Benton RSS Feed

Coverage Type 

FCC SEEKS COMMENT ON RECOMMENDATIONS BY THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR THE 2007 WORLD RADIOCOMMUNICATION CONFERENCE
[SOURCE: Federal Communications Commission]
On October 4, 2006, the World Radiocommunication Conference Advisory Committee (WRC-07 Advisory Committee) approved and submitted for Commission consideration its recommendations with regard to a number of issues that will be considered by the 2007 World Radiocommunication Conference. Based upon an initial review of the WRC-07 Advisory Committee recommendations, the International Bureau, in coordination with other FCC Bureaus and Offices, tentatively concludes that it can generally support these recommendations. The FCC seeks comment on the recommendations. The FCC also seeks comment on the draft preliminary views and proposals that have been developed by the Executive Branch Agencies and submitted to the FCC by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA). Finally, the FCC seeks comment on the International Bureau's initial conclusions with regard to the WRC-07 Advisory Committee recommendations. The comments provided by interested parties will assist the FCC in its upcoming consultations with the U.S. Department of State and NTIA in the development of U.S. positions for WRC-07.
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.doc


FCC Seeks Comment on 2007 World Radiocommunication Conference
Coverage Type 

THE GOOGLE YOUTUBE TANGO
[SOURCE: The Nation, AUTHOR: Jeff Chester]
[Commentary] Under the radar of all but the most savvy Internet users, powerful commercial forces are rapidly creating a digital media system for the United States that threatens to undermine our ability to create a civil and just society. A handful of companies now dominate much of the US new-media market. Five corporations -- Comcast, Time Warner, AT&T, Verizon and Qwest -- control the wires and cable lines delivering us broadband, digital TV and, soon, much wireless service. The takeover of YouTube by Google announced October 9 and the 2005 buyout by Rupert Murdoch of MySpace are not just about mega-deals for new media. They are the leading edge of a powerful interactive system that is being designed to serve the interests of some of the wealthiest corporations on the planet. Given this emerging marketing model, the US broadband infrastructure may well become one giant "brandwashing" machine. The most powerful communications system ever developed by humans is increasingly being put in the service of selling, commercialization and commodification. And it will lead to an inherently conservative and narcissistic political culture, in which the interests of the self and the consumption of products are the primary, most visible, media messages. And unless we begin to challenge it now, the emerging digital culture will seriously challenge our ability to effectively communicate, inform and organize.
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20061030/chester


The Google YouTube Tango
Coverage Type 

CALL IT 'DIGITAL DIVIDES,' MAJOR STUDY SUGGESTS
[SOURCE: Association for Progressive Communications]
Unequal access to information and communication technologies (ICTs) has generated new inequalities, according to Social Watch, a coalition of 400 non-governmental organizations present in 60 countries. "More than four-fifths of the people in the world do not have access to the Internet and are therefore disadvantaged when it comes to making progress in production, education, and constructing full citizenship," the organization's 11th annual report reads. Giving figures to measure the 'size of the digital gap', the study says, "In the most developed countries, there are 563 computers per 1000 people; but in the most backward there are only around 25 per 1000 people, which is to say there are 20 times more in the developed world. That is just one measure of the size of the digital gap." Social Watch points out that in the most backward regions, "investment in new technologies is not geared to spreading them on a large scale." The section called 'Information, Science and Technology: Digital gap, people gap' refers to the widely debated 'digital divide'. The point its tries to bring home is that the divide is reflected among people and without a doubt, affects their ability to advance collectively. Says the report: "For some years now, the experts have been talking about the new 'information society' (and more recently about the 'knowledge society'), and the challenges and dangers it involves." But it suggests that the "capability to manage information" is increasingly important. It notes that currently, 40% of Canadians and the US-Americans have access to the Internet, but in Latin America and the Caribbean, the figure averages only 2 or 3%. Narrowing this gap is a major challenge, the study finds. There is currently not "one digital gap", but several, it suggests. This is because people's access to current information systems "is conditional upon a series of factors". People simply get "left out" from using the emerging technology because of economic resources, geography, age, gender, language, education, cultural background, employment and physical well-being. Moreover, "Access to personal computers is a pre-requisite for access to the new sources of information," it cautions. One billion Internet users on the planet is a "great success story". But the 80% still left out cannot be ignored. UNESCO says that 90% of Internet users are from the 'industrialized' world. Social Watch monitors government compliance with international commitments to development and gender equity.
http://www.apc.org/english/news/index.shtml?x=5041176

* Social Watch 2006 Annual Report
http://www.socialwatch.org/en/press/index.html


http://www.apc.org/english/news/index.shtml?x=5041176
Coverage Type 

ASSOCIATION BETWEEN TELEVISION, MOVIE AND VIDEO GAME EXPOSURE AND SCHOOL PERFORMANCE
[SOURCE: Pediatrics, AUTHOR: Iman Sharif and James D. Sargent]
A population-based cross-sectional survey of middle school students (grades 5­8) in the Northeastern United States finds that the odds of poorer school performance increased with increasing weekday television screen time and cable movie channel availability and decreased with parental restriction of television content restriction. As compared with children whose parents never allowed them to watch R-rated movies, children who watched R-rated movies once in a while, sometimes, or all of the time had significantly increased cumulative odds of poorer school performance. Weekend screen time and video game use were not associated with school performance.
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/118/4/e1061


Association Between Television, Movie, and Video Game Exposure and School Performance

Benton's Communications-related Headlines For Friday October 13, 2006

** Don't forget that the FCC is scheduled to meet=20
again today to consider the AT&T-BellSouth merger=20
and a new proceeding on Network Neutrality. For=20
this and other upcoming media policy events, see http://www.benton.org **

JOURNALISM
Study Examines Midwest Election Coverage

NEWS FROM THE FCC
AT&T offers concessions to get FCC OK on BellSouth
A Growing Free-for-All
FCC Launches Video Competition Review
FCC OK's Some Wireless Devices in Broadcast Band
Qualcomm Gets MediaFLO OK
FCC Seeks Comment on 2007 World Radiocommunication Conference

INTERNET/BROADBAND
The Google YouTube Tango
Call it =91Digital Divides=92, major study suggests
CDT Opposes Involving ICANN in "Spamhaus" Case
PokerStars says U.S. Gaming Ban does not Cover Poker

