Benton RSS Feed

Benton's Communications-related Headlines For Tuesday July 11, 2006

To view Benton's Headlines feed in your RSS=20
Aggregator, paste=20
http://www.benton.org/index.php?q=3Dtaxonomy/term/6/all/feed into your read=
er.
For upcoming media policy events, see http://www.benton.org

GOVERNMENT & COMMUNICATIONS
White House asks for Dismissal of NSA Wiretap Suit

TELECOM LEGISLATION
Wireless Carriers Score Win In Senate Commerce Bill
Tangled Net

ADVERTISING
TV Ad Market Primed for Pay-by-Pod; Move Would Mark Historic Shift
Nielsen Plans to Track Viewership Of TV Commercials for First Time
Polluting The Blogosphere
As more people play, advertisers devise game plan

BROADCASTING
Six-Figure Fines For Four-Letter Words Worry Broadcasters
LOCAL Television Act: Status of Spending for Fiscal Year 2005

QUICKLY -- Martin's Missteps Put FCC Off Game;=20
House to Vote on Bill to Curb Online Gaming;=20
Internet poker could net US billions in tax;=20
Media Balance; Brand It Like Beckham; Comcast=20
Foundation to Back National Council of La Raza;=20
AT&T to Pay $550,000 to Settle Privacy Cases;=20
Spitzer says AOL customer woes remain an issue;=20
As States Aim to Rein in Content, Videogame Makers Fight Back

GOVERNMENT & COMMUNICATIONS

WHITE HOUSE ASKS FOR DISMISSAL OF NSA WIRETAP SUIT
[SOURCE: Reuters, AUTHOR: Jui Chakravorty]
The Bush administration on Monday asked a federal=20
judge to dismiss a lawsuit challenging the=20
National Security Agency's domestic eavesdropping=20
program, arguing that defending the four-year-old=20
wiretapping program in open court would risk=20
national security. In arguments before U.S.=20
District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor in Detroit, the=20
American Civil Liberties Union on Monday renewed=20
its call for a court order that would force the=20
government to suspend its program of intercepting=20
without a court order the international phone=20
calls and e-mails of U.S. citizens. But the U.S.=20
Justice Department has asked federal judges in=20
Detroit and New York to throw out the landmark=20
challenges to the eavesdropping program. In both=20
cases, the Bush administration has invoked a=20
legal doctrine known as the "state-secrets=20
privilege" that it has used to head off other=20
court action spy programs. "If the court accepts=20
the state-secret argument, we are truly facing a=20
constitutional crisis in this country," Michael=20
Steinberg, legal director for ACLU Michigan, told reporters after the heari=
ng.
http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=3DpoliticsNews&storyID=
=3D2006-07-10T182734Z_01_N10353096_RTRUKOC_0_US-SECURITY-EAVESDROPPING.xml

TELECOM LEGISLATION

WIRELESS CARRIERS SCORE WIN IN SENATE COMMERCE BILL
[SOURCE: Technology Daily 7/7, AUTHOR: Drew Clark]
Wireless carriers unaffiliated with a Bell=20
company scored a win via an amendment to a=20
sweeping telecommunications bill that could curb=20
rates they pay for wholesale access. The=20
amendment, sought by cellular carriers Sprint=20
Nextel, T-Mobile and other Bell competitors,=20
instructs the FCC to take action in revisiting=20
the issue of "special access" to wholesale=20
telecommunications wires. Wireless companies are=20
particularly dependent upon this form of=20
communications to compete the loop between a=20
cellular tower and a central switching station.=20
Sen. John Sununu (R-NH) supported the amendment,=20
which was added to the successful Senate Commerce=20
Committee measure by ranking member Daniel Inouye=20
(D-Hawaii). It essentially was accepted in the=20
fourth of four managers' packages to S. 2686, the=20
omnibus bill sponsored by Chairman Ted Stevens=20
(R-Alaska). The issue did not come up for debate=20
during the three-day vote session on the broader measure.
http://www.njtelecomupdate.com/lenya/telco/live/tb-BJPF1152560666620.html

