Benton RSS Feed

Benton's Communications-related Headlines For Monday October 16, 2006

To view Benton's Headlines feed in your RSS=20
Aggregator, paste=20
http://www.benton.org/index.php?q=3Dtaxonomy/term/6/all/feed into your read=
er.
For upcoming media policy events, see http://www.benton.org

TELECOM
Following Protests From Democrats, Martin Delays=20
Debate On AT&T-BellSouth Merger

BROADCASTING & PUBLIC SERVICE
Journal Fires Back At Political Coverage Study
"There's a failure of process here"
Private-Public Pact Spurs Localism in NYC
Bangor TV Stations Cut Live Late Newscasts
Fake News Lobby Group Gears Up

SPECTRUM
Spectrum policy committee remains shrouded in secrecy

QUICKLY -- Moyers Weighs In On Net Neutrality;=20
Media =93Resegregation=94; 2007 eRate features=20
changes, improvements; Statewide Franchises Still=20
Alive for N.J. Ops; Politicians caught on=20
Internet candid cameras; As U.S. Is Reviled=20
Abroad, American TV Charms; The Latest Chapters=20
On the War; Access To Gov't Info Is 'Human Right', Inter-American Court Rul=
es

TELECOM

FOLLOWING PROTESTS FROM DEMOCRATS, MARTIN DELAYS DEBATE ON MERGER
[SOURCE: Technology Daily, AUTHOR: David Hatch]
FCC Chairman Kevin Martin delayed a vote on the=20
acquisition of BellSouth by AT&T after the two=20
Democrats on the FCC requested more time to study=20
last-minute concessions proposed by=20
AT&T. Commissioners Jonathan Adelstein and=20
Michael Copps asked for the delay until they were=20
able to evaluate AT&T's proposals and make them=20
available for public comment. Chairman Martin,=20
who is scheduled to leave the country Saturday=20
for a 10-day business trip to Asia, told=20
Adelstein and Copps in a letter that he would=20
make AT&T's proposals available for public=20
comment for 10 days. He also set a FCC meeting=20
date for Friday, Nov. 3, but a FCC spokeswoman=20
said a decision on the AT&T-BellSouth deal could=20
occur earlier through private deliberations among=20
the Commissioners. There is widespread=20
speculation that Chairman Martin wants the agency=20
to act before Election Day to shelter its=20
decision from repercussions if Democrats take=20
over one or both houses of Congress. Friday's=20
action came two days after the FCC's two=20
Democrats harshly criticized the Justice=20
Department for approving the $80 billion AT&T-=20
BellSouth merger without conditions.
http://www.njtelecomupdate.com/lenya/telco/live/tb-RONK1160597560735.html
* Commission Seeks Comment on Proposals Submitted by AT&T
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2035A1.pdf
* Letter From Chairman Martin Concerning Next=20
Steps for Review of AT&T/Bell South Transfer of Control Application
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267892A1.pdf
* Commissioners Copps & Adelstein letter to Chairman Martin
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267893A1.pdf
* FCC vote on AT&T/BellSouth merger postponed
http://news.com.com/FCC+vote+on+AT38TBellSouth+merger+postponed/2100-103...
-6125831.html?tag=3Dnefd.top
* House, Senate Leaders Push AT&T/BellSouth Vote
The leaders of the House and Senate Commerce=20
Committees have asked the FCC to get on with the=20
vote on the AT&T/BellSouth merger. In a statement=20
Friday, Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Ted=20
Stevens (R-Alaska) and House Energy and Commerce=20
Committee Chairman Joe Barton (R-TX), said the=20
FCC has had plenty of time to consider the merger and plenty of input alrea=
dy.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6381172.html
* FCC Releases AT&T's Proposed Modifications
The FCC late Friday released proposed AT&T=20
modifications to its merger with BellSouth for=20
public perusal. AT&T said that, in order to speed=20
the process, it was willing to accept some=20
conditions, including promises of Internet Access=20
to 100% of homes in AT&T/BellSouth territory by=20
the end of next year; donating $1 million to=20
promote public safety; and conducting at least 10=20
wireless broadband tests, and numerous other phone-related conditions.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6381201.html?display=3DBreaki...
News
* Consumer advocates criticize AT& T deal
Consumer advocates say the new concessions AT&T=20
has offered to close its $80 billion merger with=20
BellSouth don't go far enough to preserve competition.
http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/money/20061016/2b_phonemerger16.art...

