Benton RSS Feed

Coverage Type 

EU PLANS TO LAUNCH TELECOM INQUIRY
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Joon Knapen joon.knapen@dowjones.com]
Neelie Kroes, the European Commission's antitrust regulator, said she will open an investigation into possible anticompetitive behavior in the European telecommunications industry starting next year, following similar inquiries into European energy and financial-services markets. "We can't do it all at once," she said. "Two inquiries are nearly finished....The next one will be telecommunications." Smaller telecom companies in Europe argue that former state monopolies, such as Deutsche Telekom AG and France Télécom SA, use networks built with government support to offer services and then restrict access to competitors. Commissioner Kroes shares regulatory authority over the telecom sector with Viviane Reding, EU media commissioner. In June Ms. Reding called for German regulators to impose price controls on Deutsche Telekom for fixed-line services it offers.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB115218285878499434.html?mod=todays_us_ma...
(requires subscription)


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB115218285878499434.html?mod=todays_us_marketplac…
Coverage Type 

CINGULAR SUED BY USERS IT INHERITED
[SOURCE: Los Angeles Times, AUTHOR: James S. Granelli]
Former AT&T Wireless customers accused Cingular Wireless in a lawsuit Thursday of misleading them about the benefits of combining the two companies and overcharging them for upgrading service. Despite a "massive marketing campaign" that promised the transition to Cingular's system would be seamless, the customers alleged that Cingular had been dismantling the AT&T network since the two united 21 months ago. Cingular forces AT&T customers to pay $18 for a new handset chip and $18 to move to Cingular's network — or $175 to terminate service early, according to the lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Seattle. The complaint, which seeks an award of more than $5 million plus punitive damages, was filed on behalf of seven plaintiffs, including five from California.
http://www.latimes.com/business/printedition/la-fi-cingular7jul07,1,2142...
(requires registration)


Cingular Sued by Users It Inherited

Benton's Communications-related Headlines For Friday July 7, 2006

To view Benton's Headlines feed in your RSS=20
Aggregator, paste=20
http://www.benton.org/index.php?q=3Dtaxonomy/term/6/all/feed into your read=
er.
For upcoming media policy events, see http://www.benton.org

FCC AGENDA
FCC July 13 Open Meeting Agenda
FCC Set to Vote on Adelphia July 13
Networks Prepare To Challenge Remand
FCC, Senate Committee At Odds Over States' VoIP Regulation

PUBLIC BROADCASTING
Chicago's jazz radio gets the blues, bows to iPod
PBS Kids Go! a No Go

GOVERNMENT & COMMUNICATIONS
The Government's Current War with the Free Press
Russia's Signal to Stations Is Clear: Cut U.S. Radio

MEDIA OWNERSHIP
XM and Sirius: Meant to Be Together?
5 Editors, Columnist Quit in Santa Barbara

QUICKLY -- Minorities Make Gains in TV News; New=20
Radios Letting DC Metro Police Down; EU Plans to=20
Launch Telecom Inquiry; Cingular Sued by Users It=20
Inherited; U.S. Homes With =91Connected Entertainment Network=92 to Jump

FCC AGENDA

FCC JULY 13 MEETING AGENDA
[SOURCE: Federal Communications Commission]
The Federal Communications Commission will hold=20
an Open Meeting on Thursday, July 13, 2006,=20
starting at 9:30 a.m. in Room TW-C305, at 445=20
12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. The=20
Commission will consider: 1) rules governing=20
medical devices that rely on radiocommunications,=20
2) fining LocateCell.com, a databroker, for=20
repeated failure to respond to FCC directives to=20
provide subpoenaed information in connection with=20
the Commission's privacy investigation, 3)=20
approving the Adelphia-Time Warner-Comcast merger=20
(see story below), 4) rules for digital audio=20
broadcasting, and 5) the Interstate TRS Fund.=20
Bring your own popcorn or visit=20
www.fcc.gov/realaudio if you prefer to watch in your pajamas.
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266285A1.doc

