Benton RSS Feed
Google is launching a new feature that makes it easy to tell Google what you want done with your digital assets when you die or can no longer use your account. The feature is called Inactive Account Manager — not a great name, we know — and you’ll find it on your Google Account settings page. You can tell us what to do with your Gmail messages and data from several other Google services if your account becomes inactive for any reason.
Plan your digital afterlife with Inactive Account Manager
Verizon Chairman-CEO Lowell McAdam said that, in answer to cord-cutting and consumer pressure, the television industry should be open to the idea of a-la-carte cable subscriptions.
Speaking at the National Association of Broadcasters’ confab, McAdam said a move to a-la-carte would answer market pressures and customer feedback. Through its FiOS TV service, he said, Verizon can monitor how many of its 5 million TV subscribers are watching any channel at a given moment. “It might be in the hundreds,” he said. “I think there’s a pressure now from customers about why do I have to have 300 channels?” He called a-la-carte “a novel way that could help protect subscriptions in the long run. … This isn’t a cause celebre for us but I think it’s an early warning that we should pay attention to.” He compared cable bundles to bundled services on cell phone plans. “As more and more smartphones were out there, (customers) said why are you making me buy a text bundle, why are you making me buy a voice bundle? We said, you know, you’re right, so we did away with that.
Verizon CEO: Try a la Carte to Protect Cable
The House Communications and Technology Subcommittee approved a bill to support Internet freedom despite Democrats' concern that it could undermine existing laws and regulations.
Rep. Greg Walden (R-OR), the subcommittee's chairman, insisted the measure is only a statement of policy and would not repeal any existing rules. "As a matter of law, a statement of policy does not impose statutorily mandated responsibilities on an agency," Chairman Walden said. The bill would make it formal U.S. policy to "promote a global Internet free from government control and to preserve and advance the successful multi-stakeholder model that governs the Internet." But the Democrats expressed concern that a person or company could use the law as a basis to sue to overturn regulations, such as the Federal Communications Commission's network neutrality rules, which require Internet providers to treat Web traffic equally. After assurances from Republicans that they would work to revise the bill before a full committee vote, Democrats agreed not to derail the markup with a slew of amendments. The subcommittee approved the bill on a voice vote, with the Democrats dissenting.
Internet governance bill advances, but Democrats wary Subcommittee Affirms United States’ Commitment to Internet Freedom (House Commerce Committee)
The Obama Administration indicated it's not likely to support the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act of 2013 (CISPA), a cybersecurity bill approved by the U.S. House Intelligence Committee this week.
While stopping short of an outright veto threat that many privacy activists may have wanted, the statement made clear that the Administration does not believe the bill in its current form does enough to safeguard personal information. "We continue to believe that information sharing improvements are essential to effective legislation, but they must include privacy and civil liberties protections, reinforce the roles of civilian and intelligence agencies, and include targeted liability protections," Caitlin Hayden, a National Security Council spokeswoman, said in a statement. "We believe the adopted committee amendments reflect a good-faith effort to incorporate some of the Administration's important substantive concerns, but we do not believe these changes have addressed some outstanding fundamental priorities."
Obama Administration: CISPA bill must do more to protect privacy CISPA still missing the mark for Dems, White House (Politico)
As closely as local media companies watch — and have come to depend on — Facebook and Google, how reciprocal is the infatuation?
As Facebook's Kay Madati, head of entertainment and media, demonstrated, there might be something of a disjuncture with local media. Social engagement hinges on “likes,” he told attendees, "and if you can't get to 200,000 likes on a page, it's almost not worth it," he said. Cue the incredulity from television and radio managers who felt pretty good after crossing the 50,000 threshold. Madati made the impossible-to-dispute case that people are discovering and sharing new media content all the time on his platform, citing TV's Downton Abbey and Dallas reboot as recent examples of shows jet-boosted by their social lift. But he also added the impossible-to-quantify social media caveat: "Can I definitely tell you that it helps with the ratings? I can't," he said.
Google, Facebook: Local Media Disconnect?
[Commentary] What if Facebook is just trolling us, carrying out the biggest social experiment in history by testing the limits of how much privacy-invading creepiness we’ll take before we actually quit using it?
