April 2015

Turkey blocks access to Twitter and YouTube as tensions mount

Turkey has blocked access to Twitter and YouTube for the second time in little more than a year, as tensions mount ahead of the June 7 general elections. The move follows a court ruling on April 3 against 166 Internet addresses that published images of a prosecutor held hostage at gunpoint by a banned far left group. The Turkish authorities said the images promoted terrorism. It comes despite a ruling by the country’s top court in 2014 that blanket bans on social media were unconstitutional. In April 6’s follow up ruling blocking access, an Istanbul judge said the content endangered public order. According to an autopsy, the hostage, a prosecutor, was shot dead by his captors who were later killed by special forces. The sites affected by Friday’s order to remove content included specific news pages on mainstream Turkish media as well as Twitter, YouTube and Facebook.

Yaman Akdeniz, a Turkish legal academic who successfully appealed against 2014’s ban on Twitter and YouTube argued that the ban was an attempt to intimidate media in the run up to June’s vote. “This is a wholly disproportionate exercise,” he said. “This is intended to put pressure on social media platforms ahead of the election.” Other commentators said that propaganda images by groups such as the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, also known as ISIS, have been routinely published by media in Turkey.

Comcast Recruits Its Beneficiaries to Lobby for Time Warner Deal

The letters have come from all around the United States -- from the Nutmeg Big Brothers and Big Sisters in Connecticut, the Houston Area Urban League and even the Dan Marino Foundation in Fort Lauderdale (FL) -- some praising the Comcast Corporation, others urging the federal government to stand aside and approve Comcast’s proposed takeover of Time Warner Cable. The argument has been reinforced by a blitz of academic papers from groups like the International Center for Law and Economics in Portland (OR). More endorsements have come in from elected officials like Gov. Phil Bryant (R-MS), and state Rep Fred Crespo (D-IL). “The merger will not hinder competition but will bring better technology to more consumers,” Gov Bryant said.

But there is a common element to dozens of these appeals: The senders received money from Comcast in recent years, either as a charitable donation, corporate support or a political contribution, records show. It is a demonstration of how Comcast, the media conglomerate long known for its aggressive lobbying operation, has enlisted a vast network of allies to press federal regulators to approve the $45 billion transaction, much as it did in 2010 as it sought to acquire NBCUniversal. But even while Comcast has been busy working to mobilize this support -- it had a huge team of 124 federal lobbyists working for it in 2014 -- there is growing chatter in Washington that it has been less successful this time in making the public case for its deal.

Sling TV Faces Streaming Errors During Final Four Games

Many subscribers to Dish Network’s nascent online video service Sling TV saw error messages on the night of April 4 as they tried to stream the Final Four semifinal games of the men’s college basketball tournament. The games, which included a late thriller between Wisconsin and Kentucky and an earlier contest featuring Duke and Michigan State, were aired on Time Warner’s Turner cable networks. Customers took to Twitter to express their frustration, with some saying they would cancel service. Sling TV, which hasn’t disclosed its subscriber numbers since launching in February, apologized in a tweet Saturday night and said basketball fans saw error messages due to “extreme sign-ups and streaming.”

The company said its engineers “rebalanced load across network partners.” Dish said in a statement on April 5 that it “experienced an unprecedented combination of new customer signups and high levels of viewership,” which stressed its systems. It said the streaming experience was “spot on for the vast majority of our customers” and it was able to improve the experience for affected customers during the evening. The satellite-TV provider has been ramping up marketing of Sling, and the National Collegiate Athletic Association men’s basketball tournament is one of the major programming assets it secured in a recent distribution deal with Turner. The streaming traffic jam illustrates the hurdles Web TV still needs to surmount. Other media companies, including Time Warner’s HBO and Walt Disney Co.’s ABC, have faced similar technical problems during airings of highly anticipated events like the Oscars.

Online Test-Takers Feel Anti-Cheating Software’s Uneasy Glare

As universities and colleges around the country expand their online course offerings, many administrators are introducing new technologies to deter cheating. The oversight, administrators say, is crucial to demonstrating the legitimacy of an online degree to students and their prospective employers. Some schools use software that prevents students from opening apps or web browsers during online exams. Others employ services with live exam proctors who monitor students remotely over webcams. But the rise of Proctortrack, an anti-cheating technology, and other automated student analysis services like it have raised questions about where to draw the line, and whether the new systems are fair and accurate.

Tuning Music Royalties to the Times

[Commentary] For some time, performers a notch below Beyoncé and Taylor Swift have complained about the change in music delivery from CDs to downloads to streaming, today’s dominant system, as the progression has chipped away at their already-modest royalties. These gripes are legitimate, but even worse off is the nonperforming songwriter, who can’t go on the road and sell signed CDs and merchandise, and who takes home significantly lower royalties. It has been 40 years since the last major overhaul to US copyright law. Today’s technologies of music distribution bear no resemblance to those of the 1970s, and songwriters have borne the brunt of the ever-widening disconnect between law and reality.

Half a century ago, talented young people aspired to write another “White Christmas” or “Summertime.” Today, after reading about the paltry rewards of Aloe Blacc or Desmond Child, a creative soul would more likely turn his or her attention to devising a new music-sharing app. But we’ve got plenty of apps. What we need is a new torrent of great songs.

[Ben Yagoda is a professor of journalism at the University of Delaware. Gary Rosen is an attorney and author of "Unfair to Genius"]

Is the Online Ad Industry Cleaning Up Its Act?

