC Refuses to Investigate NSA Program,=20
Predicting Likely Administration Road Blocks
http://markey.house.gov/index.php?option=3Dcom_content&task=3Dview&id=3D...
0&Itemid=3D141

FOR TELECOMS, A STORM OF LAWSUITS AWAITS
[SOURCE: The Christian Science Monitor, AUTHOR: Peter Grier]
Lawyers specializing in class-action litigation=20
are lining up to sue phone firms alleged to have=20
handed over customer records to the National=20
Security Agency without a court order. On Monday,=20
for instance, the American Civil Liberties Union=20
of Illinois filed suit against AT&T, charging=20
that its actions in the NSA program violated=20
customer privacy. Despite this rush to the=20
courthouse, it isn't yet clear which phone firms=20
handed over what records to whom. Some companies=20
have denied involvement - while critics note that=20
those denials are carefully worded. Further=20
scrutiny by Congress or the Federal=20
Communications Commission (FCC) is needed to=20
resolve this issue for the public, say some.
http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0524/p02s01-usju.html

MEDIA OWNERSHIP

PHILADELPHIA GROUP BUYS INQUIRER, DAILY NEWS, PHILLY.COM
[SOURCE: Philadelphia Inquirer, AUTHOR: Joseph N.=20
DiStefano and Harold Brubaker]
McClatchy Co. has agreed to sell Philadelphia's=20
major daily newspapers and web site Philly.com to=20
a group of local investors for $562 million, most=20
of which will be borrowed from banks. "We got=20
it," said a jubilant Brian P. Tierney as he=20
rushed through The Inquirer and Philadelphia=20
Daily News lobby this afternoon to a meeting with=20
publisher Joe Natoli. "We signed every line."=20
Tierney, a Philadelphia public relations and=20
advertising executive who organized the local=20
buyers, said that Philadelphia Media Holdings=20
L.L.C. intended to be long-term owners. "Our plan=20
is to invest in and grow both papers" and=20
Philly.com, he said in a news release. Union=20
leaders said they look forward to meeting with=20
the new owners in preparation for contract talks=20
later this year. "His enthusiasm is infectious,"=20
said John Laigaie, president of Teamsters Local=20
628, which represents Inquirer and Daily News=20
truck drivers. "Enthusiasm is good."
http://www.philly.com/mld/philly/14649158.htm
* Ex-'Inky' Editor: New Ownership Of Philly Papers Could Be 'Dangerous'
Former Inquirer editor cautions that new=20
ownership includes "some of the most influential=20
business people in Philadelphia and people who=20
actively support politicians locally and nationally."
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_con...
t_id=3D1002541091
* Analysts See Pros and Cons of Local Group Buying Philly Papers
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_con...
t_id=3D1002540865
* Philadelphia Investors Buy Two Newspapers
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/24/business/media/24paper.html

SURROUNDED BY SINGLETON
[SOURCE: American Journalism Review, AUTHOR: Charles Layton]
Most major newspapers came of age in big cities,=20
surrounded by smaller papers in the suburbs and=20
outlying towns. These rivals may have nipped at=20
their heels and cut into their circulation, but=20
they never threatened the big papers' market=20
dominance. But now, in the San Francisco Bay=20
Area, a cluster of suburban papers is rising up=20
to challenge, and perhaps one day overshadow, the=20
San Francisco Chronicle. This summer, a series of=20
newspaper sales involving six media companies =97=20
Knight Ridder, McClatchy, Hearst, Gannett,=20
Stephens Media Group and MediaNews Group =97 will=20
reshape the newspaper business in the Bay Area.=20
Unless those transactions are blocked by=20
government antitrust action, one group of local=20
papers, owned by MediaNews, will more than double=20
its circulation overnight, becoming larger and=20
more potent economically than its big-city rival,=20
the Chronicle. What this means for advertisers,=20
readers and the newspapers' employees remains to=20
be seen. The one certainty is that plenty of=20
people are worried. The architect behind the new=20
juggernaut is William Dean Singleton, the=20
innovative, somewhat flamboyant 54-year-old chief=20
executive of MediaNews, a Denver-based company=20
that presently owns 51 dailies in 13 states.=20
Singleton began preparing the ground for this=20
little revolution in 1985, when he bought three=20
small family-owned dailies in the towns of=20
Hayward, Fremont and Pleasanton, in Alameda=20
County just across the bay from San Francisco.=20
Later, he bought more small papers in that area,=20
and by 2002 he had stitched nine of them together=20
into what he calls the Alameda Newspaper Group,=20
or ANG. Because they are close together, six of=20
these papers share newsgathering, production,=20
distribution, accounting and administrative=20
facilities, a strategy known as clustering. They=20
also offer combination advertising deals. It is=20
possible to think of them, in fact, as one big=20
paper with six zoned editions. Their news coverage is heavily local.
http://ajr.org/Article.asp?id=3D4112