I ask because Facebook’s newest attempt to boost ad revenues — it’s “partner categories” program — seems too dunderheaded a move to be real. A company that’s regularly lambasted and has even been sanctioned by the government for privacy indiscretions is now going to let advertisers place ads based on what users have purchased offline, or at least off of Facebook? And, worse yet, based on public records such as the type of car someone drives? This type of advertising happens all the time, of course, but I just can’t believe it’s for real from Facebook.
OK, now I’m convinced Facebook is trying to be creepy
Now an integral part of everyday life, GPS makes it easy for users to pinpoint an exact location. This technology has a myriad of applications today, from street navigation to keeping track of your family or family pets. Although three-quarters of smartphone owners are using location-based services such as navigation apps, these capabilities largely have been limited to outdoor use. That’s all beginning to change as companies start to develop innovative technologies to bring GPS indoors. The retail industry is tapping indoor location technology, and ABI Research predicts the retail indoor location market will reach $5 billion in 2018. The technology delivers in-store directions to preferred products and personalized promotions directly to customers. Indoor location services have the potential to impact numerous industries, bringing new opportunities for engagement at every turn.
GPS Moves Indoors
New America Foundation
Monday, April 15, 2013
9:00 - 10:30 a.m.
http://newamerica.net/events/2013/to_save_everything_click_here
In the very near future, "smart" technologies and "big data" will allow us to make large-scale and sophisticated interventions in politics, culture, and everyday life. Technology will allow us to solve problems in original ways and create new incentives to get more people to do the right thing. But how will such "solutionism" affect our society? What will happen when deeply political, moral, and irresolvable problems are recast as uncontroversial and easily manageable matters of technological efficiency? Technology, Evgeny Morozov proposes, can be a force for improvement--but only if we keep solutionism in check and learn to appreciate the imperfections of liberal democracy.
Arguing that we badly need a new, post-Internet way to debate the moral consequences of digital technologies, To Save Everything, Click Here warns against a world of seamless efficiency, where everyone is forced to wear Silicon Valley's digital straitjacket.
Featured Speakers:
Evgeny Morozov
Contributing Editor, The New Republic
Author, To Save Everything, Click here
Christine Rosen
Bernard L. Schwartz Fellow, New America Foundation
Senior Editor, The New Atlantis
For questions, contact Stephanie Gunter at New America at (202) 596-3367 or gunter@newamerica.net
Copies of the book will be available for purchase.
The Internet might have looked very different than it does today.
When Marc Andreessen and Eric Bina were building Mosaic, the browser that practically created the Web in 1993, they included the ability to annotate any page. Discussions immediately sprang up. But they quickly realized that the server to host the annotations would have had to scale to enormous size, which was not practical. So they took the feature out. What would the Web have looked like if annotation had managed to stay in? Maybe a million conversations would have bloomed, and some of the furious divides that plague this country would have been bridged. Or maybe it just would have been a deafening free-for-all, cranking up all the cranks.
Twenty years later, there is a vast amount of discussion on the Web, much of it in the form of comments and reviews. But it is generally hosted by corporations – Facebook, Google, Amazon – that are selling ads or products, which kind of undermines the democratic spirit of give and take. When the companies fail, like MySpace did, the content simply goes away.
Speak Up, the Internet Can’t Hear You
Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerberg launched a new organization, called Fwd.us, to advocate for immigration reform in the United States. The group has laid out its priorities for immigration reform: Secure the U.S. border; modify the guest worker program to increase the number of visas for skilled workers; develop a “simple and effective” system to verify employment; create a clear path for immigrants to become U.S. citizens; and reform the legal immigration system. Why do they care? Immigration reform is an issue near and dear to the tech industry, which has repeatedly complained that the current system restricts U.S. companies’ ability to recruit and retain high-quality engineering and programming talent. Tech industry groups have thrown support behind congressional legislation that would boost the number of H-1B visas — visas given to highly skilled workers — issued each year and that would grant permanent residency status to students who earn graduate degrees in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) fields.
Why Mark Zuckerberg cares about immigration reform