November 2014

Tech industry must lead privacy fight

[Commentary] The Senate charade allowing the National Security Agency to continue spying on Americans' phone records would be laughable if it didn't have such dangerous implications for both the tech industry and consumer privacy.

One by one Senate Republicans stood up and announced their support for the NSA's "collect it all" mentality on the grounds that it's a crucial counterterrorism tool. Never mind that the United States has been able to point to only one case that came to light through a search of domestic phone records. And that one example was an Anaheim cabbie sending the vast sum of $1,000 to an al-Qaida affiliate in Somalia. Yep, that makes all the spying worthwhile. Silicon Valley and the American public must increase the pressure on Congress to come to its senses. It's unlikely that the valley will be able to innovate itself out of this mess. The right to privacy is one of the nation's most treasured principles. Silicon Valley needs to take a more active role in protecting Americans' privacy -- and restoring public trust in its products.

Workers in Silicon Valley Weigh In on Obama’s Immigration Order

Silicon Valley’s constant stream of new apps and services depends on hundreds of thousands of foreign-born engineers to help create them. So the technology industry has been pushing for changes to the nation’s immigration policy for more than a decade to allow more skilled workers into the country. President Obama’s executive order on immigration falls well short of what both immigrants and industry leaders were seeking. The most vexing issues they face, like speeding up the process for obtaining permanent residency and getting more visas for high-skilled technology work, would require an act of Congress. Nonetheless, some immigrants working in technology were heartened by the President’s actions and said they could potentially make life and work in the United States easier. One of President Obama’s initiatives, for example, would give entrepreneurs starting a company a special founder’s visa, provided that they raise outside funding.

In Social-Media Era, When Is Free Speech Illegal?

A case before the Supreme Court over threats made on Facebook is highlighting long-standing tension between law enforcement and free-speech advocates over when threatening speech crosses a line and breaks the law.

The appeal, up for arguments on Dec. 1, presents a vexing legal issue courts have long struggled to settle, and it does so when what people say can reach a bigger audience than ever before through social media. Although social-media companies have rules for managing individual speech online, the outcome could affect the leeway people have to express themselves, even darkly and violently, on Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and other sites.

Terrorists Get a Phone Upgrade

[Commentary] Apple , Google, Facebook and others are playing with fire by making it impossible for intelligence agencies or law enforcement to gain access to communications.

It looks like Silicon Valley has misread public opinion. The initial media frenzy caused by the Edward Snowden leaks has been replaced by recognition that the National Security Agency is among the most lawyered agencies in the government. Contrary to initial media reports, the NSA does not listen willy-nilly to phone and email communications. The lesson of the Snowden accusations is that citizens in a democracy make reasonable trade-offs between privacy and security once they have all the facts. As people realized that the rules-bound NSA poses little to no risk to their privacy, there was no reason to hamstring its operations. Likewise, law-abiding people know that there is little to no risk to their privacy when communications companies comply with US court orders.

FCC Acts to Preserve Reliable 911 Service as Technology Evolves

The Federal Communications Commission proposed rules to preserve reliable 911 service as technology evolves. The proposals address the increasingly complex nature of the nation’s 911 infrastructure and respond to a recent trend of large-scale “sunny day” 911 outages – that is, outages not due to storms or disasters but instead caused by software and database errors. Technology transitions, including the move to IP-based networks, can vastly improve 911 calling and help first responders during emergencies. However these transitions also present potential new vulnerabilities to 911 service. The process of routing and completing a 911 call now often involves multiple companies, sometimes geographically remote from where the call is placed. Outsourcing and consolidation of critical 911 network infrastructure means that a single 911 outage can affect more people in more places than before, and can also complicate restoration efforts.

In the Policy Statement and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), the FCC affirmed the core principles that have guided and will continue to guide the FCC’s approach to 911 oversight – particularly its policy of working with state and local partners to ensure reliable 911 service. The FCC also cited recent large-scale “sunny day” 911 outages, most notably an April 2014 outage caused by a software coding error in a 911 routing facility. That outage resulted in a loss of 911 service for more than 11 million people in seven states for up to six hours, with over 6,600 failed calls to 911. The FCC’s Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau issued a report on the outage, citing the importance of network reliability and clear accountability throughout the 911 call completion process.

