Benton RSS Feed
[Commentary] Patriot’s Day, for baseball fans, means an early start for the Red Sox game. For runners, it means the Boston marathon. The meaning of the holiday -- the commemoration of the Battles of Lexington and Concord on April 19, 1775 -- may have been lost by many of us. But after this past Monday, April 15, 2013 will take on a new, horrific meaning. The Benton Foundation joins the world in condemning the cowardly act that killed and injured scores of people in Boston and we salute the brave people who responded to the explosions with acts of heroism. Sadly, it was just a couple of months ago that we wrote about the connections between media, telecommunications and the tragedy at Sandy Hook Elementary School, this week we look at the role of communications in the wake of the Boston marathon bombings.
Telling the Story of Another Patriot’s Day We’ll Never Forget
[Commentary] The news audience has been chopped up into ideological camps, and CNN’s middle way has been clobbered in the ratings. The legacy networks’ news divisions can still flex powerful muscles on big stories, and Twitter and other real-time social media sites have seduced a whole new cohort of news consumers. But the biggest damage to CNN has been self-inflicted — never more so than in June, when in a rush to be first, it came running out of the Supreme Court saying that President Obama’s health care law had been overturned. It was a hugely embarrassing error. Still, when big news breaks, we instinctively look to CNN. We want CNN to be good, to be worthy of its moment. That impulse took a beating last week. On Wednesday at 1:45 p.m., the correspondent John King reported that a suspect had been arrested. It was a big scoop that turned out to be false.
The Pressure to Be the TV News Leader Tarnishes a Big Brand
Three years ago, Charles and David Koch, the billionaire industrialists and supporters of libertarian causes, held a seminar of like-minded, wealthy political donors at the St. Regis Resort in Aspen (CO). They laid out a three-pronged, 10-year strategy to shift the country toward a smaller government with less regulation and taxes. The first two pieces of the strategy — educating grass-roots activists and influencing politics — were not surprising, given the money they have given to policy institutes and political action groups. But the third one was: media.
Other than financing a few fringe libertarian publications, the Kochs have mostly avoided media investments. Now, Koch Industries, the sprawling private company of which Charles G. Koch serves as chairman and chief executive, is exploring a bid to buy the Tribune Company’s eight regional newspapers, including The Los Angeles Times, The Chicago Tribune, The Baltimore Sun, The Orlando Sentinel and The Hartford Courant.
Conservative Koch Brothers Turning Focus to Newspapers Koch Industries Eyes Tribune Papers (NYTimes)
[Commentary] While technology has great potential to bring about change, there is a dark side to the digital revolution that is too often ignored.
There is a turbulent transition ahead for autocratic regimes as more of their citizens come online, but technology doesn't just help the good guys pushing for democratic reform—it can also provide powerful new tools for dictators to suppress dissent. Fifty-seven percent of the world's population still lives under some sort of autocratic regime. In the span of a decade, the world's autocracies will go from having a minority of their citizens online to a majority. From Tehran to Beijing, autocrats are building the technology and training the personnel to suppress democratic dissent, often with the help of Western companies. The digital revolution will continue. For all the complications this revolution brings, no country is worse off because of the Internet. And with five billion people set to join us online in the coming decades the digital future can be bright indeed, despite its dark side.
[Schmidt is Google's executive chairman. Cohen is the director of Google Ideas.]
The Dark Side of the Digital Revolution
Five days of harrowing footage from Boston has allowed a voracious nation to experience Monday’s bombings and their aftermath almost as the events were happening, with ever-present cameras at once documenting history and pushing it relentlessly forward. Fueling this situation has been a series of technological shifts that are likely to accelerate in the years ahead as police, corporations and even private citizens gain access to unprecedented troves of video imagery and the tools to analyze them.
