Benton RSS Feed

Coverage Type 

VONAGE WINS COURT STAY IN VERIZON PATENT BATTLE
[SOURCE: Reuters]
Internet phone company Vonage Holdings Corp. won a legal victory that sent its shares sharply higher when a U.S. appeals court ruled on Tuesday the company can continue signing up new customers while it appeals a patent infringement ruling. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted Vonage's request for an extended stay of a lower court injunction while it appeals a jury finding that it infringed patents held by Verizon Communications Inc. for making calls over the Internet. The federal circuit appeals court, which specializes in hearing patent cases, put Vonage's appeal on a fast-track schedule, with arguments set for June 25. It takes the appeals court more than a year to rule on most cases. But lawyers involved in the Vonage appeal said it could be decided as soon as this summer.
http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSWEN690320070424

* Vonage Injunction Stayed in Patent Case
http://www.latimes.com/technology/ats-ap_technology12apr24,1,5397243.sto...
* Vonage can keep signing up new customers
http://news.com.com/Vonage+can+keep+signing+up+new+customers/2100-1036_3...
* No quick decision in Vonage patent appeal
http://news.com.com/No+quick+decision+in+Vonage+patent+appeal/2100-1036_...
* Appeals Court Allows Net Phone Company to Continue Signing Up New Customers
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/25/technology/25vonage.html
* Vonage Wins Stay in Verizon Dispute
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/24/AR200704...


Vonage wins court stay in Verizon patent battle
Coverage Type 

AT&T EARNINGS BEAT FORECASTS DESPITE SLOW MARKET FOR MOBILE PHONES
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Matt Richtel]
AT&T, the world’s largest telephone company, reported first-quarter earnings on Tuesday that handily beat Wall Street expectations. But some investors and telecommunications industry analysts said they were not sure that AT&T could continue its pace, particularly as growth is slowing in the mobile phone business. The earnings show the potential for growth but also the steep challenges facing AT&T and other telephone companies that are turning into multifaceted telecommunications providers offering landline, mobile, Internet and television services. Industry analysts said that a crucial question facing AT&T was whether the company, now that it has wrapped up a series of major acquisitions, can find growth by expanding its underlying businesses. AT&T, like other major telecommunications companies, continued to see a decline in its traditional telephone business. In the first quarter, it lost 285,000 primary consumer lines, compared with declines of 251,000 in the first quarter of last year and 331,000 in the fourth quarter. The company said that it also lost 130,000 secondary phone lines in the latest quarter. But it continued to see gains in its high-speed Internet business, adding 691,000 subscribers to reach 12.9 million over all.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/25/technology/25phone.html
(requires registration)

* Takeover savings help AT&T's earnings soar
http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/money/20070425/earn25.art.htm


AT&T Earnings Beat Forecasts Despite Slow Market for Mobile Phones
Coverage Type 

DON'T BLAME HIP-HOP
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Kelefa]
Hip-hop has been making enemies for as long as it has been winning fans. It has been dismissed as noise, blamed for concert riots, accused of glorifying crime and sexism and greed and Ebonics. From Run-D.M.C. to Sister Souljah to Tupac Shakur to Young Jeezy, the story of hip-hop is partly the story of those who have been irritated, even horrified, by it. Even so, the anti-hip-hop fervor of the last few weeks has been extraordinary, if not quite unprecedented. Somehow Don Imus’s ill-considered characterization of the Rutgers women’s basketball team — “some nappy-headed hos” — led not only to his firing but also to a discussion of the crude language some rappers use. Mr. Imus and the Rev. Al Sharpton traded words on Mr. Sharpton’s radio show and on “Today,” and soon the hip-hop industry had been pulled into the fray. Unlike previous hip-hop controversies, this one doesn’t have a villain, or even a villainous song. The current state of hip-hop seems almost irrelevant to the current discussion. The genre has already acquired (and it’s fair to say earned) a reputation for bad language and bad behavior.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/25/arts/music/25hiph.html
(requires registration)

* The Imus Test: Rap Lyrics Undergo Examination
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/24/AR200704...


Don’t Blame Hip-Hop
Coverage Type 

XM's ROGUE ANTENNAS AMPLIFY SIGNALS, MERGER SCRUTINY
[SOURCE: Bloomberg, AUTHOR: Christopher Stern]
XM Satellite Radio became the nation's largest satellite broadcaster with a network of hundreds of antennas that were built and operated in violation of Federal Communications Commission rules. At least a third of the 800 antennas that beam XM's radio channels to millions of customers were placed in unapproved locations or emitted signals that were too strong, according to a review of FCC filings. XM says some now comply with the rules, though it doesn't know how many. The misplaced antennas may result in fines or a shutdown of part of the company's network. Lawmakers including Rep Edward Markey (D-MA) say regulators should take the violations into account when they consider XM's plan to combine with Sirius Satellite Radio.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601204&sid=azdBm8rw6BmU


http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601204&sid=azdBm8rw6BmU
Coverage Type 

THE SUN WILL SET ON 50 JOBS IN BALTIMORE
[SOURCE: Editor&Publisher]
Following on the heels of Tribune Co. stablemates the Los Angeles Times and Chicago Tribune, Baltimore's The Sun announced internally a plan to cut 50 positions by buyouts or layoffs.
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_con...


http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=…

Benton's Communications-related Headlines For Wednesday April 25, 2007

To view Benton's Headlines feed in your RSS=20
Aggregator, paste=20
http://www.benton.org/index.php?q=3Dtaxonomy/term/6/all/feed into your read=
er.