TANGLED NET
[SOURCE: National Journal 7/8, AUTHOR: Drew Clark]
A long piece on the Net Neutrality debate by one=20
of the best reporters on the beat. Net neutrality=20
is about the rules of the road for the=20
information superhighway -- and whether, some=20
day, traveling in the fast lane will require=20
paying a toll. Because of the convergence of=20
television and telephone service into digital=20
transmissions, the outcome of the battle will=20
affect all aspects of communications.=20
Net-neutrality advocates -- Google, Microsoft,=20
and the other tech companies -- say the telecom=20
companies (the Bells) and the cable industry=20
shouldn't be permitted to control the Internet=20
through discriminatory pricing in which their=20
business partners enjoy a huge competitive=20
advantage by gaining access to the wires into=20
homes and offices. The telecom and cable guys --=20
the neutrality critics -- counter that =93net=20
neutrality=94 is just a fancy way of saying that=20
the government should regulate the Internet. They=20
say, let the free market, not Washington, reign.
Read more excerpts at the URL below.
http://www.drewclark.com/

ADVERTISING

TV AD MARKET PRIMED FOR PAY-FOR-POD; MOVE WOULD MARK HISTORIC SHIFT
[SOURCE: AdAge, AUTHOR: Claire Atkinson]
This year's $9.05 billion upfront may well be the=20
last negotiated on the basis of program ratings=20
as the TV-ad business embarks on one of the most=20
radical shifts in its 65-year history.=20
Broadcasters are preparing to junk the age-old=20
metric of charging on the basis of who watches=20
the programs and begin charging advertisers based=20
on who watches the commercials. Execs at three of=20
the big networks believe next year's upfront will=20
be negotiated with commercial ratings, and Mike=20
Shaw, president-sales and marketing at ABC, which=20
raked in the biggest upfront ad haul this year,=20
thinks it could happen even sooner, in the=20
scatter market, well ahead of next year's=20
marketplace. "Commercial ratings are going to be=20
the new big thing," he said. "It has huge=20
implications for the TV industry, based on return=20
on investment and return on equity."
http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=3D110363
* Shaw: ABC Ready to Sell Now Using Commercial Ratings
http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/news/recent_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=3D100...
2373

NIELSEN PLANS TO TRACK VIEWERSHIP OF TV COMMERCIALS FOR FIRST TIME
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Brian=20
Steinberg brian.steinberg( at )wsj.com and Brooks Barnes]
Nielsen Media Research, the firm that calculates=20
national television ratings, plans to answer one=20
of advertising's most pressing questions: How=20
many people actually watch TV commercials? In=20
November, Nielsen will begin for the first time=20
to provide formal ratings for commercial breaks,=20
a move with far-reaching implications for the=20
fast-changing media world. Both TV networks and=20
advertisers expect the new Nielsen ratings will=20
show that viewership declines noticeably when a=20
program breaks for commercials. A particularly=20
big drop could fuel advertisers' push for changes=20
in how ads are incorporated into shows,=20
reinforcing demands for fewer or shorter ad=20
breaks and lower ad rates. It could also=20
accelerate the flow of advertising dollars out of=20
television to the Internet and new digital media.=20
Any softening of ad prices would be a big blow=20
for the nation's TV networks and their parent=20
companies. Media stocks overall have been=20
depressed in recent years as technology has=20
whipsawed the industry. Many big advertisers have=20
already cut back on traditional TV spots. General=20
Motors Corp., for example, says its spending on=20
30-second prime-time commercials declined by 50%=20
in the five years between 2000 and 2005.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB115258347955103007.html?mod=3Dtodays_us_...
e_one
(requires subscription)