FCC SET TO VOTE ON ADELPHIA JULY 13
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: Ted Hearn]
The Federal Communications Commission announced=20
Thursday night that it plans to vote at its July=20
13 public meeting to approve the $16.9 billion=20
acquisition of Adelphia Communications by Time=20
Warner and Comcast, ending a review that has=20
lingered at the agency for nearly 400 days. The=20
approval is expected to come with several=20
conditions related to sports programming, but the=20
agency is not planning to impose Internet=20
network-neutrality mandates on either Comcast or=20
Time Warner, according to an FCC official. Under=20
a merger proposal supported by FCC Chairman Kevin=20
Martin, Comcast and Time Warner would be barred=20
from charging noncompetitive rates in an effort=20
to effectively withhold affiliated regional=20
sports networks from competing distributors, such=20
as EchoStar Communications and DirecTV, an FCC official said.
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6349995.html?display=3DBreaking+News
* FCC To Weigh In on Adelphia Breakup
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6350118.html?display=3DBreaki...
News

NETWORKS PREPARE TO CHALLENGE REMAND
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
The FCC has asked a New York court to let it take=20
another crack at four indecency findings it=20
levied against "fleeting profanities," issued as=20
part of its omnibus March indecency orders. The=20
affiliates and the networks together challenged=20
those four findings in court. ABC alone among the=20
networks has rejoined the National Association of=20
Broadcasters, which the vast majority of=20
affiliates also belong to. While the ABC, CBS,=20
and NBC affiliate groups support the FCC move,=20
saying they want the chance to defend their=20
broadcasts, the networks want the court case to=20
proceed without delay, arguing the FCC has had=20
ample time to mull the issue in the two years=20
since ruling, in the case of a Bono adjectival=20
f-word on NBC's Golden Globes, that fleeting profanities could be indecent.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6350081?display=3DBreaking+News

FCC, SENATE COMMITTEE AT ODDS OVER STATES' VOIP REGULATION
[SOURCE: Technology Daily, AUTHOR: Drew Clark]
If the Communications, Consumer's Choice, and=20
Broadband Deployment Act of 2006 (S.2686), passed=20
late last month by the Senate Commerce Committee,=20
becomes law, Internet telephone companies will be=20
exempt from certain state economic regulations.=20
But until then, the FCC ruled last week, states=20
may conditionally regulate Internet telephony.=20
The back-and-forth between the agency and the=20
Senate panel occurred as the committee was=20
approving S. 2686, its version of=20
telecommunications overhaul legislation. An=20
amendment pre-empting state regulation of=20
voice-over-Internet protocol, offered by Sen.=20
John Sununu (R-NH) was approved 14-8 on June 22=20
-- at the start of the markup. At the same time,=20
the FCC was detailing its decision to apply the=20
universal service fund to VoIP providers. Such=20
companies must pay a fee into the USF based on=20
64.9 percent of their revenue -- or be subject to=20
regulation by state public utility commissions.=20
However, uncertainty about the regulation of VoIP=20
is likely to continue: Some members of the Senate=20
committee sought an amendment to S. 2686 that=20
would have granted VoIP providers the ability to=20
obtain a waiver for up to four years from an FCC=20
requirement that they implement E-911, or=20
enhanced location-based 911 service. That=20
amendment ultimately was not offered in=20
committee, as two of the measure's chief patrons=20
-- Sens Sununu and Bill Nelson (D-FL) -- withdrew=20
it to allow further discussion with Sen. John=20
(Jay) Rockefeller (D-WV) who opposes any=20
extension of time for VoIP providers to comply with the existing FCC mandat=
e.
http://www.njtelecomupdate.com/lenya/telco/live/tb-CYKN1152212935769.html