BROADCASTING & PUBLIC SERVICE

JOURNAL FIRES BACK AT POLITICAL COVERAGE STUDY
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
The Journal Broadcast Group, whose stations were=20
included in a University of Wisconsin study=20
critical of the amount of political news coverage=20
on Midwest TV stations, fired back Friday. Doug=20
Kiel, Vice Chairman and CEO of Journal Broadcast=20
Group and President, Journal Communications,=20
called the study "disappointingly narrow" and=20
failing to provide a "complete or accurate"=20
picture of the commitment to election coverage of=20
Journal stations WTMJ Milwaukee and WGBA-TV=20
Appleton/Green Bay, Wisconsin, two of the nine=20
markets surveyed by the University of Wisconsin's=20
NewsLab with funding from media reformer The=20
Joyce Foundation. "By limiting the scope, the=20
authors of the study have made a choice to=20
exclude potential election coverage included in=20
more than thirty hours of news programming each=20
week in Wisconsin's two largest television=20
markets," said Kiel. "Our broadcast group has=20
made a significant commitment of five minutes per=20
day for the thirty days leading up to the=20
November 7th general election," he said. "We have=20
broadcast debates, public service announcements=20
urging people to vote, and significant news and public affairs programming.=
=94
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6381164.html?display=3DBreaki...
News
* D=E9j=E0 View From the Real World
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: Editorial Staff]
[Commentary] We hope this does not turn into an=20
annual event, but once again, broadcasters'=20
campaign coverage is being criticized in a study=20
that leaves a bad impression while leaving out=20
reams of data that could paint a very different=20
picture. Not included in the University of=20
Wisconsin study were morning news shows; a Ball=20
State University study of Midwest viewers in 2004=20
found that more people were getting their news in=20
the morning than in the evening.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6381194.html?display=3DOpinion
* What Community Service?
"Roughly half of the local TV news hole not=20
devoted to weather, traffic and sports is devoted=20
to crime and accidents. 30% of morning news shows=20
are devoted to weather and traffic."
http://www.benton.org/benton_files/whatservice.doc

"THERE'S A FAILURE OF PROCESS HERE"
[SOURCE: Lasar's Letter on the FCC, AUTHOR: Matthew Lasar]
On September 12th, the Federal Communications=20
Commission granted closed-captioning exemptions=20
for two religious broadcasters, a fairly rare=20
occurrence until recently. But this decision went=20
further, noting that in future cases if a=20
non-profit demonstrates that it receives no=20
compensation from video program distributors and=20
that "in the absence of an exemption, may=20
terminate or substantially curtail its=20
programming," the FCC will favor a closed=20
captioning exemption request. The American=20
Association of People with Disabilities quickly=20
denounced the decision. Rep Edward Markey (D-MA)=20
sent an open letter to FCC Chair Kevin Martin=20
expressing his concern. Karen Peltz Strauss, who=20
served as attorney for the National Association=20
for the Deaf and helped to draft language=20
included in the Telecommunications Act of 1996=20
that created closed captioning mandates, says=20
she's "very concerned about the process that the=20
FCC has followed, or failed to follow, in taking=20
this new step." She adds, "The new standard seems=20
to suggest that a non-profit organization can get=20
an exemption when it does not receive=20
compensation from program distributors and when=20
it claims that, without getting an exemption, it=20
might terminate or substantially curtail its=20
programming or curtail other activities important=20
to its mission. Being able to get an exemption=20
when the entity even alleges that activities=20
important to their mission would be=20
curtailed=97that is not a standard in the rules.=20
It's a standard that is created by this order.=20
There was no notice and public comment. So it is=20
very upsetting that the FCC would go ahead and=20
create a standard like this without issuing=20
notice and comment to the public. Now on top of=20
that there have been hundreds of additional=20
letters sent out from the FCC granting additional exemptions."
http://lasarletter.com/freepage.php?id=3D200610101

PRIVATE-PUBLIC PACT SPURS LOCALISM IN NYC
[SOURCE: tvnewsday, AUTHOR: Steve Passwaiter, BIA Financial Network]
[Commentary] Many station owners and GMs truly=20
want to do more locally-focused programming, but=20
lament that it is time consuming and expensive.=20
With most bottom lines under increasing pressure=20
these days, it=92s difficult to make heightened=20
localism a reality. As a result, most stations=92=20
localism defaults to local news and some Sunday=20
morning public affairs shows, but not much else.=20
A partnership between a public and a private=20
broadcaster shows that commercial TV stations can=20
make a real commitment to localism while=20
maintaining fiscal responsibility. In August,=20
WNBC New York General Manager Frank Comerford=20
announced that the NBC flagship would air five=20
local programs produced by city-owned WNYE, aka=20
NYC-TV, at 11 a.m. each weekday until the launch=20
of the new iVillage program in December. The=20
arrangement also includes airing the five=20
programs, plus two others, on WNBC=92s digital=20
multicast channel, WNBC 4.4, which is carried on=20
major cable systems in the market. Under the=20
deal, NYC-TV retains four minutes of advertising=20
avails in the shows with the remainder going to WNBC.
http://www.tvnewsday.com/articles/2006/10/13/daily.2/

WVII/WFVX CUTS LIVE LATE NEWSCASTS
[SOURCE: Bangor Daily News, AUTHOR: Andrew Neff]
How can you broadcast a newscast when there=92s=20
nobody in the studio? Bangor television station=20
and ABC network affiliate WVII (Channel 7) will=20
answer that question next week as it takes a new=20
approach to its late night newscasts. Starting=20
Monday, WVII and sister station/Fox Network=20
affiliate WFVX (Ch. 22) will pre-tape their=20
respective 10 and 11 p.m. newscasts. "We=92ll tape=20
it a couple of hours earlier because =97 frankly,=20
for the same reason there isn=92t an afternoon=20
newspaper =97 not a whole lot happens in Bangor,=20
Maine late at night," said Mike Palmer, WVII=92s=20
vice-president and general manager. "We can save=20
some efficiency that way by sending everyone home=20
a couple hours earlier and still have an 11=20
o=92clock newscast." Palmer said the 10 and 11 p.m.=20
newscasts will be the same, but they won=92t be the=20
same as the early evening (6 p.m.) newscast on WVII.
http://bangordailynews.com/news/t/sports.aspx?articleid=3D141755&zoneid=...

