Benton RSS Feed
Few can accuse Google's top executives of holding a grudge. Despite facing a possible antitrust lawsuit from the Obama Administration's Federal Trade Commission, Google's leaders are still backing the president when it comes to donations to his reelection effort.
Leading the way is Google Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt, who served as an adviser to then-Sen. Barack Obama's 2008 presidential campaign and is now a member of the President's Council of Advisers on Science and Technology. Schmidt has given $5,000 to the Obama reelection campaign and an additional $30,800 to the Obama Victory Fund, the joint fundraising committee for Obama and the Democratic National Committee, according to Federal Election Commission records. In all, President Barack Obama has received more than $737,000 from Google-related donors -- the president's third biggest contributor, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. Microsoft-related contributors are the second biggest donors to Obama, giving more than $761,000, according to the center's data.
Facing Antitrust Scrutiny, Google Execs Still Backing Obama
There are as many small base stations out in the world as there are large base stations attached to cell phone towers, according to an Informa Telecoms & Media report. That doubles the number of equipment telcos must monitor and manage to help deliver a crystal clear signal on your cell phone, but it also creates a management nightmare and perhaps, an opportunity.
The report states that between October and November 2012, the number of small cells reached 6.1 million with macrocells worldwide totaling 5.9 million. Most of the small cells at 80 percent are inside people’s homes helping improve the cell signal inside the house. But others are in crowded venues like offices and stadiums where the smaller cells act as a backup and signal booster for larger cell towers nearby. Sprint by the way has deployed a million of those small cells–up from 250,000 in 2011. For operators who now have up to four times as many base stations to manage, the network complexity can be daunting. Sure these small cells boost the quality of the subscriber experience but managing all of those end points comes at a cost. And who will pay it? Some operators charge users for their in-home femtocells, which can frustrate people who believe that the operator should provide quality coverage as part of the basic service.
To scale, telcos must learn from the ops community
A new study by U.K.-based Juniper Research concludes thousands of Android applications are collection more information than they need, suggesting mobile are exposing more data than they realize when downloading apps.
The analysis, looking at over 1.7 million apps in the Google Play market from March 2011 to September 2012, found free apps are four times more likely to track location, and three times more likely to have permission to access user address books than paid apps. Concerns about privacy in mobile apps first gained prominence through an investigation undertaken by The Wall Street Journal two years ago, finding popular apps routinely collect and share personal data about users without their knowledge or consent. That and subsequent reports, along with revelations that apps like Path and Hipster were collecting users address books without informing them, have spurred a backlash, leading to increased government scrutiny and proposed legislation, such as the Mobile Device Privacy Act.
Study: Android Apps Raise Privacy Issues
Four years can change a lot in federal technology. As the Bush administration prepared to hand power to the Obama team in late-2008, no mission-critical government systems were housed in computer clouds, there were fewer than two dozen government-built mobile applications and the nation had never had a chief information officer. Now new systems are moving to or being built in the cloud every month, there are more than 100 government apps and as for federal chief information officers—there have been two.
There is no crystal ball into the future of federal technology, of course, but the short list of emerging trends includes a seismic shift in the role of chief information officers, more collaborative technologies and a workplace that moves beyond ‘bring your own device’ to ‘bring your own everything.’
- Trend 1: Empowering the CIO: First off, the next presidential term or two likely will shift the balance of power, both within the federal technology shop and between technologists and other workers. This could involve concentrating authority—including budget decisions—in the hands of agency CIOs.
- Trend 2: Collaborative Tools: The face of federal technology likely will be changed by collaborative systems developed in the consumer sphere that are just now making their way into government.
- Trend 3: Bring Your Own: The next four to eight years in federal IT will be defined by what workers increasingly lack, experts say, including agency-issued phones, tablets and even laptops for telework. “Bring your own device” policies already have been rolled out at some agencies, mostly on a voluntary basis. As the years go by and agency-issued BlackBerrys and other product lines wear out, those policies will become increasingly common and, in some cases, mandatory, experts say.
Get Ready for a Seismic Shift in Federal IT
[Commentary] If Big Bird were on the ballot on Election Day, he’d probably win in a landslide. But in our closely divided partisan election cycle, public broadcasting has once again become a sign of divided government.
Sadly, in all the joking and sloganeering, what has gotten lost is a key opportunity to talk about what America really needs: a more expansive public media service. By injecting public broadcasting into the 2012 campaign, politicians have brought into view just how paltry a sum the federal Treasury provides to public television and radio stations. The 2012 budget for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, the principal source of federal dollars for public media, was just $445-million, roughly 0.01 percent of the federal budget. Adding a little more to it would hardly cause significant deficit pain. It is time for our political leaders to give public outlets the resources it takes to satisfy the news and information needs of communities. And it’s time for public broadcasters to pledge that they will never try to shore up their financial position by taking on the corrupting influence of political contributions on behalf of the least trusted crop of politicians in our nation’s history.