QUICKLY -- Association Between Television, Movie,=20
and Video Game Exposure and School Performance;=20
Liberty Media eyes News Corp's stake in DirecTV;=20
Clear Channel Launching Multi-cast Network; PTC=20
Files Profanity Complaints; PTC Praises KidZone;=20
Merril Lynch Downgrades Ad Spending Forecasts;=20
New media changes news ethics; NPR Is Said to Be=20
Demoting News Executive; FTC Fighting Phone=20
Pretexting; Nonprofits Sold Influence to Abramoff

JOURNALISM

STUDY EXAMINES MIDWEST ELECTION COVERAGE
[SOURCE: Associated Press, AUTHOR: Scott Bauer]
An average of 36 seconds per broadcast is all=20
that election coverage has warranted on local=20
evening news in nine top Midwestern markets since=20
Labor Day, a study released Thursday found. The=20
five-state analysis by the University of=20
Wisconsin-Madison's NewsLab looked at 30-minute=20
evening news broadcasts on 36 stations. The study=20
also found that TV stations do almost three times=20
as many stories on campaign strategy as on=20
substantive issues. Just 23 percent of the=20
station's election stories were devoted to=20
issues. Studies show that most people rely on TV=20
news reports to get most of their election=20
information, but that they don't learn much from=20
those reports, said Ken Goldstein, a UW-Madison=20
political science professor who directs the=20
NewsLab. Advertising, sports and weather all=20
received more attention than the upcoming=20
November election, the study found. On average,=20
the stations devoted more than 10 minutes to=20
advertising, seven minutes to sports and weather=20
and about 2 1/2 minutes to crime per broadcast.=20
The only stories that got less airtime on=20
average, according to the study, were ones about=20
foreign policy - 23 seconds - and unintentional injury - 11 seconds.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/E/ELECTION_COVERAGE?SITE=3DMAFIT&SE...
ON=3DHOME&TEMPLATE=3DDEFAULT
* See press release: http://www.joycefdn.org/pdf/MNI-Release.pdf
* See research findings at=20
http://www.joycefdn.org/pubs/content/pubs-newslab.html
* Election Coverage Panned in NewsLab Study
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6380266?display=3DBreaking+News
* Study: Stations Slacking on Political Coverage
http://www.tvweek.com/news.cms?newsId=3D10884
(requires free registration)
* NAB Touts Station Election Efforts
On the eve of the release of a study from the=20
University of Wisconsin, Madison, critical of TV=20
station election coverage, the National=20
Association of Broadcasters released its=20
documenting of an anecdotal sample of broadcasters' campaign efforts.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6380374.html?display=3DBreaki...
News
* NAB Blasts UW-Madison Election Coverage "Study"
"It's hard to take seriously a report that=20
purports to document political coverage of local=20
TV stations that ignores debates, public affairs=20
programs, morning news, noon news, 4 p.m. news,=20
and Saturday and Sunday morning programming. This=20
is a bogus study from a group with a biased agenda."
http://www.nab.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=3DNews_room&TEMPLATE=3D/CM/Co...
ntDisplay.cfm&CONTENTID=3D6981
* What Community Service?
"Roughly half of the local TV news hole not=20
devoted to weather, traffic and sports is devoted=20
to crime and accidents. 30% of morning news shows=20
are devoted to weather and traffic."
http://www.benton.org/benton_files/whatservice.doc

NEWS FROM THE FCC

AT&T OFFERS CONCESSIONS TO GET FCC OK ON BELLSOUTH
[SOURCE: Reuters, AUTHOR: Jeremy Pelofsky]
The FCC has scheduled time on Friday to decide on=20
the pending merger of AT&T and BellSouth. AT&T=20
apparently has offered some concessions to get=20
FCC approval for the $80.6 billion acquisition.=20
FCC Chairman had initially proposed approving the=20
deal with no conditions, according to sources,=20
but later offered one requiring the company to=20
provide competitors access to at least 30=20
commercial buildings in BellSouth's territory so=20
they can offer service. While there are five FCC=20
commissioners and the Republicans have a 3-2=20
majority, Republican Robert McDowell has said he=20
does not plan to vote on the deal because he=20
previously worked for a group that represented=20
rivals to AT&T and BellSouth. Chairman Martin=20
could ask the FCC general counsel to allow=20
McDowell to vote by arguing it would benefit the=20
public interest. But for the moment, Chairman=20
Martin has chosen to try to hammer out a=20
compromise with the Democrats and the companies.=20
Issues being debated at the FCC include Internet=20
access, wireless airwaves that BellSouth owns and=20
is using for high-speed Internet service, and=20
prices for wholesale access to the networks by=20
competitors to serve business customers. Analysts=20
at Stifel, Nicolaus & Co. said in a research note=20
to clients that it was unclear whether the agency=20
would vote on Friday and while the Democrats=20
would likely extract some targeted conditions,=20
they would not be overly harsh. "We continue to=20
expect the FCC to approve the current deal with=20
conditions similar to last year's relatively=20
modest ones," it said. "We remain skeptical the=20
Republicans or the companies, which could=20
facilitate a compromise, will agree to sweeping new requirements."
http://today.reuters.com/news/articleinvesting.aspx?type=3DbondsNews&sto...
D=3D2006-10-12T164111Z_01_N12356132_RTRIDST_0_TELECOMS-BELLSOUTH-FCC-UPDATE=
-1.XML&pageNumber=3D0&imageid=3D&cap=3D&sz=3D13&WTModLoc=3DInvArt-C1-Articl=
ePage2
http://today.reuters.com/news/articleinvesting.aspx?type=3DbondsNews&sto...
D=3D2006-10-12T150753Z_01_N12298624_RTRIDST_0_TELECOMS-BELLSOUTH-FCC.XML
* Consumer fears could delay AT&T acquisition
FCC Commissioners Michael Copps and Jonathan=20
Adelstein, want to require the new AT&T to: Let=20
consumers subscribe to high-speed Internet=20
service even if they don't have phone service=20
with the company; Lease more lines to local phone=20
and data service providers; and Accept some=20
restrictions against charging higher rates to=20
online content providers who are not affiliated with them.
http://www.philly.com/mld/mercurynews/business/15748614.htm?source=3Drss...
annel=3Dmercurynews_business

