Benton RSS Feed

Coverage Type 

E-RATE REVIEW PROCEEDINGS
[SOURCE: Federal Communications Commission]
The FCC set January 8, 2007 as the deadline for public comment in two proceedings concerning the E-rate discount program for schools and libraries. In one proceeding, E-Rate Central filed a petition for clarification of the Commission's rules concerning the disposal of equipment purchased under the E-rate program. Specifically, E-Rate Central seeks guidance from the Commission on the proper method for disposing of equipment when its value or usefulness precludes the possibility of transferring the equipment to another eligible facility. E-Rate Central notes that the Commission's rules for the disposal of equipment funded under the E-rate program, which prohibit eligible services and equipment components from being sold or transferred in consideration of anything of value, may conflict with New York's state regulations mandating that obsolete equipment shall be sold through bid procedures, if possible, for the highest possible price. In the second proceeding, the State E-Rate Coordinators' Alliance (SECA) is seeking clarification of the Commission's rules as they apply to state replacement contracts. Currently, USAC's procedure for funding requests for services covered by state master contracts that are scheduled to expire, but expected to be renewed, during the funding year requires an applicant to file two separate funding requests. SECA asks the Commission to clarify its contract extension rules to permit an applicant to extend the contract expiration date of a renewed state master contract. Alternatively, if the rules do not permit such extensions, SECA asks for a modification and/or permanent waiver of the Commission's rules to allow them.

* E-rate Central petition
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2371A1.doc

* State E-Rate Coordinators' Alliance petition
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2369A1.doc



Coverage Type 

CONGRESSIONAL LEADERS SEEK BAN DELAY
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: Todd Spangler]
Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Ted Stevens (R-Alaska), House Commerce Committee Chairman Joe Barton (R-Texas) and Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.), Chairman of the House Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet, sent a letter to Federal Communications Commission Chairman Kevin Martin Tuesday asking the agency to extend the July 1, 2007 deadline that would bar cable operators from deploying set-top boxes with integrated security features. FCC rules currently would require any new set-top boxes deployed by cable operators as of July 1 to provide separable conditional-access features. Several operators have filed petitions with the FCC requesting at least partial waivers to the regulation. In the letter to Martin, the congressional leaders noted that the FCC has already pushed back the deadline twice to allow the industry to develop downloadable security technology, which would be less expensive than requiring physical security cards for set-top boxes. They said the industry still needs more time to develop downloadable security.
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6395340.html?display=Breaking+News


http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6395340.html?display=Breaking%20News

Benton's Communications-related Headlines For Wednesday November 29, 2006

TELECOM
AT&T's Campaign for Compromise
Supreme Court Hears Views In Telecom Competition Case

MEDIA OWNERSHIP
Judge Issues Restraining Order in Bay Area Newspaper Sale
Tribune Extends Sale Decision Deadline
NBC 2.0 Cuts and Washington Newscast

EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY
Report: Students struggle with information literacy
E-Rate Review Proceedings

QUICKLY -- Republican Congressional Leaders Seek Ban Delay; 1 in 5
Parents Say Kids Online Too Much; Violent video game effects linger in brain

TELECOM

AT&T'S CAMPAIGN FOR COMPROMISE
[SOURCE: BusinessWeek 11/27, AUTHOR: Steve Rosenbush]
Discussions have reached a critical stage between merger partners
AT&T and BellSouth and the Democrats in Washington who have held up
approval of the companies' $79.3 billion deal. AT&T and BellSouth are
willing to make concessions in a bid to assuage government concerns
over the elimination of a potential competitor in the lucrative
market for business telecommunications services. Analysts say there's
a good chance the companies will know by the end of the week whether
they can reach a compromise. Lawmakers such as Representative John
Dingell (D-MI) have become more vocal about their reservations since
the Democrats took control of the House and Senate in the Nov. 7
general election. If a compromise is reached, the deal could be
approved at the Dec. 20 meeting of the Federal Communications
Commission or at an FCC meeting in January. "We will know more this
week," says former FCC official Blair Levin, now a regulatory analyst
with researcher Stifel Nicolaus. "The odds still favor the deal being
done in December, although there's a decent chance that it slips into
January." Industry analysts say there are three issues at stake:
Network Neutrality, the rates that AT&T charges rivals to connect to
its networks, and whether it should be forced to sell off some of its
wireless spectrum.
http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/nov2006/tc20061127_092741...