[Stehle is executive director of Media Impact Funders, an organization of grant makers that was formerly called Grantmakers in Film and Electronic Media]
The Fight Over PBS Should Be to Broaden Its Scope, Not to Threaten It
A Q&A with Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski.
He says: “We've focused the FCC on broadband because wired and wireless broadband, high speed Internet, is our central platform for economic growth and innovation for years to come. In many ways, things are going really well for the U.S. when it comes to broadband. Think about where we were four years ago: If we were talking about mobile broadband, we would have been talking about mobile innovation and we would have been saying, "Hey, in Japan and South Korea there's incredible mobile innovation. In Europe, they are ahead of us on 3G infrastructure." Flash forward to now, [and] the U.S. has regained global leadership in mobile broadband. [In terms of] infrastructure, the U.S. is the first country in the world getting to scale with 4G LTE, the next generation of mobile broadband. No one else is even close. So we are the world's test bed for 4G LTE applications and services. On the innovation side, it's a completely different world. You know, around the [globe] they are using American apps, whether it's Twitter or Facebook or Google -- that's what the rest of the world is using, a major change in four years. And then think about operating systems. Four years ago, the percentage of mobile devices globally that had American-made operating systems was under 20%. Today it's over 80%. That's a very, very fast change. And so we are strongly positioned to continue to lead the world when it comes to mobile broadband, an incredibly important platform for innovation and economic growth. But we have some real challenges in order to keep that going.”
How Is the U.S. Doing in the 'Global Bandwidth Race'?
[Commentary] The Federal Communications Commission released a political advertising decision that, while perhaps not surprising, will still alarm many broadcasters.
Back in February, I wrote a pair of posts about Randall Terry, who was then seeking airtime during the Super Bowl to air ads featuring graphic footage of aborted fetuses, ostensibly in support of his effort to become the presidential nominee of the Democratic Party. It appears that the Democratic Party didn't want him, as the Democratic National Committee sent stations a letter asserting that Terry was not a candidate for the Democratic nomination and was not entitled to the broadcast airtime benefits legally qualified federal candidates receive.
Randall Terry Pushes the FCC's Political Envelope FCC orders TV station to air anti-abortion activist Randall Terry's campaign ads (The Hill) FCC Rules in Favor of Anti-Abortion Candidate on TV Ads (National Journal)
If the chatter surrounding the mythical, eventual release of the true Apple TV is any indicator, consumers are dying for a bit of simplicity with their streaming video options. When will they get it? Not any time soon, says a chorus of online media makers, ranging from content creators to set-top box makers.
"There's no agreed upon standard format, bit-rate, codec, aspect ratio, player, protocol, or content protection technology," explains Daniel Rayburn, principal analyst for digital media at Frost & Sullivan and the executive vice president at Streamingmedia.com. According to Rayburn, because industry players like Amazon, Apple, Google and Microsoft all want their technologies to be the standard, no one is working together to bring cohesion to the online video world. It's like Betamax versus VHS all over again, only with a dozen more types of trapezoidal and rhombus-shaped cassettes vying for supremacy. "It's only going to continue fragmentation in the market," says Rayburn, "and it's only going to get worse over time."
You can forget about better TV
Four out of five under-25s feel 'lost' without the internet, a survey has found.
The opinion poll of 1,000 adults by the Science Museum shows how a generation that has grown up with the web has become dependent upon it. By contrast, just three out of five people over the age of 25 said that they would feel 'lost' without the internet. One in three adults surveyed would choose the internet over television, with 60 per cent of people surveyed describing the internet as one of the most important inventions of the twentieth century. Half of the women surveyed also use the web to self-diagnose illnesses, with 60 per cent of under-25s using the internet for the same purpose.
Four out of five young people feel 'lost' without internet
The rise of tablets and smartphones will help grow the online paid-content market 65% to £8bn a year by 2017, with consumer spending on digital news rocketing 77% to almost £250m, according to a report.
Research firm Forrester also warns that the rise of paid-for services on mobile devices and tablets could limit advertising revenue opportunities. The Forrester report found that over the next five years, the amount spent on online music, games, film, TV and news content by consumers in western Europe will surge by 65% from €6.2bn (£5bn) to €10.2bn. News content spend will grow by 77% from €158m this year to €279m in 2017, including digital subscriptions to newspapers such as the Financial Times, New York Times, Wall Street Journal Europe, the Times and Sunday Times. The number of people choosing to buy news content online will jump 68% from 4.8 million to 8.1 million, with 20% of tablet users choosing to do so by 2017, according to Forrester.
Online paid-content market poses threat to traditional advertising