CBS RADIO STATION ON THE BLOCK
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: Mike Farrell]
Just one day after announcing a deal to sell its=20
Paramount Parks theme parks, CBS Corp. said=20
Tuesday that it is exploring opportunities to=20
divest its radio stations in 10 markets -- Austin=20
and San Antonio (TX), Buffalo and Rochester (NY),=20
Cincinnati and Columbus (OH), Fresno (CA),=20
Greensboro-Winston/Salem (NC), Kansas City, and=20
Memphis. CBS owns 39 stations in these markets.=20
Just what price those stations could attract is=20
anyone=92s guess. However, earlier this year,=20
Cumulus Media Inc. purchased 33 radio stations in=20
large and small markets from Susquehanna Media=20
Co. for about $1.2 billon. CBS Radio owns about=20
179 radio stations -- including those earmarked=20
for sale -- across the country.
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6337318.html?display=3DBreaking+News

INTERNET/BROADBAND

COPPS: FCC CAN IMPOSE NET NEUTRALITY
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: Ted Hearn]
The Federal Communications Commission has=20
authority under current law to ensure that=20
broadband-access providers -- currently mainly=20
cable and phone companies -- do not discriminate=20
against Web-based providers of content, search=20
services and applications, FCC commissioner=20
Michael Copps said Tuesday. Speaking to=20
reporters, Copps stressed that it was essential=20
for the agency to go beyond hortatory policy=20
principles and adopt enforceable rules that=20
guarantee network neutrality and shield Internet=20
companies without wires into millions of homes=20
from potential misconduct by companies that=20
control those wires. =93I think we have authority=20
to go now to the second phase of network=20
neutrality, to make sure that there=92s not=20
discrimination against those that are not=20
affiliated with the network owners,=94 Copps said=20
in a press briefing held in his office . Although=20
some have questioned the FCC authority=92s to=20
impose network neutrality on information-service=20
providers under Title I of the Communications=20
Act, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a majority=20
opinion last June indicating otherwise. =93The=20
[FCC] remains free to impose special regulatory=20
duties on facilities-based [Internet-service=20
providers] under its Title I ancillary=20
jurisdiction,=94 Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in=20
National Cable & Telecommunications Association=20
vs. Brand X Internet Services. Copps indicated=20
that the FCC could rely on Title I authority to=20
act. =93I think we have a good bit of authority in=20
serving the public interest in keeping the=20
networks open to move ahead on this,=94 he said.
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6337396.html?display=3DBreaking+News