A GROWING FREE-FOR-ALL
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Editorial Staff]
[Commentary] By approving the merger between AT&T=20
and BellSouth unconditionally, the Bush=20
administration has again abdicated responsibility=20
for protecting consumers when huge companies=20
combine. Fierce competition between private=20
companies is at the core of the nation=92s economic=20
strength. But government still has an important=20
role to play as referee, making sure that the=20
rough-and-tumble game of capitalism doesn't=20
become perversely uncompetitive through=20
significant concentrations of market power in the=20
hands of a few companies. That leaves the Federal=20
Communications Commission. The commission has=20
scheduled a meeting to discuss the merger today.=20
It should take a long, hard look at the deal, and=20
the overall trend toward consolidation in the=20
telecommunications industry. There are strong=20
arguments that competition with cable companies=20
and Internet phone services have changed the=20
playing field. But the commissioners should=20
pursue the question thoroughly rather than=20
wielding a rubber stamp as the Justice Department=20
sometimes appears to. They must think first about=20
protecting consumers, while bearing in mind that bigger is not always bette=
r.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/13/opinion/13fri1.html
(requires registration)

FCC LAUNCHES VIDEO COMPETITION REVIEW
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
The FCC for the first time will look at the=20
effect of family cable programming tiers on price=20
and service in its annual review of competition=20
in the video marketplace. The Commission will=20
also expand its view by looking at the impact of=20
Internet video, IPTV, mobile video and even home=20
video rental and sales on the marketplace, all=20
but home video having taken off substantially=20
since its 2005 competition report. The FCC is=20
soliciting information, including programming,=20
technical, and financial information, from the=20
relevant industries. Those include DBS, cable,=20
broadband, private cable, wireless, and=20
over-the-air broadcast TV as the new delivery systems.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6380446.html?display=3DBreaki...
News
* FCC Issues Inquiry for Annual Report to Congress on Video Competition
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267863A1.doc
* Copps Statement: "If we are going to continue=20
to improve these Reports, we need the submission=20
of detailed comments from the widest possible=20
range of sources. Our analysis can be only as=20
good as the data going into it. If the record=20
that develops falls short in any way, the=20
Commission must then rely upon other public data=20
to round out the picture of competition in the=20
video programming marketplace. My preferred=20
method would entail, in addition to the submitted=20
comments and public data, intensive and proactive=20
Commission information-gathering to obtain=20
independent and verified data. Such an effort=20
would help ensure the accuracy of our findings=20
and help us to fulfill Congress' directive."
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267863A2.doc
* Adelstein Statement:
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267863A3.doc
* McDowell Statement:
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267863A4.doc
* MAP Questions FCC's Upcoming NOI on Video Competition
"It is unfortunate that the Commission has=20
initiated another annual report without finishing=20
last year's business. While the Commission is to=20
be applauded for trying to improve its video=20
competition report, it means nothing if the=20
Commission refuses to act on the information it=20
collects. The Commission has yet to resolve the=20
question raised by last year's report -- whether=20
cable penetration has met the so called 70/70 test of Section 612(g)."

FCC OKs SOME WIRELESS DEVICES IN BROADCAST BAND
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
The FCC has voted unanimously to allow fixed=20
wireless services to operate in the so-called=20
"White Spaces" between broadcast channels, but is=20
has not concluded whether they should be licensed=20
or unlicensed and has made no ruling on mobile=20
devices in that same spectrum. In essentially=20
beginning the process of allowing some types of=20
wireless devices into the broadcast band, the FCC=20
took a cautious approach. It put out for comment=20
a number of issues, like whether to allow mobile=20
devices and whether or not any of the devices=20
should be unlicensed. But it did rule that no=20
mobile devices will be allowed on channels 14-20,=20
which are used for public safety in some areas,=20
or on channel 37, which is used for radio=20
astronomy. The difference between licensed and=20
unlicensed is crucial to broadcasters, since they=20
fear the latter are too difficult to monitor. If=20
such a device does wind up interfering with DTV=20
signals, it will be a tough egg to un-break, they=20
argue. While putting channels 2-4 in play, on=20
which set-tops operate, the FCC has asked for=20
more comment before deciding what, if any,=20
devices should be allowed to operate there. That=20
is also good news for broadcasters, as is the=20
FCC's emphasis on extensive interference testing.=20
While broadcasters were undoubtedly happy the FCC=20
took a conservative approach, particularly in not=20
approving unlicensed operation without soliciting=20
more comments, some would have preferred the=20
presumptive ruling that unlicensed was the way to go.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6380391.html?display=3DBreaki...
News
* TV Spectrum to Be Opened for Other Uses
http://www.latimes.com/business/printedition/la-fi-fcc13oct13,1,4385436....
ry?coll=3Dla-headlines-pe-business
(requires registration)
* U.S. FCC allows limited use of vacant TV airwaves
http://today.reuters.com/News/newsArticle.aspx?type=3DtechnologyNews&sto...
D=3D2006-10-13T004901Z_01_N12220585_RTRUKOC_0_US-TELECOMS-AIRWAVES-FCC.xml&=
WTmodLoc=3DTechNewsHome_C2_technologyNews-4
* FCC Takes Steps to Allow New Low Power Devices on Vacant TV Channels
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267867A1.doc
* Martin Statement: "Now that Congress has=20
established a "hard date" for the DTV transition,=20
however, the Commission should resolve=20
outstanding technical issues so that low power=20
devices designed to operate on unused TV=20
frequencies may be placed on the market with the=20
completion of the DTV transition."
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267867A2.doc
* Copps Statement: "[U]nlicensed uses most=20
closely approach the ideal of the people's=20
airwaves, to be used in direct service of the public interest."
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267867A3.doc
* Adelstein Statement: "[T]he potential use of=20
this spectrum for fixed wireless broadband=20
services in rural areas is too great to take the=20
spectrum completely out of consideration at this=20
time, particularly as channels 14-20 are not in=20
use across most of the country. So I want to=20
thank my colleagues for agreeing to changes to=20
the item that allow us to keep this spectrum "in=20
play" pending the results of future tests."
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267867A4.doc
* Tate Statement:
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267867A5.doc
* McDowell Statement: "I am excited about this=20
item because it starts a chain of events that=20
will lead to an explosion of entrepreneurial=20
brilliance. I am also delighted that it provides=20
tremendous opportunities for further unlicensed=20
use of these slices of the spectrum."
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267867A6.doc
* MAP Applauds Commissioners on "White Spaces" Order
=93Today's FCC action is another step forward in=20
freeing more public spectrum for productive=20
public use. Commissioner Adelstein has once again=20
proven himself a champion for rural broadband and=20
affordable wireless everywhere through his heroic=20
efforts to keep as much spectrum as possible "on=20
the table" until testing is complete. As=20
Commissioner Copps observed, these are the=20
"people's airwaves, to be used in direct service of the public interest."
http://www.mediaaccess.org/press/whitespaces.pdf