Advances in computing power and analytical software have allowed for individuals to be identified and tracked as never before — especially when that information is combined with the location data emitted by most cellphones. The role of these technologies in the Boston investigation is unclear, but law enforcement experts say that video surveillance and analysis is especially valuable in cases such as this, with an unexpected attack and no obvious suspects at first. The process of winnowing happened with remarkable speed, moving in just days from a mountain of unsorted video, to blurry images of potential suspects, to pictures crisp enough to drive a manhunt. For those seeking to protect privacy in the digital age, however, the news is not all good.
Advances in image analysis empower law enforcement but worry privacy advocates
The Obama Administration is considering a raft of options to more aggressively confront China over cyberspying, officials say, a potentially rapid escalation of a conflict the White House has only recently acknowledged.
Options include trade sanctions, diplomatic pressure, indictments of Chinese nationals in U.S. courts and cyber countermeasures—both attack and defense, officials said. Officials said such a counterpunch, while likely not imminent, would be the natural culmination of a carefully choreographed escalation of warnings in recent weeks from President Barack Obama and top administration officials. The escalation was launched with a secret démarche, or formal diplomatic protest, to the Chinese government in January, officials said.
US Eyes Pushback On China Hacking
[Commentary] The House passed a new cybersecurity bill, and the accompanying report emphasizes what many corporate and government experts know only too well. “A number of advanced nation-state actors are actively engaged in a series of wide-ranging, aggressive efforts to penetrate American computer systems and networks” and “these efforts are targeted not only at sensitive national security and infrastructure information but are also often aimed at stealing corporate research and development information that forms the very lifeblood of the American economy.” The report called it nothing less than “pillage.” With all this urgency in the air, there is a real need for the government, which has the sophisticated tools and expertise, to team up with the private sector, where the majority of vulnerable networks exist. But such information sharing requires a basis in law. Congress deadlocked over legislation in the last session. On Feb. 12, President Obama issued an executive order, a stopgap attempt to begin doing something to meet the threat. The new Congress must do better.
Government, private sector must team up to fight cyberthreats
EBay Inc Chief Executive John Donahoe began e-mailing millions of users of the company's online marketplace in an unprecedented lobbying effort to change looming Federal sales tax legislation.
The e-commerce giant plans to send e-mails from Donahoe to at least 40 million eBay users, including most sellers on the marketplace. The first messages were sent out April 21. In the e-mails, Donahoe said the legislation, known as the Marketplace Fairness Act, unfairly burdens small online merchants and asked eBay users to send an email message to members of Congress asking for changes.
EBay recruits users in push against sales tax legislation
[Commentary] Every time Congress has taken a serious look at proposals to boost Internet sales taxes, it has rejected them. That's probably why pro-tax Senators are trying to rush through an online tax hike with as little consideration as possible.
For Senators curious about what they're voting on, it is the same flawed proposal that Mike Enzi (R-WY) introduced in February. It has been repackaged to qualify for a Senate rule that allows Majority Leader Harry Reid to bypass committee debate and bring it straight to the floor. The Marketplace Fairness Act discriminates against Internet-based businesses by imposing burdens that it does not apply to brick-and-mortar companies. For the first time, online merchants would be forced to collect sales taxes for all of America's estimated 9,600 state and local taxing authorities.
The Internet Sales Tax Rush
Sprint Nextel is up to its neck in a merger fight, and it's all about airwaves. Pay-TV provider Dish Network has offered $25.5 billion for the mobile-phone carrier, in a headline-grabbing attempt to break up Sprint's agreement to be bought by SoftBank Corp. But Sprint is waging another battle over a separate, lower-profile effort to buy the roughly 50% stake it doesn't own in wireless-broadband operator Clearwire. The fight is against a little-known but determined investment fund called Crest Financial Ltd., and Sprint could end up the loser. The standoff underscores how the long-awaited wave of consolidation in the telecom industry that kicked off last year has been stymied by activist shareholders wary of selling on the cheap, or even selling at all. It also highlights the messy, interlocking series of deals now consuming the industry.
Big Clearwire Holder Resists Sprint