BERNERS-LEE CALLS FOR NET NEUTRALITY
[SOURCE: C-Net|News.com, AUTHOR: Jonathan Bennett]
Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of the Web, has called=20
for clear separation between Internet access and=20
Internet content. Speaking at the World Wide Web=20
conference in Edinburgh on Tuesday morning,=20
Berners-Lee gave his views on the growing battle=20
over Net neutrality. "It's better and more=20
efficient for us all if we have a separate market=20
where we get our connectivity, and a separate=20
market where we get our content. Information is=20
what I use to make all my decisions. Not just=20
what to buy, but how to vote," Berners-Lee told=20
journalists. "There is an effort by some=20
companies in the U.S. to change this. There's an=20
attempt to get to a situation where if I want to=20
watch a TV station across the Internet, that TV=20
station must have paid to transmit to me."=20
Berners-Lee characterized the issue as a=20
U.S.-only problem at present. "In Europe, Net=20
neutrality is the rule," he said. Although=20
Berners-Lee offered his support for Net=20
neutrality, he does not support a completely=20
unregulated telecoms and Internet market. "The=20
fact is that the openness of the Internet, which=20
is such a wonderful thing, does depend on a=20
certain amount of regulation. We've had in=20
Britain the fact that if you put a stamp on a=20
letter it gets there," Berners-Lee said.
http://news.com.com/Berners-Lee+calls+for+Net+neutrality/2100-1036_3-607...
2.html?tag=3Dhtml.alert

BROADCASTING

COPPS CALLS SMUT BILL 'POWERFUL MESSAGE'
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
FCC Commissioner Michael Copps Tuesday said that=20
last week's unanimous Senate passage of the bill=20
boosting indecency fines tenfold sent "a powerful=20
message." He said the fact that the increased=20
fines "will now possibly be available to the=20
commission obviously gets the attention of=20
anybody who is concerned." Calling indecency a=20
difficult and sensitive topic, he nonetheless=20
said that there was "plenty for everybody to do"=20
on the issue, beginning with the family, but=20
including the industry, the Commission and=20
Congress. "I think the family has the=20
responsibility for understanding the tools that=20
are available," he said in a press conference=20
with reporters, praising industry efforts to help=20
parents do that. "I applaud the idea that they=20
are highlighting the use of new tools, trying to=20
educate people on their use." But he said that=20
effort "should not be to the exclusion of coming=20
forward with other ideas for family-friendly=20
programming and carrying through on the=20
commitment that NAB and others gave about what=20
they are going to do. We have been waiting two years," he said.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6337216?display=3DBreaking+News

PTC WILLING TO ACCEPT SENATE INDECENCY BILL
[SOURCE: TVWeek, AUTHOR: Doug Halonen]
An executive of the Parents Television Council=20
said Tuesday his group will be satisfied if the=20
House of Representatives opts to end the debate=20
over indecent TV programming by dropping its own=20
legislation and accepting a Senate bill that=20
would simply raise the cap on federal fines to=20
$325,000. A bill approved by the House last year=20
would raise the cap to $500,000, and also=20
includes provisions that would clear the way for=20
the FCC to fine on-air talent for infractions --=20
not just the broadcast licensees -- and would=20
allow the agency to revoke the licenses of repeat=20
offenders. "The consensus is for raising the=20
fines, and [lawmakers are] willing to accept=20
two-thirds of a loaf," said Blair Levin, an analyst for Stifel Nicolaus.
http://www.tvweek.com/news.cms?newsId=3D10056
(requires free registration)

MCCAIN CABLE TV MEASURE GETS A FUZZY RECEPTION
[SOURCE: Congress Daily, AUTHOR: David Hatch]
Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) is having difficulty=20
lining up cosponsors for cable television=20
legislation that he plans to announce this week=20
-- and might have to go it alone when he unveils=20
it, industry and congressional sources said. As=20
of Monday, Sen McCain was still reaching out to=20
other legislators, particularly Democrats, for=20
support. The bill would reward incumbent cable=20
operators and new video entrants -- such as the=20
former regional Bell operating companies -- with=20
relaxed franchise regulations if they carry=20
programming on a per channel, or a la carte,=20
basis. The introduction of the legislation has=20
been delayed several times in recent months,=20
partly to give Sen McCain more time to build=20
support. Another reason for the holdup is that=20
there is no clear legislative vehicle for=20
McCain's bill. While Commerce Committee Chairman=20
Ted Stevens (R-AZ) plans to mark up a sweeping=20
draft telecommunications measure on June 20, he=20
does not want it to include content regulation.=20
McCain's bill is now expected to be unveiled no later than this Thursday.
http://www.njtelecomupdate.com/lenya/telco/live/tb-EUXO1148412581291.html