PUBLIC BROADCASTING

CHICAGO'S JAZZ RADIO GETS THE BLUES, BOWS TO iPOD
[SOURCE: Reuters, AUTHOR: Deborah Cohen]
WBEZ, Chicago's National Public Radio (NPR)=20
member station and among the oldest public radio=20
outlets in the United States, has decided to=20
scrap scheduled music programming -- the bulk of=20
which was nightly jazz -- and move to a 24-hour=20
news and public affairs format. The change --=20
which has sparked a backlash from loyal fans --=20
speaks volumes about the worries facing=20
independent radio stations. Downloadable music=20
and streaming Webcasts are competing for their=20
music listeners, and local news, threatened by=20
consolidation in the commercial media, is taking=20
on greater importance. In addition, WBEZ and many=20
other public radio stations say their programming=20
has not kept pace with a changing U.S.=20
population. "Local news has simply been abandoned=20
by the commercial broadcasters and sometimes even=20
the commercial newspapers," Ken Stern, executive=20
vice president of Washington-based National=20
Public Radio, said. "What you see as a trend is=20
stations like WBEZ investing heavily in local=20
news and information," Stern added. WBEZ and=20
NPR's other so-called member stations raise their=20
own operating funds -- much of them from=20
individual listeners -- and pay providers such as=20
NPR for syndicated shows such as the daily news=20
program "All Things Considered." Around the=20
United States, changes similar to WBEZ's are=20
taking place. Connecticut Public Radio's WNPR-FM=20
dropped most of its classical programming in=20
favor of news and information early in June.=20
WETA, another public FM station in Washington,=20
D.C., made the switch to all-talk more than a=20
year ago. Stations in New York, Boston and=20
elsewhere have made similar moves. Chicago Public=20
Radio's new strategy also calls for reaching a=20
more diverse audience -- putting mics in the=20
hands of listeners, for instance, to let them=20
produce their own shows, and adding satellite=20
bureaus in the inner city. The station aims to go=20
after untapped Hispanic, black and youth listeners, among others.
http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=3DindustryNews&storyID=
=3D2006-07-06T130937Z_01_N30272704_RTRIDST_0_INDUSTRY-RADIO-DC.XML
* Jazz Out, News In on Chicago NPR Station
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/07/arts/07arts.html?_r=3D1&oref=3Dslogin

PBS KIDS GO! A NO GO
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
Citing financial constraints, PBS has pulled the=20
plug on its much balyhooed October launch of a=20
digital kids channel, PBS Kids Go!, saying it is=20
rethinking the strategy of a linear channel=20
targeted to elementary school kids. "An=20
insufficient number of stations are in a position=20
to financially sustain the service," PBS said in=20
a brief statement. Other options for expansion=20
into the elementary school area in the near=20
future--the next several months--could be a VOD=20
service or other new media delivery, though it=20
also said a channel is not off the table at some future date.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6350111?display=3DBreaking+News

GOVERNMENT & COMMUNICATIONS

THE GOVERNMENT'S CURRENT WAR WITH THE FREE PRESS
[SOURCE: The Christian Science Monitor, AUTHOR: Daniel Schorr, NPR]
[Commentary] The Bush Administration has=20
discovered what governments have discovered=20
before, that an undercurrent of hostility toward=20
the news media runs through the country and that=20
there could be political advantage in campaigning=20
against the press in general. You would not=20
expect that I, as a journalist, would exhibit=20
total neutrality in such a war. And so let me=20
quote Justice Potter Stewart in his opinion in=20
the Pentagon Papers case in 1971: "In the absence=20
of governmental checks and balances present in=20
other areas of our national life, the only=20
effective restraint upon executive policy and=20
power in the area of national defense and=20
international affairs may lie in an enlightened=20
citizenry.... Without an informed and free press,=20
there cannot be an enlightened people." That=20
remains true, even when Mr. Bush proclaims a state of war with the terroris=
ts.
http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0707/p09s01-cods.html
* Bush vs. New York Times
[Commentary] Attacks on the New York Times aren't=20
about national security, they're about muting criticism.
http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/38251/