SUPREME COURT HEARS VIEWS IN TELECOM COMPETITION CASE
[SOURCE: Technology Daily 11/27, AUTHOR: Andrew Noyes]
The practice of price-fixing without a verbal agreement between
competitors was the focus of a case heard by the Supreme Court. The
dispute involves dominant telephone companies accused of not helping
to facilitate competition in local markets. Such "conscious
parallelism," several justices agreed, is commonplace in highly
competitive sectors in the U.S. economy. Under such an arrangement,
one firm takes the lead in hiking prices and others follow suit with
the shared belief that greater profits will benefit them all. At
issue in the case, Bell Atlantic v. Twombly, is how much evidence
plaintiffs must present in conspiracy allegations to pursue
litigation. The 2002 consumer class action suit claimed that
BellSouth, Qwest Communications, SBC and Verizon Communications
conspired to violate antitrust law by divvying up service areas. An
American Bar Association synopsis characterizes the case as the most
important antitrust matter to reach the Supreme Court since a 1986
dispute that pitted Japanese television makers against U.S.-based competitors.
http://www.njtelecomupdate.com/lenya/telco/live/tb-OEKS1164736361113.html

MEDIA OWNERSHIP

JUDGE ISSUES RESTRAINING ORDER IN BAY AREA NEWSPAPER SALE
[SOURCE: Associated Press]
On Tuesday U.S. District Judge Susan Illston temporarily blocked the
consolidation of advertising and distribution operations of Bay Area
newspapers owned by Denver-based MediaNews. The Northern California
newspapers in the McClatchy and MediaNews deal include the Monterey
County Herald, San Jose Mercury News and Contra Costa Times.
MediaNews, which owns the Denver Post and dozens of other newspapers,
also got the St. Paul Pioneer Press in Minnesota under a complex deal
that involves financing from Hearst Corp., owner of the San Francisco
Chronicle. San Francisco real estate magnate Clint Reilly filed an
antitrust lawsuit to block McClatchy's sale of the Bay Area papers to
MediaNews, claiming it would create a monopoly on readership and
advertising in the Bay Area. Judge Illston ruled Hearst had an
undisclosed motive for investing in the deal -- to consolidate
advertising and distribution operations with competitors of the
Chronicle -- a possible antitrust violation. "Though defendants
offered no explanation why Hearst was willing to help finance an
acquisition that would only make its competition stronger, the court
did not understand that Hearst expected, or would later receive, any
quid pro quo," Judge Illston wrote.
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_con...
* Judge wary of Hearst-MediaNews collaboration
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/11/29/BUGJEMLGLG1.DTL

TRIBUNE EXTENDS SALE DECISION DEADLINE
[SOURCE: Associated Press]
Tribune Co. said Tuesday that it would extend its deadline for
deciding whether to sell the company from the end of the year until
the first quarter of 2007. The company has been under pressure from
shareholders disappointed with its sagging stock, and has said it
will decide whether to sell all or parts of the business. Tribune
runs 11 newspapers, including the Chicago Tribune and the Los Angeles
Times. It also owns 25 television stations, as well as the Chicago
Cubs. Tribune Chairman Dennis FitzSimons said response to the
company's proposed sale has been "strong" and the timeline was being
extended so the company could thoroughly consider all the proposals.
The company also announced that it had received FCC approval to sell
WCWN-TV in Albany, N.Y., and WLVI-TV in Boston and expects to close
both deals in December. Both sales were part of a performance
improvement plan Tribune put into place prior to the strategic review
process. To date, Tribune has sold or agreed to sell about $450
million of non-core assets.
http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/061128/tribune.html?.v=1
* Tribune Extends Strategic Review Policy Into 1st Qtr. '07
http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/news/recent_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=10034...
* Why Tribune wants more time to review buyout proposals
James Rainey hears that lukewarm bids had increased the chances that
the company would be sold in parts or that it would be reduced in
size and taken private by current management. "Clearly bids are not
coming in as high as expected, so Tribune needs more time to figure
out what to do," says one person involved in the auction.
http://www.latimes.com/business/investing/la-fi-tribune29nov29,1,5905498...
* Gannett may be interested in Trib because of CareerBuilder
If Gannett were to take over Tribune, its CareerBuilder stake would
give Gannett 85% ownership of the asset, which would allow it to
carry CareerBuilder on its income statement instead of treating it as
an unconsolidated minority position. "But a Gannett bid would also
amount to betting big on newspapers, and bidders all along have said
that the falloff in newspaper industry performance has made it
difficult to predict what papers like the Los Angeles Times and the
Chicago Tribune are really worth."
http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-0611290131nov29,0,6091136.sto...

