Benton RSS Feed
The benefits of universally available broadband are enormous
The Benefits of Universally-Available Broadband are Enormous
America is on the verge of vast new broadband-driven digital transformation that promises to make life more livable, businesses more productive, jobs more plentiful, and the Internet more accessible. for:
- Families
- Consumers
- Rural Americans
- The economy
- People with disabilities
- Seniors
- Homeland Security
- Public Safety
- Government
- Telecommuters
- Parents can keep on top of their child's homework and be in contact with their teacher.
- Children in the most isolated inner-city neighborhood or rural region can have access the same universe of knowledge as a child in the most affluent suburb -- transforming the way teachers teach and students learn.
- Many online academic enrichment services use video, animation, sound, and interaction to help children learn, to excite them about a topic, and to reinforce concepts learned in class. Broadband is increasingly necessary to view multimedia Web sites. Some services even offer real-time tutoring by connecting students to a live tutor through a video and audio feed. Early research also indicates that such technology can have a strong impact on improving academic performance, particularly among children with lower grades.
- A growing number of immigrants in the United States are staying in touch through videoconferencing technology developed for use in the corporate world. Entrepreneurs from California to New Jersey are connecting relatives using high-quality cameras and fast broadband Internet links, helping them to maintain family ties at a cost of $40 for half an hour. The service connects offices placed near consulates or wire transfer agencies in Latino neighborhoods in the United States with an ever-expanding network of offices across Mexico, Central America and South America.
- Students can complete a university degree online
- All Americans, no matter where they live, can be no more than a keystroke or a mouse click away from the jobs and opportunities that broadband both creates and supports
- Doctors in urban areas can diagnose patients in rural areas or consult with experts from around the globe.
- Employees from around the world can collaborate on projects in real time or gain new “on-demand†skills as they need them.
- Citizens can register their cars, buy fishing licenses and pay parking tickets on-line, saving both time and money.
- People can play a greater role in democracy as blogger, online activist, or movie creator.
- Consumers can benefit from competition in more cost efficient voice and video services â€" lowering costs but increasing choices.
- Computer professionals can often repair their client's software glitches virtually.
- Seniors can take advantage of new remote health monitoring technologies and independent living.
- Children can take language or piano lessons from experts around the globe with the help of voice and video software
- A shop owner with a good idea and an Internet connection can become a corner store in the global economy.
- And anyone with a computer can become a reporter, broadcaster, movie producer, or musician.
For Rural Americans. Nowhere is broadband opportunity as profound as it is in rural America. In too many rural communities, because jobs have migrated to urban areas, high school graduates often feel they have only two choices - go away, or go nowhere. Broadband can:
- enable consumers to bridge the distance between urban and rural America
- allow rural businesses to reach new markets
- deliver new economic opportunities, allowing rural economies to become an engine for higher paying information age jobs
- reconnect distant families
Already big businesses are utilizing broadband to “insource†jobs to rural America rather than “outsourcing†jobs abroad. Further expansion of broadband access to rural markets may help shrink the urban rural wage gap by allowing highly paid workers to move to more remote areas, and rural Americans to access higher paying urban jobs.(1) Broadband can also deliver new online learning and job opportunities that enhance modern rural life. The future should not be to deny rural American’s access to these new transformative technologies, but to ensure that rural Americans can take full advantage of their benefits.
For the economy. Ubiquitously available broadband could unleash:
- an estimated $500 billion in economic growth
- create more than 1.2 million high-wage jobs
- restore America’s global competitiveness
- boost business productivity â€" which is essential to raising standards of living for all families in America
- allow small businesses to reach global markets
- is simply a more inclusive technology than the universal service-supported voice telephone network
- gives Americans with disabilities the opportunity to improve personal communication and leave inaccessible voice telephony behind
- for people with disabilities, is not just something nice to have, it is a critical communications link and equalizer with the rest of the population.
Yet for Americans with disabilities to be able to benefit from new technologies, policymakers must 1) ensure the continued vitality of existing relay services, and 2) ensure that disabled Americans, who are too often living in poverty, also have access to broadband enabled benefits at home.
For seniors. Policies designed to accelerate the use of broadband could save seniors more than $800 billion by reducing health care costs.(2) These benefits are as substantial as what the federal government is likely to spend on homeland security over the next 25 years, and under the right set of policies, could exceed what the United States currently spends annually for health care for all its citizens. A New Millennium Research Council analysis finds that accelerated broadband deployment could:
- lower medical costs
- lower costs of institutionalized living
- generate additional output by more seniors and individuals with disabilities in the labor force.