QUICKLY

SENATE JUDICIARY POSTPONES NET NEUTRALITY HEARING
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
Sometimes Headlines is published a little too=20
early. Yesterday morning we noted the Senate=20
Judiciary Committee planned a hearing --=20
Reconsidering Our Communications Laws: Ensuring=20
Competition and Innovation. In fact, the hearing=20
was postponed as debate on the Senate's=20
immigration bill began. The hearing has not been rescheduled yet.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6337074?display=3DBreaking+News

SOUTH CAROLINA ADOPTS STATEWIDE FRANCHISE
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
Starting Tuesday, no South Carolina city or town=20
can issue a cable franchise and can only enforce=20
existing franchise agreements until they expire.=20
New franchise applicants will apply to the=20
Secretary of State for a franchise. The city or=20
town in which the franchise will be built has 65=20
days to say yes or no. If it's no, the franchise=20
is not granted, but the locality has to give its=20
reasons and could be sued if the denial is=20
actionable in court. Otherwise, franchises must=20
be awarded within 80 days of application.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6337392?display=3DBreaking+News

TEENS' HEAVY CELLPHONE USE COULD SIGNAL UNHAPPINESS, STUDY FINDS
[SOURCE: Los Angeles Times, AUTHOR: Denise Gellene]
The teen obsession with yakking, text messaging=20
and ring-tone swapping on cellphones might mean=20
more than a whopping phone bill. For the most=20
crazed, it's a sign of unhappiness and anxiety,=20
according to a new medical study. A survey of 575=20
South Korean high school students found that the=20
top third of users -- students who used their=20
phones more than 90 times a day -- frequently did=20
so because they were unhappy or bored. They=20
scored significantly higher on tests measuring=20
depression and anxiety than students who used=20
their phones a more sedate 70 times daily. Two of=20
every five youths in the U.S. from ages 8 to 18=20
have a cellphone, according to a recent survey.=20
Students in grades seven through 12 spend an=20
average of an hour a day on their cellphones --=20
about the same time they devote to homework.
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-sci-cellphone24may2...
,1881384.story?coll=3Dla-news-a_section
(requires registration)
--------------------------------------------------------------
Communications-related Headlines is a free online=20
news summary service provided by the Benton=20
Foundation (www.benton.org). Posted Monday=20
through Friday, this service provides updates on=20
important industry developments, policy issues,=20
and other related news events. While the=20
summaries are factually accurate, their often=20
informal tone does not always represent the tone=20
of the original articles. Headlines are compiled=20
by Kevin Taglang headlines( at )benton.org -- we welcome your comments.
--------------------------------------------------------------

Author 
Coverage Type 

Earlier this year, Congress established a converter-subsidy program in an effort to mitigate the effects of the digital television transition on millions of consumers that, according to the National Association of Broadcasters, possess 73 million analog TV sets not connected to cable or satellite. The Department of Commerce is several weeks away from soliciting public comment on the $1.5 billion subsidy program to help consumers purchase converter boxes to run analog television sets after the cessation of analog TV broadcasting in early 2009. Congress has ordered Commerce's National Telecommunications and Information Administration to supervise the program, but lawmakers gave NTIA director John Kneuer just a few instructions on how to allocate the money and how to limit ways consumers may use it. As a result, NTIA is planning to issue “by late July” a Notice of Inquiry (NOI) that would seek public input on program details, NTIA spokesman Ranjit De Silva said last Monday. The Office of Management and Budget has the document under review, he added. coupon program without eligibility criteria could threaten to exhaust the $1.5 billion fund and force millions of low-income consumers either to fund 100% of their converter box costs or shop for TV sets equipped with over-the-air digital tuners. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the U.S. has 105 million occupied housing units. If each one sought to redeem two $40 coupons, the box program would cost $8.4 billion. The program would cost $1.6 billion if NTIA were to restrict eligibility to just the 20.5 million households that are broadcast-only. NTIA could cut the cost even more if only broadcast-only homes that met an income test were eligible.
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6336337.html?display=Policy