INTERNET/BROADBAND
Answers Sought for U.S. Broadband Decline
Markey Holds Hearing on International Broadband
Why the U.S. Doesn=92t Measure Up
Bush Administration: U.S. Maintains Telecommunications Technology Leaders=
hip
FCC to unveil auction plan today
Researchers break Internet speed records

BROADCASTING/CABLE
Activists Call For DTV Obligations Before Dual Carriage
Barton, Upton 'Disturbed' By Martin's Cable Agenda
NAB Warns Tower Changes Will Affect Rollout

GOVERNMENT & COMMUNICATIONS
A Host Dials Down, and Bush Speaks Up
China Sets Out to Cut Secrecy, but Laws Leave Big Loopholes

TELECOM
Vonage wins court stay in Verizon patent battle
AT&T Earnings Beat Forecasts Despite Slow Market for Mobile Phones

ACCESS
Expert panel faults U.S. policies on disabled people

QUICKLY -- Don=92t Blame Hip-Hop; XM's Rogue=20
Antennas Amplify Signals, Merger Scrutiny; The=20
Sun Will Set on 50 Jobs in Baltimore

INTERNET/BROADBAND

ANSWERS SOUGHT FOR US BROADBAND DECLINE
[SOURCE: PCMagazine, AUTHOR: Chloe Albanesius]
A U.S. innovation brain drain, coupled with=20
sloppy government handling of subsidy programs=20
and data collection, have contributed to a=20
decline in the country's broadband standing,=20
technology experts told the Senate Commerce=20
Committee on Tuesday. The hearing was held a day=20
after the Organization for Economic Cooperation=20
and Development (OECD) issued new global=20
broadband per-capita penetration data that saw=20
the U.S. fall from 12th to 15th place out of 30=20
countries. Some viewed the results as a sign that=20
the U.S. is falling behind its global=20
counterparts, while others said it was unfair to=20
compare the U.S. against the smaller and more=20
densely populated countries that beat the U.S. in=20
the OECD rankings. The questions that panelists=20
tangled with mainly dealt with issues of=20
geography. In Europe, where per-capita broadband=20
penetration is growing, world powers like the=20
United Kingdom are smaller geographically than=20
California. The person-to-person proximity also=20
allows infrastructure buildouts to serve more=20
people. While this isn't a problem in major=20
cities, serving rural customers with broadband=20
access is still a thorny issue. One of the=20
issues left undefined was the definition of=20
"broadband". Add to that the lack of reliable=20
government data, and the problem becomes even=20
more complicated, witnesses said. Sen. Daniel=20
Inouye (D-Hawaii), who chairs the Commerce=20
Committee, said that he would soon introduce a=20
bill to promote innovation and improve the=20
federal commitment to basic research on=20
communications. He is also penning broadband data=20
development legislation that would call for the=20
collection of broadband data collection at the=20
federal and state levels, a complaint that was voiced by several speakers.
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,2121582,00.asp
* Statement by Sen Inouye:
"The broadband bottom line is that too many of=20
our international counterparts are passing us=20
by. For this we are paying a price. Some=20
experts estimate that universal broadband=20
adoption would add $500 billion to the U.S.=20
economy and create more than a million new jobs."
http://commerce.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=3DHearings.Statem...
&Statement_ID=3D243
* Statement by Sen Ted Stevens:
http://commerce.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=3DHearings.Statem...
&Statement_ID=3D242
* U.S. Broadband Access Slips Further
http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/apr2007/tc20070424_190579...
m?campaign_id=3Drss_daily

MARKEY HOLDS HEARING ON INTERNATIONAL BROADBAND
[SOURCE: Rep Ed Markey (D-MA)]
Rep Edward J. Markey (D-MA) chaired a hearing of=20
the House Commerce Subcommittee on=20
Telecommunications and the Internet Tuesday on=20
lessons the United States broadband industry can=20
learn from international broadband expansion. In=20
his opening statement he said, "It is clearly=20
time for us to look beyond our borders in=20
developing our nation=92s broadband=20
strategy. While U.S. broadband adoption is=20
certainly increasing and deployment continues, in=20
international broadband rankings a nation must=20
essentially run in order to stand=20
still. Relative to other countries, however, it=20
appears as if America=92s broadband penetration is=20
stalling at =93dial up=94 speed while other nations=20
have developed national plans and are moving=20
ahead." ... "Advanced, high speed broadband=20
service is the indispensable infrastructure of=20
the 21st Century. It will be the vehicle through=20
which countless other economic, civic, and=20
cultural activities occur. As we assess where we=20
stand today, I think the way to achieve greater=20
progress is not from more hortatory rhetoric or=20
excuses for poor rankings =AD the U.S. needs a=20
plan. In my view, the United States started out=20
on the right path. The 1996 Telecommunications=20
Act mandated a robust unbundling and=20
interconnection regime designed to jump-start=20
competition both between and among technology=20
platforms. The idea was that competition would=20
reduce prices, improve service, and spur=20
innovation =AD including the deployment of=20
broadband by incumbents and=20
competitors. Gradually, however, we lost our=20
way, as regulators became convinced that=20
competition within a platform actually hindered=20
overall broadband deployment. As a result, we=20
now have a residential broadband duopoly marked=20
by relatively slow speeds and high prices. Many=20
other nations took one look at our broadband=20
situation, learned from our experience, and took=20
the opposite approach. In Japan and the U.K. for=20
instance, they implemented policies such as local=20
loop unbundling and broadband resale that=20
facilitate competition using the incumbent=92s=20
plant, regardless of technology. As a result,=20
Japan and the U.K. today have faster broadband,=20
cheaper broadband, and more broadband choices."
http://markey.house.gov/index.php?option=3Dcom_content&task=3Dview&id=3D...
5&Itemid=3D141
* Upton Comments on Broadband
At the same hearing, Rep Fred Upton (R-MI) said,=20
"As a result of ... FCC and judicial actions, we=20
at long last have a semblance of a national=20
broadband policy that promotes competition, is=20
pro-investment not anti-investment, and that=20
imposes minimal government regulation upon=20
broadband services and facilities. I am=20
confident that these long sought pro-broadband=20
policy decisions will greatly accelerate=20
broadband deployment. They are only now taking=20
hold as the regulatory uncertainty that hung over=20
broadband was, as we thought in 2002, an=20
investment stifling factor. We heard last week at=20
the wireless hearing about how the spectrum=20
resulting from the DTV transition will permit=20
wireless providers to provide significant=20
broadband services. So, rather than look for new=20
regulatory solutions, we must continue to promote=20
competition, promote new technologies, promote=20
and foster broadband network investment, and rely=20
on competition and deregulatory not government regulation."
http://www.house.gov/upton/press/press-04-24-07.html

