Benton RSS Feed
[Commentary] Apart from anything else, freedom of speech and the press are officially protected by article 35 of the Chinese constitution. Somehow, the Communist party contrives to hold that thought alongside the precept that, as one commentary put it, “party control of the media is an unwavering basic principle.”
The act of censorship that led to the brief strike by journalists on the Southern Weekend newspaper was even more absurd than usual. Tuo Zhen, the chief censor of Guangdong province, not only blocked a pointed new year editorial calling for the rule of law (by implication, placing limits on party rule) but wrote a version supporting Xi Jinping, the incoming president. A group of academics, including Prof He, warned last month that without political reform China could “slip into the turbulence and chaos of violent revolution”. That was neatly calculated to play on the party’s insecurity, but I doubt it was taken to heart in Beijing. For too many officials, a free press is itself equivalent to “turbulence and chaos”. Free expression could, they fear, escalate into popular protests and students massing again in Tiananmen Square. Censorship is a tried and trusted tradition, no matter how absurd it has become. The humiliation of a few black pens is a small price to pay.
Censorship makes China look ridiculous
China has opened up the prospect of private sector competition in its national mobile telecoms market, with a consultation about whether major state-controlled carriers should be allowed to sell some of their spectrum holdings to other groups.
The Chinese Ministry of Industry and Information Technology said that it was looking for views on proposals to allow the three state-backed groups to begin reselling spectrum that could be used for rival telecoms services. The mobile market in the country, the biggest in the world by subscribers, is divided up into three groups – China Telecom, China Unicom and China Mobile . China Telecom and China Unicom also operate fixed-line businesses. In a statement, the ministry said that this was part of the state council’s desire to “encourage and guide the healthy development of private investment”, which could be the first step towards a wider liberalization. The ministry said that it would solicit public opinion until February 6. If the trial were to proceed, private companies would be allowed to buy spectrum and offer services under their own brands to consumers.
China debating opening telecoms market
Mobile users pay up to 10 times more to use smartphones in European Union countries that lack an independent “challenger” telecoms group outside the large, dominant pan-European operators, according to research.
Across the eurozone, there is a wide range of prices being charged for the same voice and data plans, according to Rewheel, a Helsinki-based independent strategic advisory group. It found European markets that lack what regulators call the “maverick” – a discounter that tends to set the lower end of prices – are much higher priced. The Rewheel study shows that markets lack price competition even when one of the larger pan-European groups – such as Vodafone, France Telecom and Telefónica – are the smallest operators, and concludes that further in-market consolidation in Europe would likely yield higher prices for consumers.
Mobile users pay price for digital divide
Attorney General Eric Holder, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, and Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric Shinseki will stay in their positions in President Obama’s second term. Labor Secretary Hilda Solis is resigning.
Sec Solis was a four-term congresswoman representing southern California, and was the first Hispanic woman to serve in the U.S. Cabinet. Sec Solis becomes the fifth member of the Cabinet to announce that she intends to leave in Obama's second term, joining Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and Environmental Protection Agency Director Lisa Jackson. Her resignation will likely intensify pressure on the White House to consider diversity in the remainder of its Cabinet appointments. Obama's last two appointments — Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) and former Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-NE) — are white men. And Obama is expected to nominate White House chief of staff Jack Lew to be Treasury secretary as soon as this week.
Obama’s Second Term Cabinet Hilda Solis resigning as Labor secretary (The Hill – Solis)
The Women's Media Center, co-founded by Jane Fonda, is urging President Barack Obama to nominate a woman as the next chair of the Federal Communications Commission.
Current FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski has not announced his departure, but there’s a great deal of speculation he will step down. "In its nearly 80-year history, the FCC has never had a female chair. Appointing a woman is not just a symbolic step. The next FCC chair should promote diversity and increase competition in telecommunications and in media," said WMC President Julie Burton. The center was founded by Jane Fonda, Robin Morgan, and Gloria Steinem to "make women visible and powerful in the media."
President Pushed to Nominate Woman as Next FCC Chair Women's Org Urges Obama to Name a Woman as Next FCC Chair (Variety)
[Commentary] Surrounded by next generation flexible displays and the next big tech toys at the 2013 International Consumer Electronics Show, former President Bill Clinton made this observation: South Korea is now number one in the world for computer download speeds, and the U.S. has fallen to number 15. “Our speeds are one-fourth of theirs, and we have fallen off the map,” Clinton said.
But just announced a plan to bring gigabit service to a dozen of its neighborhoods. Over 100,000 Seattle residents, as well as health care and educational institutions, will have access to world-leading speeds. Not only is the scale of Seattle’s effort impressive, the path it took — smart policies involving rights of way management and dark fiber — can be replicated by other communities that wish to control their own bandwidth destiny. Not every community has Seattle’s assets, particularly the strong information, communications, apps development economy and committed local leaders like Mayor McGinn. But Seattle has created a model that every community can follow in improving the environment for the private investment necessary to create a new generation of American broadband leadership. Mr. Friedman proposed a $20 billion fund to bring gigabit connectivity to 200 American cities, arguing that these networks would lead to “a ‘melt-up’ in the United States economy.” While, unfortunately in our view, such a program may not be in the realm of the politically achievable, ironically, it might be the actions of individual cities to catalyze such networks that leads to the kind of growth, debt reduction, and surplus that could enable the federal government to once again consider big programs to drive growth and American economic leadership. And this is the kind of policy innovation America deserves.