FAKE NEWS LOBBY GROUP GEARS UP
[SOURCE: PR Watch]
A group of producers of video news releases=20
(VNRs) have formed the National Association of=20
Broadcast Communicators (NABC) to campaign=20
against the mandatory disclosure of fake news.=20
NABC Vice-President Mike Hill, who is President=20
of News Broadcast Network, told PR Week that=20
"disclosure is something that TV and radio=20
stations should do as they feel necessary from a=20
news standpoint." Mandatory disclosure, Hill=20
claimed, "would be unworkable." The new group had=20
also enlisted support from the Public Relations=20
Society of America. "We all play an important=20
role in the news gathering and dissemination=20
process," said Michael Cherenson, the chair of=20
the PRSA's advocacy practice. NABC has hired the=20
Washington D.C. law firm Keller and Heckman and=20
the lobbying company Bryan Cave Strategies to=20
counter a Federal Communications Commission=20
investigation into the use of VNRs.
http://www.prwatch.org/node/5301

SPECTRUM

SPECTRUM POLICY COMMITTEE REMAINS SHROUDED IN SECRECY
[SOURCE: RCR Wireless News, AUTHOR: Jeffrey Silva]
Nearly two years after President Bush authorized=20
the creation of an advisory committee as part of=20
spectrum policy initiative launched in 2003, the=20
National Telecommunications and Information=20
Administration has yet to disclose identities of=20
members, whether any meetings have been held or=20
explain what progress has been made on White=20
House-driven spectrum program that from the=20
beginning has been shrouded in secrecy and=20
yielded few tangible results to date. NTIA, a=20
unit of the Commerce Department that advises the=20
president on telecom policy and manages federal=20
government spectrum, last week declined to=20
provide any details on the status of advisory=20
committee and the Bush spectrum initiative. Todd=20
Sedmak, an NTIA spokesman, said the agency may=20
say more publicly by the end of the year or early=20
2007. But Sedmak did not elaborate on what NTIA=20
planned to announce. The spectrum advisory=20
committee, which is allotted between five and 20=20
members, is chartered for two years. The charter=20
can be renewed. While NTIA has tried to keep the=20
matter quiet, criticism has surfaced about=20
financial disclosure statements required of=20
advisory committee participants. At least one top=20
industry lobbyist invited to join the panel is=20
said to have refused to be part of the advisory=20
committee as a result of financial filing=20
requirements. Some federal advisory committees do=20
not require financial disclosures. It is unclear=20
whether the structuring of the Commerce spectrum=20
management advisory committee, with its financial=20
disclosure requirements, has caused NTIA to lose=20
talent that otherwise it might have been able to attract.
http://www.rcrnews.com/lockland.cms?articleId=3D51823
(requires subscription)

QUICKLY

MOYERS WEIGHS IN ON NET NEUTRALITY
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
With the network neutrality battle being waged=20
among large-walleted lobbyists for big computer=20
and media companies, "Big Media" critic Bill=20
Moyers will tackle the subject in the final=20
installment of his Moyers on America series of=20
specials on PBS. The Oct. 18, 90-minute special=20
is meant to raise the issue's profile with the=20
general, says a spokesperson for producing=20
station WNET (it couldn't get much higher inside=20
the Beltway). "While attention to the issue is=20
low, the stakes are high with no less than the=20
public and private sectors access to the Internet=20
is being threatened," said the release announcing the show.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6381159.html?display=3DBreaki...
News

MEDIA "RESEGREGATION"
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
BET, Radio One, Inner City, Viacom,=20
Post-Newsweek, Emmis, Granite and LIN TV were=20
among 24 companies that weighed in on school=20
desegregation at the Supreme Court, arguing that=20
=93a ruling that racial diversity in K-12 public=20
education is not a compelling government interest=20
would send a devastating message to Americans and=20
to the world that, as a nation, we believe that=20
we have done enough with respect to racial=20
integration and are prepared to accept the=20
resegregation of our schools.=94 Elizabeth G.=20
Taylor, counsel to the petitioners, says she sent=20
questionnaires to the communications companies=20
about their positions and found, =93to a company,=20
they all said it really does make a difference=20
that people don't just go through diversity=20
training when they are hired but learn it from a=20
young age. I don't think it is something they are=20
making up. They really believe it.=94 David Honig=20
of the Minority Media and Telecommunications=20
Council helped to assemble the group and points=20
out that the companies are hoping a finding that=20
diversity is a compelling government interest=20
could help in the effort to restore the FCC's=20
tax-certificate policy, which gave media=20
companies a tax break for selling to minority=20
owners. =93Congress' consideration of whether to=20
bring back tax certificates could be affected by=20
what the court says about diversity in education,=94 says Honig.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6381206.html?display=3DNews

