Benton RSS Feed

Author 
Coverage Type 

Rep. Janice Schakowsky (D-IL) is the latest Member of Congress to ask Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski to back off a vote on his media ownership item.

In a letter dated Dec. 4, Rep Schakowsky, who tried to block then-FCC chairman Kevin Martin's vote on a similar proposal in 2007, asked the chairman to rethink his draft proposal, which has been circulated to the other commissioners for a vote. Rep Schakowsky said she is concerned that the FCC has not sufficiently taken the Third Circuit's instruction to consider the impact of new rules on women and minorities. "I do not believe the draft order will improve the quality of American media," she wrote, "and I am concerned that it will threaten the diversity of news." But if he does decide to hold the vote, she said, it should be in a public meeting after the public had more time to weigh in.


Rep Schakowsky Asks FCC Chair to Rethink Ownership Draft
Author 
Coverage Type 

The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, which represents groups that have been critical of the Federal Communications Commission's media ownership proposal, has told the FCC that its proposed 30-day extension of the comment period on its associated 323 state of ownership survey is not sufficient. They also don't want the FCC to vote the ownership item in early January after the comment period closes.

In a letter to the FCC commissioners, the group said that its more than 200 member organizations had concluded that extra period -- until Jan. 4 on a report released Nov. 14 – does not permit a full opportunity to understand, analyze and offer comment on the ownership data, especially since the data was only released two weeks ago. They add that the brief window could leave the FCC wide open for a court challenge because it is "self-evidently insufficient."


Leadership Conference Says 323 Comment Extension Is Insufficient
Source 
Author 
Coverage Type 

Long the scourge of liberals, Rupert Murdoch is emerging as the boogeyman in a fight over federal regulators’ attempts to rewrite the rules on who can own TV and radio stations and newspapers — and where.

While Murdoch hasn’t announced his plans, reports that the media mogul is eyeing The Los Angeles Times and the Chicago Tribune are giving leverage to traditionally liberal groups that want to ensure the Federal Communications Commission doesn’t ease regulations preventing too much media consolidation in major markets. “It’s been widely reported that he’s shown interest in these two papers,” said Free Press Legislative Director Joel Kelsey. “I don’t know if he does buy them or not. I just know the ban in place now would prevent him from doing it, and the one the FCC is considering putting in place would allow him to.”


Left uses Rupert Murdoch to combat media consolidation
Author 
Coverage Type 

[Commentary] Until now, this hasn't been the best year for media mogul Rupert Murdoch. But Murdoch's luck may be changing.

Despite Fox News' moonlighting as the propaganda ministry of the Republican Party, President Obama's team may be making it possible for Sir Rupert to increase his power, perversely rewarding the man who did his best to make sure Barack Obama didn't have a second term. The Federal Communications Commission could be preparing him one big Christmas present, the kind of gift that keeps on giving -- unless we all get together and do something about it. All indications are that Murdoch has his eye on two of the last remaining big newspapers in America -- the Chicago Tribune and the Los Angeles Times, each owned by the now bankrupt Tribune Company. He could add one or both to his impressive portfolio, but even though the media mogul is splitting News Corp into two separately traded companies -- one for its print entities, the other for TV and film -- he would still come under current rules restricting media companies from owning newspapers and TV and radio stations in the same town. However, the FCC may be planning to suspend those rules, paving the way for Murdoch's takeover of either of the two papers.


FCC May Give Murdoch a Very Merry Christmas
Author 
Coverage Type 

Verizon and MetroPCS have asked for more time and space from a federal court to make their case against the Federal Communications Commission's network neutrality rules.

That was prompted by the decision of that same court Dec 3 in Verizon's challenge to the FCC's data roaming rules (Cellco Partnership [Verizon] v. FCC). In a motion filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Verizon and MetroPCS asked for two more weeks from the current Dec. 6 deadline to file the latest briefs in their network neutrality challenge so they can incorporate this week's roaming decision into their filings, and for 1,000 additional words (the limit is 6,000) for their joint brief and 350 additional words for MetroPCS' separate filing (the limit is 2,000 words). They point out that the roaming case, in which the court upheld the FCC's application of voice roaming obligations to data, deals with similar issues and was released only two days before the Dec. 6 deadline.


Verizon, MetroPCS Ask Court for Time to Amend Network Neutrality Briefs
Source 
Author 
Coverage Type 

The Justice Department has begun meeting with companies that long have accused Google of illegally skewing its search results and are losing faith that the Federal Trade Commission will act forcefully on their complaints, said people familiar with the matter.

Senior officials from the Justice Department, which shares responsibilities with the FTC for policing allegations of monopolistic behavior, have met with at least two companies in recent weeks, said these people, who spoke on condition of anonymity to describe private conversations. This has come amid reports that the FTC may resolve its nearly 2-year-old investigation of Google without dealing directly with complaints that the company uses its power over the search market to gain an edge over rivals. Those familiar with the meetings with Justice officials say they were of a preliminary nature and it was not clear if they would lead to any action. Justice considered launching an antitrust investigation before the FTC claimed the case.


Department of Justice meets with firms seeking Google antitrust probe
Source 
Author 
Coverage Type 

There’s not much to enjoy about sitting in a doctor’s waiting room, leafing through old magazines and waiting for an eventual appointment. New research suggests there might be a new way to eliminate that experience entirely: Move doctors’ visits online.

University of Pittsburgh’s Ateev Mehrotra lead a team of researchers in comparing electronic and in-person visits to the doctor at four primary care clinics in Pittsburgh. They looked at two relatively simple conditions: sinus and urinary tract infections, where doctors either worked with patients face-to-face or via e-mail, with the patient filling out a series of questions about his or her condition and the doctor making a prognosis. Their results, published this month in the Journal of the American Medical Association, suggest that the outcomes are relatively similar.


The doctor won’t see you now. He’ll e-mail you.
Source 
Coverage Type 

Companies are offering up social media and “web footprint” rankings on everything from celebrities to Supreme Court Justices. Some recent examples make one wonder if there’s a point to all this.


Social media rankings: perceptive or pointless?
Source 
Author 
Coverage Type 

Media companies are looking for new revenues through selling things. Meanwhile, more commerce sites are starting to publish. Is it easier for content to transform into commerce — or vice versa?


Content and commerce collide: is it harder for publishers or e-tailers?
Source 
Author 
Coverage Type 

With its new employer-matching service, Coursera has opened up a key revenue stream in which it receives payment from employers in exchange for information about students who may be good job candidates.

Matching students with employers is a revenue model, as well as charging students for certificates from partner universities. The company did not disclose how much it is charging employers or how it is splitting the revenue with its university partners, but a contract between Coursera and the University of Michigan obtained this summer by the Chronicle of Higher Education indicated that partners could get 6 to 15 percent of the revenue.


Online ed startup Coursera moves further along money-making path