Commerce Shapes $1.5B Plan for Digital TV Aid
Coverage Type 

FCC MISSES ADVISORY COMMITTEE DEADLINE ON PUBLIC INTEREST OBLIGATION MATTERS
[SOURCE: The Campaign Legal Center, AUTHOR: Meredith McGehee]
Six months ago, the Federal Communications Commission's own Consumer Advisory Committee asked the Commission to define the public interest obligations of digital television broadcasters by May 18. The date has passed without any action. CLC Policy Director Meredith McGehee sent a letter to FCC Chairman Kevin Martin calling on him and the rest of the Commission to define public interest obligations for digital broadcasters.
http://www.campaignlegalcenter.org/FCC-270.html

* Members of the FCC's Advisory Committee have sent Chairman Martin a letter as well. See http://www.benton.org/index.php?q=node/2436


FCC Misses Advisory Committee Deadline on Public Interest Obligation Matters
Coverage Type 

ILL EFFECTS OF A GATED CYBER WORLD
[SOURCE: Seattle Times, AUTHOR: Editorial Staff]
[Comentary] If computer-network providers are allowed to hijack the Internet, the damage will go much deeper than the consumers' wallets. Democracy will be at risk with the inevitable limiting of voices if Internet neutrality is not ensured. The effect of allowing a few companies to toll traffic across the pipes through which Web content flows would be chilling, and primed for abuse. Not only could the network keepers decide what and whom to charge, the companies could use this power as a tool to promote their services before a competitor. How will telephone companies that provide DSL respond to new Internet accessories like Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP), the telephone service provided across the Internet? The biggest loser in a gated cyber world would be American democracy. Democracy is already suffering from the effects of consolidation, especially in the media where only a handful of companies either own outright or own interests in films, newspapers, magazines, radio, television, book publishing, and any other media channel that can be devoured. Congress should think of that before funneling more power into the hands of a few.
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/editorialsopinion/2003006552_nette...

FAIR USE AND NETWORK NEUTRALITY
[SOURCE: Prof Lawrence Lessig]
[Commentary] in a fundamental sense, fair use (FU) and network neutrality (NN) are the same thing. They are both state enforced limits on the property rights of others. In both cases, the limits are slight -- the vast range of uses granted a copyright holder are only slightly restricted by FU; the vast range of uses allowed a network owner are only slightly restricted by NN. And in both cases, the line defining the limits is uncertain. But in both cases, those who support each say that the limits imposed on the property right are necessary for some important social end (admittedly, different in each case), and that the costs of enforcing those limits are outweighed by the benefits of protecting that social end. So from this perspective, it is easy to understand those who reject FU and NN. And it is easy to understand those who embrace FU and NN. What gets difficult is understanding those who embrace one while rejecting the other -- at least when that rejection is articulated in terms of “government regulation.” For there is a consistency problem for those who embrace FU while arguing against “government regulation to support NN.” For FU and NN are both “government regulations” -- each government defined limits on government granted property rights. In both cases, a government official (a court, or the FCC) is telling a property owner “this use of your property is opposed by the state.” And while there are important differences in the way FU and NN get administered, if anything, FU is more vague, more complex, more expensive, and more uncertain than the regulations being called for under NN.
http://www.lessig.org/blog/archives/003410.shtml