QUALCOMM GETS MEDIAFLO OK
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
After months of waiting, Qualcomm has finally=20
gotten the FCC go-ahead, with some caveats, for=20
its MediaFLO mobile video service using spectrum=20
in the 700 mhz broadcast band. Qualcomm had asked=20
for a declaratory ruling that its method of=20
measuring possible interference from broadcasters=20
who will be in the band through the end of the=20
DTV transition (February 2009) was acceptable.=20
The FCC said it was. Qualcomm did not get all it=20
asked for, however. Rather than an FCC ruling=20
that a 2% interference threshold was acceptable,=20
the FCC established a .5% standard for the first=20
year, escalating up to 1.5% by the end of the=20
transition, when more broadcasters will have=20
vacated their spectrum. Qualcomm's service will=20
not be allowed to cause any additional=20
interference to stations already facing at least=20
10% interference from other sources. The FCC=20
approved the move unanimously, saying it would=20
speed the roll-out of advanced services while=20
causing minimal disruption to broadcasters in the=20
run-up to the transition, when they will all be=20
moved out of the 700 mhz band and into chs. 2-52.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6380372.html?display=3DBreaki...
News
* FCC Acts on Qualcomm Petition Regarding=20
Interference Protection Requirements in the 700 MHz Band.
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267862A1.doc
* Martin Statement:=20
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267862A2.doc
* Copps Statement:=20
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267862A3.doc
* FCC Eases Way for Live Video to Cellphones, PDAs
http://www.tvweek.com/news.cms?newsId=3D10885
(requires free registration)

FCC SEEKS COMMENT ON RECOMMENDATIONS BY THE=20
ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR THE 2007 WORLD RADIOCOMMUNICATION CONFERENCE
[SOURCE: Federal Communications Commission]
On October 4, 2006, the World Radiocommunication=20
Conference Advisory Committee (WRC-07 Advisory=20
Committee) approved and submitted for Commission=20
consideration its recommendations with regard to=20
a number of issues that will be considered by the=20
2007 World Radiocommunication Conference. Based=20
upon an initial review of the WRC-07 Advisory=20
Committee recommendations, the International=20
Bureau, in coordination with other FCC Bureaus=20
and Offices, tentatively concludes that it can=20
generally support these recommendations. The FCC=20
seeks comment on the recommendations. The FCC=20
also seeks comment on the draft preliminary views=20
and proposals that have been developed by the=20
Executive Branch Agencies and submitted to the=20
FCC by the National Telecommunications and=20
Information Administration (NTIA). Finally, the=20
FCC seeks comment on the International Bureau's=20
initial conclusions with regard to the WRC-07=20
Advisory Committee recommendations. The comments=20
provided by interested parties will assist the=20
FCC in its upcoming consultations with the U.S.=20
Department of State and NTIA in the development of U.S. positions for WRC-0=
7.
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.doc

INTERNET/BROADBAND

THE GOOGLE YOUTUBE TANGO
[SOURCE: The Nation, AUTHOR: Jeff Chester]
[Commentary] Under the radar of all but the most=20
savvy Internet users, powerful commercial forces=20
are rapidly creating a digital media system for=20
the United States that threatens to undermine our=20
ability to create a civil and just society. A=20
handful of companies now dominate much of the US=20
new-media market. Five corporations -- Comcast,=20
Time Warner, AT&T, Verizon and Qwest -- control=20
the wires and cable lines delivering us=20
broadband, digital TV and, soon, much wireless=20
service. The takeover of YouTube by Google=20
announced October 9 and the 2005 buyout by Rupert=20
Murdoch of MySpace are not just about mega-deals=20
for new media. They are the leading edge of a=20
powerful interactive system that is being=20
designed to serve the interests of some of the=20
wealthiest corporations on the planet. Given this=20
emerging marketing model, the US broadband=20
infrastructure may well become one giant=20
"brandwashing" machine. The most powerful=20
communications system ever developed by humans is=20
increasingly being put in the service of selling,=20
commercialization and commodification. And it=20
will lead to an inherently conservative and=20
narcissistic political culture, in which the=20
interests of the self and the consumption of=20
products are the primary, most visible, media=20
messages. And unless we begin to challenge it=20
now, the emerging digital culture will seriously=20
challenge our ability to effectively communicate, inform and organize.
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20061030/chester

CALL IT 'DIGITAL DIVIDES,' MAJOR STUDY SUGGESTS
[SOURCE: Association for Progressive Communications]
Unequal access to information and communication=20
technologies (ICTs) has generated new=20
inequalities, according to Social Watch, a=20
coalition of 400 non-governmental organizations=20
present in 60 countries. "More than four-fifths=20
of the people in the world do not have access to=20
the Internet and are therefore disadvantaged when=20
it comes to making progress in production,=20
education, and constructing full citizenship,"=20
the organization's 11th annual report reads.=20
Giving figures to measure the 'size of the=20
digital gap', the study says, "In the most=20
developed countries, there are 563 computers per=20
1000 people; but in the most backward there are=20
only around 25 per 1000 people, which is to say=20
there are 20 times more in the developed world.=20
That is just one measure of the size of the=20
digital gap." Social Watch points out that in the=20
most backward regions, "investment in new=20
technologies is not geared to spreading them on a=20
large scale." The section called 'Information,=20
Science and Technology: Digital gap, people gap'=20
refers to the widely debated 'digital divide'.=20
The point its tries to bring home is that the=20
divide is reflected among people and without a=20
doubt, affects their ability to advance=20
collectively. Says the report: "For some years=20
now, the experts have been talking about the new=20
'information society' (and more recently about=20
the 'knowledge society'), and the challenges and=20
dangers it involves." But it suggests that the=20
"capability to manage information" is=20
increasingly important. It notes that currently,=20
40% of Canadians and the US-Americans have access=20
to the Internet, but in Latin America and the=20
Caribbean, the figure averages only 2 or 3%.=20
Narrowing this gap is a major challenge, the=20
study finds. There is currently not "one digital=20
gap", but several, it suggests. This is because=20
people's access to current information systems=20
"is conditional upon a series of factors". People=20
simply get "left out" from using the emerging=20
technology because of economic resources,=20
geography, age, gender, language, education,=20
cultural background, employment and physical=20
well-being. Moreover, "Access to personal=20
computers is a pre-requisite for access to the=20
new sources of information," it cautions. One=20
billion Internet users on the planet is a "great=20
success story". But the 80% still left out cannot=20
be ignored. UNESCO says that 90% of Internet=20
users are from the 'industrialized' world. Social=20
Watch monitors government compliance with=20
international commitments to development and gender equity.
http://www.apc.org/english/news/index.shtml?x=3D5041176
* Social Watch 2006 Annual Report
http://www.socialwatch.org/en/press/index.html