2007 eRATE FEATURES CHANGES, IMPROVEMENTS
[SOURCE: eSchool News, AUTHOR: Corey Murray]
As the filing window for the 2007-08 funding year=20
draws near, schools and libraries applying for=20
discounts under the $2.25 billion-a-year federal=20
eRate program have at their disposal a host of=20
new resources intended to help them navigate the=20
complex funding process. Though the 2007 filing=20
window cannot open until officials at the Federal=20
Communications Commission (FCC) approve a revised=20
list of services that are eligible for discounts=20
under next year's program, the Schools and=20
Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service=20
Administrative Co. (USAC), the independent outfit=20
tapped by the FCC to help oversee the eRate, says=20
it expects to begin processing applications as=20
early as mid-November, giving schools about a=20
month to make final preparations. In this special=20
feature, eSchool News talks with SLD Vice=20
President Mel Blackwell about what's new for the=20
2007 funding year and examines the strides=20
program administrators are taking to streamline=20
the process for applicants, many of whom have=20
voiced frustrations over the program and its track record of abuse.
http://www.eschoolnews.com/news/showStoryts.cfm?ArticleID=3D6648

STATEWIDE FRANCHISES STILL ALIVE FOR NJ OPS
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: Linda Haugsted]
The New Jersey Board of Public Utilities, seeking=20
comment on implementing a new statewide video=20
franchise law, is proposing new rules that would=20
allow any company currently providing cable to=20
convert any or all of its existing franchises to=20
a system franchise without NJBPU or municipal=20
approval. Such an amendment will be subject to=20
public hearings, planned for December and=20
January. Final adoption of implementation policies is planned early next ye=
ar.
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6381115.html?display=3DBreaking+News

POLITICIANS CAUGHT ON INTERNET CANDID CAMERAS
[SOURCE: Reuters, AUTHOR: Deborah Charles]
Want to catch a senator napping during a=20
congressional hearing? Or letting a possible=20
racial slur slip out at a campaign rally? Then=20
log on to Internet video-sharing Web sites like=20
YouTube.com -- the latest weapon in U.S. politics=20
where a candidate's missteps can be viewed by=20
hundreds of thousands of people. Political=20
campaigns for the November 7 congressional=20
elections have sent out mass e-mails with links=20
to videos of opponents in unscripted, often=20
embarrassing, situations. Some campaigns have=20
even dispatched young staffers known as=20
"trackers" armed with video cameras. Their sole=20
job is to track a rival candidate's every move=20
and make sure their cameras are rolling in case the politician makes a gaff=
e.
http://today.reuters.com/News/newsArticle.aspx?type=3DtechnologyNews&sto...
D=3D2006-10-15T120806Z_01_N15301440_RTRUKOC_0_US-USA-POLITICS-VIDEOS.xml&WT=
modLoc=3DTechNewsHome_C1_%5bFeed%5d-5

AS US IS REVILED ABROAD, AMERICAN TV CHARMS
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Eric Pfanner]
In the parliaments and pubs of Europe, the United=20
States may wallow in least-favored-nation status.=20
But on European television, American shows have=20
been enjoying a popularity not seen since the=20
1980=92s heyday of =93Dallas,=94 =93Dynasty=94 and =93The=20
Dukes of Hazzard.=94 United States producers are=20
taking more risks, creating edgier shows,=20
analysts say, and they are spending more on them=20
in an effort to appeal to European audiences.=20
With revenue from sales of American rights flat,=20
they are also increasingly dependent on=20
international sales to recover costs. Meanwhile,=20
European programming budgets are getting=20
squeezed. Advertising revenues at many of the=20
leading channels are stagnant or falling as=20
viewers defect to the Internet and other new=20
media. Yet broadcasters have to fill many more=20
hours of air time as cable, satellite and digital=20
channels proliferate. Buying the rights to=20
American shows is much less expensive than=20
producing original ones. To be sure, analysts=20
say, the appetite for local content remains=20
strong. And European producers have been adept at=20
developing reality TV series and game shows that=20
can be replicated in export markets, including the United States.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/16/business/media/16tv.html
(requires registration)

THE LATEST CHAPTERS ON THE WAR
[SOURCE: Washington Post, AUTHOR: Howard Kurtz]
In an age of blogging, podcasting, BlackBerrying=20
and instant messaging, when any thought can be=20
expressed within nanoseconds, an old-fashioned=20
form of technology is making a comeback. It's=20
called the book, a collection of pages, bound=20
between hard covers, that generally takes at=20
least two years to report, write, edit and=20
publish, using the kind of presses that date to=20
the 15th century. With striking swiftness, a=20
series of books about the Iraq war has exposed=20
deep flaws in its planning and execution, made=20
the Bush administration appear dysfunctional at=20
times and generated enormous news coverage.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/15/AR200610...
1029.html
(requires registration)