POLLUTING THE BLOGOSHERE
[SOURCE: BusinessWeek, AUTHOR: Jon Fine]
[Commentary] Ted Murphy founded an interactive ad=20
agency called MindComet, also runs a side=20
business that pays bloggers to write nice things=20
about corporate sponsors -- without unduly=20
worrying about whether or not bloggers disclose=20
these arrangements to readers. (A scan of=20
relevant blog searches strongly suggests that,=20
often, they don't.) He is launching=20
PayPerPost.com, which will automate such hookups=20
between advertisers and bloggers and thus codify=20
a new frontier of product placement. Advertisers=20
pay to post details about their "opportunity,"=20
specifying, among other things, how they want=20
bloggers to write about, say, a new shoe, if they=20
want photos to be included, and whether they'll=20
pay only for positive mentions. Bloggers who=20
abide by the rules get paid; heavily trafficked=20
blogs may command premium rates. Those seeking to=20
subvert PayPerPost from within can't: No=20
pornographic or "illicit" content is accepted.=20
Thanks in no small part to bloggers, this is an=20
era of increased media transparency, and many=20
shifty dealings between the business and=20
editorial sides have been exposed. An undisclosed=20
PayPerPost placement on a little-seen blog isn't=20
the most egregious thing out there, but it's far=20
from honest. Media may be more transparent, but=20
the line between authentic editorial and paid=20
placement is still often smeared, and defenders=20
of disclosure can feel, like the proverbial buggy=20
whip company, that they're terribly outmoded.=20
Things being what they are, I should mention that=20
no buggy whip association paid me to say that.
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/06_28/b3992034.htm

AS MORE PEOPLE PLAY, ADVERTISERS DEVISE GAME PLAN
[SOURCE: USAToday, AUTHOR: Theresa Howard]
=93Games are an exploding media channel,=94 says=20
Reuben Hendell, CEO of digital ad agency MRM.=20
Marketers are scrambling to be players in the=20
world of video game advertising. A growing army=20
of game fans and new game advertising options are=20
making games increasingly attractive. Marketers=20
spent about $80 million in 2005 on game=20
advertising -- from product placement in games to=20
sponsoring gaming events =97 according to research=20
firm Parks Associates. By comparison, the value=20
of all media product placement in 2005 was about=20
$3.5 billion, estimates marketing researcher PQ=20
Media. Parks projects game ad spending will top=20
$400 million by 2009. About 75% of U.S. Internet=20
users spend at least an hour a month playing=20
games, according to Parks. About 27% average 30=20
hours a month. And more players are women: They=20
are about 20% of the audience at community gaming=20
site Global Gaming League (GGL), for example, up from 10% last year.
http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/money/20060711/adgames.art.htm

BROADCASTING

SIX-FIGURE FINES FOR FOUR-LETTER WORDS WORRY BROADCASTERS
[SOURCE: Washington Post, AUTHOR: Frank Ahrens]
Last month's tenfold increase in broadcast=20
indecency fines has sent radio and television=20
stations and media giants scurrying to protect=20
themselves, as the cost of uttering a dirty word=20
over the air has turned a minor annoyance into a=20
major business expense. The new law is a boon for=20
companies that make time-delay machines for=20
broadcasters, which are designed to catch=20
offensive language before it hits the airwaves,=20
and a potentially powerful reason for performers,=20
directors and producers to take their talent to=20
cable and satellite outlets, where federal=20
decency standards do not apply. Other=20
repercussions from the escalating crackdown on=20
broadcast indecency: On-air personalities at one=20
radio giant are contractually obligated to pay=20
indecency fines if they say anything that causes=20
their stations to be penalized. Lawyers at=20
another radio company are advising superstar=20
deejays on what material to avoid on air. Public=20
television, still puzzling over a March fine for=20
a Martin Scorsese-produced documentary, is=20
sending periodic legal advice to its member=20
stations. One stand-up comedian took out an=20
indecency-liability policy on himself. Another=20
said he was forced to sign a waiver before he=20
went on the air at a radio station, promising to=20
pay any indecency fine that might result from his=20
appearance. Broadcast companies are taking=20
further measures protect themselves by training=20
their talent and cutting them loose at the first=20
sign of trouble. Radio giants such as Clear=20
Channel Communications have adopted=20
"zero-tolerance" policies for on-air=20
personalities, meaning that they can be fired for=20
offensive language even before an FCC fine is levied.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/10/AR200607...
1245.html
(requires registration)