WRC CUTS CHANGE FACE OF LOCAL NEWS
[SOURCE: Washington Post, AUTHOR: Paul Farhi]
A look at cost-cutting measures at NBC's Washington (DC) affiliate
WRC (Channel four). The station is a highly profitable operation
that has long enjoyed a market-leading position. The station
nevertheless has been swept up by the "NBC 2.0" program, a broad
initiative by NBC Universal to cut more than $750 million in expenses
from its news and entertainment operations and trim about 700
positions (roughly 5 percent of its employees). Since TV
news-watching is often the product of habit, local stations make even
small changes to their newscasts -- their most profitable programs --
at their peril. A rival news executive said the cutbacks could
provide WRC with a double economic benefit. The station can pare its
payroll substantially by replacing older, higher-salaried veterans
with younger, less expensive on-air personalities who theoretically
will help WRC attract the younger viewers that advertisers seek. The
news executive noted that the largest share of viewers for WRC's
early-evening newscasts are older than 55, an audience that
advertisers devalue.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/28/AR200611...
(requires registration)

EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY

REPORT: STUDENTS STRUGGLE WITH INFORMATION LITERACY
[SOURCE: eSchool News, AUTHOR: Justin Appel]
Despite the assumption that today's students are tech-savvy, many
fall short in demonstrating the information literacy skills necessary
for success in college and the workforce, a new report says. The
report comes from an evaluation of responses from students nationwide
to an information-literacy assessment tool developed by the nonprofit
ETS. The report comes from an evaluation of the responses of 6,300
students from 63 institutions around the country to ETS's new ICT
(Information and Communications Technology) Literacy Assessment.
Students were given scenario-based items that were presented to them
in 75-minute test environments. These information literacy tests
included extracting information from a database, developing a
spreadsheet, or composing eMail summaries of research findings. The
tests are meant to measure students' abilities to overcome three
challenges they typically have: 1) The ability to identify
trustworthy and useful information; 2) The ability to manage
overabundant information; and 3) The ability to communicate
information effectively. The study found that 52 percent of those
tested could correctly judge the objectivity of a web site, and 65
percent could correctly judge that web site's authoritativeness. But
only 40 percent of students entered multiple search terms when
researching a topic, and only 44 percent properly identified a
statement that captured the demands of the assignment.
http://www.eschoolnews.com/news/showStoryts.cfm?ArticleID=6725

E-RATE REVIEW PROCEEDINGS
[SOURCE: Federal Communications Commission]
The FCC set January 8, 2007 as the deadline for public comment in two
proceedings concerning the E-rate discount program for schools and
libraries. In one proceeding, E-Rate Central filed a petition for
clarification of the Commission's rules concerning the disposal of
equipment purchased under the E-rate program. Specifically, E-Rate
Central seeks guidance from the Commission on the proper method for
disposing of equipment when its value or usefulness precludes the
possibility of transferring the equipment to another eligible
facility. E-Rate Central notes that the Commission's rules for the
disposal of equipment funded under the E-rate program, which prohibit
eligible services and equipment components from being sold or
transferred in consideration of anything of value, may conflict with
New York's state regulations mandating that obsolete equipment shall
be sold through bid procedures, if possible, for the highest possible
price. In the second proceeding, the State E-Rate Coordinators'
Alliance (SECA) is seeking clarification of the Commission's rules as
they apply to state replacement contracts. Currently, USAC's
procedure for funding requests for services covered by state master
contracts that are scheduled to expire, but expected to be renewed,
during the funding year requires an applicant to file two separate
funding requests. SECA asks the Commission to clarify its contract
extension rules to permit an applicant to extend the contract
expiration date of a renewed state master contract. Alternatively, if
the rules do not permit such extensions, SECA asks for a modification
and/or permanent waiver of the Commission's rules to allow them.
* E-rate Central petition
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2371A1.doc
* State E-Rate Coordinators' Alliance petition
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2369A1.doc