WHY THE US DOESN'T MEASURE UP
[SOURCE: Free Press, AUTHOR: Ben Scott]
In testimony before the Senate Commerce Committee=20
today, Free Press Policy Director Ben Scott urged=20
lawmakers to pursue a comprehensive national=20
broadband policy that will bring more broadband=20
competition to American households. =93Above all,=20
we need competition policy to drive down prices,=20
accelerate speeds, and deliver an attractive=20
value to the consumer,=94 Scott said. =93We must not=20
sacrifice the long-term interests of the country=20
for the short-term interests of incumbents that=20
have long shielded themselves from an open=20
market.=94 =93This isn=92t just a matter of pride at=20
stake,=94 Scott said. =93This is real money. The=20
economic benefits of higher broadband penetration=20
accumulate exponentially. Even a small increase=20
in broadband penetration can generate a consumer=20
surplus measured in the billions of dollars.=20
While we aren=92t capturing these dollars, someone=20
else is.=94 =93This is a paradigm-shifting moment=20
for American telecommunications,=94 Scott=20
concluded. =93It is imperative that we choose wisely.=94
http://www.freepress.net/news/22657
* Read Scott's testimony at:=20
http://www.freepress.net/docs/42407bssentestimony.pdf
* U.S. Falling Behind Further and Faster on Broadband
http://www.consumersunion.org/blogs/hun/2007/04/us_falling_farther_and_f...
er.html

STATE DEPARTMENT LETTER ON OECD STUDY ON BROADBAND USE
[SOURCE: National Telecommunications and Information Administration]
The Organization for Economic Co-operation and=20
Development released new broadband statistics on=20
Monday that worry some in the US as the country=20
fell farther behind in per capita broadband=20
penetration. On Tuesday, the US Department of=20
State responded with concerns about the OECD's=20
methodology. David Gross, US Coordinator of=20
Internatonal Communications and Information=20
Policy, wrote that the OECD underestimates US=20
broadband use because the organization relies=20
solely on broadband subscribership numbers.=20
Ambassador Gross believes the survey should also=20
include Wi-Fi hotspot users -- especially on=20
college campuses -- and people who use broadband=20
at work. He writes: "The United States strongly=20
believes that the world community would greatly=20
benefit from a balanced picture of broadband=20
deployment that accurately reflects and captures=20
the rich variation of how people actually gain=20
access to broadband services, and that provides such information in context=
."
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/press/2007/State_OECD_042407.pdf
* Fact Sheet: United States Maintains Information=20
and Communication Technology Leadership and Economic Strength
The National Telecommunications and Information=20
Administration focuses on the bright side of the=20
broadband research. It highlights findings from=20
non-OECD research: The US has the most broadband=20
subscribers, the most Internet users and the most=20
Wi-Fi hotspots in the world. Between June, 2001=20
and June 2006, the number of homes with broadband=20
in the United States has increased by 599%, from=20
9.2 million high-speed lines 64.6 million.
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/press/2007/ICTleader_042407.html

FCC TO UNVEIL AUCTION PLAN TODAY
[SOURCE: Reuters, AUTHOR: Rachelle Younglai]
The Federal Communications Commission will take=20
its first stab on Wednesday at defining how a=20
2007 auction of airwave spectrum will take place.=20
The agency plans to auction airwaves later this=20
year that are being returned by television=20
broadcasters as they move to digital signals=20
early in 2009. The sale is touted as the last=20
opportunity for new players to enter the wireless=20
market and is expected to raise billions of=20
dollars. But first the FCC has to define how the=20
auction will work, provide a set of rules on how=20
the spectrum will be divided and say what kind of=20
services can be offered using the airwaves. The=20
FCC is expected to outline a tentative plan at an=20
open meeting of its commissioners on Wednesday --=20
a crucial step that will help potential bidders=20
craft their strategy. The Media Access Project=20
and other consumer advocacy groups such as=20
Consumers Union are pushing for rules they say=20
would increase competition. The groups want half=20
the airwaves up for auction to be designated as=20
"open access" spectrum. That would allow other=20
companies to buy access on established wireless=20
networks so they can offer their own wireless=20
services. The consumer groups also want rules to=20
ensure that broadband providers treat all Internet content in the same way.
http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSN2441759420070424
* Wireless tech's high-stakes turf
http://news.com.com/FCC+to+reveal+spectrum+auction+plan/2100-1039_3-6178...
.html?tag=3Dnefd.lede