LOCAL TELEVISION ACT: STATUS OF SPENDING FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005
[SOURCE: Government Accountability Office=20
(GAO-06-858R), AUTHOR: McCoy Williams]
In December 2000, the Congress passed the=20
Launching Our Communities=92 Access to Local=20
Television Act of 2000 (LOCAL TV Act). The act=20
created the Local Television Loan Guarantee=20
Program and established the LOCAL Television Loan=20
Guarantee Board to finance projects to provide=20
access to signals of local television stations to=20
households in areas with limited or no access to=20
such signals from a commercial, for-profit=20
satellite service or other multichannel video=20
provider. The program authorizes the board to=20
approve loan guarantees up to 80 percent of=20
loans, totaling no more than $1.25 billion in=20
aggregate; however, since inception of the=20
program, no loan guarantees have been approved=20
and the program has not been utilized. Section=20
1006 of the act requires that the GAO perform an=20
annual audit of the 1) administration of the=20
provisions of the act and 2) financial position=20
of each applicant who receives a loan guarantee=20
under the act, including the nature, amount, and=20
purpose of investments made by the applicant. In=20
April 2005, the GAO issued the required annual=20
report covering fiscal year 2004. Since there=20
continue to be no loan guarantee recipients for=20
GAO to audit, this report primarily addresses=20
whether program administration during fiscal year=20
2005 satisfied the provisions of the act. Since=20
fiscal year 2002, GAO has reported annually on=20
the administration of the LOCAL TV Act as=20
required by Section 1006 of the act. Since=20
inception of the program, no loan guarantees have=20
been approved and there are no current or=20
anticipated budgetary resources available for=20
future loan guarantees. On December 13, 2004, the=20
board authorized closing out one of two existing=20
contracts. The other contract expired on December=20
31, 2005. Fiscal year 2005 administrative costs=20
totaled about $6,500. Given that the President=92s=20
Budgets for Fiscal Years 2006 and 2007 both=20
pointed out that the unobligated budget authority=20
for this program had been rescinded and the=20
administration was not proposing additional funds=20
for this program, GAO reiterates the previous=20
matter for congressional consideration to rescind=20
the balance of the appropriation for=20
administrative expenses. In oral comments on a=20
draft of this report, the board agreed with the GAO report.
http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-06-858R

QUICKLY

MARTIN'S MISSTEPS PUT FCC OFF GAME
[SOURCE: TVWeek, AUTHOR: Editorial Staff]
[Commentary] FCC Chairman Kevin Martin has a=20
large, unwieldy agency to lead. Going forward,=20
with a major rewrite of media ownership rules=20
looming, he should learn from past missteps and=20
err on the side of deliberation.
http://www.tvweek.com/article.cms?articleId=3D30152
(requires free registration)

HOUSE TO VOTE ON BILL TO CURB ONLINE GAMING
[SOURCE: Los Angeles Times, AUTHOR: Jim Puzzanghera]
After nearly a decade of trying, Congress appears=20
ready to deal with Internet gambling, a=20
phenomenon that has grown dramatically in recent=20
years as millions of people from college students=20
to retirees log on to play poker or wager on=20
sporting events. The House is set to vote today=20
on a measure -- part of the Republican=20
leadership's election-year "values" agenda --=20
designed to choke off the flow of U.S. money to=20
poker and other gambling sites, most of which are=20
based overseas, because Internet gambling is=20
illegal in the United States. The legislation=20
would make it illegal for banks and credit card=20
companies to make payments to Internet gambling=20
sites. It also allows law enforcement officials=20
to force Internet service providers to remove=20
links to the websites. Many major credit card=20
companies already refuse to process such=20
payments. Opponents of the bill, including online=20
gambling sites and a new group representing U.S.=20
poker players, noted the growing popularity of=20
Internet gambling and predicted that people would continue to sidestep laws.
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-na-gamble11jul11,1,...
699.story?coll=3Dla-news-a_section
(requires registration)