QUICKLY

CONGRESSIONAL LEADERS SEEK BAN DELAY
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: Todd Spangler]
Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Ted Stevens (R-Alaska), House
Commerce Committee Chairman Joe Barton (R-Texas) and Rep. Fred Upton
(R-Mich.), Chairman of the House Subcommittee on Telecommunications
and the Internet, sent a letter to Federal Communications Commission
Chairman Kevin Martin Tuesday asking the agency to extend the July 1,
2007 deadline that would bar cable operators from deploying set-top
boxes with integrated security features. FCC rules currently would
require any new set-top boxes deployed by cable operators as of July
1 to provide separable conditional-access features. Several operators
have filed petitions with the FCC requesting at least partial waivers
to the regulation. In the letter to Martin, the congressional leaders
noted that the FCC has already pushed back the deadline twice to
allow the industry to develop downloadable security technology, which
would be less expensive than requiring physical security cards for
set-top boxes. They said the industry still needs more time to
develop downloadable security.
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6395340.html?display=Breaking+News

1 IN 5 PARENTS SAY KIDS ONLINE TOO MUCH
[SOURCE: Associated Press, AUTHOR: Anick Jesdanun]
One in five American parents believe their kids are spending too much
time on the Internet, though most say the online activities haven't
affected grades either way. In a study to be released Wednesday by
the University of Southern California, 21 percent of adult Internet
users with children believe the kids are online too long, compared
with 11 percent in 2000. Still, that's less than the 49 percent who
complain their kids watch too much TV. About 80 percent of the
children say the Internet is important for schoolwork.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/I/INTERNET_USE?SITE=MIHOL&SECTION=H...

VIOLENT VIDEO GAMES EFFECTS LINGER IN BRAIN
[SOURCE: Reuters, AUTHOR: Susan Kelly]
Teens who play violent video games show increased activity in areas
of the brain linked to emotional arousal and decreased responses in
regions that govern self-control, a study released on Tuesday found.
http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=technologyNews&story...
--------------------------------------------------------------
Communications-related Headlines is a free online news summary
service provided by the Benton Foundation (www.benton.org). Posted
Monday through Friday, this service provides updates on important
industry developments, policy issues, and other related news events.
While the summaries are factually accurate, their often informal tone
does not always represent the tone of the original articles.
Headlines are compiled by Kevin Taglang headlines( at )benton.org -- we
welcome your comments.
--------------------------------------------------------------

Coverage Type 

Still looking for that something special for someone special? A digital stocking-stuffer perhaps? Headlines is the gift that gives all year round -- and its free (which we'll keep just between us). If you know someone who would like Headlines, direct them to http://lists.benton.org/lists/subscribe/headlines or headlines@benton.org and we'll deliver to them the exciting world of telecommunications policy.


Give the Gift of Headlines
Coverage Type 

JUSTICE SEPT TO EXAMINE ITS USE OF NSA WIRETAPS
[SOURCE: Washington Post, AUTHOR: Dan Eggen]
The Justice Department's inspector general yesterday announced an investigation into the department's connections to the government's controversial warrantless surveillance program, but officials said the probe will not examine whether the National Security Agency is violating the Constitution or federal statutes. In a letter to House lawmakers, Inspector General Glenn A. Fine said his office decided to open the probe after conducting "initial inquiries" into the program. Under the initiative, the NSA monitors phone calls and e-mails between people in the United States and others overseas without court oversight if one of the targets is suspected of ties to terrorism. The "program review" will examine how the Justice Department has used information obtained from the NSA program, as well as whether Justice lawyers complied with the "legal requirements" that govern it, according to Fine's letter. Officials said the review will not examine whether the program itself is legal.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/27/AR200611...
(requires registration)

* NSA spy program is under review
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-na-spy28nov28,1,133...