RESEARCHERS BREAK INTERNET SPEED RECORDS
[SOURCE: Associated Press, AUTHOR: Anick Jesdanun]
A group of researchers led by the University of=20
Tokyo has broken Internet speed records -- twice=20
in two days. Operators of the high-speed=20
Internet2 network announced Tuesday that the=20
researchers on Dec. 30 sent data at 7.67 gigabits=20
per second, using standard communications=20
protocols. The next day, using modified=20
protocols, the team broke the record again by=20
sending data over the same 20,000-mile path at=20
9.08 Gbps. That likely represents the current=20
network's final record because rules require a 10=20
percent improvement for recognition, a percentage=20
that would bring the next record right at the=20
Internet2's current theoretical limit of 10 Gbps.=20
However, the Internet2 consortium is planning to=20
build a new network with a capacity of 100 Gbps.=20
With the 10-fold increase, a high-quality version=20
of the movie "The Matrix" could be sent in a few=20
seconds rather than half a minute over the=20
current Internet2 and two days over a typical home broadband line.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070424/ap_on_hi_te/faster_internet;_ylt=3DA...
cVIblS5Gz78AEANj24cA

BROADCASTING/CABLE

ACTIVISTS CALL FOR DTV OBLIGATIONS BEFORE DUAL CARRIAGE
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
Media activist groups The Campaign Legal Center=20
and Common Cause sent a letter to the FCC=20
commissioners Monday asking them not to expand TV=20
station's carriage rights until they have=20
resolved the issue of TV stations' DTV public=20
interest obligations. =93The FCC's inaction on=20
public interest obligations remains a gaping hole=20
in the fabric of our nation's telecommunications=20
policy," they argued. With at least two of the=20
commissioners, Democrats Jonathan Adelstein and=20
Michael Copps--they were preaching to the choir.=20
They have both pushed for a resolution of a 1999=20
inquiry into DTV public interest obligations. At=20
its April 25 monthly meeting, the commission is=20
scheduled to consider a proposal by FCC Chairman=20
Kevin Martin that cable operators be required to=20
deliver both an analog and digital version of TV=20
station's signals after the conversion to=20
all-digital broadcast TV as a means of insuring=20
viewers get a "viewable signal," as required by law.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6435988.html
-- See also --
* Benton supports Broadcasters' Disclosure rules
http://www.benton.org/benton_files/bentonltr.doc

BARTON, UPTON 'DISTURBED' BY MARTIN'S CABLE AGENDA
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
Former House Commerce Chairman Joe Barton (R-TX)=20
and former House Telecom Subcommittee Chairman=20
Fred Upton (R-MI) have asked FCC Chairman Kevin=20
Martin to lay off the cable industry when it=20
comes to "additional, unnecessary and burdensome=20
regulations." The Congressmen wrote Chairman=20
Martin on Tuesday saying they are "disturbed that=20
with respect to the cable industry, you appear to=20
be making proposals that are leading the=20
Commission precisely down the road of intrusive=20
regulation when it is least justified." Their=20
concerns include Chairman Martin's push for a la=20
carte cable pricing, mandatory cable carriage of=20
TV station's multicast digital signals, a new=20
plan to require cable to carry TV stations in=20
both digital and analog after the DTV transition,=20
his insistence that the FCC hold to its July 1=20
deadline for banning integrated cable set-top=20
boxes, reports he plans to reimpose a 30%=20
national cap on one cable company's subs, and=20
plans to allow stations to lease digital capacity=20
to women and minorities, who would then get=20
mandatory cable carriage for the channels they create.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6436156.html
* House Leaders Back Cable in FCC Fight
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6436192.html

NAB WARNS TOWER CHANGES WILL AFFECT ROLLOUT
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
The National Association of Broadcasters warns=20
that changes to tower heights, sites or lights=20
that are driven by concerns over bird collisions=20
could delay the DTV transition, impede the=20
rollout of broadband, jeopardize homeland=20
security, contribute to global warming and even=20
possibly cause planes to crash. [OK, the NAB did=20
not mention global warming.] Broadcasters say it=20
is all for "little, if any, impact on the future=20
ecological viability of migratory birds." NAB=20
and the wireless phone industry argue in comments=20
to the FCC that migratory bird collisions with=20
towers are only a fraction of other "human-caused=20
aviation mortality" which includes "window=20
collisions, vehicle collisions, transmission=20
lines, wind energy facilities, pesticides and oil=20
pollution, hunting and domestic cat predation."=20
Estimates vary from 4 million to as many as 50=20
million tower-related bird deaths annually. Most=20
estimates fall on the lower end of that scale.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6436115.html

GOVERNMENT & COMMUNICATIONS

A HOST DIALS DOWN, AND BUSH SPEAKS UP
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Alessandra Stanley]
Charlie Rose is a talk show host known for long=20
and rambling questions. President Bush is famous=20
for his short, Texas-terse answers. On last=20
night=92s show, the two men reversed roles.=20
President Bush spoke forcefully and at length=20
about Iraq. Mr. Rose was succinct. It was the=20
closest President Bush has come to the kind of=20
winding declamations that Richard M. Nixon=20
delivered to the British interviewer David Frost=20
in 1977 and that are now resurrected on Broadway=20
in =93Frost/Nixon,=94 a play by Peter Morgan. Mr.=20
Morgan, who was one of Mr. Rose=92s guests on=20
Monday, told the host that American audiences=20
would see parallels =93between presidents facing=20
the wrath of a country that feels that in their=20
name, bad decisions were made.=94 Actually,=20
President Bush looked more at ease than he=20
usually does in interviews, but he did not offer=20
any revelations about his showdown with Congress=20
over financing for additional troops or his=20
support for his embattled attorney general,=20
Alberto R. Gonzales. He mostly expanded on=20
positions he had staked out in the past. It was=20
his wordiness that spoke volumes.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/25/arts/25teevee.html?_r=3D1&oref=3Dslogin
(requires registration)