- In a post-9/11, post-Katrina communications environment, ubiquitous broadband is a national security imperative.
- Designed by Defense Department to withstand a nuclear attack, the Internet has some inherent advantages over traditional communications systems in an emergency: a decentralized broadband network with multiple paths between any two points and the Internet’s packet communication protocol-enhanced network capabilities eliminate many single points of failure, and enables the network to automatically and efficiently work around failures.
For Public Safety. Katrina, another catastrophic communications failure, highlighted once again how fragile and woefully outdated the emergency communications system in this country has become. During Katrina, 38 Public Safety Answering Points (PSAPS) failed preventing 911 calls from being answered -- which public safety leaders say could have been avoided if they had switched to IP based voice and data communication.(3)
- Connecting public safety answering points to broadband, like we’ve connected schools and libraries, is the new post-Katrina communications imperative.
For Government. Universal broadband could also have important advantages for the government itself, allowing government workers to communicate in more geographically-dispersed locations in an emergency. In the event of a major 9/11-type attack on Washington, offices could be inaccessible but employees will still need to communicate.
- Federal workers using broadband enabled phones could immediately work from home or other broadband enabled location -â€" improving continuity of government.
Many government agencies are already making the switch to broadband enabled voice services, but without broadband at home, workers can’t connect.
- If everyone who could took full advantage of telecommuting, the reduction in miles driven would save $3.9 billion a year in fuel and the time savings would be equal to 470,000 jobs(4) -- reducing our dependence on foreign oil, traffic congestion, and greenhouse gas emissions at the same time.
- 79% of all office workers agree that allowing employees to work remotely improves their work-life balance.(5)
- People who normally commute 30 minutes each way to and from work can reduce their commute by 125 hours annually over a 50-week year â€" the equivalent to giving them more than three weeks of additional time with family and friends every year.
- The White House flu pandemic plan suggests every business have a plan in place to allow employees to work from home. However, one in four Americans say they likely would lose their job or business if they had to stay at home for seven to 10 days in a severe flu pandemic, according to a new survey.(6) Broadband is an essential ingredient in allowing people to stay connected to work and work from home.
Notes
1. Song, Moohoun, Peter F Orazem and Rajesh Sing. Broadband Access, Telecommuting and the Urban-Rural Digital Divide Iowa State University. March 1 2006 (http://www.seta.iastate.edu/abstracts/files/5.pdf) Return to text
2. Litan, Robert E. Great Expectations: Potential Economic Benefits To The Nation From Accelerated Broadband Deployment To Older Americans And Americans With Disabilities New Millennium Research Council. December 2005. (http://www.newmillenniumresearch.org/archive/Litan_FINAL_120805.pdf) Return to text
3. Reardon, Marguerite. "911 dials IP technology" ZDNet. January 13, 2006 (http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9595_22-6026770.html) Return to text
4. Rockbridge Associates Inc. 2005/2006 National Technology Readiness Survey University of Maryland. July 12, 2006 (http://www.rhsmith.umd.edu/ntrs/NTRS-2005-06.pdf)Return to text
5. Avaya 2005 Global Research Report: Working to Communicate Better in Business January 2005 (http://whitepapers.techrepublic.com.com/whitepaper.aspx?&kw=Avaya+2005+G...))Return to text
6. Hoskinson, Charles. “One in Four Say They’d Lose Job or Business if They Had to Stay Home in a Pandemic†October 27, 2006 Return to text
TEN YEARS AGO...
Silicon Valley to Washington: Ignore Us, Please
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal 3/4/1997, AUTHOR: Tim Draper]
[Commentary] Draper wrote that Silicon Valley didn't need to do a better job of lobbying because the technology industries are doing great without any interference from Washington and it should stay that way. He argued that since the technology industries have created lots of good paying jobs, strengthened the economy, and made businesses more efficient, Washington should just leave them alone.
http://online.wsj.com/page/ppv_snippet-SB857426375248997500-search.html
(requires subscription)
See from just last week...
* WHY THE TECH INDUSTRY STILL CAN'T GET ITS WAY
[SOURCE: C-Net|News.com 3/1/2007, AUTHOR: Charles Cooper]
[Commentary] Each week, it seems, brings fresh evidence of the increasing intersection between the worlds of high technology and politics. Yet it's also clear that the tech business sector commands less influence with our political class than its size might suggest. The reasons? I've heard several, but maybe the most persuasive is that Silicon Valley, for most of its history, wanted as little to do with Washington, D.C., as possible. And now it's got to play catch-up in a hurry.
http://news.com.com/Why+the+tech+industry+still+cant+get+its+way/2010-10...