OVERSIGHT BOARD BRIEFED ON NATIONAL SECURITY ELECTRONIC EAVESDROPPING PROGRAM
[SOURCE: Associated Press, AUTHOR: John Solomon]
Several members of a government board appointed to guard privacy and civil liberties during the war on terror say they're impressed with the protections built into the Bush administration's electronic eavesdropping program. The Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board received a long-awaited briefing on the secret program last week by senior members of the National Security Agency. Two of the five board members told The Associated Press on Monday they were impressed by the safeguards the government has built into the NSA's monitoring of phone calls and computer transmissions and wished the administration could tell the public more about them to ease distrust. The briefing had been delayed for over a year because President Bush was concerned - after several press leaks - about widening the circle of people who knew the exact details of the eavesdropping program.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/T/TERROR_PRIVACY?SITE=SCCHA&SECTION...



Coverage Type 

THE COWARDS TURNED OUT TO BE RIGHT
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Nicholas Kristof]
[Commentary] For several years, the White House and its Dobermans helpfully pointed out the real enemy in Iraq: those lazy, wimpish foreign correspondents who were so foolish and unpatriotic that they reported that we faced grave difficulties in Iraq. As we try to extricate ourselves from Iraq, a basic lesson for the administration is that it should deal with bad news in ways more creative than clobbering the messenger. From the beginning of the war, the Pentagon has had an incredibly sophisticated news operation (now including its own news channel, carried on some cable networks), but it has often seemed more concerned with disseminating propaganda than with gathering facts. So how about if the administration devotes itself less to managing the news and more to trying to manage Iraq?
http://select.nytimes.com/2006/11/28/opinion/28kristof.html
(requires subscription)


The Cowards Turned Out to Be Right
Coverage Type 

WILL O.J. FALLOUT AFFECT CROSS-MEDIA OWNERSHIP RULES?
[SOURCE: AdAge, AUTHOR: Claire Atkinson]
Even though Fox Broadcasting's O.J. special was canceled, it still may have done lasting harm to the broadcast industry. The backlash comes at a sensitive time for broadcasters, which have been battling the belief that cross-media ownership gives them too much power -- and some fear the incident gives ammunition to their foes. The Federal Communications Commission is reconsidering rules that determine whether media companies can own more than two TV stations in a market, as well as whether those that own radio stations and newspapers should also be allowed to own TV stations. News Corp.'s Fox is at the forefront of a broadcast-network-TV push to be allowed to buy more of its affiliate stations. "Think about how much O.J. they could have crammed in if they owned three TV stations, eight radio stations and the local paper in your town," said Craig Aaron, communications director for Free Press, a group campaigning against loosening of the rules. "It certainly doesn't help Big Media's case for throwing out the rules."
http://adage.com/mediaworks/article.php?article_id=113468

See also --
* People Power Forced Rupert Murdoch to Abandon O.J.
[SOURCE: AdAge 11/26, AUTHOR: Matthew Creamer and Claire Atkinson]
American consumers sent a very clear message last week to Rupert Murdoch and the rest of the media world: We have standards. They may be low and not terribly visible, but we do have them.
http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=113471

* How the O.J. Debacle Restored a Bit of Faith in the Media
http://adage.com/columns/article?article_id=113452

* The O.J. Lesson: Ad Agencies Should Use Their Clout More Often
http://adage.com/smallagency/article?article_id=113472

RINTELS ON O.J. FLAP: "THE DARK SIDE OF SYNERGY"
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable 11/20, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
Jonathan Rintels, president of The Center for Creative Voices in Media, sees a link between media consolidation and the growing flap over Fox's O.J. Simpson If I Did It sweeps special, calling it the "dark side of synergy." While a growing number of Fox affiliates say they won't carry the show, he says he has heard of no network-owned station who has dropped out. "Stations owned by the national network don't preempt for taste reasons or content reasons content that their network is putting out there," he says, a check and balance that is missing because of consolidation. Rintels and company argue that a lot of the indecency complaints can be traced to formerly locally owned stations bought up by the networks after the FCC lifted the ownership caps.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6393555.html?display=Breaking...