ACCESS TO GOVERNMENT INFO IS 'HUMAN RIGHT,' INTER-AMERICAN COURT RULES
[SOURCE: Editor&Publisher, AUTHOR: Mark Fitzgerald]
For the first time ever, an international court=20
has declared that access to government=20
information is a human right. Ruling in a case=20
brought by three Chilean environmental activists,=20
the Inter-American Court of Human Rights declared=20
that a "right of general access" to=20
government-held information is protected by=20
Article 13 of the American Convention on Human=20
Rights. Article 13 deals with "freedom of thought=20
and expression." The court further ruled that=20
government information that isn't otherwise=20
restricted "should be provided without a need to=20
demonstrate a direct interest in obtaining it, or=20
a personal interest, except in cases where there=20
applies a legitimate restriction."
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_con...
t_id=3D1003254197
--------------------------------------------------------------
Communications-related Headlines is a free online=20
news summary service provided by the Benton=20
Foundation (www.benton.org). Posted Monday=20
through Friday, this service provides updates on=20
important industry developments, policy issues,=20
and other related news events. While the=20
summaries are factually accurate, their often=20
informal tone does not always represent the tone=20
of the original articles. Headlines are compiled=20
by Kevin Taglang headlines( at )benton.org -- we welcome your comments.
--------------------------------------------------------------

October 27, 2006

Columbia University
207 Warren Hall
New York, New York

Broadband is increasingly available in rural areas around the globe. How does rural broadband availability in the US compare? What factors determine its economic viability and which technologies are being deployed? What do case studies of rural broadband reveal about costs and business models, the providers, the technology and government involvement?

AGENDA

9:30 AM Welcome

Darcy Gerbarg
Conference Organizer, Senior Fellow CITI
Robert Atkinson
Director of Policy Research, CITI

9:45 AM Rural America's Demand for Broadband Services

What are rural America's broadband needs? Do rural communities' broadband needs differ from urban America's? Who in Rural America has Broadband today? What is the value proposition for rural communities?

Bob Rowe
Senior Partner, Balhoff & Rowe, LLC
Victor Glass
Director of Demand Forecasting and Rate Development, National Exchange Carrier Association
Rick Schadelbarer
Economist, Legal & Industry Division, National Telecommunications Cooperative Association
Bruce Egan
Economist
Chris Savage
Wyoming Telecommunications Council
PJ Louis
Author: Broadband Crash Course and Telecom Management Crash Course: A Telecom Company Survival Guide

11:15 AM International Perspective

Broadband access is a global issue. Which technologies hold the most promise and what business models seem workable in remote and sparsely populated areas? Who is funding deployments and what impact on communities are these deployments having?

Charles (Charlie) Watts
World Bank
Heather Hudson
Professor, Director, Telecommunications Management and Policy Program School of Business and Management, University of San Francisco

12:00PM Lunch

1:30 PM The Business Case for Broadband in Rural Areas

A number of companies are successfully providing broadband to rural communities. Who are they and what is the secret of their success? Are multiple broadband infrastructures sustainable in rural communities? Or is a "monopoly" more likely? What are the cost and performance characteristics of various technologies? Which best "fits" various rural geographies and demographics?

Don Helms
Bresnan Communications
Brett Glass
Lariat Communications
Eugene (Gene) B. Johnson
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer, FairPoint Communications, Inc.
Jack Hoffman Chairman, Vermont Broadband council
James Stegeman- INVITED
President, CostQuest
Jim McKenna - INVITED
President, Red Zone Wireless
William H. Berkman- INVITED
Chairman and Co-founder, Current Technologies

3:30 PM Public Policy Implications

Will market forces be able to bring broadband to all of rural America or is government intervention necessary? Where the market fails, should government subsidize multiple competing broadband infrastructures, regulate a monopoly infrastructure, provide broadband services directly, facilitate or subsidize infrastructure build out and/or service providers?

Jay Etta Hecker
Director, Physical Infrastructure Issues Government Accountability Office (GAO)
Sharon Cates-Williams
CIO and Commissioner, Suffolk County Department of Information Technology
Larry Landis
Commissioner Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission - Vice Chairman Inter-Carrier Compensation Task Force for the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC), member universal service joint board

4:30PM Concluding remarks

Registration

Please register online at http://www.ersvp.com/r/event5291. Corporate rate: $75. Academics, government officials, ITS Members, and non-profit attendees: $25. CITI Affiliates: please contact Ben Bloom at 212-854-4222 for special registration arrangements.

http://www.citi.columbia.edu/events/ruralbb2006.shtml

Columbia University
New York, NY
October 20, 2006
9:00am-5:00pm · 142 Uris Hall

The Columbia Institute for Tele-Information (CITI) and Institut de l'Audiovisuel et des Télécommunications en Europe (IDATE) will link their respective annual reviews of the North American and European telecommunications and information industries.

o What is the relative health of the telecom, cable, and internet communications industries in Europe and North America?

o Are multiple broadband infrastructures sustainable?

o How are technology trends shaping the Information and Communications Technology (ICT) industries in Europe and North America?