Ten Years Ago... Silicon Valley to Washington: Ignore Us, Please
CITIZEN K STREET
[SOURCE: Washington Post 3/4, AUTHOR: Robert G. Kaiser]
In the coming weeks, Robert G. Kaiser, associate editor of The Washington Post, will tell the story of Gerry Cassidy's career and the evolution of his firm in a unique fashion, combining the resources of both The Post and washingtonpost.com. Gerald S. J. Cassidy worked on the staff of the Senate Select Committee on Nutrition and Human Needs, chaired by Sen. George McGovern (D-SD). Cassidy worked for Sen McGovern on food stamps, school lunch programs and the like for six years, then left with a colleague to establish a consulting business. They thought they could use their knowledge of Congress and the federal bureaucracy to help businesses and institutions navigate the nation's capital. Instead, they ended up helping to change Washington itself. They developed one big idea for a business that proved amazingly successful: the earmarked appropriation for individual institutions. Tufts University was their first client to win an earmark, $27 million to build a human nutrition research center. This success was the first recorded example of lobbyists making money by persuading Congress to send money to a private institution that had asked for the money without any government agency proposing the project. Within a few years this upstart lobbying firm had dozens of clients and was making millions of dollars. The original partnership broke up after ten years, but the business boomed. Cassidy & Associates became the biggest lobbying firm in town. Its success contributed to an explosion of lobbying as imitators tried to copy the Cassidy method. Lobbyists became important sources of cash for the politicians they lobbied, and as campaigns became ever more expensive, lobbyists' contributions became ever more important. Over time, the rise of lobbying helped create a new culture of wealth in the nation's capital. And Gerald Cassidy himself amassed a fortune of more than $100 million.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/03/AR200703...
(requires registration)
* Washington Post’s K Street Connections
[Commentary] We hope the Post fully discloses its own relationships with lobbyists as it unfolds its major “†series. Right from the beginning, readers should learn that the Washington Post has had a long relationship with super-lobbyist Tony Podesta. All the various wheeling and dealing which Tony’s firm has and is doing for the company must be disclosed. The Post should also identify how it is supporting the lobbying agendas of the newspaper, broadcast, and cable industries.
http://www.democraticmedia.org/jcblog/?p=193
Citizen K Street
ASHCROFT SAYS XM/SIRIUS DEAL WOULD DECREASE COMPETITION
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
Former Attorney General John Ashcroft has sent a letter to his successor, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, saying he thinks that terrestrial radio should not be considered a direct competitor in the satellite radio market for purposes of a Justice Department review. Ashcroft has been hired to represent the interests of the National Association of Broadcasters.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6421256.html?display=Breaking...
* XM-Sirius Merger? NAB Won't Hear of It
[Commentary] NAB President David Rehr makes 5 points: 1) The national satellite-radio market currently is a two-company duopoly trying to become a government-sanctioned monopoly. 2) Such a monopoly would violate FCC rules and precedent, congressional policy and antitrust principles. 3) This government-sanctioned monopoly would undermine audio-content competition, not enhance it. 4) XM and Sirius have a pattern of violating their FCC licenses and cannot be trusted with monopoly power. 5) By their own admission, this merger is not necessary for their survival.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6421255.html?display=Opinion
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6421256.html?display=Breaking%20News
LOCAL LOBBYISTS LAUNCH TELECOM REFORM SITE
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: Linda Haugsted]
City and county lobbyists are painting pro-telephone-company legislative reform as a blackjack game where consumers lose on a newly launched Web site (www.thetruthontelecomreform.org/). The site is sponsored by the Telecommunications Advocacy Coalition. Its members are the National League of Cities, the National Association of Counties, the Government Finance Officers Association and the National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors. The groups asserted that moving video franchising from local governments to state or federal levels will cost local government up to $8 billion in revenue annually. Local agreements mean city officials can quickly act on consumer complaints, can seek compensation for the use of public rights-of-way and can assure that roads opened by providers as they install plant are properly repaired, according to opinions expressed on the new site. The site invites visitors into the "big telco casino" to play a hand of blackjack with chips bearing labels including "consumer complaints" and "first responders." The telephone "dealer" hand always gets 21, with the consumer getting messages like, "You just lost local control. Who's going to make sure big telecom repairs the roads they dig up?"