INTERNET POKER COULD NET US BILLIONS IN TAX: STUDY
[SOURCE: Reuters]
Regulating Internet poker could bring the U.S.=20
government some $3.3 billion in taxes annually,=20
according to a study to be released on Tuesday,=20
ahead of an expected debate over legislation to=20
ban online gambling. Income taxes on winnings=20
from Internet poker alone -- which is estimated=20
to have attracted $60 billion in wagers worldwide=20
in 2005 -- could amount to $2.5 billion each=20
year, according to the study commissioned by the=20
Poker Players Alliance, a group calling for the=20
regulation of online gambling. "The majority of=20
the revenue that's generated would be from=20
reporting of poker winnings," said Michael=20
Bolcerek, president of the group. The study also=20
said that a 1 percent user fee on online poker=20
transactions would generate another $800 million=20
to $1 billion in revenue per year for the U.S.=20
government. The U.S. Justice Department says a=20
1961 law that forbids interstate telephone=20
betting also applies to the Internet, making it=20
illegal for the industry to do business in the country.
http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=3DpoliticsNews&storyID=
=3D2006-07-10T215527Z_01_N10381864_RTRUKOC_0_US-LEISURE-ONLINEGAMBLING.xml&=
archived=3DFalse

WHEN MEDIA AIMS FOR BALANCE, SOME VIEWS AND FACTS GET LOST
[SOURCE: The Christian Science Monitor, AUTHOR:=20
Dante Chinni, Pew Project for Excellence in Journalism]
[Commentary] Balance is one of those issues that=20
seems simple on the surface, but gets more=20
complicated as you look at it more deeply. As a=20
concept, it is often trumpeted by outlets that=20
profess to be objective. The problem, of course,=20
is that balance doesn't necessarily lead to=20
getting the story right. In searching for an easy=20
way to explain the news in a limited space,=20
journalists too often reduce issues to their most=20
rudimentary forms. This is true on debates=20
ranging from gay marriage (a for-or-against=20
argument with little talk of what rights gays=20
should have) to when troops in Iraq should come=20
home (stay or "cut and run" even though both=20
sides are talking about when reductions should=20
occur) and everything in between. The extreme=20
points of view on those issues may be actual=20
positions, but so are the many nuanced views that=20
live between them and get less coverage. In other=20
words, despite its prominent place in many media=20
debates, "balance," as it is usually understood,=20
is often not particularly useful in journalism.=20
All opinions and points of view aren't equal when=20
one digs into the facts and "both sides" leaves a lot of sides out.
http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0711/p09s01-codc.html

BRAND IT LIKE BECKHAM
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
The NewsMarket, which supplies corporate video=20
news releases and footage to media worldwide,=20
says that more than 50 broadcast quality "news=20
stories" from corporate suppliers including Coke,=20
Adidas, BMW, were downloaded during the World=20
Cup. NewsMarket said that more than 4,000 clips=20
were requested by 180 media outlets.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6351021?display=3DBreaking+News

COMCAST FOUNDATION TO BACK NCLR
[SOURCE: Multichannel News]
The Comcast Foundation will invest in a new=20
initiative by the National Council of La Raza to=20
build the capacity of eight NCLR affiliates=20
around the United States. Each affiliate will=20
receive a three-year grant totaling up to $75,000=20
to support program and advocacy initiatives to strengthen the Latino commun=
ity.
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6351249.html?display=3DBreaking+News

AT&T TO PAY $550,000 TO SETTLE PRIVACY CASES
[SOURCE: Bloomberg News]
AT&T settled two Federal Communications=20
Commission enforcement actions by paying $550,000=20
and agreeing to strengthen customer privacy=20
practices. The nation's largest phone company=20
didn't admit to violating any law and the payment=20
doesn't constitute a fine or penalty, according=20
to a consent decree announced Monday by the FCC.=20
The settlement ends actions against the former=20
AT&T Corp. and SBC Communications. The FCC=20
claimed AT&T Corp. failed to certify it complied=20
with privacy rules. San Antonio-based SBC bought=20
AT&T Corp. last November and then renamed itself=20
AT&T. The agency cited increasing concern over=20
the security of customers' personal data and=20
evidence that records can be obtained easily by unauthorized users.
http://www.latimes.com/business/printedition/la-fi-att11jul11,1,4638408....
ry?coll=3Dla-headlines-pe-business
(requires registration)
See FCC Order:=20
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-100A1.doc