Gangnam Bandwidth, American Style
What's going on? The Internet was supposed to make traditional companies poor. Instead, the Internet is making them rich.
"We heard stories about how cable was doomed by the Internet as early as 2003," says Craig Moffett, an analyst with Sanford C. Bernstein. "It has finally dawned on investors that, not only was that never a realistic concern, but also, the Internet has turned out to be a boon for both distributors and content companies." To understand why the Internet hasn't destroyed cable, ask yourself: Where do you get your Internet? It's probably from the same people selling you TV. Since 2005, total cable industry revenue is up 50% -- and two-thirds of that increase came from selling something that wasn't television. For the most part, it was Internet. Cable companies like Comcast and Time Warner Cable sell broadband at ridiculously high margins. When you compare the total cost and profit of selling TV versus selling Internet, it's clear to Moffett that pay TV "has represented less than half of [cable's] business for more than a year." While cable has made Internet a second business, content companies have treated the Internet as a second window. Even as they demand more money from cable operators for the right to carry their channels to households, media companies have also made a killing selling their shows to companies like Amazon, Netflix, Hulu, and Apple.
How the TV Business Got Rich Off the Thing That Was Going to the Kill It: The Internet
Should broadband Internet service be treated as a basic utility in the United States, like electricity, water, and traditional telephone service? That’s the question at the heart of an important and provocative new book by Susan Crawford, a tech policy expert and professor at Cardozo Law School. In Captive Audience: The Telecom Industry and Monopoly in the New Guilded Age, released by Yale University Press, Crawford argues that the Internet has replaced traditional phone service as the most essential communications utility in the country, and is now as important as electricity was 100 years ago.
“Truly high-speed wired Internet access is as basic to innovation, economic growth, social communication, and the country’s competitiveness as electricity was a century ago,” Crawford writes, “but a limited number of Americans have access to it, many can’t afford it, and the country has handed control of it over to Comcast and a few other companies.” Because the U.S. government has allowed a small group of giant, highly profitable companies to dominate the broadband market, Crawford argues, American consumers have fewer choices for broadband service, at higher prices but lower speeds, compared to dozens of other developed countries, including throughout Europe and Asia. “In Seoul, when you move into an apartment, you have a choice of three or four providers selling you symmetric fiber access for $30 per month, and installation happens in one day,” Crawford said. “That’s unthinkable in the United States. And the idea that the country that invented the Internet can’t get online is beyond my imagination.”
Is Broadband Internet Access a Public Utility? U.S. Internet Suffers When the Refs Blow the Calls (The Huffington Post)
A $126.3 million federal stimulus project was intended to bring high-speed fiber-optic Internet connections to public facilities across West Virginia, but state officials are now mostly selecting sites that already have fiber and delivering routers instead.
The state designated 175 new sites as "community anchor institutions" that will receive upgraded Internet service. Only seven of those sites will get high-speed fiber cable. All facilities will get new routers. "Due to the amount of time required for environmental assessments and fiber builds, we determined that we would limit most of the additional sites to 'router-only' so that we could complete the build on time," said Diane Holley-Brown, a spokeswoman for the state Office of Technology. The latest list of 175 replacement sites includes mostly schools, community and technical colleges, and Marshall University, which will receive 10 routers for buildings on its Huntington campus. Holley-Brown said the National Telecommunications & Information Administration, the federal agency overseeing the grant funds, has approved West Virginia's plans to pick sites that already have fiber and deliver routers to them.
West Virginia broadband effort narrowed
While speaking at the 2013 International CES, Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski announced that the FCC will soon kick-off a government-wide effort to increase speeds and alleviate Wi-Fi congestion at major hubs, such as airports, convention centers and large conference gatherings. In addition, this would also increase speed and capacity for Wi-Fi in the home where multiple users and devices are often on the network at the same time.
This will increase and free up the unlicensed spectrum available for ultra-high-speed, high-capacity Wi-Fi - known as “Gigabit Wi-Fi” - by up to 35 percent. This effort will enable higher data speeds and greater capacity – most notably, improved HD video distribution capability. Chairman Genachowski said that the FCC will take the first steps next month to unleash up to 195 megahertz of spectrum in the 5 gigahertz band. This would be the largest block of unlicensed spectrum to be made available for expansion of Wi-Fi since 2003. Because the 5 gigahertz band is already used for other purposes by both federal and non-federal users, the effort will require significant collaboration with other federal agencies. Chairman Genachowski committed the Commission to move expeditiously to complete the proceeding.
FCC Effort to Increase Wi-Fi Speeds and Alleviate Wi-Fi Congestion FCC's Genachowski: Gov't will open up radio spectrum to improve Wi-Fi (ars technica) CES: FCC Chair Promises to Boost Wi-Fi (B&C)