CHINA SETS OUT TO CUT SECRECY, BUT LAWS LEAVE BIG LOOPHOLES
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Jim Yardley]
China announced new regulations on Tuesday to=20
reduce government secrecy and grant citizens=20
greater access to official information, but the=20
regulations include broad exceptions that raise=20
questions about how much new openness will be=20
tolerated. The regulations, approved in a decree=20
signed by Prime Minister Wen Jiabao, were=20
announced with fanfare on Tuesday but will not=20
become effective until May 1, 2008. And the=20
caveats suggest that the new regulations may=20
represent only measured steps in fulfilling=20
promises by top leaders to create a more=20
transparent and accountable government.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/25/world/asia/25china.html
(requires registration)

TELECOM

VONAGE WINS COURT STAY IN VERIZON PATENT BATTLE
[SOURCE: Reuters]
Internet phone company Vonage Holdings Corp. won=20
a legal victory that sent its shares sharply=20
higher when a U.S. appeals court ruled on Tuesday=20
the company can continue signing up new customers=20
while it appeals a patent infringement ruling.=20
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit=20
granted Vonage's request for an extended stay of=20
a lower court injunction while it appeals a jury=20
finding that it infringed patents held by Verizon=20
Communications Inc. for making calls over the=20
Internet. The federal circuit appeals court,=20
which specializes in hearing patent cases, put=20
Vonage's appeal on a fast-track schedule, with=20
arguments set for June 25. It takes the appeals=20
court more than a year to rule on most cases. But=20
lawyers involved in the Vonage appeal said it=20
could be decided as soon as this summer.
http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSWEN690320070424
* Vonage Injunction Stayed in Patent Case
http://www.latimes.com/technology/ats-ap_technology12apr24,1,5397243.sto...
coll=3Dsns-ap-toptechnology
* Vonage can keep signing up new customers
http://news.com.com/Vonage+can+keep+signing+up+new+customers/2100-1036_3...
78783.html?tag=3Dhtml.alert.hed
* No quick decision in Vonage patent appeal
http://news.com.com/No+quick+decision+in+Vonage+patent+appeal/2100-1036_...
178731.html?tag=3Dhtml.alert.hed
* Appeals Court Allows Net Phone Company to Continue Signing Up New Custome=
rs
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/25/technology/25vonage.html
* Vonage Wins Stay in Verizon Dispute
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/24/AR200704...
1034.html

AT&T EARNINGS BEAT FORECASTS DESPITE SLOW MARKET FOR MOBILE PHONES
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Matt Richtel]
AT&T, the world=92s largest telephone company,=20
reported first-quarter earnings on Tuesday that=20
handily beat Wall Street expectations. But some=20
investors and telecommunications industry=20
analysts said they were not sure that AT&T could=20
continue its pace, particularly as growth is=20
slowing in the mobile phone business. The=20
earnings show the potential for growth but also=20
the steep challenges facing AT&T and other=20
telephone companies that are turning into=20
multifaceted telecommunications providers=20
offering landline, mobile, Internet and=20
television services. Industry analysts said that=20
a crucial question facing AT&T was whether the=20
company, now that it has wrapped up a series of=20
major acquisitions, can find growth by expanding=20
its underlying businesses. AT&T, like other major=20
telecommunications companies, continued to see a=20
decline in its traditional telephone business. In=20
the first quarter, it lost 285,000 primary=20
consumer lines, compared with declines of 251,000=20
in the first quarter of last year and 331,000 in=20
the fourth quarter. The company said that it also=20
lost 130,000 secondary phone lines in the latest=20
quarter. But it continued to see gains in its=20
high-speed Internet business, adding 691,000=20
subscribers to reach 12.9 million over all.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/25/technology/25phone.html
(requires registration)
* Takeover savings help AT&T's earnings soar
http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/money/20070425/earn25.art.htm

ACCESS

EXPERT PANEL FAULTS US POLICIES ON DISABLED PEOPLE
[SOURCE: Reuters, AUTHOR: Will Dunham]
Outdated U.S. policies are keeping many disabled=20
Americans from getting help they need, an expert=20
panel said on Tuesday in a report faulting=20
government inaction toward the needs of this=20
growing population. The report looked at a wide=20
range of issues affecting the disabled such as=20
accessibility of buildings and other places, gaps=20
in public programs such as those paying for=20
wheelchairs and scooters and health insurance=20
coverage. The panel said younger and middle-aged=20
people face increasing risk for future disability=20
due to factors such as diabetes, obesity and a=20
sedentary lifestyle. The report concludes that=20
immediate action is essential for the nation to=20
avoid harm and to help people with disabilities=20
lead independent and productive lives. Report=20
includes a chapter on "Assistive and Mainstream=20
Technologies for People with Disabilities" and an=20
appendix on "Access to Telecommunications=20
Technology by Americans with Disabilities: Key Laws and Policies."
http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSN2441044520070424?pageNu...
r=3D1
* The Future of Disability in America (Committee on Disability in America)
http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=3D11898