CDT OPPOSES INVOLVING ICANN IN "SPAMHAUS" CASE
[SOURCE: Center for Democracy & Technology]
A case filed by an Illinois-based e-mail=20
marketing company -- e360 Insight, LLC -- against=20
London-based anti-spam group Spamhaus, took an=20
unfortunate turn earlier this month, when e360=20
Insight asked that the court force the Internet=20
Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers=20
(ICANN) to suspend Spamhaus's domain=20
name. ICANN, which oversees the Internet's=20
global addressing system, was not a party to the=20
case and does not manage individual Web=20
addresses. Under no circumstances should ICANN be=20
involved in these sorts of disputes, CDT said in=20
a statement issued October 12, 2006.
CDT Statement: http://www.cdt.org/press/20061012press.php

POKERSTARS SAYS US GAMING BAN DOES NOT COVER POKER
[SOURCE: Reuters, AUTHOR: Pete Harrison]
PokerStars, the world's second-biggest Internet=20
poker firm, said on Thursday that a looming U.S.=20
ban on online gaming would not apply to poker, as=20
it is a game of skill, and its business would=20
continue as usual. The gambling industry was left=20
reeling this month after the U.S. Congress=20
unexpectedly approved a bill that would make it=20
illegal for companies to accept Internet wagers=20
or for banks to process payments to online gaming=20
companies. The bill defines gambling as the act=20
of staking something of value on "a sporting=20
event or a game subject to chance" and is=20
expected to be signed into law by President George W. Bush on Friday.
http://today.reuters.com/News/newsArticle.aspx?type=3DinternetNews&storyID=
=3D2006-10-12T145036Z_01_WLA4379_RTRUKOC_0_US-LEISURE-POKERSTARS-POKER.xml&=
WTmodLoc=3DInternetNewsHome_C2_internetNews-2

QUICKLY

ASSOCIATION BETWEEN TELEVISION, MOVIE AND VIDEO=20
GAME EXPOSURE AND SCHOOL PERFORMANCE
[SOURCE: , AUTHOR: Iman Sharif and James D. Sargent]
A population-based cross-sectional survey of=20
middle school students (grades 5=AD8) in the=20
Northeastern United States finds that the odds of=20
poorer school performance increased with=20
increasing weekday television screen time and=20
cable movie channel availability and decreased=20
with parental restriction of television content=20
restriction. As compared with children whose=20
parents never allowed them to watch R-rated=20
movies, children who watched R-rated movies once=20
in a while, sometimes, or all of the time had=20
significantly increased cumulative odds of poorer=20
school performance. Weekend screen time and video=20
game use were not associated with school performance.
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/118/4/e1061

LIBERTY MEDIA EYES NEWS CORP'S STAKE IN DIRECTV
[SOURCE: Reuters, AUTHOR: Kenneth Li]
Liberty Media Corp. said on Thursday it may swap=20
its stake in News Corp. for a controlling=20
interest in DirecTV Group Inc., a move that would=20
thrust cable pioneer John Malone into the=20
satellite television arena. Malone, Liberty=20
Media's chairman, has been in discussions with=20
News Corp. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer=20
Rupert Murdoch over making a swap for Liberty=20
Media's close-to-20-percent stake in News Corp.=20
since Malone quietly snapped up shares in 2004.
http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=3DindustryNews&storyID=
=3D2006-10-12T181015Z_01_N12338865_RTRIDST_0_INDUSTRY-LIBERTYMEDIA-DC.XML

CLEAR CHANNEL LAUNCHING MULTI-CAST NETWORK
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: Allison Romano]
Clear Channel Television is launching a new=20
multi-cast network in seven of its markets with a=20
rotating wheel of entertainment fare, including=20
movies, children's shows and how-to programs. The=20
channel, dubbed Variety TV, will air on Clear=20
Channel stations' secondary digital channels and=20
is expected to launch in two markets, Tulsa and=20
Fresno, and roll out soon after on Clear=20
Channel-owned stations in Syracuse, Albany,=20
Jacksonville, Little Rock and Memphis. Viewers=20
will be able to access the channel on DTV-enabled=20
televisions and, in some markets, through deals=20
with the cable companies. Clear Channel is=20
modeling the network off a multi-cast channel=20
developed by its Salt Lake City station KTVX,=20
called The Hive, which features locally-produced=20
entertainment and sports fare, as well as a popular radio show filmed for T=
V.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6380734.html?display=3DBreaki...
News

PTC FILES PROFANITY COMPLAINTS
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
The Parents Television Council Thursday filed=20
indecency complaints against programming that=20
aired on My Network TV and NBC over=20
profanities--actually it called them "illegal=20
obscenities"--it claims aired on the networks=20
before 10 p.m. The NBC infraction was the use of=20
the word "tits" on ER, and "shit" on My Network=20
TV's telenovella, Desire. PTC can complain about=20
ER because even though its airs on the East and=20
West Coasts in the 10 p.m.-6 a.m. safe harbor for=20
indecency, it airs at 9 p.m. in the Mountain time=20
zone. Desire airs at 8 p.m. EST. PTC points out=20
that the swearing was in scripted shows rather=20
than the inadvertent cussing that sometimes slips=20
through on a NASCAR or NFL telecast. PTC's Dan=20
Isett also says the V-chip would not have blocked=20
the broadcasts because their TV-14 ratings did=20
not contain the "L' language descriptor.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6380749.html?display=3DBreaki...
News

