October 2012

Now it gets interesting: How to build a social contract for broadband

[Commentary] For a century, our country has benefited from a communications social contract in telephone, broadcast, and multi-channel video in which through law, regulation, and franchise agreements, providers obtain public benefits in exchange for providing certain, limited public obligations. But how will we write the terms of the social contract between communities and communications providers in building the next infrastructure of world-class IP communications for the 21st century?

The question regarding how to build it has become increasingly important as Internet communications begin to supplant 20th Century methods of delivering voice and video, but it remains unanswered. When we developed the National Broadband Plan, we expressed our concern that the current social contracts governing communications would not create a critical mass of communities with world-leading bandwidth, without which the United States might lose its international leadership in developing the next generation of broadband applications. The best outcome for the country would be if Time-Warner, AT&T and others seized this moment to offer to deploy the kind of network Google deployed in other communities if those communities would provide the kind of inducements Kansas City offered. If they did so, they would find willing partners. And those partnerships would spark a race to the top that would catalyze new investments, new economic growth, and a new generation of American leadership in delivering the benefits of broadband.

[Levin became a communications & society fellow with the Aspen Institute after serving as Executive Director of the National Broadband Planning effort. He is currently Executive Director of Gig.U, a project within the Institute that seeks to accelerate the deployment of next generation networks and services by using university communities as test-beds.]

Google has $8 billion in mobile revenue: is that good or bad?

Google disclosed that it’s on pace to pull in an impressive $8 billion from the mobile environment — but its refusal to provide details about the nature of that revenue means it’s still not possible to tell whether the company can thrive without desktop computers.

Upgrading the White House Homepage

We’ve upgraded the White House homepage. What makes it better? Most visitors aren't just stopping by; they're looking for specific information about the President and his policies. With these changes, we're applying the lessons we’ve learned from our earlier updates and making sure that the homepage is a gateway to our most timely and important content. It puts tools to search the site front and center and makes the page easier to navigate. We've also made it easier to catch live events broadcast on WhiteHouse.gov/live and highlighted the many White House social media accounts.

Another Week, Another Wireless Deal

[Commentary] It is not every week that we focus on consolidation of ownership in the wireless industry. OK, you are right, frequent reader, it is almost every week. On October 15, Sprint Nextel announced that it had agreed to sell 70 percent of itself to SoftBank of Japan for $20.1 billion. SoftBank, a big Japanese telecommunications company, said it would pay $8 billion to buy newly issued Sprint stock worth about $5.25 a share. It will then pay $12.1 billion to buy existing stock from other investors at $7.30 a share, a premium to current levels. The parties hope to close the deal – after gaining approval from regulators and Sprint shareholders – in the middle of 2013. For Sprint, the deal provides some much-needed cash as it tries to compete with Verizon Wireless, which controls 32 percent of the market, and AT&T Mobility, which has a 30 percent market share. Sprint is the third-largest carrier with a 16 percent share.

How Verizon’s Privacy Policy Affects You

In 2011, we announced a number of new programs that will help companies better understand mobile consumers in a more detailed and efficient way. One of these programs provides insights into audiences on the move by connecting aggregated demographic, mobile usage, and location data into useful business and marketing reports.

To be clear about this, we are aggregating customer data that has already been de-identified, which means none of it is personally identifiable information. By packaging together information about demographics (age ranges, gender, etc.) and interests (such as “pet lovers” or “tennis enthusiasts”) with information about the types of people at a venue or who might pass a specific place, we improve advertisers’ ability to determine what ads to place on billboards or sporting events. This type of information can also be used by web publishers to help provide content that is more appealing to consumers.

During debates voters turn to mobile for instant answers

Google wanted to understand how viewers use their smartphones and tablets as ‘second screens’ to research and fact-check topics during and after the debate. So the company took a look at debate-related search queries coming from mobile devices and found that:

  • Mobile has become a central component of this year’s election: 2,000% increase in debate-related searches on mobile in 2012 vs. 2008
  • Mobile helps voters find spur-of-the-moment information: 3,300% increase in searches related to Libya immediately after the question about presidential accountability for the Benghazi attack
  • Mobile is used simultaneously with television: 47% of Tuesday’s elections-related mobile searches occurred during and immediately after the debate

Social Media and Political Engagement

The use of social media is becoming a feature of political and civic engagement for many Americans. Some 60% of American adults use either social networking sites like Facebook or Twitter and a new survey by the Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project finds that 66% of those social media users—or 39% of all American adults—have done at least one of eight civic or political activities with social media.

Overall, there are mixed partisan and ideological patterns among social media users when it comes to using social media like social networking sites and Twitter. The social media users who talk about politics on a regular basis are the most likely to use social media for civic or political purposes. And the social media users who have firmer party and ideological ties—liberal Democrats and conservative Republicans—are, at times, more likely than moderates in both parties to use social media for these purposes. Some of these activities are more likely to be pursued by younger social media users compared with the social media users who are ages 50 or older. Younger users are more likely to post their own thoughts about issues, post links to political material, encourage others to take political action, belong to a political group on a social networking site, follow elected officials on social media, and like or promote political material others have posted.

Awash in ads in Roanoke

What will stations do with campaign largesse? How will they invest in their community, and how will they bolster news coverage? And considering where that money came from, how much time, effort, and money are they investing now in covering the elections and in checking out the ads themselves?

Those concerns are especially apropos in the Roanoke-Lynchburg market, located in southwest Virginia. Though it’s only the 68th-largest broadcast area in the nation, the market has at times ranked at the top of the list in terms of the volume of political advertising on its airwaves. And the center of the TV ad war in Roanoke is the market leader, WDBJ (Channel 7). Jeff Marks, the general manager of WDBJ, said the “cushion” provided by campaign ads helped support equipment upgrades, plus the reopening of a local bureau and other staff additions. He pointed to added staff for the digital newsroom; an increase to six-figure levels in the station’s charitable donations to arts and human services groups; a boost in employee benefits; and investments in equipment, such as $65,000 for a touch screen device that will allow anchors to manipulate images.

San Diego developer eyes purchase of Tribune

San Diego Union-Tribune LLC newspaper owner and real estate developer Doug Manchester told a local TV news station that he would consider buying the Tribune Company. "We certainly are going to look at it," Manchester told KPBS in an interview. "We are looking at it, yes. I would like to, yes." Manchester, who gained prominence in Southern California for his hotel and resort developments, bought the Union-Tribune last November reportedly for about $100 million. He has since also launched a television channel and bought another local newspaper, the North County Times. In the past, he also ran and sold a chain of radio stations.

French media to Google: pay us for news searches

The French seem to have an appetite for regulating the Internet, and for going after Google in particular. A new proposed law would force Google to make payments when French media show up in news searches; but Google has responded, in a letter to French ministers, that it "cannot accept" such a solution and would simply remove French media sites from its searches. The result? "Less information would be available online," writes Google.