QUICKLY

DON'T BLAME HIP-HOP
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Kelefa]
Hip-hop has been making enemies for as long as it=20
has been winning fans. It has been dismissed as=20
noise, blamed for concert riots, accused of=20
glorifying crime and sexism and greed and=20
Ebonics. From Run-D.M.C. to Sister Souljah to=20
Tupac Shakur to Young Jeezy, the story of hip-hop=20
is partly the story of those who have been=20
irritated, even horrified, by it. Even so, the=20
anti-hip-hop fervor of the last few weeks has=20
been extraordinary, if not quite unprecedented.=20
Somehow Don Imus=92s ill-considered=20
characterization of the Rutgers women=92s=20
basketball team =97 =93some nappy-headed hos=94 =97 led=20
not only to his firing but also to a discussion=20
of the crude language some rappers use. Mr. Imus=20
and the Rev. Al Sharpton traded words on Mr.=20
Sharpton=92s radio show and on =93Today,=94 and soon=20
the hip-hop industry had been pulled into the=20
fray. Unlike previous hip-hop controversies, this=20
one doesn=92t have a villain, or even a villainous=20
song. The current state of hip-hop seems almost=20
irrelevant to the current discussion. The genre=20
has already acquired (and it=92s fair to say=20
earned) a reputation for bad language and bad behavior.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/25/arts/music/25hiph.html
(requires registration)
* The Imus Test: Rap Lyrics Undergo Examination
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/24/AR200704...
2496.html

XM's ROGUE ANTENNAS AMPLIFY SIGNALS, MERGER SCRUTINY
[SOURCE: Bloomberg, AUTHOR: Christopher Stern]
XM Satellite Radio became the nation's largest=20
satellite broadcaster with a network of hundreds=20
of antennas that were built and operated in=20
violation of Federal Communications Commission=20
rules. At least a third of the 800 antennas that=20
beam XM's radio channels to millions of customers=20
were placed in unapproved locations or emitted=20
signals that were too strong, according to a=20
review of FCC filings. XM says some now comply=20
with the rules, though it doesn't know how many.=20
The misplaced antennas may result in fines or a=20
shutdown of part of the company's network.=20
Lawmakers including Rep Edward Markey (D-MA) say=20
regulators should take the violations into=20
account when they consider XM's plan to combine with Sirius Satellite Radio.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=3D20601204&sid=3DazdBm8rw6BmU

THE SUN WILL SET ON 50 JOBS IN BALTIMORE
[SOURCE: Editor&Publisher]
Following on the heels of Tribune Co. stablemates=20
the Los Angeles Times and Chicago Tribune,=20
Baltimore's The Sun announced internally a plan=20
to cut 50 positions by buyouts or layoffs.
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_con...
t_id=3D1003575874
--------------------------------------------------------------
Communications-related Headlines is a free online=20
news summary service provided by the Benton=20
Foundation (www.benton.org). Posted Monday=20
through Friday, this service provides updates on=20
important industry developments, policy issues,=20
and other related news events. While the=20
summaries are factually accurate, their often=20
informal tone does not always represent the tone=20
of the original articles. Headlines are compiled=20
by Kevin Taglang headlines( at )benton.org -- we welcome your comments.
--------------------------------------------------------------

Letter to FCC on Disclosure

April 25, 2007

Kevin J. Martin
Chairman
Federal Communications Commission
445 12th Street, SW
Washington, DC 20554

Dear Chairman Martin,

Recent trade press reports suggest that the Commission is considering a proposal that would require online filing of broadcast television stations’ public files. I write today in strong support of such a requirement and ask, again, that the Commission move swiftly to define the public interest obligations of digital television broadcasters.

In December 1998, the Presidential Advisory Committee on Public Interest Obligations of Digital television Broadcasters submitted a report and recommendations. The Advisory Committee, composed of both broadcasters and advocates, developed several key recommendations that would provide enhanced disclosures of broadcasters’ public interest programming and activities. In its final report, the Advisory Committee, on which I served, argued that “greater availability of relevant information will increase awareness and promote continuing dialogue between digital television broadcasters and their communities and provide an important self-audit to the broadcasters.”

To date, the Commission has still not implemented the Advisory Committee’s recommendations, which would require TV stations to:

• file quarterly reports disclosing how they have met their obligation to air programming responsive to the community;

• use a standardized disclosure form that is clear and coherent, such as check-off forms that can reduce administrative burdens and be easily understood by the public (the Committee’s draft form is attached);

• report on how often they air newscasts, local and national public affairs programming, political/civic discourse, programming for underserved communities, other local programming, and public service announcements, as well as closed captioning for the hearing-impaired and video description for the vision-impaired; and

• report on such public interest programming via the Internet.

Out of concerns that the public could not determine the extent to which broadcasters were meeting obligations even in the analog world, on September 14, 2000 the Commission adopted a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the matter of Standardized and Enhanced Disclosure Requirements for Television Broadcast Licensee Public Interest Obligations (MM 20 Docket No. 00–168). The NPRM sought comment on requiring television broadcasters (both digital and analog) to disclose on a quarterly standardized form how they are serving the public interest.

On November 18, 2005, citing a woeful lack of progress, the Commission’s Consumer Advisory Committee (CAC), on which I also served, adopted a recommendation that Commission should, within six months, issue Reports & Orders in the matters of 1) Public Interest Obligations of TV broadcast Licensees (MM Docket No. 99–360) and 2) Standardized and Enhanced Disclosure Requirements for Television Broadcast Licensee Public Interest Obligations (MM 20 Docket No. 00–168).

Television stations have an essential public interest obligation to provide the public with information about how they are serving the community’s interests. But too often the public does not have access to basic information that would let us know if broadcasters are making the grade. Holding broadcasters accountable for their current requirements is as important as food labeling.

Some valuable information is currently made available about broadcasters’ public interest performance. For example, all television broadcasters must prepare and place in their public file reports on their children’s programming and how they are serving their communities.

• Public files can be used to investigate if stations are living up to their obligations. For example, stations have listed programs like a Star Trek-like cartoon and a reality show modeled after “Survivor” as educational and informational.

• These reports can be used by community members and civic leaders to grade a television station’s performance when its broadcast license comes up for renewal.