RUSSIA'S SIGNAL TO STATIONS IS CLEAR: CUT US RADIO
[SOURCE: Washington Post, AUTHOR: Peter Finn]
Russian regulators have forced more than 60 radio=20
stations to stop broadcasting news reports=20
produced by Voice of America and Radio Free=20
Europe/Radio Liberty, according to radio managers=20
and Russian officials. The regulators cited=20
license violations and unauthorized changes in=20
programming format. But senior executives at the=20
U.S.-government-funded broadcast services and at=20
the stations blame the Kremlin for the crackdown,=20
which has knocked the reports off stations from=20
St. Petersburg in western Russia to Vladivostok=20
in the Far East. The two services' straight-up=20
reporting, often by journalists on the ground in=20
Russian communities, has at times challenged the=20
political establishment here. In a country where=20
the news media increasingly avoid controversial=20
subjects, millions of Russians had made the=20
broadcasts a listening staple. U.S. diplomats,=20
managers at the two news services and their board=20
of governors have held repeated discussions with=20
Russian officials in recent months seeking a=20
compromise, to no avail. "We've tried to be=20
collegial, tried to work within the system, but=20
this is a most unfortunate development," said=20
Kenneth Y. Tomlinson, chairman of the U.S.=20
Broadcasting Board of Governors, which oversees both services.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/06/AR200607...
1760.html
(requires registration)

MEDIA OWNERSHIP

XM AND SIRIUS: MEANT TO BE TOGETHER?
[SOURCE: AdAge, AUTHOR: Abbey Klaassen]
The rumors of a satellite-radio merger are=20
swirling again as last week Mel Karmazin told=20
investors and venture capitalists at The Deal's=20
Convergence 2.0 conference that "we'd love to=20
buy" XM, before cautioning that price and=20
regulatory issues would be impeding factors. His=20
candidness about his desire to be the only player=20
in the space has fueled speculation for the past=20
year and a half. But lately, as the=20
satellite-radio industry, like the rest of the=20
media world, faces more competition than it may=20
ever have anticipated -- from sophisticated=20
wireless devices, Wi-Fi and=20
premium-online-content offerings -- media=20
veterans are questioning whether there will be a=20
single satellite-radio company five years from now.
http://adage.com/article?article_id=3D110293
See also:
* Sirius's Footsteps Beat Louder As It Cuts XM Subscriber Lead
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB115219181763299502.html?mod=3Dtodays_us_...
ketplace
(requires subscription)
* Sirius Beats XM Satellite in Adding Subscribers
http://www.latimes.com/business/printedition/la-fi-sirius7jul07,1,463624...
tory?coll=3Dla-headlines-pe-business

5 EDITORS, COLUMNIST QUIT IN SANTA BARBARA
[SOURCE: Los Angeles Times, AUTHOR: James Rainey]
Five top editors and a veteran columnist have=20
resigned from the Santa Barbara News-Press,=20
saying Thursday that the newspaper's billionaire=20
owner had been meddling improperly in the=20
editorial content of the 151-year-old=20
publication. Editor Jerry Roberts was escorted=20
from the newspaper's headquarters before noon as=20
several staff members cried and others hurled=20
obscenities at the new publisher, Travis K.=20
Armstrong, the latest in a series of people to=20
run the paper under controversial owner Wendy=20
McCaw. Six years ago, the newspaper's journalists=20
reacted with relief, even euphoria, when McCaw=20
purchased the paper from the New York Times Co.=20
They welcomed the ascension of a local owner =97=20
known for her environmentalism and philanthropy=20
-- over an investor-owned chain that had made=20
sharp cost-cutting and layoffs routine. But=20
Thursday, reporters and editors described an=20
"awful" and "surreal" scene -- what Santa=20
Barbara's alternative paper called a=20
"self-inflicted blood bath." Several News-Press=20
employees and the city's leader said McCaw's=20
tenure should give pause to the many journalists=20
across the country who had been pining for private ownership of their paper=
s.
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/front/la-na-newspress7jul07,1,4...
254.story?coll=3Dla-headlines-frontpage
(requires registration)
* Mass Exit at Santa Barbara Paper Causes Wild Scene
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_con...
t_id=3D1002801214