SPITZER SAYS AOL CUSTOMER WOES REMAIN AN ISSUE
[SOURCE: Reuters, AUTHOR: Joseph A. Giannone]
New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer, who last=20
year struck a settlement with America Online=20
regarding its customer service policies, will=20
meet with AOL to discuss if the Internet services=20
giant still blocks customers from canceling their accounts.
http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=3DinternetNews&storyID=
=3D2006-07-10T212510Z_01_N10371239_RTRUKOC_0_US-MEDIA-AOL-SPITZER.xml

AS STATES AIM TO REIN IN CONTENT, VIDEOGAME MAKERS FIGHT BACK
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Andrew=20
LaVallee andrew.lavallee( at )wsj.com ]
The videogame industry is locked in a battle with=20
state and local lawmakers around the country who=20
want to rein in access to what they see as=20
increasingly violent and sexually explicit games.=20
At issue are the content ratings attached to=20
videogames, and the steps retailers take (or=20
don't take) to make sure some games -- like Grand=20
Theft Auto: San Andreas, which included hidden=20
nude scenes -- aren't sold to young players.=20
Critics of the industry say that even though=20
major retailers like Wal-Mart and Best Buy have=20
voluntarily adopted policies to restrict sales of=20
such games, enforcement can be lax. Several=20
states want to impose fines on underage sales.=20
What's more, some argue the ratings system needs=20
to be overhauled because ratings are determined=20
by a group created and funded by the game=20
industry itself. The videogame industry,=20
meanwhile, is fighting back on two fronts. Last=20
month, an industry trade group launched an=20
initiative in cooperation with major retailers=20
and three senators aimed at tightening sales=20
policies for games. Less publicly, the group=20
continues to aggressively challenge local=20
legislative efforts in the courts, and has had=20
success in getting some state laws overturned.=20
The new initiative, dubbed "Commitment to=20
Parents," was launched after a June hearing in=20
Congress in which lawmakers slammed game makers=20
for the bloody sequences and racy scenes in some=20
of the most notorious (and popular) titles.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB115100063777787743.html?mod=3Dtodays_us_...
sonal_journal
(requires subscription)
--------------------------------------------------------------
Communications-related Headlines is a free online=20
news summary service provided by the Benton=20
Foundation (www.benton.org). Posted Monday=20
through Friday, this service provides updates on=20
important industry developments, policy issues,=20
and other related news events. While the=20
summaries are factually accurate, their often=20
informal tone does not always represent the tone=20
of the original articles. Headlines are compiled=20
by Kevin Taglang headlines( at )benton.org -- we welcome your comments.
--------------------------------------------------------------

The Alliance for Public Technology invites you to bring a bag lunch and join us to discuss

Thursday, July 13th
12:00 - 2:00 p.m.

at

Alliance for Public Technology
919 Eighteenth Street, NW
10th Floor Conference Room

Guest Speakers:

Brian Adkins, Executive Director, National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners

Brian Fontes, Vice President, Federal Relations, Cingular

K. Dane Snowden, Vice President, External & State Affairs, CTIA - The Wireless Association

RSVP to apt@apt.org or (202) 263-2970.

Sign language interpreters are available upon request.

Coverage Type 

"We, the people, paid for these networks, not the phone companies, and we, not the phone companies, should decide on the policies of these utilities. The pendulum has swung too far, and now it needs to swing back.”
-- Bruce Kushnick, author of The Two Hundred Billion Dollar Scandal


http://www.benton.org/index.php?q=node/2879
Coverage Type 

JUDGE LOOKS INTO MODIFYING TERMS OF 2 PHONE MERGERS
[SOURCE: New York Times 7/8, AUTHOR: Stephen Labaton]
A federal district judge in Washington is considering the imposition of major modifications to the two largest telephone mergers in history: SBC Communication's acquisition of AT&T and Verizon's purchase of MCI. In a surprising order issued Friday afternoon, Judge Emmet G. Sullivan raised a series of questions about the Bush administration's review of the two deals that he said should be answered by the Justice Department and the phone companies at a hearing next week. Both deals have already closed, and lawyers said that the judge could not unravel them, although he could try to impose significant conditions or divestitures. The proceedings will probably shed light on the administration's antitrust enforcement program at a time when officials have put up virtually no roadblocks to deals and imposed few restrictions in other areas of antitrust law. Still, the proceedings could affect the government's review of BellSouth's proposed acquisition by AT&T, the name the company took after AT&T was swallowed by SBC. The proceedings are also the first significant test of changes in the law that have given federal judges greater authority to scrutinize antitrust settlements.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/08/business/08antitrust.html
(requires registration)