KEEPING NET NEUTRAL BENEFITS TV INDUSTRY
[SOURCE: TVWeek, AUTHOR: Editorial Staff]
[Commentary] Television companies are putting more programs online. Viral video Web sites are all the rage. It's clear the Internet is joining TV stations, cable systems and satellite providers as an important distribution channel for entertainment. Congress should ensure the Web remains an even playing field by preventing Internet access providers from offering some content providers better connections than others. The National Cable & Telecommunications Association calls the network neutrality legislation "a solution in search of a problem." That's one way to look at it. Another is that the measure would prevent Web access companies that are (legitimately) in search of higher profits from starting down a harmful path. Congress should act to keep those with more money from having a leg up on the Internet.
http://www.tvweek.com/article.cms?articleId=29858
(requires free registration)

EYES ON THE 'NET
[SOURCE: The Daily News (Jacksonville, NC), AUTHOR: Editorial Staff]
[Commentary] As soon as a marketplace relatively free of heavy-handed regulation develops a resource that shows value for a wide variety of consumers, you can be sure some interest group will arise to lock the current situation into place by law.A current example is the promotion of bills in Congress that would give the Federal Communications Commission the power to enforce the rather vaguely understood concept of “net neutrality” on Internet service providers. Network neutrality is not a technological or network-architectural term or a model arising from the structure of the Internet itself. Instead it is a legal and political term for the belief that the Internet should be governed as the old monopoly utilities were, with the “pipes” to the Internet viewed as “common carriers,” open to all on terms decided by a government regulatory agency. Ultimately, it means government price controls. Before succumbing to the idea that government regulation will ensure fairness or neutrality, it should be helpful to remember that the Internet has developed under a very light regulatory regime. With entrepreneurs large and small free to try things (many of which fail) the number of users, speed of connections and variety of products, services and information available through the Internet has increased fantastically. The Internet has achieved widespread adoption faster than any comparable technology, especially than technologies tightly regulated by government. Enforcing net neutrality through FCC regulation is likely to make future innovation slower. Prices for Internet services should be determined through the changing interplay of supply and demand rather than with the blunderbuss of regulation.
http://www.jdnews.com/SiteProcessor.cfm?Template=/GlobalTemplates/Detail...

NET NEUTRALITY'S END MIGHT TURN A BUCK
[SOURCE: Light Reading press release]
Incumbent network operators hoping to boost revenues by charging premium fees for delivery of some broadband content are likely to realize modest gains if current rules that guarantee so-called "network neutrality" are eliminated, according to a new report from Light Reading Insider (www.lightreading.com/insider), a paid research service of Light Reading Inc. (www.lightreading.com). "At first glance, charges for the delivery of Internet content look as though they could provide an additional $10.7 billion in carrier revenues by 2010," notes Simon Sherrington, research analyst for Light Reading Insider and author of the report. But a variety of factors ­ including potential customer churn, competitive pressures from operators that maintain net-neutrality policies, and the ongoing threat of re-regulation ­ would likely diminish those revenue gains, Sherrington says. "If operators could persuade companies representing 20 percent of the consumer content market to pay a premium for improved content delivery, they could open a market worth around $309 million in the U.S. by 2010," he says. "Accessing 20 percent of the business information and ecommerce markets could deliver a further $1.8 billion by 2010." Other key findings of the report include: 1) In practice, the widespread imposition of content delivery charges looks highly unlikely. 2) Operators using selective charging mechanisms to prevent competitors from undercutting them or to prevent revenue losses are likely to face close scrutiny from regulators. The End of Net Neutrality: An Economic Analysis offers an assessment of the revenue opportunity that would be available to network operators if regulators set aside requirements that prohibit those operators from charging fees for different tiers of Internet connectivity service. It analyzes how operators might charge for preferential content delivery and quantifies the additional revenue they might generate. It also considers the potential reactions of competitors, content providers, and access customers to such a move and draws conclusions about the commercial appeal of the strategy for broadband access network operators.
http://www.unstrung.com/document.asp?doc_id=95323