Broadcasters argue for self-regulation as the solution. However, even effective self-regulation by the broadcast industry requires adequate information be made available to the public about what a local broadcaster is doing. Broadcasters are no longer required to perform public “ascertainments” to determine community needs. A public file is an essential way for a community to hold local broadcasters accountable. Public reporting can be improved:

• The requirement for listing programs that serve the community is so vague that many television stations list everything and anything as qualifying. For example, a 2000 review of the public file of a Washington, DC, TV station provided a lengthy list of seemingly irrelevant programming or program segments, e.g., “Great Britain honored Queen Mum’s 100th birthday” as addressing the DC-area’s needs. In the Matter of Standardized and Enhanced Disclosure Requirements for Television Broadcast Licensee Public Interest Obligations. (MM Docket 00-168) Comments filed by United Church of Christ et al. (Dec 18, 2000).

• Interested and concerned community members must visit the television station headquarters to view the information, a process that may be intimidating, inaccessible, or inconvenient for working families.

Television station owners say that reporting their public interest performance electronically is unduly burdensome. But disclosure can be an important opportunity for broadcasters to tell their viewers about the good things they are doing. Shouldn’t television station owners be thrilled to share this information? It’s a chance to advertise their own good work.

Disclosure would not impose new programming requirements nor would the standardized form alter broadcasters’ editorial discretion. New disclosure guidelines would serve to make reporting consistent with modern means of accessing information. And to ease the burden of making files available electronically, regulators might only require that stations post the files that are most helpful to the public and merely provide links to information available on a government web site. Any reasonable and moderate burden placed on broadcasters is far outweighed by the benefits to the public and the lessening of current burdens placed on the public in accessing this information today.

Of course, disclosure obligations should not be viewed as replacements for strong public interest obligations. Public interest obligations are about whether:

• Our children can turn on a television and find truly educational content
• We can be active and intelligent participants in our democracy with sufficient civic programming before elections
• The voices and views on our airwaves reflect the diversity of our country
• Our televisions can keep us alert and informed in national and local emergencies
• People who are sight- or hearing-impaired can access all of TV’s educational, informational, and entertainment programming

For over a decade, the Commission has been considering the appropriate public interest obligations of digital television broadcasters, but has yet to fully clarify these obligations. In less than two years, when analog TV is finally turned off, so too will broadcasters’ mandate to serve the public interest, convenience, and necessity be left behind unless the Commission acts to extend meaningful obligations to the digital TV world of multicasting.

In return for serving the public, broadcasters enjoy a variety of government-ensured benefits including:

• Free, exclusive use of a valuable but scarce public spectrum – including many billions of dollars worth of additional spectrum to convert to digital.
• Legal protection against anyone else who seeks to compete in their market or broadcast over their licensed frequencies.
• Federal preemption of local zoning and environmental regulations in order to make sure that stations’ transmission towers can be erected and send signals to viewers.
• Free carriage of programming on local cable systems for which other programmers pay millions.

Obviously, these special benefits should not be expanded for digital broadcasters unless they are fulfilling well-defined obligations to serve communities’ public interest needs. As long-time commercial broadcaster James “Jim” F. Goodmon, President and CEO of Capitol Broadcasting, puts it, “The broadcast company is fulfilling a contract between itself as the user of a public asset and the public body that owns the asset. As with all contracts, both parties to the agreement need to know exactly the responsibilities that they have to each other. With minimum standards spelled out, there is no question. As a broadcaster, I would like to know what is expected of me in serving the public interest. Required minimum standards and a voluntary code provide the benefit of certainty to broadcasters. I like to know what the rules are.”

Sincerely,
Charles Benton
Chairman & CEO
Benton Foundation

Cc: Commissioners Michael J. Copps, Jonathan S. Adelstein, Deborah Taylor Tate, Robert M. McDowell

Enclosure: "Public Interest Programming and Community Service Certification Form"

Universal access in the information economy: Tracking policy innovations abroad

Lessons from successful national broadband strategies

Universal access in the information economy:

Tracking policy innovations abroad


Krishna Jayakar and Harmeet Sawhney

kpj1@psu.edu | hsawhney@indiana.edu


Several successful national broadband strategies have enabled many countries to overtake the U.S. in per capita broadband deployment. Many embrace "ubiquitous" broadband for the competitive advantages it offers not just as a societal goal. Their universal service goals extend beyond mere physical connectivity to fostering the "arenas of innovation" that generate innovations and drive broadband adoption.


Key findings:

  • Universal broadband access in the emerging information economy is not just a social ideal or a redistributive tool, but an economic imperative with consequences for job creation, international competitiveness and individual empowerment.

  • Countries that have now taken a lead in broadband deployment -- Denmark, the Netherlands, Iceland, Korea, Switzerland -- do not have a long history of telecommunications leadership, a role that has historically belonged to the United States. How did these countries leapfrog the United States and capture the lead in broadband deployment? They tend to embrace universality from the outset and see universal service as a driver rather than a remedial action. For instance, Japan has a U-Japan strategy—where the ‘U’ represents ‘ubiquitous’, ‘universal’, ‘user-friendly’ and ‘unique.’


The "New Universal Service":

  • The new universal broadband initiatives that many countries are putting in place, especially those that have had remarkable success in promoting broadband deployment, are not as uni-dimensional as traditional U.S. universal service policy. These programs are premised on the assumption that consumers will voluntarily subscribe to network services, if such services provide a genuine value.

  • The emphasis thus shifts from promoting network take-up through affordability ("low rates") to promoting it through increasing the value that consumers derive from network services. Also, instead of providing the least common denominator of services to all consumers uniformly, the new universal broadband initiatives offer a multiplicity of services, with consumers able to choose the services that they value the most.