Judge Looks Into Modifying Terms of 2 Phone Mergers
Coverage Type 

MAKING BOOK ON THE BELL PROMISES
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: Kent Gibbons]
[Commentary] "The 200 Billion Dollar Scandal" is a 406-page e-book written by Bruce Kushnick about how the biggest U.S. regional telephone providers have extracted billions of dollars in rate increases while failing to build out the advanced broadband networks promised to Congress and to state regulators who passed the Telecom Act of 1996 and approved higher local rates. But as Congress considers telecom legislation, net neutrality is the issue potentially derailing bills, not whether the former Baby Bells should be told to go ahead and build out ubiquitous broadband networks they've already promised using money they've already pocketed and not be given any additional incentives. "We, the people, paid for these networks, not the phone companies, and we, not the phone companies, should decide on the policies of these utilities. The pendulum has swung too far, and now it needs to swing back,” Kushnick writes. He wants to see U.S. consumers get the fiber-optic based broadband services he figures the Bell companies collectively promised to deliver to 86 million homes by now, at 45 Megabits per second of two-way traffic, in exchange for states approving or sustaining high service charges. Promising to offer video services in competition with cable companies helped let the Bells into the long-distance business. The Bells still have jobs to get done, though, such as changes in federal and state law to let them compete in video on their own terms, without enforceable buildout requirements. Other analysts figure Verizon is dead serious this time about fiber-based broadband and video services to the home, given cable’s competition for phone service. Kushnick said: “Yes, it may be rolled out in rich neighborhoods. Do the rich really need competition?” If some folks in Congress were among the 45,000 who downloaded Kushnick’s book, they'll probably have a better sense of how to respond to the latest promises from the Bells.
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6350480.html?display=Opinion

** See 200 Billion Dollar Broadband Scandal
http://www.newnetworks.com/broadbandscandals.htm


http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6350480.html?display=Opinion
Coverage Type 

AN INDIRECT PATH TO MANDATE
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: Ted Hearn]
Senate telecommunications legislation would “indirectly” provide the Federal Communications Commission with a new opportunity to impose broad digital broadcast-TV carriage requirements on cable operators, according to Senate Commerce Committee chairman Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) who sponsored the sweeping telecommunications bill (S. 2686, H.R. 5252) that passed his committee on June 28. He included new language that addressed cable carriage of digital TV stations that demand access without compensation, also called must-carry. The new language states that cable operators have to carry “any digital video signal requiring carriage;” existing law requires carriage of a TV station’s “primary video.” The change has potential importance because the FCC has twice determined that the phrase “primary video” meant mandatory cable carriage of one programming service per station. Broadcasters are hopeful the FCC could be persuaded to read “any digital signal” more broadly than it did “primary video.” Asked if the addition of the words “any digital video signal” was aimed at imposing must-carry on cable, Sen Stevens indicated that was his intention. “I don't think it does directly. But indirectly it does,” Sen Stevens said June 28. “Indirectly, it does, yes.”
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6350826.html


An Indirect Path to Mandate
Coverage Type 

LET'S EDUCATE, NOT CASTIGATE, LEGISLATORS
[SOURCE: IP Democracy, AUTHOR: Cynthia Brumfield]
[Commentary] The blogosphere castigated Sen Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) for his limited knowledge of technology. The 80-year old Senator betrayed his lack of understanding of high-tech matters over and over again during the Commerce Committee’s mark-up of his controversial telecom bill. Senator Stevens made such laughable faux pas as describing the Internet as a “series of tubes,” which prompted critics of his legislation to brand him as a luddite and out-of-touch and worse. The real concern expressed by bloggers: how can someone who is rewriting the nation’s telecom laws be so ignorant of the technology? But instead of snickering at the statesman, why not take that ridicule and come up with a plan to educate Members of Congress, Senators and other public officials on the new technological realities? There’s no way, of course, to make public officials and lawmakers as conversant in technology as the industry is. But that’s not the point. The point is to enlighten them on the bigger picture issues and why they matter.
http://www.ipdemocracy.com/archives/2006/07/07/index.php#001741