QUICKLY

MINORITIES MAKE GAINS IN TV NEWS
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
Local TV news employed more minorities than ever=20
in 2005, according to a new study from Ball State=20
University/Radio-Television News Directors=20
Association study, but that 4.4% boost over 2004=20
was leveled by a 4.4% drop in radio. Minorities=20
made up 22.2% of local TV news staffs, up from=20
21.2% in 2004. Even with Hispanic stations=20
factored out, the increase was 20.4%, which is=20
also up from last year. Minorities in TV station=20
news top management also increased, with 13.2% of=20
news directors minorities vs. 12% the year=20
before. The story was different for radio=20
however, with the minority workforce down from 7.9% in 2004 to 6.4% in 2005.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6350057?display=3DBreaking+News
* Download complete survey results at=20
http://www.rtnda.org/research/2006diversity.pdf
* Press Release: http://www.rtnda.org/news/2006/070606.shtml

NEW RADIOS LETTING DC METRO POLICE DOWN
[SOURCE: Washington Post, AUTHOR: Lena H. Sun]
Persistent problems with a $60 million radio=20
system that Metro bought six years ago have=20
forced transit police to rely on their old radios=20
underground, raising questions about the transit=20
authority's ability to respond to emergencies at=20
a time of heightened concern nationwide about the=20
safety of public transportation. The new radios=20
offer extra security and communications features=20
that are valuable to officers responding to a=20
crime, a terrorist attack or another emergency,=20
such as a tunnel fire or collision, that would=20
require an evacuation. But there are some Metro=20
stations and tunnels where officers cannot be=20
heard reliably on the new radios. Officials with=20
Motorola Inc., which designed and installed the=20
new system, say they do not know when it will become fully operational.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/06/AR200607...
1715.html
(requires registration)

EU PLANS TO LAUNCH TELECOM INQUIRY
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Joon Knapen joon.knapen( at )dowjones.com]
Neelie Kroes, the European Commission's antitrust=20
regulator, said she will open an investigation=20
into possible anticompetitive behavior in the=20
European telecommunications industry starting=20
next year, following similar inquiries into=20
European energy and financial-services markets.=20
"We can't do it all at once," she said. "Two=20
inquiries are nearly finished....The next one=20
will be telecommunications." Smaller telecom=20
companies in Europe argue that former state=20
monopolies, such as Deutsche Telekom AG and=20
France T=E9l=E9com SA, use networks built with=20
government support to offer services and then=20
restrict access to competitors. Commissioner=20
Kroes shares regulatory authority over the=20
telecom sector with Viviane Reding, EU media=20
commissioner. In June Ms. Reding called for=20
German regulators to impose price controls on=20
Deutsche Telekom for fixed-line services it offers.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB115218285878499434.html?mod=3Dtodays_us_...
ketplace
(requires subscription)

CINGULAR SUED BY USERS IT INHERITED
[SOURCE: Los Angeles Times, AUTHOR: James S. Granelli]
Former AT&T Wireless customers accused Cingular=20
Wireless in a lawsuit Thursday of misleading them=20
about the benefits of combining the two companies=20
and overcharging them for upgrading service.=20
Despite a "massive marketing campaign" that=20
promised the transition to Cingular's system=20
would be seamless, the customers alleged that=20
Cingular had been dismantling the AT&T network=20
since the two united 21 months ago. Cingular=20
forces AT&T customers to pay $18 for a new=20
handset chip and $18 to move to Cingular's=20
network =97 or $175 to terminate service early,=20
according to the lawsuit filed in U.S. District=20
Court in Seattle. The complaint, which seeks an=20
award of more than $5 million plus punitive=20
damages, was filed on behalf of seven plaintiffs,=20
including five from California.
http://www.latimes.com/business/printedition/la-fi-cingular7jul07,1,2142...
.story?coll=3Dla-headlines-pe-business
(requires registration)