HILLARY, FOR NET NEUTRALITY, FIRES UP THE RIGHT
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: Ted Hearn]
In Washingtonian physics, for every action, there's an unequal and irrational reaction. So since presidential hopeful Sen Hillary Clinton (D-NY) co-sponsored a bill on Net Neutrality last week, someone must make hay out of it. On Monday, the American Conservative Union sent an e-mail alert to members denouncing Sen Clinton’s political alliance with various pro-net-neutrality groups as a concerted effort by government to seize control of the Internet: "While Hillary, MoveOn.org and their liberal allies call this legislation ‘net neutrality,’ it is nothing less than a government takeover of the Internet. If they succeed, this legislation would allow government to control Internet content and prices."
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6336956.html?display=Breaking+News



Coverage Type 

FREE BROADBAND FOR THE MASSES
[SOURCE: BusinessWeek, AUTHOR: Steve Rosenbush]
M2Z Networks, a company launched by former FCC Wireless Bureau Chief John Muleta, wants to offer free wireless broadband to consumers across the US. M2Z aims provide a basic advertiser-supported service at no cost to consumers. It would charge fees for premium services, such as faster connection speeds. "The model here is broadcast TV," said Muleta, referring to free over-the-air TV, which is supported by ad revenue. He founded the company with Milo Medin, founder of the @Home Networks broadband service. But what may sound like a straightforward plan won't be easy to put into practice. M2Z's biggest obstacle is gaining access to the radio airwaves over which wireless signals travel. The FCC typically sells the airwaves, or spectrum, at auctions where rival bidders spend large sums with no guarantee that they can secure the specific chunks of spectrum they want. The biggest-ever FCC auction of spectrum, worth an estimated $8 billion to $15 billion, is set to begin in August. Muleta wants to bypass the auction process altogether. He's hoping to strike a deal that would give him a preset block of underutilized spectrum in the range of 2155 megahertz to 2175 megahertz. The government has designated the spectrum for high-speed wireless services. Rather than fork over the up-front payments associated with auctions, M2Z wants to give the government 5% of annual sales.
http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/may2006/tc20060522_430352...

* Group makes play to build $400M wireless network
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/12911687/

* Spectrum Is Too Valuable To Give Away
[SOURCE: New York Sun, AUTHOR: Former FCC Commissioner Harold Fuchtgott-Roth]
http://www.freepress.net/news/15628

* Company Asks U.S. to Provide Radio Space for Free Internet
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/23/technology/23wireless.html


Free Broadband for the Masses
Coverage Type 

A CURE TO CITYWIDE WI-FI WOES?
[SOURCE: C-Net|News.com, AUTHOR: Marguerite Reardon]
A new Wi-Fi start-up called Wavion Networks came out of stealth mode Monday and said it has developed technology to solve many of the problems big cities like Philadelphia and San Francisco face when deploying citywide Wi-Fi. Interest in citywide Wi-Fi networks has exploded in the past year, with cities including Philadelphia, San Francisco and Chicago planning to blanket their cities with wireless Internet access. But early deployments in cities, such as Tempe, Ariz., and St. Cloud, Fla., are resulting in contractors being required to deploy more access points than had been originally planned and subscribers being forced to attach signal boosters to their homes to get Internet access inside. San Jose, Calif.-based Wavion, which is backed by venture capital firm Sequoia Capital, says it has developed software and silicon that not only increase the transmission distance of a Wi-Fi signal, but also alleviate much of the signal loss so that fewer people need to deploy signal boosters.
http://news.com.com/A+cure+to+citywide+Wi-Fi+woes/2100-7351_3-6075380.ht...