o How are telecom consumers (individuals and businesses) doing and how will consumers shape the regulatory and business environment?

o What are the trends in Europe and North America regarding regulation and public policy in the era of convergence, particularly network neutrality and open access.
Public Sector Speakers

o GABRIELLE GAUTHEY, Board Member, French Electronics Communication Regulatory Authority

o MATTHIAS KURTH, President, German Federal Network Agency

o STEFANO MANNONI, Commissioner, Italian Communications Authority

o HAROLD FURCHTGOTT-ROTH, former COMMISSIONER, Federal Communications Commission

o JACK GOLDBERG, Vice Chairman, Connecticut Board of Public Utility Control

Private Sector Speakers:

Alcatel Olivier Baujard – Chief Technical Officer
France Telecom Jacques Champeaux – Exec. Vice President

AT&T Brent Olson, Asst. Vice President
IBM Joe Ziskin, VP Strategy, Global Telecom Industry

Balhoff & Rowe Robert Rowe, Senior Partner
Lagardere Philippe Camus, Chairman

Bell Canada Lawson Hunter - Exec. Vice President
Merrill Lynch Gene Campbell, Analyst

BT Americas Dwight C. Rees, Head of Sales
Motorola Tony Zona, VP Strategy and Business Development

Cisco Robert Pepper, Sr. Managing Director
Telecom Italia Andrea Camanzi

Deutsche Telekom Klaus-Peter Statz, CEO and President
Verizon Business Randy Milch, Sr. Vice President and General Counsel

Fibernet Jon DeLuca, President & CEO
Vodafone Richard Feasey, Director-Group Public Policy

Registration

Register online at http://www.ersvp.com/r/event4920. Corporate rate: $200. Columbia faculty and staff: $50. Columbia students: free, without lunch, $10 with lunch. Please contact Ben Bloom at 212-854-4222 for special registration arrangements. See http://www.citi.columbia.edu for agenda and additional information.

Coverage Type 

Elected officials, political parties, administrative and regulatory agencies, candidates, interest groups, and indeed, voters and the public at large—in short nearly all of us—must bear some responsibility for the political system’s problems. But so too must the news media. Local television news, in particular, has a special responsibility—due to its reach, influence and statutory obligations—to inform voters at election time about the backgrounds, experiences, qualifications, and policy views of candidates for public office. And between elections, local TV news has an obligation to help citizens make sense out of critically important and often complex governmental issues and decisions that will impact their lives and communities. No institution in our democracy is in a better position to do this job than television news. But regrettably, as the Midwest News Index findings dramatically reveal, it is not—by almost any standard of measurement—getting the job done. The failure of local television news to foster and encourage informed citizen participation in the political process is scandalous. That’s a harsh verdict—but also an inescapable verdict. Why? Because broadcasters accept certain obligations to serve the public interest in exchange for free access to the public airwaves. This obligation goes largely ignored and unfulfilled by stations—and unenforced by the Federal Communications Commission. And to make matters worse, these same stations are raking in millions of dollars from paid political ads—which are not and never will be a substitute for the kind of in-depth and balanced political news coverage our fellow citizens need and deserve. For many in the broadcast industry, elections are increasingly seen as little more than a profit center that never stops giving.


Today's Quote 10.13.06
Coverage Type 

STUDY EXAMINES MIDWEST ELECTION COVERAGE
[SOURCE: Associated Press, AUTHOR: Scott Bauer]
An average of 36 seconds per broadcast is all that election coverage has warranted on local evening news in nine top Midwestern markets since Labor Day, a study released Thursday found. The five-state analysis by the University of Wisconsin-Madison's NewsLab looked at 30-minute evening news broadcasts on 36 stations. The study also found that TV stations do almost three times as many stories on campaign strategy as on substantive issues. Just 23 percent of the station's election stories were devoted to issues. Studies show that most people rely on TV news reports to get most of their election information, but that they don't learn much from those reports, said Ken Goldstein, a UW-Madison political science professor who directs the NewsLab. Advertising, sports and weather all received more attention than the upcoming November election, the study found. On average, the stations devoted more than 10 minutes to advertising, seven minutes to sports and weather and about 2 1/2 minutes to crime per broadcast. The only stories that got less airtime on average, according to the study, were ones about foreign policy - 23 seconds - and unintentional injury - 11 seconds.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/E/ELECTION_COVERAGE?SITE=MAFIT&SECT...

* See press release: http://www.joycefdn.org/pdf/MNI-Release.pdf

* See research findings at http://www.joycefdn.org/pubs/content/pubs-newslab.html

* Election Coverage Panned in NewsLab Study
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6380266?display=Breaking+News

* Study: Stations Slacking on Political Coverage
http://www.tvweek.com/news.cms?newsId=10884
(requires free registration)

* NAB Touts Station Election Efforts
On the eve of the release of a study from the University of Wisconsin, Madison, critical of TV station election coverage, the National Association of Broadcasters released its documenting of an anecdotal sample of broadcasters' campaign efforts.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6380374.html?display=Breaking...

