Benton RSS Feed
[Commentary] AT&T has proposed phasing out the old telephone network in favor of one using IP, or Internet protocol.
Not widely appreciated, AT&T, Verizon and other regulated operators are obliged to maintain the old phone service as long as customers want it, and to stand ready to provide a connection to anyone in their service territory who asks. These days that's not many: mostly the elderly and rural dwellers whose service has long been sustained by hidden subsidies possible only under a system of regulated monopolies. Coming soon: the death spiral, as fewer and fewer of these customers are left to bear the cost of maintaining the network. That's why AT&T has put before the Federal Communications Commission a plan to wean the country off POTS, or plain old telephone service, and retire the regulatory obligations that go with it. To this end, the company announced last month that it was willing to extend its fixed broadband network to several million customers in its service territory who don't yet have access. That would still leave millions of customers within the footprint of AT&T's existing phone system where the business case (i.e., absence of profits) wouldn't justify extending the broadband network.
AT&T Seeks a Lifeline on Land Lines
Verizon Communications is replacing copper wire damaged by superstorm Sandy with fiber-optic cable, a move that allows the company to sell more services to customers.
The accelerated installation of fiber cable in storm-damaged areas lowers the maintenance costs for the company while providing an almost instant increase in revenue from customers, Verizon Chief Executive Lowell McAdam said. Verizon is aiming to transfer as many services as possible off of older, slower copper lines and onto its faster FiOS network, where it wants to improve its scale. "When we convert someone over, they almost always take the double play off the bat," he said, referring to a bundling of two of the companies services that include phone, TV and Internet.
Verizon to Upgrade Sandy-Damaged Wireline Network
In the increasingly internet and mobile data driven society we live in today, there are times we all share personal information with others in exchange for something that benefits us; perhaps it is a coupon, or access to a website that contains details about a product or service in which we are interested. Beginning this week, Verizon Wireless plans to reach out to some of its consumer customers asking them to opt-in to participate in a new initiative called Verizon Selects, which is part of the company’s Precision Marketing portfolio.
Verizon Wireless will offer customers who opt-in to Verizon Selects a coupon or some other form of reward, most likely from a popular retailer, in exchange for their participation. If a customer chooses not to opt-in, absolutely nothing about their relationship with us changes. Customers are not part of Verizon Selects unless and until they opt-in. Simply put, Verizon Selects will use location, web browsing and mobile application usage data, as well as other information including customer demographic and interest data, to create specific insights. Verizon Selects analyzes this information about customers to see whether they fit into certain audiences Verizon or third party marketers are trying to reach. Depending on the results, participating customers will receive marketing messages or offers that may be of more interest to them than what they see or receive today. These messages could be delivered in various ways such as email, text, postal mail or online or mobile advertising. We are asking customers to opt-in to Verizon Selects because of the types of information being used and because the capabilities provided to third-party marketers gives them the ability to reach customers directly. It’s important to remember that Verizon DOES NOT share information that identifies customers personally outside of Verizon.
How “Verizon Selects” from Verizon Wireless Works Verizon seeks customers to spam with mobile marketing forever (ars technica)
The post-election shake-up on House committees has enhanced the brands of lobbyists who are considered close to the new leaders.
Several House committees that are closely watched by industry will see changes at the top, most notably the Financial Services, Judiciary and Transportation panels. The chairmen of those three committees all have a network of support on K Street to which they turn for advice and counsel — and that can mean more clients and more fees for the lobbyists who are known to be in the inner circle.
Lobbyists cashing in on ties to new House committee chairmen
BT has cut the monthly wholesale costs of its “ultra-fast” broadband service aimed at small to medium-sized businesses by more than a third, although the initial one-off costs to install the fiber network will be higher than expected for broadband providers. BT will say that Openreach, its functionally separated business that builds wholesale fiber networks across the UK, will next summer charge broadband providers £38 a month for its 330Mbps fiber-to-the-premises (FTTP) service, down from £60 a month currently.
BT cuts cost of ‘ultra-fast’ broadband
Under heavy pressure from the victims of Britain’s phone hacking scandal, Prime Minister David Cameron met with the country’s top newspaper editors and told them “the clock is ticking” on their pledge to adopt a tough new system of press regulation of their own devising if they are to avoid demands by the hacking victims and many lawmakers for a new regulatory system backed by parliamentary statute. After the meeting at 10 Downing Street, a Twitter post in Mr. Cameron’s name said he had told the editors, representing most of Britain’s main national newspapers, that “they need to set up an independent regulator urgently,” with the implication that the government might otherwise have to bow to demands for a law to put teeth into a new system of accountability.
British Editors Urged to Set Up Regulator
Germany’s newspaper crisis has led to the birth of a new compound noun: Zeitungssterben, newspaper death. The announcement by G+J, the magazine division of Bertelsmann, that it will close Financial Times Deutschland and the bankruptcy filing of the Frankfurter Rundschau have led to much soul searching. Even chancellor Angela Merkel offered her condolences, calling on the sector to keep its spirits up. “I think print media are very important,” she said on her weekly web-post. But her officials note that what Germany is seeing is not unique. While the country looks set to lose two quality dailies, in Spain editorial staff are being slashed, and in Italy speculation about possible newspaper mergers comes and goes.
Europe’s newspaper woes spread to Germany
The Senate Commerce Committee held a hearing to explore the nominations of appointees, including current Federal Communications Commission member Mignon L. Clyburn and proposed Federal Trade Commission member Joshua D. Wright.
Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) said, “President Obama has re-nominated Federal Communications Commissioner Mignon Clyburn to another term. This Committee favorably reported her nomination back in 2009, and I am glad that she is willing to serve in this important position for another term. I have always urged Commissioner Clyburn and the other commissioners to approach their work at the FCC with a few simple values: they should protect consumers, promote competition, and make sure that all Americans – including Americans who live in rural places like West Virginia – have access to an up-to-date, affordable communications network. I know she shares these values and look forward to hearing from her about where she thinks the Commission will be going over the next few years.” Senate Democrats, led by Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-WA), threatened to pass a resolution of disapproval over the FCC’s media ownership rules, currently under circulation at the agency. Mentioning her newspaper experience, Commissioner Clyburn told the Senators that at her request, the FCC opened up a comment period on the FCC’s broadcast minority report, which showed minority ownership at radio and TV stations was low. “Diversity and media are what I lived and breathed,” Commissioner Clyburn said. The GOP also had a message to send to the FCC about its attempts to regulate the Internet. Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX) who is retiring from the Senate, told Commissioner Clyburn the FCC’s network neutrality rules “seemed like an overreach.” Sen Hutchison wanted to know if the FCC would seek to reclassify the Internet to impose “common carrier regulations.” Commissioner Clyburn dodged the question, responding she would keep an open mind. “I am not comfortable commenting on a pathway forward,” Commissioner Clyburn said.
On Wright’s nomination, Chairman Rockefeller said, “Our final nominee is Josh Wright, who is a law professor at George Mason University. He has been nominated to be a commissioner at the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the federal government’s most important consumer protection agency. Mr. Wright is a very accomplished young scholar. He has written extensively on antitrust and other issues that would likely come before him as an FTC Commissioner. In his academic writing – some of which has been funded by groups with a clear anti-regulatory agenda – Mr. Wright makes it very clear that he believes that market forces can solve almost any consumer protection problem. While it is easy to espouse ideas like this from the academic ivory tower, serving as an FTC Commissioner is a very different job. As a commissioner, his job will be to enforce the law as it is written, not as he theorizes it should be. In the real world, some business practices hurt consumers and his job is to protect the consumers, not make excuses for the businesses. I look forward to hearing what he has to say on this subject.” Wright said he would recuse himself from any law enforcement action involving Google for 2 years. Wright, a George Mason University professor, was co-author of a paper in 2011, "Google and the Limits of Antitrust: The Case Against the Case Against Google," defending the company. Wright would not commit to recusing himself beyond that timetable, but Sen Cantwell said she wanted him to give her that answer at a follow-up to the hearing. Sen Barbara Boxer (D-CA) said she appreciated that, but wanted a list of the companies who might have business before the FTC that had supported his work so she could get a sense of what he could rule on. Wright was also asked to give follow-up answers on his view of FTC do-not-track and notice and choice proposals.
Chairman Rockefeller intends for the committee to vote on the nominations next week.
Recap: FCC and FTC Nominations Hearing Statement (Chairman Rockefeller) Senate Dems Keep Heat on FCC in Clyburn Nomination Hearings (AdWeek) Clyburn Won't Show Her Cards on Title II Reclassification (B&C) Democrats skeptical of Obama's FTC pick (The Hill)
Cell phone carriers have successfully pushed back against rules on what they have to do in a disaster. The carriers insist that emergency standards should be voluntary, an approach the Federal Communications Commission has gone along with.
After Hurricane Katrina, for instance, carriers successfully opposed a federal rule that would have required them to have 24-hours of backup power on cell towers. In another instance, an FCC program to track crucial information during an emergency — such as which areas are down and the status of efforts to bring the network back — remains entirely voluntary. Nor is the information collected made public. After Sandy, when thousands roamed the streets looking for service, many had no idea where they could get a signal. AT&T and Sprint, among the major carriers, didn't initially release details on what portion of their network was down. The emergency issue has been part of a trend in deregulation of the telecommunications industry. Since 2010, more than 20 states have passed laws limiting their regulation of telecoms. "The FCC is very concerned about the nature of their overall authority and whether rules would survive a court challenge," says Harold Feld, senior vice president of Public Knowledge, a technology advocacy nonprofit. "So their approach is to push and nudge and come up with things that would be more acceptable to the industry." "Traditional carriers had reliability requirements, and reporting requirements," says Susan Crawford, a visiting professor at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government and a former technology adviser to President Obama. "We treat wireless and broadband much differently."
How Cellphone Companies Have Resisted Rules for Disasters
[Commentary] Verizon takes the prize for most outrageous claim of a First Amendment right. Its challenge to the 2010 Federal Communications Commission rule that requires an open Internet - effectively preventing the companies that provide online connections from censoring or favoring content - as an abridgement of Verizon's free speech. If Verizon's argument as presented to a federal appeals court holds, then the constitutional guarantee of "free speech" suddenly would include the right to suppress someone else's ability to transmit or receive information.
Verizon's argument, absurd on its face, veers to the bizarre when it tries to compare the role of broadband service provider to that of a newspaper. Verizon suggests in its federal court filing that broadband providers possess "editorial discretion" - and should be free to feature some content over others, or exclude content, just as a newspaper decides what is and is not fit for publication. Such an argument, of course, misses the essence of the Internet, which is to allow the user to act as his or her own editor in deciding what is of interest. Here's the twist: Verizon clearly knows better. Its joint statement with Google about the prospect of open-Internet rules in early 2010 stated: "The minute that anyone, whether from the government or the private sector, starts to control how people access and use the Internet would be the beginning of the end of the 'net as we know it."
Verizon attack on Internet misguided