Benton RSS Feed
JOURNAL FIRES BACK AT POLITICAL COVERAGE STUDY
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
The Journal Broadcast Group, whose stations were included in a University of Wisconsin study critical of the amount of political news coverage on Midwest TV stations, fired back Friday. Doug Kiel, Vice Chairman and CEO of Journal Broadcast Group and President, Journal Communications, called the study "disappointingly narrow" and failing to provide a "complete or accurate" picture of the commitment to election coverage of Journal stations WTMJ Milwaukee and WGBA-TV Appleton/Green Bay, Wisconsin, two of the nine markets surveyed by the University of Wisconsin's NewsLab with funding from media reformer The Joyce Foundation. "By limiting the scope, the authors of the study have made a choice to exclude potential election coverage included in more than thirty hours of news programming each week in Wisconsin's two largest television markets," said Kiel. "Our broadcast group has made a significant commitment of five minutes per day for the thirty days leading up to the November 7th general election," he said. "We have broadcast debates, public service announcements urging people to vote, and significant news and public affairs programming.â€
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6381164.html?display=Breaking...
* Déjà View From the Real World
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: Editorial Staff]
[Commentary] We hope this does not turn into an annual event, but once again, broadcasters' campaign coverage is being criticized in a study that leaves a bad impression while leaving out reams of data that could paint a very different picture. Not included in the University of Wisconsin study were morning news shows; a Ball State University study of Midwest viewers in 2004 found that more people were getting their news in the morning than in the evening.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6381194.html?display=Opinion
* What Community Service?
"Roughly half of the local TV news hole not devoted to weather, traffic and sports is devoted to crime and accidents. 30% of morning news shows are devoted to weather and traffic."
http://www.benton.org/benton_files/whatservice.doc
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6381164.html?display=Breaking%20News
"THERE'S A FAILURE OF PROCESS HERE"
[SOURCE: Lasar's Letter on the FCC, AUTHOR: Matthew Lasar]
On September 12th, the Federal Communications Commission granted closed-captioning exemptions for two religious broadcasters, a fairly rare occurrence until recently. But this decision went further, noting that in future cases if a non-profit demonstrates that it receives no compensation from video program distributors and that "in the absence of an exemption, may terminate or substantially curtail its programming," the FCC will favor a closed captioning exemption request. The American Association of People with Disabilities quickly denounced the decision. Rep Edward Markey (D-MA) sent an open letter to FCC Chair Kevin Martin expressing his concern. Karen Peltz Strauss, who served as attorney for the National Association for the Deaf and helped to draft language included in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 that created closed captioning mandates, says she's "very concerned about the process that the FCC has followed, or failed to follow, in taking this new step." She adds, "The new standard seems to suggest that a non-profit organization can get an exemption when it does not receive compensation from program distributors and when it claims that, without getting an exemption, it might terminate or substantially curtail its programming or curtail other activities important to its mission. Being able to get an exemption when the entity even alleges that activities important to their mission would be curtailed—that is not a standard in the rules. It's a standard that is created by this order. There was no notice and public comment. So it is very upsetting that the FCC would go ahead and create a standard like this without issuing notice and comment to the public. Now on top of that there have been hundreds of additional letters sent out from the FCC granting additional exemptions."
http://lasarletter.com/freepage.php?id=200610101
http://lasarletter.com/freepage.php?id=200610101
PRIVATE-PUBLIC PACT SPURS LOCALISM IN NYC
[SOURCE: tvnewsday, AUTHOR: Steve Passwaiter, BIA Financial Network]
[Commentary] Many station owners and GMs truly want to do more locally-focused programming, but lament that it is time consuming and expensive. With most bottom lines under increasing pressure these days, it’s difficult to make heightened localism a reality. As a result, most stations’ localism defaults to local news and some Sunday morning public affairs shows, but not much else. A partnership between a public and a private broadcaster shows that commercial TV stations can make a real commitment to localism while maintaining fiscal responsibility. In August, WNBC New York General Manager Frank Comerford announced that the NBC flagship would air five local programs produced by city-owned WNYE, aka NYC-TV, at 11 a.m. each weekday until the launch of the new iVillage program in December. The arrangement also includes airing the five programs, plus two others, on WNBC’s digital multicast channel, WNBC 4.4, which is carried on major cable systems in the market. Under the deal, NYC-TV retains four minutes of advertising avails in the shows with the remainder going to WNBC.