* NAB Blasts UW-Madison Election Coverage "Study"
"It's hard to take seriously a report that purports to document political coverage of local TV stations that ignores debates, public affairs programs, morning news, noon news, 4 p.m. news, and Saturday and Sunday morning programming. This is a bogus study from a group with a biased agenda."
http://www.nab.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=News_room&TEMPLATE=/CM/Conten...

* What Community Service?
"Roughly half of the local TV news hole not devoted to weather, traffic and sports is devoted to crime and accidents. 30% of morning news shows are devoted to weather and traffic."
http://www.benton.org/benton_files/whatservice.doc


http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/E/ELECTION_COVERAGE?SITE=MAFIT&SECTION=HOME…
Coverage Type 

AT&T OFFERS CONCESSIONS TO GET FCC OK ON BELLSOUTH
[SOURCE: Reuters, AUTHOR: Jeremy Pelofsky]
The FCC has scheduled time on Friday to decide on the pending merger of AT&T and BellSouth. AT&T apparently has offered some concessions to get FCC approval for the $80.6 billion acquisition. FCC Chairman had initially proposed approving the deal with no conditions, according to sources, but later offered one requiring the company to provide competitors access to at least 30 commercial buildings in BellSouth's territory so they can offer service. While there are five FCC commissioners and the Republicans have a 3-2 majority, Republican Robert McDowell has said he does not plan to vote on the deal because he previously worked for a group that represented rivals to AT&T and BellSouth. Chairman Martin could ask the FCC general counsel to allow McDowell to vote by arguing it would benefit the public interest. But for the moment, Chairman Martin has chosen to try to hammer out a compromise with the Democrats and the companies. Issues being debated at the FCC include Internet access, wireless airwaves that BellSouth owns and is using for high-speed Internet service, and prices for wholesale access to the networks by competitors to serve business customers. Analysts at Stifel, Nicolaus & Co. said in a research note to clients that it was unclear whether the agency would vote on Friday and while the Democrats would likely extract some targeted conditions, they would not be overly harsh. "We continue to expect the FCC to approve the current deal with conditions similar to last year's relatively modest ones," it said. "We remain skeptical the Republicans or the companies, which could facilitate a compromise, will agree to sweeping new requirements."
http://today.reuters.com/news/articleinvesting.aspx?type=bondsNews&story...
http://today.reuters.com/news/articleinvesting.aspx?type=bondsNews&story...

* Consumer fears could delay AT&T acquisition
FCC Commissioners Michael Copps and Jonathan Adelstein, want to require the new AT&T to: Let consumers subscribe to high-speed Internet service even if they don't have phone service with the company; Lease more lines to local phone and data service providers; and Accept some restrictions against charging higher rates to online content providers who are not affiliated with them.
http://www.philly.com/mld/mercurynews/business/15748614.htm?source=rss&c...



Coverage Type 

A GROWING FREE-FOR-ALL
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Editorial Staff]
[Commentary] By approving the merger between AT&T and BellSouth unconditionally, the Bush administration has again abdicated responsibility for protecting consumers when huge companies combine. Fierce competition between private companies is at the core of the nation’s economic strength. But government still has an important role to play as referee, making sure that the rough-and-tumble game of capitalism doesn't become perversely uncompetitive through significant concentrations of market power in the hands of a few companies. That leaves the Federal Communications Commission. The commission has scheduled a meeting to discuss the merger today. It should take a long, hard look at the deal, and the overall trend toward consolidation in the telecommunications industry. There are strong arguments that competition with cable companies and Internet phone services have changed the playing field. But the commissioners should pursue the question thoroughly rather than wielding a rubber stamp as the Justice Department sometimes appears to. They must think first about protecting consumers, while bearing in mind that bigger is not always better.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/13/opinion/13fri1.html
(requires registration)


A Growing Free-for-All
Coverage Type 

FCC LAUNCHES VIDEO COMPETITION REVIEW
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
The FCC for the first time will look at the effect of family cable programming tiers on price and service in its annual review of competition in the video marketplace. The Commission will also expand its view by looking at the impact of Internet video, IPTV, mobile video and even home video rental and sales on the marketplace, all but home video having taken off substantially since its 2005 competition report. The FCC is soliciting information, including programming, technical, and financial information, from the relevant industries. Those include DBS, cable, broadband, private cable, wireless, and over-the-air broadcast TV as the new delivery systems.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6380446.html?display=Breaking...

* FCC Issues Inquiry for Annual Report to Congress on Video Competition
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267863A1.doc

* Copps Statement: "If we are going to continue to improve these Reports, we need the submission of detailed comments from the widest possible range of sources. Our analysis can be only as good as the data going into it. If the record that develops falls short in any way, the Commission must then rely upon other public data to round out the picture of competition in the video programming marketplace. My preferred method would entail, in addition to the submitted comments and public data, intensive and proactive Commission information-gathering to obtain independent and verified data. Such an effort would help ensure the accuracy of our findings and help us to fulfill Congress' directive."
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267863A2.doc

* Adelstein Statement:
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267863A3.doc

* McDowell Statement:
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267863A4.doc