PTC PRAISES KIDZONE
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
The Parents Television Council has found a=20
parental control technology it likes. While the=20
group, a driving force behind indecency=20
complaints to the FCC, has long criticized the=20
V-chip/ratings system as insufficient protection=20
from indecent content, it has given the TiVo=20
KidZone service its "seal of approval."
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6380265.html?display=3DBreaki...
News

MERRIL LYNCH DOWNGRADES AD SPENDING FORECASTS
[SOURCE: MediaWeek, AUTHOR: Anthony Crupi]
Merrill Lynch has downgraded its outlook for U.S.=20
ad spending for 2006 and 2007, lowering its=20
growth estimate for this year from 5.1 percent to=20
4.7 percent and dropping its forecast for next=20
year from 3.5 percent to 2.8 percent. Merrill did=20
not change its estimates for broadcast TV,=20
forecasting 5.5 percent growth in 2006 and a drop=20
of 1.2 percent in 2007. This year=92s cable=20
networks growth also went unchanged, standing=20
firm at plus-6 percent, although Merrill=20
downgraded its prediction for 2007 from plus-7.5=20
percent to plus-6 percent. While Fine noted that=20
cable had a =93lackluster=94 upfront, she said that=20
scatter =93seems to be stronger now=94 for both cable=20
and broadcast. Merrill was optimistic about one=20
sector in particular, characterizing the Internet=20
and other digital platforms as bright spots in an=20
otherwise underwhelming market. Merrill projected=20
Internet ad growth to soar 29.4 percent in 2006=20
and another 21.9 percent next year.
http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/news/recent_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=3D100...
2548

NEWS MEDIA CHANGES NEWS ETHICS
[SOURCE: Reuters, AUTHOR: Robert MacMillan]
Media outlets are finding it harder to protect=20
the privacy of the politicians and stars they=20
cover without losing scoops to blogs and other=20
competitors, the editor of online magazine Slate=20
said on Thursday. "I very much agree that we need=20
to have standards, but I think that in practical=20
terms, we don't control what people find out=20
anymore," Slate Editor-in-Chief Jacob Weisberg said .
http://today.reuters.com/News/newsArticle.aspx?type=3DinternetNews&storyID=
=3D2006-10-13T095535Z_01_N12349500_RTRUKOC_0_US-MEDIA-PRIVACY.xml&WTmodLoc=
=3DInternetNewsHome_C2_internetNews-4

NPR IS SAID TO BE DEMOTING NEWS EXECUTIVE
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Katharine Seelye]
William K. Marimow, the executive vice president=20
for news at National Public Radio, has been asked=20
to take a lower position, as NPR=92s ombudsman,=20
according to current and former colleagues at the=20
broadcasting network. A decision to move Mr.=20
Marimow would be the first major step by Ken=20
Stern, who was promoted to the chief executive=20
position at NPR on Oct. 1. One of Mr. Marimow=92s=20
former colleagues, Jeffrey Dvorkin, who served as=20
the network=92s first and only ombudsman and left=20
in July, said that Mr. Marimow had not found his=20
footing, either in the newsroom or in management.=20
=93He was perceived as a traditional newspaperman=20
who had difficulty adapting to a broadcast=20
medium,=94 said Mr. Dvorkin, who is now the=20
executive director of the Committee of Concerned=20
Journalists. =93And he seemed to have difficulty=20
finding a role in upper management.=94
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/13/business/media/13npr.html
(requires registration)
* Top News Executive at NPR Steps Down
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/12/AR200610...
2033.html

FTC TRIES TO FIGHT PHONE PRETEXTING BUT HAS FEW WEAPONS
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Christopher=20
Conkey christopher.conkey( at )wsj.com]
Several months before the scandal erupted at=20
Hewlett-Packard Co. over operatives using false=20
pretenses to obtain people's phone records, a=20
Federal Trade Commission investigator clicked on=20
a Web site that touted its ability to produce=20
consumer cellphone and financial records promptly=20
for a fee. When the site -- www.isis2020.com --=20
produced a record of calls and credit-card=20
transactions made by an FTC staff member, the=20
agency pounced. It sued the company,=20
Virginia-based Integrity Security & Investigation=20
Services Inc., and four others in May for=20
advertising and selling private records. These=20
cases were the beginning of a roundabout federal=20
crackdown on so-called telephone pretexting. But=20
it is a fight the FTC has entered with one hand=20
tied behind its back. Federal law has made it=20
illegal to pretext for financial records since=20
1999, giving the FTC the ability to levy civil=20
penalties and refer cases involving those records=20
to the Justice Department for criminal=20
prosecution. But no federal law explicitly makes=20
pretexting for phone records a crime. Instead,=20
the FTC has had to use its mandate to stamp out=20
"unfair and deceptive practices" in commerce. The=20
agency can bring civil suits to compel companies=20
to change their ways, but it can't levy stiff fines.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB116069919454791390.html?mod=3Dtodays_us_...
ketplace
(requires subscription)

REPORT SAYS NONPROFITS SOLD INFLUENCE TO ABRAMOFF
[SOURCE: Washington Post, AUTHOR: James V. Grimaldi and Susan Schmidt]
Five conservative nonprofit organizations,=20
including one run by prominent Republican Grover=20
Norquist, "appear to have perpetrated a fraud" on=20
taxpayers by selling their clout to lobbyist Jack=20
Abramoff, Senate investigators said in a report=20
issued yesterday. The groups named in the report=20
are Norquist's Americans for Tax Reform; the=20
Council of Republicans for Environmental=20
Advocacy, which was co-founded by Norquist and=20
Gale Norton before she became secretary of the=20
interior; Citizens Against Government Waste; the=20
National Center for Public Policy Research, a=20
spinoff of the Heritage Foundation; and Toward=20
Tradition, a Seattle-based religious group founded by Rabbi Daniel Lapin.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/12/AR200610...
0889.html
(requires registration)
--------------------------------------------------------------
...and we're outta here. Have a happy weekend --=20
and safe Friday the 13th. Go... Tigers?
--------------------------------------------------------------
Communications-related Headlines is a free online=20
news summary service provided by the Benton=20
Foundation (www.benton.org). Posted Monday=20
through Friday, this service provides updates on=20
important industry developments, policy issues,=20
and other related news events. While the=20
summaries are factually accurate, their often=20
informal tone does not always represent the tone=20
of the original articles. Headlines are compiled=20
by Kevin Taglang headlines( at )benton.org -- we welcome your comments.
--------------------------------------------------------------

Announcement of Next Meeting Date and Agenda of

By this Public Notice, the Federal Communications Commission (“Commission”) announces the date and agenda of the next meeting of its (“Committee”).