http://www.tvnewsday.com/articles/2006/10/13/daily.2/
Private-Public Pact Spurs Localism in NYC
WVII/WFVX CUTS LIVE LATE NEWSCASTS
[SOURCE: Bangor Daily News, AUTHOR: Andrew Neff]
How can you broadcast a newscast when there’s nobody in the studio? Bangor television station and ABC network affiliate WVII (Channel 7) will answer that question next week as it takes a new approach to its late night newscasts. Starting Monday, WVII and sister station/Fox Network affiliate WFVX (Ch. 22) will pre-tape their respective 10 and 11 p.m. newscasts. "We’ll tape it a couple of hours earlier because — frankly, for the same reason there isn’t an afternoon newspaper — not a whole lot happens in Bangor, Maine late at night," said Mike Palmer, WVII’s vice-president and general manager. "We can save some efficiency that way by sending everyone home a couple hours earlier and still have an 11 o’clock newscast." Palmer said the 10 and 11 p.m. newscasts will be the same, but they won’t be the same as the early evening (6 p.m.) newscast on WVII.
http://bangordailynews.com/news/t/sports.aspx?articleid=141755&zoneid=23
* What's Local about local news in Bangor? See http://www.benton.org/publibrary/television/whatslocal.html#Bangor
http://bangordailynews.com/news/t/sports.aspx?articleid=141755&zoneid=23
FAKE NEWS LOBBY GROUP GEARS UP
[SOURCE: PR Watch]
A group of producers of video news releases (VNRs) have formed the National Association of Broadcast Communicators (NABC) to campaign against the mandatory disclosure of fake news. NABC Vice-President Mike Hill, who is President of News Broadcast Network, told PR Week that "disclosure is something that TV and radio stations should do as they feel necessary from a news standpoint." Mandatory disclosure, Hill claimed, "would be unworkable." The new group had also enlisted support from the Public Relations Society of America. "We all play an important role in the news gathering and dissemination process," said Michael Cherenson, the chair of the PRSA's advocacy practice. NABC has hired the Washington D.C. law firm Keller and Heckman and the lobbying company Bryan Cave Strategies to counter a Federal Communications Commission investigation into the use of VNRs.
http://www.prwatch.org/node/5301
Fake News Lobby Group Gears Up
SPECTRUM POLICY COMMITTEE REMAINS SHROUDED IN SECRECY
[SOURCE: RCR Wireless News, AUTHOR: Jeffrey Silva]
Nearly two years after President Bush authorized the creation of an advisory committee as part of spectrum policy initiative launched in 2003, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration has yet to disclose identities of members, whether any meetings have been held or explain what progress has been made on White House-driven spectrum program that from the beginning has been shrouded in secrecy and yielded few tangible results to date. NTIA, a unit of the Commerce Department that advises the president on telecom policy and manages federal government spectrum, last week declined to provide any details on the status of advisory committee and the Bush spectrum initiative. Todd Sedmak, an NTIA spokesman, said the agency may say more publicly by the end of the year or early 2007. But Sedmak did not elaborate on what NTIA planned to announce. The spectrum advisory committee, which is allotted between five and 20 members, is chartered for two years. The charter can be renewed. While NTIA has tried to keep the matter quiet, criticism has surfaced about financial disclosure statements required of advisory committee participants. At least one top industry lobbyist invited to join the panel is said to have refused to be part of the advisory committee as a result of financial filing requirements. Some federal advisory committees do not require financial disclosures. It is unclear whether the structuring of the Commerce spectrum management advisory committee, with its financial disclosure requirements, has caused NTIA to lose talent that otherwise it might have been able to attract.
