Why Silicon Valley Won't Enlist in Anti-Terror Fight
Apple and Facebook have designed technology that even they can't break into, because a system that is unbreakable even to its creator is more secure than the alternatives. Steven Bellovin, a computer-science professor at Columbia University, says designing cryptography is difficult enough without worrying about granting special access to certain people or organizations. Trying to accommodate law enforcement will add a layer of complexity that others -- read hackers -- could exploit. "Maybe it'll make it easier to track ISIS, maybe it won't," Bellovin says. "It might let in the Chinese, Russians and Iranians."
Even if Washington did require US technology companies to build so-called backdoors into their encrypted products, it wouldn’t eliminate the ability of terrorists -- or anyone else -- to use encrypted communications to talk privately. Silicon Valley doesn't hold a monopoly on this technology, says Kevin Bankston, director of New America's Open Technology Institute. "Any software engineer anywhere in the world can create and distribute their own encryption apps," he says. "That's exactly what the jihadists do. They don't need WhatsApp."