Purpose & Functions

The purpose of the Committee is to make recommendations to the Commission regarding consumer issues within the jurisdiction of the Commission and to facilitate the participation of all consumers in proceedings before the Commission.

Meeting Date

The next meeting of the FCC's will take place on Friday November 3, 2006 from 9:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M., at Verizon Communications, Inc., 1320 North Courthouse Road, Arlington, VA in rooms Forum I and II.

Meeting Agenda

Morning Session

8:30 - 9:00 a.m. Continental Breakfast, Networking and Conversation

9:00 - 9:05 a.m. Welcome and Call to Order
Shirley L. Rooker, Chair, (CAC)

9:05 - 9:10 a.m. Meeting Logistics
Scott Marshall, CAC Designated Federal Officer, Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau (CGB)

9:10 - 9:30 a.m. CGB Update
Monica Desai, Chief, Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau (CGB)

9:30 – 10:00 a.m. Emerging Technologies: Accessibility, Ubiquity, and Affordability, Jim Tobias, CAC Member

10:00 - 10:15 a.m. Break

10:15 - 11:15 a.m. Recommendations of TRS Working Group
Dixie Ziegler, WG Chair

11:15 – 12:15 p.m. Recommendation of Media Working Group
Denis Moynihan, WG Chair

12:15- 1:15 p.m. Lunch and Networking

Afternoon Session

1:15 - 2:15 p.m. Report and Recommendations of Disability Working Group Claude Stout, WG Chair

2:15 – 2:45 p.m. Recommendation of Adhoc Working Group on CAC Effectiveness and Recommendations
John Morris, WG Chair

2:45 – 3:00 p.m. Break

3:00 – 3:30 p.m. Report and Recommendations of Rural and Underserved Populations Working Group
Gene Crick, WG Chair

3:30 – 4:00 p.m. Wrap Up and Comments from the Public

4:00 p.m. Adjournment

The Committee is organized under, and operates in accordance with, the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C., App. 2 (1988). Minutes of meetings are available for public inspection at the FCC. Members of the public may address the Committee or may send written comments to: Scott Marshall, Designated Federal Officer of the Committee. scott.marshall@fcc.gov.

The meeting site is fully accessible to people using wheelchairs or other mobility aids. Meeting agendas and handouts will be provided in accessible formats; sign language interpreters, open captioning, and assistive listening devices will be provided on site. The meeting will be webcast with open captioning at http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/cac. Request other reasonable accommodations for people with disabilities as early as possible; please allow at least five (5) days advance notice. Include a description of the accommodation you will need including as much detail as you can. Also include a way we can contact you if we need more information. Send an e-mail to: fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (tty).

For further information contact: Scott Marshall, Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 202-418-2809 (voice) or 202-418-0179 (TTY), scott.marshall@fcc.gov (e-mail).

DA 06-1998
Released: October 12, 2006
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1998A1.doc

The FCC will hold a Commission Meeting at the FCC, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC. Two items on the agenda; the FCC will consider 1) the merger of AT&T and BellSouth and 2) a Notice of Inquiry on Network Neutrality. Meeting scheduled to begin at 11am (Eastern).

See http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267857A1.doc

Coverage Type 

"The Justice Department has packed its bags and walked out on consumers and small businesses by refusing to impose even a single condition in the largest telecom merger the nation has ever seen," FCC Commissioner Michael Copps complained in a statement. Because the Justice Department did not issue a consent decree, or a settlement with the parties, a combined AT&T-BellSouth would not be subject to an automatic judicial review. "This abdication looks suspiciously like an end-run around the public interest review" required under antitrust law, Copps charged. His views were echoed by the FCC's other Democratic member, Commissioner Jonathan Adelstein, who issued a statement characterizing the department's conclusions as "a reckless abandonment of [Justice's] responsibility to protect competition and consumers."


http://www.benton.org/index.php?q=node/3697
Coverage Type 

FCC DELAYS AT&T/BELLSOUTH VOTE
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
The FCC has pulled the AT&T/BellSouth merger from its Thursday meeting agenda. Also gone is the planned launch of a notice of inquiry on network neutrality, the issue that has stalled telecommunications reform legislation in the Senate. But the commission has only put off those two controversial items for a day. It has scheduled another meeting for Friday, Oct. 13, where it still plans to take up both items, though that is not a certainty either. The FCC could be deadlocked on the merger, with Robert McDowell not participating. That leaves two Democrats and two Republicans, with the Democrats highly critical of the DOJ decision and wanting conditions on the merger. Commissioner McDowell has been operating as though he will not vote. That's because his former employer, telecom lobby COMPTEL, has weighed in on the merger.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6380251.html?display=Breaking...
* See FCC public notice: http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267857A1.doc

See Also --
* AT&T, BellSouth Merger Passes Antitrust Test
http://www.benton.org/index.php?q=node/3697


http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6380251.html?display=Breaking%20News
Coverage Type 

AT&T, BELLSOUTH MERGER PASSES ANTITRUST TEST
[SOURCE: C-Net|News.com, AUTHOR: Marguerite Reardon]
AT&T and BellSouth got the green light from U.S. antitrust authorities on Wednesday to move forward with their proposed $67 billion merger, which will create the largest phone company in the United States. The Department of Justice's antitrust division issued a statement approving the merger unconditionally. The merger still needs approval from the Federal Communications Commission, which is scheduled to vote on the matter Thursday. The unconditional approval also drew harsh words from Sen. Daniel Inouye, the Democratic co-chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, which counts communications laws among its responsibilities. The Hawaii politician accused the Justice Department of ignoring potential negative effects from the reduced competition wrought by the merger, saying in a statement that the decision "not only flies in the face of the department's own merger guidelines, but also rests on the hope of potential facilities-based competition that may never materialize." Sen Inouye said it's now up to the FCC "to stand up for consumers and to insist upon strong conditions to protect competition."
http://news.com.com/AT38T,+BellSouth+merger+passes+antitrust+test/2100-1...