US HOMES WITH 'CONNECTED ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK' TO JUMP
[SOURCE: Telecommunications Online, AUTHOR: Georgia Mullen]
The number of U.S. households with a connected=20
entertainment network is rising, and is expected=20
to reach 30 million by 2010, says a new report from Parks Associates.
http://telecommagazine.com/newsglobe/article.asp?HH_ID=3DAR_2212
* Study: Home networking to hit home
http://news.com.com/Study+Home+networking+to+hit+home/2100-1033_3-609137...
tml?tag=3Dnefd.top
--------------------------------------------------------------
...and we're outta here. Have a great weekend.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Communications-related Headlines is a free online=20
news summary service provided by the Benton=20
Foundation (www.benton.org). Posted Monday=20
through Friday, this service provides updates on=20
important industry developments, policy issues,=20
and other related news events. While the=20
summaries are factually accurate, their often=20
informal tone does not always represent the tone=20
of the original articles. Headlines are compiled=20
by Kevin Taglang headlines( at )benton.org -- we welcome your comments.
--------------------------------------------------------------

Coverage Type 

Senator Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) gives an amazing primer on how the Internet works:

There's one company now you can sign up and you can get a movie delivered to your house daily by delivery service. Okay. And currently it comes to your house, it gets put in the mail box when you get home and you change your order but you pay for that, right.

But this service is now going to go through the Internet* and what you do is you just go to a place on the Internet and you order your movie and guess what you can order ten of them delivered to you and the delivery charge is free.

Ten of them streaming across that Internet and what happens to your own personal Internet?

I just the other day got, an Internet was sent by my staff at 10 o'clock in the morning on Friday and I just got it yesterday. Why?

Because it got tangled up with all these things going on the Internet commercially.

So you want to talk about the consumer? Let's talk about you and me. We use this Internet to communicate and we aren't using it for commercial purposes.

We aren't earning anything by going on that Internet. Now I'm not saying you have to or you want to discriminate against those people [¿]

The regulatory approach is wrong. Your approach is regulatory in the sense that it says "No one can charge anyone for massively invading this world of the Internet". No, I'm not finished. I want people to understand my position, I'm not going to take a lot of time. [¿]

They want to deliver vast amounts of information over the Internet. And again, the Internet is not something you just dump something on. It's not a truck.

It's a series of tubes.

And if you don't understand those tubes can be filled and if they are filled, when you put your message in, it gets in line and its going to be delayed by anyone that puts into that tube enormous amounts of material, enormous amounts of material.

Now we have a separate Department of Defense Internet now, did you know that?

Do you know why?

Because they have to have theirs delivered immediately. They can't afford getting delayed by other people.

Now I think these people are arguing whether they should be able to dump all that stuff on the Internet ought to consider if they should develop a system themselves.

Maybe there is a place for a commercial net but it's not using what consumers use every day.

It's not using the messaging service that is essential to small businesses, to our operation of families.

The whole concept is that we should not go into this until someone shows that there is something that has been done that really is a violation of net neutrality that hits you and me.