A cure to citywide Wi-Fi woes?
Coverage Type 

COMMERCE ROLE IN INTERNET OVERSIGHT SCRUTINIZED
[SOURCE: Washington Post 5/20, AUTHOR: Arshad Mohammed]
The Bush administration plans to renew its exclusive contract with the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), the U.S.-based nonprofit group that oversees key technical matters governing how computers communicate over the Internet. The intention to give ICANN a sole-source contract, disclosed on a federal government contracting Web site Thursday, reflects the Commerce Department's belief that the group, based in Marina del Rey, Calif., is the only entity capable of the unglamorous but necessary responsibility of managing the Internet's basic plumbing. The decision may revive international debate about the Commerce Department's role overseeing ICANN's work, a source of resentment among countries such as Iran, Saudi Arabia and Brazil. Even the European Union has called for phasing out the department's oversight in favor of some model that would increase international input. This puts the Bush administration in something of a bind as it tries to balance the demands of U.S. lawmakers adamant that the United States retain its oversight with those of other countries that want more of a say. Under the contract, which would run for one year with four one-year options, ICANN would keep its core function of managing the Internet's domain name system -- essentially overseeing the master list at the heart of the Internet that helps users find their way around and ensures traffic goes to the right addresses. In its notice, the Commerce Department said other groups had until June 17 to make the case that they were capable of meeting the contract's technical demands and overcome the agency's presumption that ICANN is best suited to the task.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/19/AR200605...


Commerce Dept's role in Internet oversight scrutinized
Coverage Type 

NEW DOMAIN NAME -- MOBI -- COULD SPUR WIRELESS WEB
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Li Yuan li.yuan@wsj.com]
Surfing the Web on a cellphone can be as difficult as surfing the ocean on a tiny board. Now, a company founded by Microsoft Corp., Google Inc., Vodafone Group PLC, Nokia Corp., and several other companies, aims to make it easier to browse the Internet on wireless devices such as cellphones or BlackBerries. Currently, few Web pages are designed to be accessed via mobile devices. Many sites can't be displayed on tiny cellphone screens, and most would take a much longer time to download than on a PC. Mobile Top Level Domain aims to change that in part by setting up a new domain name specifically for wireless Internet Web sites called dot-mobi. Just as dot-com is the domain name for many Web pages on the wired Internet, dot-mobi will become the suffix for Web pages that are formatted for cellphones and other wireless devices, the company says. Mobile Top Level Domain Chief Executive Officer Neil Edwards says the union of the Web and cellphones has so far been "a bad experience" that consumers and the mobile industry have failed to embrace. "Dot-mobi makes the Internet work on phones," says Mr. Edwards.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB114834861767160235.html?mod=todays_us_ma...
(requires subscription)


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB114834861767160235.html?mod=todays_us_marketplac…
Coverage Type 

INTERNET SEARCHES: LIBRARIANS DO IT BETTER
[SOURCE: Reuters, AUTHOR: Megan Rauscher]
According to a study reported today at the Medical Library Association's annual meeting in Phoenix, cancer patients are more likely to find what they are looking for with a librarian-mediated search instead of "going it alone." Over the last five years, Ruti Volk, a professional librarian and manager of the Patient Education Resource Center (PERC) at the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, and colleagues have done about 2,100 searches for cancer patients. After each mediated-search, patients are asked to complete an evaluation on the information provided to them. Results from 513 evaluations revealed several interesting findings, Volk noted in an interview with Reuters Health. "One of the most interesting was that 65 percent of patients said they were not able to obtain the information that we sent to them from any other source. They were not able to get it by themselves by using the Internet; they didn't get it from a healthcare provider or from a cancer organization." An additional 30 percent of PERC visitors said the librarian provided some new information. Only 4 percent said they found all the same information on their own. "This demonstrates," said Volk, "that even though the information is supposedly so accessible and everything is on the web, people still need the help of a professional to find information that is relevant to them that is current and accurate and authoritative."
http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=internetNews&storyID...