* MAP Questions FCC's Upcoming NOI on Video Competition
"It is unfortunate that the Commission has initiated another annual report without finishing last year's business. While the Commission is to be applauded for trying to improve its video competition report, it means nothing if the Commission refuses to act on the information it collects. The Commission has yet to resolve the question raised by last year's report -- whether cable penetration has met the so called 70/70 test of Section 612(g)."
http://www.mediaaccess.org/press/Video%20NOI.pdf


http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6380446.html?display=Breaking%20News
Coverage Type 

FCC OKs SOME WIRELESS DEVICES IN BROADCAST BAND
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
The FCC has voted unanimously to allow fixed wireless services to operate in the so-called "White Spaces" between broadcast channels, but is has not concluded whether they should be licensed or unlicensed and has made no ruling on mobile devices in that same spectrum. In essentially beginning the process of allowing some types of wireless devices into the broadcast band, the FCC took a cautious approach. It put out for comment a number of issues, like whether to allow mobile devices and whether or not any of the devices should be unlicensed. But it did rule that no mobile devices will be allowed on channels 14-20, which are used for public safety in some areas, or on channel 37, which is used for radio astronomy. The difference between licensed and unlicensed is crucial to broadcasters, since they fear the latter are too difficult to monitor. If such a device does wind up interfering with DTV signals, it will be a tough egg to un-break, they argue. While putting channels 2-4 in play, on which set-tops operate, the FCC has asked for more comment before deciding what, if any, devices should be allowed to operate there. That is also good news for broadcasters, as is the FCC's emphasis on extensive interference testing. While broadcasters were undoubtedly happy the FCC took a conservative approach, particularly in not approving unlicensed operation without soliciting more comments, some would have preferred the presumptive ruling that unlicensed was the way to go.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6380391.html?display=Breaking...

* TV Spectrum to Be Opened for Other Uses
http://www.latimes.com/business/printedition/la-fi-fcc13oct13,1,4385436....
(requires registration)

* U.S. FCC allows limited use of vacant TV airwaves
http://today.reuters.com/News/newsArticle.aspx?type=technologyNews&story...

* FCC Takes Steps to Allow New Low Power Devices on Vacant TV Channels
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267867A1.doc

* Martin Statement: "Now that Congress has established a "hard date" for the DTV transition, however, the Commission should resolve outstanding technical issues so that low power devices designed to operate on unused TV frequencies may be placed on the market with the completion of the DTV transition."
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267867A2.doc

* Copps Statement: "[U]nlicensed uses most closely approach the ideal of the people's airwaves, to be used in direct service of the public interest."
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267867A3.doc

* Adelstein Statement: "[T]he potential use of this spectrum for fixed wireless broadband services in rural areas is too great to take the spectrum completely out of consideration at this time, particularly as channels 14-20 are not in use across most of the country. So I want to thank my colleagues for agreeing to changes to the item that allow us to keep this spectrum "in play" pending the results of future tests."
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267867A4.doc

* Tate Statement:
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267867A5.doc

* McDowell Statement: "I am excited about this item because it starts a chain of events that will lead to an explosion of entrepreneurial brilliance. I am also delighted that it provides tremendous opportunities for further unlicensed use of these slices of the spectrum."
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267867A6.doc

* MAP Applauds Commissioners on "White Spaces" Order
“Today's FCC action is another step forward in freeing more public spectrum for productive public use. Commissioner Adelstein has once again proven himself a champion for rural broadband and affordable wireless everywhere through his heroic efforts to keep as much spectrum as possible "on the table" until testing is complete. As Commissioner Copps observed, these are the "people's airwaves, to be used in direct service of the public interest."
http://www.mediaaccess.org/press/whitespaces.pdf


http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6380391.html?display=Breaking%20News
Coverage Type 

QUALCOMM GETS MEDIAFLO OK
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
After months of waiting, Qualcomm has finally gotten the FCC go-ahead, with some caveats, for its MediaFLO mobile video service using spectrum in the 700 mhz broadcast band. Qualcomm had asked for a declaratory ruling that its method of measuring possible interference from broadcasters who will be in the band through the end of the DTV transition (February 2009) was acceptable. The FCC said it was. Qualcomm did not get all it asked for, however. Rather than an FCC ruling that a 2% interference threshold was acceptable, the FCC established a .5% standard for the first year, escalating up to 1.5% by the end of the transition, when more broadcasters will have vacated their spectrum. Qualcomm's service will not be allowed to cause any additional interference to stations already facing at least 10% interference from other sources. The FCC approved the move unanimously, saying it would speed the roll-out of advanced services while causing minimal disruption to broadcasters in the run-up to the transition, when they will all be moved out of the 700 mhz band and into chs. 2-52.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6380372.html?display=Breaking...

* FCC Acts on Qualcomm Petition Regarding Interference Protection Requirements in the 700 MHz Band.
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267862A1.doc

* Martin Statement: http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267862A2.doc

* Copps Statement: http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267862A3.doc

* FCC Eases Way for Live Video to Cellphones, PDAs
http://www.tvweek.com/news.cms?newsId=10885
(requires free registration)


http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6380372.html?display=Breaking%20News