April 2015

Senator calls for The Anarchist Cookbook to be “removed from the Internet”

In the wake of the arrest of two women accused of attempting to build a bomb, Sen Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) wrote on her website that the 1971 book "The Anarchist Cookbook" on bomb making, which may have aided the terror suspects in some small way, should be "banned from the Internet.” The Senator seems to fail to realize that not only has "The Anarchist Cookbook" been in print for decades (it’s sold on Amazon!), but also has openly circulated online for nearly the same period of time. In short, removing it from the Internet would be impossible. "I am particularly struck that the alleged bombers made use of online bombmaking guides like the Anarchist Cookbook and Inspire Magazine,” Sen Feinstein wrote. "These documents are not, in my view, protected by the First Amendment and should be removed from the Internet."

Networks Look to Turn Data Into Dollars

Ratings, shmatings. As more viewers go unmeasured watching shows on computers, tablets and smartphones, networks are dreaming up new methods for making their audiences add up in ways that are attractive to advertisers. “The game plan is a simple one -- to move away from the concept of audience measurement to performance measurement,” says David Poltrack, chief research officer at CBS Corp. Nickelodeon’s and MTV’s young viewers have made Viacom the poster child for the necessity of more comprehensive measurement. As part of Viacom’s recent restructuring, the company’s research organization brought together groups that work on first-party data capability, data science, data product and monetization, including an alternative currencies working group. Viacom’s measurement system aims not just to count viewers, but also to measure the impact its programs have in the social space specifically and the culture generally.

The amount of data Viacom collects to do that is humongous. Between its digital platforms, apps and social connections, data scientists at Viacom track each in-depth interaction a consumer has with its content and put it into a row in a database. The database now has 15 billion rows and covers 60 percent of US households. That means Viacom can single out consumers and know what they buy, what they say and what they watch. It also provides an opportunity to see its impact on consumers. “We see those changes in their consumer behavior, in their online activities, in their social conversations after they’ve been participating in a conversation with us, engaging in our content and being subject to some of the commercial messages that our partners bring to it,” executive vice president at Viacom Kern Schireson says. “We’re playing three-dimensional chess, where traditional media measurement is still checkers.”

Here We Go Again

[Commentary] We sure hope the Federal Communications Commission’s record proposed indecency fine of $325,000 against Roanoke (VA) TV station WDBJ does not signal a return to when the agency was deciding that something like a funny home video showing a pacifier that slipped down the backside of a baby was halfway to being legally indecent. The decision may actually prove to be a vehicle for change if it ultimately is reversed in court. Granted, most aren’t arguing that inadvertently showing a pornographic clip in a 6 pm news story about an ex-porn star turned rescue squad member doesn’t violate the FCC’s indecency standard -- vague as it is -- but a court would likely have to rule on whether that standard violates speech protections, something the Supremes have avoided. Such a challenge would take years to resolve.

In the meantime, we hope this is a fact-specific one-off decision and not the start of a new crackdown on content. Chilling broadcast speech at a time when TV homes everywhere are filled with top-notch cable TV fare that is not similarly bowdlerized will be just another way to tie broadcasters’ hands, this time in the march toward over-the-top video, where anything goes.

NAB to FCC: Don't Blow Through Relocation Fund

The National Association of Broadcasters in the past two weeks has hammered the Federal Communications Commission over its variable band plan for the broadcast incentive auction, which could put TV stations and wireless operations on the same or adjoining spectrum in adjacent markets during the repacking of stations after the incentive auction, a move NAB says would hurt broadcasters and blow through Congress' budget for paying broadcasters' post-auction moving expenses. The FCC wants to allow up to a 20 percent variation in the amount of spectrum cleared in each market -- NAB wants more like 3 percent. The more variation, the more likelihood that TV stations and wireless operators will be using the same spectrum, which will "impair" some spectrum due to the interference potential, meaning it will be less valuable to wireless carriers in the forward auction. NAB has dubbed that a "more 'kind-of-almost-nearly-near-nationwide'" than "near-nationwide" band plan.

NAB also argues that the FCC is low-balling its estimates of the financial impact of repacking on stations. The FCC has a $1.75 billion relocation fund for repacking TV stations (and some cable operator expenses for re-tuning headends) after the auction, but NAB says the FCC approach puts minimizing costs to broadcasters in the "back seat" of the process, only accounting for those costs after the auction is over, when it would be tough to reduce the number of stations to be repacked if the $1.75 billion doesn't cover the costs. "We continue to urge the Commission to consider the fact that, by taking an approach that makes broadcaster costs an afterthought, it will be blowing through Congress's $1.75 billion budget and harming broadcasters in the process."

Time Warner Cable Dons Casa’s CCAP

Reaching a significant milestone in the deployment of next-gen cable access technologies, Casa Systems confirmed that Time Warner Cable is delivering IP-based data and voice services and QAM-based video simultaneously in New York using the vendor’s integrated Converged Cable Access Platform (CCAP). The achievement is significant because it’s the first known deployment in North America of a CCAP that is delivering both IP and QAM services via the same platform.

The CCAP, a high-density, energy-saving platform, puts the functions of the edge QAM and the cable modem termination system under the same roof. While early CCAP-facing implementations have served as either super CMTSs or edge QAMs, the TWC/Casa deployment in New York is mixing both IP- and MPEG/QAM traffic on the same platform at the same time. According to Casa, TWC has “migrated hundreds of thousands of video subs” to the vendor’s C100G integrated CCAP, a product introduced in mid-2013.