* Statement by Assistant Attorney General Thomas O. Barnett Regarding the Closing of the Investigation of AT&T’s Acquisition of Bellsouth
"After thoroughly investigating AT&T’s proposed acquisition of BellSouth, the Antitrust Division determined that the proposed transaction is not likely to reduce competition substantially. The Division investigated all areas in which the two companies currently compete ­ including residential local and long distance service, telecommunications services provided to business customers, and Internet services ­ and the merger’s impact on future competition for wireless broadband services. The presence of other competitors, changing regulatory requirements and the emergence of new technologies in markets for residential local and long distance service indicate that this transaction is not likely to harm consumer welfare. The proposed acquisition does not raise competition concerns with respect to Internet services markets or ‘net neutrality’. The merged firm would continue to face competition from other facilities-based rivals in the provision of telecommunications services to business customers including local private line services. The combination would not significantly increase concentration in the ownership of spectrum in any geographic area or give AT&T control over a large enough share of all spectrum suitable for wireless broadband services to raise competitive concerns. Finally, the merger would likely result in cost savings and other efficiencies that should benefit consumers."
http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2006/October/06_at_692.html

Criticism of DoJ Decision
* Justice OK's AT&T/BellSouth Merger
Media consolidation critic Jeff Chester, of the Center For Digital Democracy, was neither surprised nor pleased with the decision: "The Bush Administration's DOJ has surrendered the rights of the public to have a competitive and democratic broadband media system." Big computer companies like Google, Microsoft, Yahoo Intel and others are also concerned with the merger, suggesting it constitutes one of the final pieces in the effective reconstitution of the old Ma Bell. Gigi Sohn, President of Public Knowledge, said she was concerned that the FCC will vote on the merger tomorrow as it also considers a Notice of Inquiry (NOI) on Net Neutrality: "coupling" the merger vote with the NOI was a "bait and switch," that will allow the FCC to attach few or no conditions on the merger while saying they are "taking care of Net Neutrality through the notice of inquiry."
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6379848.html?display=Breaking...

* Copps, Adelstein Criticize Justice's Approval Of Merger
The FCC's two Democratic regulators harshly criticized the Justice Department for approving the $78 billion AT&T, BellSouth merger without conditions. The department, however, said "the presence of other competitors, changing regulatory requirements and the emergence of new technologies" prompted its decision. "The Justice Department has packed its bags and walked out on consumers and small businesses by refusing to impose even a single condition in the largest telecom merger the nation has ever seen," Commissioner Michael Copps complained in a statement. Because Justice did not issue a consent decree, or a settlement with the parties, a combined AT&T, BellSouth would not be subject to an automatic judicial review. "This abdication looks suspiciously like an end-run around the public-interest review" required under antitrust law, Commissioner Copps added. His views were echoed by the Commissioner Jonathan Adelstein, who issued a statement characterizing Justice's conclusions as "a reckless abandonment of [Justice's] responsibility to protect competition and consumers." Several observers said Justice's ruling would motivate the two Democratic FCC commissioners to fight harder for consumer protections. But if the Democrats push too far, Republican FCC Chairman Kevin Martin might include GOP Commissioner Robert McDowell in the negotiations, giving the Republicans a 3-2 advantage. Without McDowell, the parties are split 2-2. Commissioner McDowell may be recused due to his background at CompTel, which represents Bell competitors. But sources note that Chairman Martin has the authority to involve McDowell if the talks with Democrats reach an impasse.
http://www.njtelecomupdate.com/lenya/telco/live/tb-RONK1160597560735.html

* DOJ Defends AT&T/BellSouth Investigation
Charged by FCC Democrats with taking a dive and "reckless abandonment" of consumers, the Justice Department Wednesday defended its decision that the $67 billion merger of AT&T and BellSouth did not raise anitcompetitive issues sufficient to attach conditions.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6380223.html?display=Breaking...

Press Releases
* Justice Department Rubber Stamps AT&T Mega-Merger
Free Press: "The merger of AT&T and Bell South would take a big step toward the resurrection of Ma Bell, and its magnitude demands thorough scrutiny and careful review. Instead, the officials charged with protecting the public interest are rubber-stamping the deal in the most irresponsible manner imaginable. The consent decree and subsequent judicial review have been tossed out the window. It appears the fix is in. The public interest is not served by handing out favors to large corporations without any safeguards. We are witnessing a wave of concentration in the telecommunications market that threatens to sweep away the free and open Internet. Yet the watchdogs in Washington can't be bothered to require even the most basic consumer protections. The new AT&T wants all the market power of its old monopoly without any consumer protections. The FCC must not sign off on this deal without applying serious conditions that prevent discrimination and foster broadband competition. First and foremost, this merger should not be allowed to proceed without permanent, binding protections for Net Neutrality."
http://www.freepress.net/press/release.php?id=173

* DOJ Rubberstamp on AT&T/BellSouth Merger Recreates the MA Bell Dynasty, Sells Out Consumers
"DOJ's rubberstamp on this merger suggests the Justice Department has thrown in the towel on competition between the Bell phone companies," said Gene Kimmelman, senior vice president for Consumers Union. "The Justice Department has abdicated responsibility to promote the competition it promised when it broke up AT&T 20 years ago," he added. "In the end, the majority of consumers will end up paying inflated prices that result when Bell companies merge and dominate local, long distance, wireless and Internet services in their territories."
http://www.hearusnow.org/other/newsroom/phoneservices/dojrubberstamponat...

Additional Coverage
* Justice Dept. Approves AT&T-BellSouth Deal
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/12/business/12att.html
* Justice Department Criticized For Approving Big AT&T Deal
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB116058124083289458.html?mod=todays_us_ma...
* AT& T Deal Wins A Key Go-Ahead
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/11/AR200610...
* BellSouth deal faces FCC fight
http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/money/20061012/3b_fcc12.art.htm
* AT&T Gets Closer to Purchase of BellSouth
http://www.latimes.com/business/printedition/la-fi-att12oct12,1,3589829....