http://www.ipdemocracy.com/archives/2006/07/07/index.php#001741
Coverage Type 

THE COST OF THE VIDEO WAR
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John M. Higgins]
The best place to get a snapshot of the costs of the cable-TV/telco war is New York. To launch video and fast Internet services on suburban Long Island, Verizon spent heavily on an extensive overhaul of its telephone plant. Some estimates put the cost at up to $1,100 in capital for each home “passed” in its new FiOS TV optical-fiber systems, and it will take an average of an additional $700 or so to actually connect a new subscriber. Preparing to defend itself, local cable operator Cablevision Systems tweaked its own plant. It boosted its Internet service to even higher speeds than Verizon's and stepped up its sales of cable telephone service, to steal Verizon's residential customers before the telco's system was ready. Cablevision's capital expenditure was lower. The Internet boost cost it just $15 per home passed; each new phone customer cost around $200. The yawning capital-spending gap shows how much of a disadvantage telephone companies are at as they push into the video business. Cable operators have largely been finished with their gigantic rebuild for several years and have a big video and Internet customer base already giving them a return on that investment.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6350838.html?display=News


http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6350838.html?display=News
Coverage Type 

FCC PROPOSES OPENING UP THE HIGH FREQUENCY SPECTRUM "DESERT" FOR MORE SATELLITE TV
[SOURCE: Truth, Justice and Telecom Policy, AUTHOR: Jim Snider]
[Commentary] Worldwide, consumer delivery of satellite TV (known as “Direct Broadcast Satellite” or “DBS”) is one of the most widely used and profitable services provided with high frequency spectrum, which is far less valuable than low frequency spectrum because it relatively plentiful and requires line-of-sight communications. In the U.S., DBS service has been equally successful. Since the mid-1990s in the U.S. and much of the rest of the world, consumer subscription to DBS service has increased by more than 2,000%. So it should be no surprise that there has been a worldwide push to increase the amount of spectrum set aside for this successful service. On June 23, 2006, the FCC’s International Bureau released an NPRM (Docket 06-123) with a proposal to do exactly that. It proposes allocating approximately 1 GHz of bandwidth for DBS type service, essentially doubling the current allocation for that service. The spectrum is located in the 17 GHz band (for downlinks) and 24 GHz band (for uplinks). If the entire spectrum allocation were used for DBS service, the consequence could be 500+ new broadcast TV channels nationally or many thousands if delivered via spot beams. Alternatively, the spectrum may be used for satellite broadband service. Echostar and DirectTV are expected to seek to acquire the spectrum. This allocation raises a host of important policy questions. I am by no means an expert on this proceeding. But from what I know, I do believe it deserves far more public scrutiny than it has do date.
http://quixote.blogs.com/telecompolicy/2006/07/fcc_proposes_op.html


FCC Proposes Opening Up the High Frequency Spectrum "Desert" for More Satellite TV
Coverage Type 

VERIZON WIRELESS, T-MOBILE OK'd FOR WIRELESS AUCTION
[SOURCE: Reuters]
Verizon Wireless and Deutsche Telekom AG's T-Mobile have qualified to participate in an August sale of valuable wireless licenses, the U.S. Federal Communications Commission said on Friday. They were among 81 applications accepted by the agency to participate in the sale. Another 171 applications were deemed incomplete and those potential bidders have until July 18 to address the issues. Cingular Wireless, the No. 1 U.S. wireless carrier, was one of the bidders that failed to initially qualify, according to forms filed with the FCC. The FCC is scheduled to begin auctioning the licenses for advanced wireless services on August 9 in a sale that analysts have said could raise between $8 billion and $15 billion.
http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=technologyNews&story...