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6421010.html?display=Breaking+News
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6421010.html?display=Breaking%20News
DIRECTV HINTS MLB DEAL MAY BE COMPLETE
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
In a signal that a deal may be finalized, DirecTV told the FCC Friday that the planned exclusive agreement with Major League Baseball for out-of-market games could result in "more baseball being available to more fans in a more compelling format." Likening the deal to those DirecTV has with 'Sunday Ticket' and 'NASCAR Hotpass', the company told the FCC's media bureau that its 'Extra Innings' package would result in more content and features and that "no one would be denied access." To access the programming, consumers will have to switch from the cable systems and competing satellite operators to DirecTV. "Consumers switching from cable to DirecTV will be provided with free equipment and free installation, " the company told the FCC. DirecTV pointed out that it had competed with EchoStar and IN Demand for the package, and it was the only company to agree to terms acceptable to MLB. One of those terms was that DirecTV must carry MLB's Baseball Channel in the basic tier. DirecTV outlined some of its plans for the package. It will include channels that would deliver cut-ins to games around the country, real-time scores and stats, and it would offer the most games in high definition -- a move very few cable operators would be able to do.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6421283.html?display=Breaking...
* Carey Swings Back at Extra Innings Critics
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6421281.html?display=Breaking+News
* DirecTV Defends Its Play for Extra Innings
http://www.tvweek.com/news.cms?newsId=11644
* New Baseball TV Deal Is Drawing Some Boos
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117304882191126389.html?mod=todays_us_ma...
* Inside Baseball
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6421254.html?display=Opinion
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6421283.html?display=Breaking%20News
WHY ADVERTISING'S CAVEMEN ARE GOING TOTALLY HOLLYROCK
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Brooks Barnes brooks.barnes@wsj.com and Suzanne Vranica]
Is finding a way for marketers to beat commercial-zapping DVRs and helping networks to cure the distressed state of TV comedy so simple that a caveman could do it? ABC's decision last week to greenlight a half-hour pilot program based on Geico's popular cavemen characters highlights the blurring line between advertising and entertainment, as well as the trouble the network has had in launching successful sitcoms. Although the project is at a nascent stage -- there's no script and no cast -- plans call for the comedy to be titled "Cavemen" and focus on a trio of prehistoric characters who battle prejudice in modern-day Atlanta. Walt Disney Co.'s ABC will pay for the pilot and show, if one eventually materializes. Geico, a unit of Berkshire Hathaway Inc., will have no creative control but will receive a royalty payment for the use of the character.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117305670677226518.html?mod=todays_us_ma...
(requires subscription)
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117305670677226518.html?mod=todays_us_marketplac…
BBC PLANS COMMERCIAL PUSH
[SOURCE: Financial Times, AUTHOR: Emiko Terazono]
The commercial arm of the BBC is planning a substantial push in its international and digital operations in an attempt to double profits to £200m over the next five years, following a disappointing licence fee settlement in January. The plans are expected to heighten concerns among the corporation’s commercial rivals, but John Smith, chief executive of BBC Worldwide, said 2007 was an “inflection point†for the division, adding that there were rising expectations within the BBC for the commercial arm to bridge the funding gap between what the corporation had been seeking and the actual settlement.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/64210496-ca8d-11db-820b-000b5df10621.html
(requires subscription)
* BBC to show trailers and news clips on YouTube
http://www.reuters.com/article/internetNews/idUSL0216508120070302
BBC plans commercial push
A SCUFFLE OVER PAY TELEVISION IN BRITAIN SPILLS INTO LIVING ROOM
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Eric Pfanner]
For 3.3 million cable television viewers in Britain, “Lost†has disappeared. So have several other popular American series, including “24†and “The Simpsons.†The shows vanished from cable last week when British Sky Broadcasting, the satellite television company, withdrew several of its channels, including those that broadcast the United States series, from Virgin Media, the main cable provider in Britain. The companies ostensibly ended their relationship because of a disagreement over the cost of carrying the channels on cable. But analysts say that the companies are fighting a broader battle over the British pay-TV market. This has turned Homer Simpson and the castaways of “Lost†into pawns for some far more powerful media figures: on one side, Richard Branson, the British entrepreneur behind the Virgin brand; on the other, the Murdoch family.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/05/business/worldbusiness/05uktv.html
(requires registration)
A Scuffle Over Pay Television in Britain Spills Into the Living Room