Hear it


http://blog.wired.com/27BStroke6/?entry_id=1512499
Source 
Author 
Coverage Type 

The Communications, Consumer's Choice, and Broadband Deployment Act of 2006, passed by the Senate Commerce Committee last week, has an uncertain future mainly because of the limited working days left before Congress faces the November election. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN) is considering whether to bring the legislation to the floor this fall. But he has first he has ordered Commerce Committee Chairman Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) to confirm that 60 senators would support an effort to overcome a potential filibuster. However, even if Sen Stevens succeeds, Sen Frist is likely to weigh the political benefits against a potential policy fight before scheduling a vote. "The clock will be a major factor regardless of whether 60 votes can be found," a Frist aide said Friday, adding that the majority leader "will take it one step at a time." Sen Frist will study the legislative calendar "and decide if this giant policy and floor fight is appropriate for the 109th Congress or for the 110th." Sen Stevens may delete parts of the bill to win votes. But he drew a line in the sand on video-franchising changes and provisions to broaden the universal service fund, which provides communications services to rural and low-income areas.
http://www.njtelecomupdate.com/lenya/telco/live/tb-GQAW1152125011916.html
* Tie Vote On 'Net Neutrality' Poses Obstacle In Senate
Advocates of telecom legislation favored by the Bell telecommunications firms acknowledged that the tie vote on a network neutrality amendment during this week's Senate Commerce Committee debate means they face an uphill battle to win congressional passage of their measure this year. The strongly partisan vote on network neutrality -- all 10 Democrats on the Commerce Committee voted with Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) -- underscores the difficulty that Sen Stevens could have in lining up the supermajority of 60 votes necessary in the Senate to limit debate and therefore override any attempt to delay the vote. In June, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) told a conference for a Web log community in Las Vegas that he strongly supports net neutrality and would stop a bill from going to the floor without it.
http://www.njtelecomupdate.com/lenya/telco/live/tb-ZVEJ1152125524722.html
* Stevens Mark Up -- Results
Harold Feld looks at what's in and what's out of the Senate telecom bill.
http://www.wetmachine.com/totsf/item/547
* Sen Stevens shows his Internet savvy
http://blog.wired.com/27BStroke6/?entry_id=1512499


Limited Time, Election Year Politics May Derail Senate Telecom Measure
Coverage Type 

LOCAL GOVERNMENTS WANT SENATE BILL CHANGED
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: Ted Hearn]
Top local government organizations want changes to a Senate telecommunications bill or they plan to oppose the measure if it ever reaches the Senate floor. In a letter Monday, local officials outlined their objections to the bill (S. 2686, H.R. 5252), which passed the Senate Commerce Committee last Wednesday in a 15-7 vote that left its main backer, Sen. Ted Stevens (R-Alaska), wondering whether he has sufficient support -- 60 votes -- to get the full Senate to debate the bill. Five local organizations -- including the U.S. Conference of Mayors and the National Association of Counties -- said the fact that the bill excluded a requirement that phone companies need to extend their video facilities to all potential subscribers in a franchise area was a “grave concern.” They added that tax relief for wireless-phone companies and a permanent ban on taxation of Internet access were “unacceptable.” Lastly, they objected to an amendment sponsored by Sen. John Ensign (R-NV) that would exempt from cable franchising a hybrid video service that combined satellite TV and terrestrial broadband service. AT&T’s Homezone project -- which offers satellite TV with movies and video downloaded from the Internet -- would be covered by the exemption.
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6349902.html?display=Breaking+News


http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6349902.html?display=Breaking%20News
Coverage Type 

FCC ASKS FOR ANOTHER CRACK AT PROFANITY
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
The FCC -- joined by ABC, NBC and CBS affiliate associations -- has asked a New York Court to delay its scheduled hearing of a challenge to four indecency findings against fleeting expletives that were part of the FCC’s March indecency findings. The four had no fine attached and the FCC’s promise it would not hold them against stations at renewal time, thus the FCC considered its work done. The networks, their affiliate associations, and Hearst-Argyle TV took those decisions directly to court, since the FCC had bypassed the normal appeals process in what it said was an effort to provide guidance without adverse consequences. The incidents in question occurred during a 2004 airing of CBS’ The Early Show, Fox’s 2002 and 2003 broadcast of The Billboard Music Awards and a 2003 episode of ABC’s NYPD Blue. NBC did not have a program involved but intervened nonetheless given the still-unresolved Bono "f-word" decision (an NBC Golden Globes telecast) that signalled the beginning of the tougher profanity policy. The FCC’s initial decision was that a fleeting, adjectival f-word was not indecent, but that was later reversed by the commissioners after Congress pushed the FCC to reexamine the case. Now, the FCC has asked the court to remand the four March profanity decisions back to it so that it can look at them again and hear the arguments that the broadcasters did not get to make. The FCC promises to make its new ruling on them within 60 days and wants the September court arguments delayed.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6349901.html

* FCC Shifts Gears on Indecency
http://www.tvweek.com/news.cms?newsId=10312

* FCC Seeks a Review of Indecency
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/06/business/media/06fcc.html