http://www.rcrnews.com/lockland.cms?articleId=51823
(requires subscription)
http://www.rcrnews.com/lockland.cms?articleId=51823
MOYERS WEIGHS IN ON NET NEUTRALITY
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
With the network neutrality battle being waged among large-walleted lobbyists for big computer and media companies, Bill Moyers will tackle the subject in the final installment of his Moyers on America series of specials on PBS. The Oct. 18, 90-minute special is meant to raise the issue's profile with the general public, says a spokesperson for producing station WNET (it couldn't get much higher inside the Beltway). "While attention to the issue is low, the stakes are high with no less than the public and private sectors access to the Internet is being threatened," said the release announcing the show.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6381159.html?display=Breaking...
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6381159.html?display=Breaking%20News
MEDIA "RESEGREGATION"
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
BET, Radio One, Inner City, Viacom, Post-Newsweek, Emmis, Granite and LIN TV were among 24 companies that weighed in on school desegregation at the Supreme Court, arguing that “a ruling that racial diversity in K-12 public education is not a compelling government interest would send a devastating message to Americans and to the world that, as a nation, we believe that we have done enough with respect to racial integration and are prepared to accept the resegregation of our schools.†Elizabeth G. Taylor, counsel to the petitioners, says she sent questionnaires to the communications companies about their positions and found, “to a company, they all said it really does make a difference that people don't just go through diversity training when they are hired but learn it from a young age. I don't think it is something they are making up. They really believe it.†David Honig of the Minority Media and Telecommunications Council helped to assemble the group and points out that the companies are hoping a finding that diversity is a compelling government interest could help in the effort to restore the FCC's tax-certificate policy, which gave media companies a tax break for selling to minority owners. “Congress' consideration of whether to bring back tax certificates could be affected by what the court says about diversity in education,†says Honig.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6381206.html?display=News
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6381206.html?display=News
2007 eRATE FEATURES CHANGES, IMPROVEMENTS
[SOURCE: eSchool News, AUTHOR: Corey Murray]
As the filing window for the 2007-08 funding year draws near, schools and libraries applying for discounts under the $2.25 billion-a-year federal eRate program have at their disposal a host of new resources intended to help them navigate the complex funding process. Though the 2007 filing window cannot open until officials at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) approve a revised list of services that are eligible for discounts under next year's program, the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Co. (USAC), the independent outfit tapped by the FCC to help oversee the eRate, says it expects to begin processing applications as early as mid-November, giving schools about a month to make final preparations. In this special feature, eSchool News talks with SLD Vice President Mel Blackwell about what's new for the 2007 funding year and examines the strides program administrators are taking to streamline the process for applicants, many of whom have voiced frustrations over the program and its track record of abuse.
http://www.eschoolnews.com/news/showStoryts.cfm?ArticleID=6648
http://www.eschoolnews.com/news/showStoryts.cfm?ArticleID=6648
AS US IS REVILED ABROAD, AMERICAN TV CHARMS
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Eric Pfanner]
In the parliaments and pubs of Europe, the United States may wallow in least-favored-nation status. But on European television, American shows have been enjoying a popularity not seen since the 1980’s heyday of “Dallas,†“Dynasty†and “The Dukes of Hazzard.†United States producers are taking more risks, creating edgier shows, analysts say, and they are spending more on them in an effort to appeal to European audiences. With revenue from sales of American rights flat, they are also increasingly dependent on international sales to recover costs. Meanwhile, European programming budgets are getting squeezed. Advertising revenues at many of the leading channels are stagnant or falling as viewers defect to the Internet and other new media. Yet broadcasters have to fill many more hours of air time as cable, satellite and digital channels proliferate. Buying the rights to American shows is much less expensive than producing original ones. To be sure, analysts say, the appetite for local content remains strong. And European producers have been adept at developing reality TV series and game shows that can be replicated in export markets, including the United States.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/16/business/media/16tv.html
(requires registration)
As U.S. Is Reviled Abroad, American TV Charms