Report: 44 Percent of US Adults Live In Cellphone-Only Households

According to new market research from GfK-MRI, more than four in ten (44 percent) of US adults live in households with cell phones but no landline telephones. The US “cell phone-only” population has expanded 70 percent since 2010, GfK reports in “Survey of the American Consumer” report. Back in 2010, 26 percent of US adults lived in cellphone-only households. That rose to 44 percent as of year-end 2014. Nearly two-thirds (64 percent) of young adult Millennials (born 1977-1994) rely solely on cellphones in their households. Corresponding figures for Hispanics, Generation X (born 1965-1976) and Baby Boomers (1946-1965) are 60 percent, 45 percent and 32 percent, respectively. In addition, 13 percent of “Pre-Boomers” live in cellphone-only households, according to GfK-MRI.

Breaking data out geographically, GfK-MRI found that “cellphone-only households are fairly evenly represented in the West (47 percent), Midwest (45 percent) and South (48 percent) but are much less prevalent in the Northeast (28 percent).” With cellphone penetration among US adults at 93 percent, smartphone ownership “skews heavily to Millennials and Gen Xers,” the market research company points out. Eighty-eight percent of U.S. Millennials and 79 percent of Gen Xers own smartphones as compared to 56 percent of Baby Boomers and 20 percent of Pre-Boomers, GfK-MRI says.

CCA’s CEO: FirstNet Public Safety Network Presents Rural Carrier Opportunities

FirstNet, the nation’s planned mobile broadband public safety network offers significant opportunities for rural wireless network operators, according to Steven K. Berry, president and CEO of the Competitive Carriers Association. “My suggestion to carriers is ‘this is an opportunity you have to be part of,’” said Berry. After being debated for more than a decade, the idea of creating a nationwide mobile broadband network to support emergency responders finally appears poised to become reality now that the AWS-3 auction has generated considerable funding for the network. “I’m pleased that there seems to be renewed focus and interest in real progress,” said Berry.

The FirstNet public safety network has been allotted a block of spectrum in the coveted 700 MHz band for which it will have priority usage. But according to Berry “in rural America there will be few times that [emergency responders will] need all of that spectrum,” which means rural wireless operators could use the spectrum when it is not needed by emergency personnel. And with technologies such as LTE-A giving carriers the ability to aggregate disparate spectrum bands, Berry argues that small wireless carriers could gain the ability to provide ultra-high-speed mobile broadband by combining their own spectrum holdings with public safety spectrum. Berry noted that there are fewer than five million emergency responders nationwide and that the public safety network will be designed to handle 250,000 to 350,000 users in an individual area.

Getting a grip on government e-mail

[Commentary] Whatever Hillary Clinton’s personal motives, future public officials who seek to circumvent government recordkeeping may try to follow her example. If we value public recordkeeping, then we ought to find effective mechanisms to confine official deliberation to official channels. Technology has allowed governments to observe and surveil the public in ways that our existing legal infrastructure does not address. By the same token, there are technical mechanisms that can be used to monitor the government, on behalf of the public, that have not yet been incorporated into our system of government. We ought to be looking for ways that technology can strengthen accountability and oversight.

[Ariel Rabkin is a professional software engineer who received is PhD in Computer Science from UC Berkeley]

China Kicks Off New Web Crackdown

It looks like the Chinese web may be in for another round of spring cleaning. On April 2, China’s National Sweep Out Porn, Strike At Rumors Office announced that three major domestic companies had been investigated and fined for pornographic content posted to their online platforms: web search giant Baidu, news site NetEase, and Momo, the Alibaba-backed mobile dating app whose December 2014 IPO in New York raised $216 million. The fines come as the first slate of cases in 2015’s “sweep out porn, strike at rumors” campaign, kicking off the third year of what now seems to have become an increasingly institutionalized push to remove sexually explicit -- and politically objectionable -- material from China’s turbulent Internet. State media have hailed the campaigns as a way to keep children safe from “harmful information” on computers and mobile phones.

In classic form, an April 3 article in state news agency Xinhua featured an interview with a Shanghai mother name Zhao Yan, who told reporters that “when relevant government authorities sweep out porn and strike hard at rumors, it creates a clean and bright Internet environment for children to grow up in.” But detractors have argued that the core of the web cleanup is not removing pornography but rather silencing dissent and preventing the spread of information that authorities consider destabilizing.

Publication of New Internet Rules to Prompt Cheers and Challenges

For those who have spent more than a decade fighting for stricter regulation of the Internet, the official publication of the rules in the Federal Register, expected as early as April 6, will give reality to their latest victory. For those opposed, it is likely to touch off a flurry of lawsuits. The rules, approved in February by the Federal Communications Commission after months of heated debate, will forbid Internet service providers to speed up, slow down or block a consumer’s access to any particular content. Barring any court intervention -- some experts think that is unlikely, given the challenge of proving immediate harm -- the rules will go into effect 60 days after publication.

The first 10 days after the rules are published in the Federal Register will be particularly significant, said Harold Feld, senior vice president of Public Knowledge, a consumer advocacy group that focuses on Internet policy. All legal complaints filed in that time will be considered together, and a lottery will determine which federal court will hear that unified case. Some opponents of the rules are expected to file lawsuits in conservative jurisdictions, in hopes that a court more likely to rule against the FCC will be assigned the case.