FCC Asks For Another Crack at Profanity
Coverage Type 

MARYLAND COUNTY 'STUNNED' BY VERIZON SUIT
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
The Montgomery County (Maryland) Council has fired back at Verizon in the wake of the telco's lawsuit charging the county with "unreasonable and illegal" demands in ongoing franchise contract negotiations. Council VP Marilyn Praisner said in a statement: “I am stunned to have these false accusations by Verizon leveled against Montgomery County. Repeatedly I have urged Verizon to submit a cable franchise and yet they have refused while posturing publicly before the Management and Fiscal Policy (MFP) Committee that they were committed to working with us....Verizon just doesn't want to play by the same rules as everyone else. The County has been more than patient with Verizon. We facilitated the deployment of their fiber optic technology even though it created construction problems in our neighborhoods and caused disruption of service for [incumbent cable operator] Comcast and others. This lawsuit is not really about Montgomery County. It is Verizon’s attempt to influence federal legislation. It is about eradicating the role of local government, the government closest to the people, and our efforts to protect consumers and our local rights-of-way.”
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6349826.html?display=Breaking...


http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6349826.html?display=Breaking%20News
Coverage Type 

LET GLOBAL ONLINE FREEDOM RING?
[SOURCE: C-Net|News.com, AUTHOR: Eric J. Sinrod]
[Commentary] A commentary on the Global Online Freedom Act of 2006 (HR 4780), a bill "to promote freedom of expression on the Internet, to protect United States business from coercion to participate in repression by authoritarian foreign governments, and for other purposes." The bill provides the following statement of policy for the United States to: "Promote the ability of all to access and contribute information, ideas and knowledge via the Internet, and to advance the right to receive and impart information and ideas through any media regardless of frontiers as a fundamental component of United States foreign policy"; "Use all instruments of United States influence, including diplomacy, trade policy and export control, to support, promote and strengthen principles, practices and values that promote the free flow of information"; and "Prohibit any United States business from cooperating with officials of Internet-restricting countries in effecting political censorship of online content." The bill proposes a process whereby the president would designate certain foreign countries as "Internet-restricting" regions that are "directly or indirectly responsible for a systematic pattern of substantial restrictions on Internet freedom during the preceding one-year period." The bill then goes on to provide restrictions on United States businesses with respect to Internet-restricting countries. For example, under certain circumstances, U.S. businesses that host Internet search engines or maintain Internet content hosting services could not locate computer hardware in Internet-restricting countries. Is it realistic to think that Internet-restricting countries will change their restricting policies because U.S. businesses might be penalized because of the restrictions put in place in those countries? The restrictions are established at the government level, and are not directed or controlled by the U.S. businesses. There might be a better way to seek to achieve global online freedom, notwithstanding the lofty goals of H.R. 4780, Sinrod concludes.
http://news.com.com/Let+global+online+freedom+ring/2010-1028_3-6090725.h...


Let global online freedom ring?
Coverage Type 

PRESS DISCLOSURES HELP MORE THAN HURT
[SOURCE: The Christian Science Monitor, AUTHOR: Pat M. Holt, former chief of staff of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee]
[Commentary] Government officials have been highly critical of the media's publication of details about US intelligence activities in the war on terror. The two most recent examples are extensive wiretaps by the National Security Agency and US access to international financial transactions. President Bush called the disclosures "disgraceful." Rep. Peter King (R-NY) said The New York Times should be prosecuted for treason rather than be awarded a Pulitzer prize for the NSA story. Rep. J.D. Hayworth (R-AZ) is asking that the Times's Congressional press credentials be suspended. All administrations tend to overclassify information, in terms of volume of documents and the level of classification. This proliferation increases the likelihood of leaks. Not many of these that become public can be demonstrated to harm national security. The stories that upset presidents most are those that expose the government doing something it should not be doing, and they are the ones that most need to be published.
http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0706/p08s02-coop.html


Press disclosures help more than hurt