  • The New Universal Service has four dimensions: 1) supporting network deployment; 2) aiding network take-up by promoting digital literacy and consumer training; 3) providing incentives for service/business innovation; and 4) creating support infrastructures that enable the deployment of new services.


Conclusions:

  • The objective of government policy has to be to intervene in a manner that fosters and drives broadband diffusion.

  • The U.S. conceptualization of universal service as a corrective precludes alternative conceptions of universal service as a driver. The U.S. needs to go beyond traditional social equity and network externalities rationale for universal service and develop a new rationale -- innovation and economic growth.

  • In the case of broadband, we need to move our thinking from “connectivity” to an “arena of innovation.”

  • An arena of innovation requires both a physical substructure, namely a multitude of participants dispersed across space, for whom the very medium that interconnects them forms the object of ‘play’ or experimentation; and a social substructure or culture, implying that the experimentation is driven by fun rather than commercial gain, that the barriers for entry to the community are low, and that a competitive camaraderie and openness exists that facilitates cross-fertilization of ideas within the community.

  Old universal service New universal service
Scope national increasingly local
Services uniformity

multiformity; choice

Demand driver  affordability; network externalities

valuation; scope economies

Program objective promote teledensity promote information economy
Motivation

social equity; economic redistribution

industrial policy; economic growth
Process incremental planned/coordinated

Krishna Jayakar

Associate Professor

Department of Telecommunications

Pennsylvania State University

kpj1@psu.edu

814-863-6416

www.psu.edu/dept/comm/faculty/jayakar.html



Harmeet Sawhney

Associate Professor

Department of Telecommunications

Indiana University

Editor-in-Chief, The Information Society

hsawhney@indiana.edu

812-855-0954

www.indiana.edu/~telecom/faculty/sawhney.html

What Lessons can the U.S. learn from Broadband Policies in Europe?

How a focus on open, competitive networks helps boost broadband

"From all my teachers I have grown wise,
and from my students more than anyone else:"

Amit M. Schejter,
Assistant Professor of Telecommunications,
Pennsylvania State University
schejter@psu.edu
814-865-3717
www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/a/m/ams37/

Europeans may be on the way to taking a more innovative and effective approach to accelerating broadband deployment. They have quickly moved ahead of the U.S. on broadband and have embraced, perfected, and are benefiting from the open competitive network concepts first developed by U.S. policymakers but later abandoned in the U.S.

Key findings:

  • Making use of policy terminology and concepts coined in the United States, the European Union has caught up and even surpassed broadband penetration levels in some countries.
  • The Europeans, for whom industry development through competition was initially a novelty, developed a focused competition policy that eventually required minimal government intervention or subsidies in to advance broadband.
  • Europeans may be on the way to taking a more innovative and effective approach to what was once considered a badge of pride of the U.S. telecommunications policy – Internet access and competition – by adopting American competition concepts and perfecting them to serve the actual policy goals.
  • The strengths of the European system are focus, simplicity, relative efficiency and willingness to change the course of policy as needed, an effective balance between centralization and delegation of power, and innovation. While in the U.S. we are still debating the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the Europeans have since 1994 rewritten their rules twice, adjusting them to realities on the ground and are now reviewing them for rewriting them by 2010.
  • By contract in the U.S., policymakers have recently been mired in regulating the relationship among the operators. Instead of managing competition, the U.S. manages the competitors. It perceives the issue as one that arises from the need to allow operators to provide certain services, and as a result the regulator does not deliberate the goals of the policy. Indeed the focus of policy in the United States, particularly in the Universal Service debate, is, too often, on the needs of the carriers and not on consumers.
  • The debate in the U.S. takes place in the courts, where operators constantly challenge the policy and slow down the development of competition. In the E.U. the debate takes place at the regulatory level, the courts are there to enforce the rules on the operators.
  • While Europeans launched their universal service policy as a strategy amid low penetration levels, saw the blessing in their competitively focused efforts, and are therefore discussing the universality of broadband at its infancy, the US is not creating the vision necessary at the initial stages of the introduction of a new technology.


Conclusions:

  • The United States, in order to stay competitive with the European Union must learn from its past mistakes and adopt policies that promote broadband competition, and use universal service as a policy concept for ensuring more rapid diffusion of broadband access, and in an ironic reversal of past trends, will learn from those who once learned from it.
  • What is it then that makes Europe different than the United States, and what can the United States learn from the European experience in order to revive broadband penetration?
    • The European debate focuses on many issues, among them the scope of universal service, while the debate in the United States debate focuses on franchising, with little focus on achieving universal broadband and its relevance with the introduction of new technologies and services.
    • The Europeans stuck to their goal of crafting an "information society," did not take their eyes off the ball, and tweaked the policy to meet the goals.
    • As a result of frequent European reassessment of policies, innovative approaches are tested and policy changes are rapid and efficient.
Coverage Type 

There are two Congressional hearings on broadband policy today: 1) In the House, the Internet & Telecommunications Subcommittee hears "Broadband Lessons from Abroad" with witnesses representing New Zealand's parliament, the UK's OFCOM, Japan's NTT, Rawandatel/Terracom, and the Phoenix Center. 2) The Senate Commerce Committee hearing is titled "Communications, Broadband and Competitiveness: How Does the U.S. Measure Up?" and includes ConnectKentucky, Free Press, the Telecommunications Industry Association, Qualcomm, the Progress and Freedom Foundation and Criterion Economics. For more on these events see http://www.benton.org/?q=event


http://www.benton.org/?q=event