Coverage Type 

IS HOMETOWN OWNERSHIP REALLY THE NEXT BIG THING?
[SOURCE: Editor&Publisher, AUTHOR: Mark Fitzgerald and Jennifer Saba]
There may be nothing new under the sun, but the sudden widespread clamor to return troubled newspapers to local ownership -- after decades of relentless industry consolidation -- at least represents a dramatic change in course. Among industry experts, opinion is growing that this phenomenon might just have legs. "My personal belief is that it's the start of a trend -- and that the trend is going to continue," says Scott Stawski, senior principal at Knightsbridge Solutions. Just a year ago, the idea that local investors would line up around the block for the chance to buy a metro daily seemed as unlikely as the idea that big chains like Knight Ridder or Tribune Co. would be forced to put them up for sale in the first place. The tipping point for the local ownership boomlet surely came this spring when the McClatchy Co. immediately hung "for sale" signs on 12 dailies it acquired in its purchase of Knight Ridder. Yet moving from chain ownership to local ownership remains rare. "When that does happen, typically it's because the chain has screwed up [the paper] so badly it has to dump it," says one broker who insisted on anonymity. That's because if a property were hot, potential local buyers wouldn't have a fighting chance. "Generally you will find that if something is attractive, the newspaper groups will be able to outbid everyone else, including private equity funds," says Robert Broadwater, founder of investment firm Broadwater & Associates.
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_con...


http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=…
Coverage Type 

TRIBUNE CO REJECTS CONSORTIUM INQUIRY ABOUT BALTIMORE SUN
[SOURCE: Washington Post, AUTHOR: Frank Ahrens]
The embattled Tribune Co., which has put its 11 newspapers and 25 television stations up for sale, is not ready to consider bids for individual properties. Ted Venetoulis, a businessman and former local politician, is leading a consortium of prominent Baltimoreans who want to buy the Sun, if Tribune decides to break up the company and sell it piece by piece. Tribune has declined Venetoulis access to the Sun's books, saying the company continues to seek a single buyer for all of its properties. Venetoulis said he has had conversations with nearly all of the bidders who want to purchase the entire company to let them know they have a willing buyer for the Sun if the new owners want to unload the Baltimore paper. The company received nonbinding bids in late October from Los Angeles billionaires Eli Broad and Ron Burkle, private equity firms Bain Capital, Thomas H. Lee Partners and Providence Equity Partners and record company mogul David Geffen. The Gannett Co., owner of USA Today, also reportedly expressed an interest.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/27/AR200611...
(requires registration)


Tribune Co. Rejects Consortium Inquiry About Baltimore Sun
Coverage Type 

PHONE FIRMS' TV MARKET BID MAY SKIP CONGRESS
[SOURCE: Los Angeles Times, AUTHOR: Jim Puzzanghera jim.puzzanghera@latimes.com]
Big phone companies trying to dial in an overhaul of telecommunications laws will have to hang up and try the call again next year. The Democratic takeover of Congress makes it increasingly unlikely that AT&T Inc. and Verizon Communications Inc. will be able to push through stalled legislation to make it easier for them to sell pay television. Instead, they probably will focus their efforts on state legislatures as they try to deliver more services to compete against cable companies. Lobbyists have all but given up on the telecommunications legislation, which also includes new anti-piracy measures for digital TV and radio signals, a three-year ban on new cellphone taxes and a permanent moratorium on Internet access taxes. Even the bill's most ardent backer, Sen. Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) has little hope. "I really don't see much chance to get a bill like that out," he said. "It's got firm objections." The bill, which would have eliminated most state and local regulation of pay television, has been stalled for months because of a dispute over rules to assure that data continue to flow freely across phone and cable company lines. Democrats support those rules, known as "network neutrality," which would apply to high-speed Internet access delivered by the same lines. But most Republicans oppose them and kept them out of the legislation. With Democrats set to take control of the Senate and the House of Representatives in January, they have no desire to allow the outgoing Republican majority to pass major legislation while still in charge. The legislation would have to be drafted from scratch next year. And Democrats, who will control all congressional committee chairmanships, may not make telecommunications overhaul as high a priority as the Republicans had.
http://www.latimes.com/business/printedition/la-fi-telecom28nov28,1,4646...
(requires registration)


Phone firms' TV market bid may skip Congress