Comcast-Time Warner Collapse Is a Win for TV Networks, Perhaps a Loss for Marketers
The collapse of the Comcast/Time Warner Cable deal is a win for executives at TV networks, but potentially a loss for marketers. TV programmers, including Discovery Communications, had told the Federal Communications Commission that the merger could result in fewer independent voices among programmers. But they also feared the unified company's enhanced clout in negotiations over distribution fees for their signals. And a combined Comcast-Time Warner Cable would give them stronger competition for national advertisers.
The combination also seemed poised to help advance addressable TV advertising, which has been constrained by factors including a lack of broad reach. Most marketers don't want to assemble targeted buys across a variety of regional cable operators, creating a sort of drag on cable companies' push to make their technology in the area better. The merger could have eventually helped expand the addressable universe to the sort of size that big marketers want, fueling the tech race to deliver tools such as household targeting and dynamic ad insertion.
Comcast-Time Warner Collapse Is a Win for TV Networks, Perhaps a Loss for Marketers