The online advertising industry is in clean-up mode. Marketers are annoyed that many of their ads never have a chance to be seen and that fraudsters are siphoning off dollars from their ad budgets. In response, the industry has developed technologies and processes to help address viewability and fraud issues, and claims the situation is improving. But is it? There’s evidence to suggest not yet.

According to a recent report from online measurement firm comScore, for example, an estimated 54 percent of all online ad impressions served during the third quarter of 2014 were not viewable -- meaning they were placed on parts of webpages that didn’t actually appear on users’ screens. That’s exactly same portion of ads comScore measured as non-viewable during the third quarter of 2013. That’s strange considering many publishers say they’re now actively reworking their websites and properties to ensure their ads can be seen. So why the stagnation? According to comScore, progress in viewability is being negated by the continued growth of ad fraud. Industry analysts estimate marketers waste millions of dollars a year buying Internet ads that aren’t delivered to real humans, but rather to hijacked computers known as “bots.” Ad execs say they’ve observed a similar trend over the past two years. The industry has made a lot of noise about fixing its fraud problem but not much has actually happened, they say. Some industry executives suggest that even marketers have come to terms with the fact that large portions of their online ad budgets might be wasted because the medium is still cost-effective compared to more expensive ones such as TV. If marketers aren’t calling for the problem to be fixed and holding back their ad dollars, then players in the supply chain may have little incentive to address it.

Can you vote for the next president on your smartphone? Not just yet.

In an age where people can transfer money using their mobile device, it’s not hard to envision a future where citizens wake up on Election Day, pull out their phones and choose the next leader of the free world on the way to work. A federal election agency took a small step toward that futuristic vision. The Election Assistance Commission, a body created in the aftermath of the 2000 presidential election, approved a measure to update the guidelines against which manufacturers test electronic voting machines to make sure they are secure and accessible. “The guidelines we have now are so old that the iPhone hadn’t even come out when they were written,” said Election Assistance Commission Chairwoman Christy McCormick. The updated guidelines will allow manufacturers to test machines against modern security and disability standards and get them certified for use by states ahead of the 2016 presidential election.

A securely designed online system also needs to be easy to use, and so far that goal has eluded researchers, said Poorvi Vora, an associate professor of computer science at George Washington University who has researched Internet voting systems. Vora is part of a group of academics, computer scientists, election officials and activists working on a project led by the Overseas Vote Foundation, an Arlington-based nonprofit, to answer one question: Is it possible to design a system that lets people vote remotely in a secure, accessible, anonymous, convenient and verifiable manner? The answer so far is no, but the group says it is close to a possible solution and will present its design to the election research community and federal agencies this summer. As with health records or financial data, online security remains an obstacle. Ultimately, election officials and researchers agree that online voting is still a worthy goal, but there are many other ways technology can be used to enhance a fundamental democratic right.

US broadband providers wake up to the need for speed

The US telecommunications industry is awaking from its slumber -- prompted, in part, by Google Fiber, a superfast broadband network that is being built from scratch by the search group. On April 2, Comcast announced Gigabit Pro, a new residential internet service that offers download and upload speeds of 2 gigabits per second -- a blistering pace that most consumers simply do not need. It has been likened to offering a Lamborghini to a parent who only needs a car for the school run. The wider significance of Gigabit Pro is that it presages a broader upgrade of Comcast’s network, due to be completed in 2016. At present, only those who live very near the fibre backbone of Comcast’s network will be eligible for the new service. After the upgrade, the company will be able to offer 1 gigabit speeds to almost all of its customers.

AT&T has introduced its U-verse Gigapower service in seven markets, including Austin (TX) and Kansas City, where Google Fiber also operates, and in Cupertino (CA) -- home to Apple and right on Google’s doorstep. It plans to expand to 11 additional markets and is exploring 25 more.

FCC Video Report Shows Cable Sub Losses

The Federal Communications Commission has released its 16th annual video competition report to Congress, and the data shows continued declines in cable subscribers, at least as of year-end 2013. The latest report compares year-end 2013 data to year-end 2012. It is based on comments and data culled from various sources. The FCC last released a video competition report in July 2013; that one was based on data through June 30, 2012, and report found inroads by online and direct-broadcast satellite (DBS) providers and a general downward trend in cable subs.

In fact, according to the report, between year-end 2012 and year-end 2013, "the total number of mulitchannel video programming distributor (MVPD) video subscribers posted its first-ever, full-year decline," though not much of one -- from 101 million to 100.9 million households. All of those declines came from cable subscribers, which fell from 56.4 million to 54.4 million, while MVPD phone subscribers increased from 9.9 million to 11.3 million. While the report said MVPDs' increased revenue from video has come in part by raising prices, it concedes that some data suggests that's because program expenses have increased faster than revenues.

Final Four Marches into Cable TV Future

When the NCAA men’s basketball championship game tips off on April 6 on CBS, it will be the end of an era of sorts. No, I’m not talking about the final game in the long, illustrious college basketball careers of Kentucky and Duke’s freshmen. Rather, this is the last year before the title game, which has aired on a broadcast network since 1969 and CBS since 1982, hits cable.

Turner, which already shares tournament coverage with CBS, will air the 2016 championship game on TBS. The title game will alternate between CBS and TBS until 2024, so it will be back on CBS in 2017. Saturday's Final Four semifinal games will air on TBS, as they did in 2014, while Turner will show the title game (and semifinal games) on TNT and truTV with team-specific “homer” announcers. But Turner superseding CBS is a major turning point in the broadcasting history of the NCAA Tournament -- and the continuation of a trend in major sports, set off by ESPN’s record-rated broadcast of the new College Football Playoff championship game in January.