Accordingly, the NPRM seeks comment on specific proposals in four key areas to set the nation on a path towards reversing the trend of large-scale 911 outages:

  1. Requiring 911 providers to make public notification of major changes to 911 service, so that 911 call centers and other stakeholders are aware of potential impacts, and to seek approval if they intend to discontinue critical 911 services.
  2. Requiring entities seeking to offer new 911 capabilities and services to certify that they have the technical and operational capability to do so reliably.
  3. Clarifying roles to promote situational awareness, information sharing, and coordination among multiple service providers during 911 outages.
  4. Updating the FCC’s 911 reliability certification requirements to account for new technologies and network architectures.

FCC Takes Up Consumer, Competition, 911 Safeguards in Tech Transitions

Taking steps to facilitate the ongoing transitions in the nation’s communications networks, the Federal Communications Commission is seeking comment on modernizing its rules to ensure access to 911 service, protect consumers, and preserve competition as the transitions move forward.

The nation’s communications networks are shifting from copper networks using legacy technologies to fiber, coaxial cable, and wireless networks using Internet Protocol (IP)-based technologies to carry voice, data and video. The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking adopted by the FCC today includes proposals to update rules ensuring access to public safety, protecting consumers faced with network changes and discontinuation of services, and preserving wholesale access to last-mile networks by competitive providers serving businesses and large institutions.

This modernization of FCC rules will help expedite the transition to next generation networks by protecting core network values in order to give consumers and businesses the confidence they need to embrace technological change and all its benefits.

Protecting Consumers’ Ability to Call 911 during a Power Outage

Traditional phone service on copper networks usually works even during broader power outages because the copper wires are powered separately by the phone company. While modern fiber and cable networks have many advantages, they do not provide power to the handset. Instead, during a power outage, consumers must rely on a battery back-up in their own homes.

The NPRM:

  • Proposes a framework to establish reasonable expectations for when providers should bear responsibility for providing a backup power solution for the communications equipment at a customer’s home during a power outage.
  • Seeks comment on different back-up power technologies and solutions in the marketplace today.
  • Examines potential strategies for providing back-up power during lengthy commercial power failures.

Increased Transparency to Empower and Protect Consumers During Transitions

While new networks can provide a wealth of innovative features, many consumers and small businesses rely on services that may not be supported following a transition. The expected frequency of network changes and discontinuances requires the FCC to modernize its rules regarding consumer notice and input in the event of network changes and discontinuances.

The NPRM:

  • Proposes greater transparency, consumer protection, and opportunities for consumer input when carriers are planning to shut down (or “retire”) their existing copper networks.
  • Sets in motion a process to ensure that new services meet the needs of consumers before carriers are allowed to remove legacy services from the marketplace.
  • Asks for facts and data about whether carriers are, in effect, retiring copper networks without giving notice simply by failing to maintain them.
  • Asks about allegations that carriers are not being clear with consumers about the options available when the copper network is shut down.

Preserving and Encouraging Competition

Small and medium-sized businesses, schools, hospitals, and other government institutions often rely on services delivered by competitive broadband and phone providers. Yet competitive providers may no longer be able to reach customers if incumbent carriers withdraw certain “last mile” services.

The NPRM:

  • Tentatively concludes that carriers seeking to discontinue a service used as a wholesale input should be required to provide competitive carriers equivalent wholesale access going forward.
  • Proposes to update the FCC’s rules so that competitive carriers receive sufficient notice of when copper networks are being shut off, so that they can continue to serve their customers effectively.

Declaratory Ruling

The FCC also adopted a Declaratory Ruling clarifying that the circumstances in which a carrier must seek approval to discontinue a service depend upon the practical impact of its actions, not the fine print of an aging tariff filing. This ensures that there will be a public process to evaluate a proposed discontinuance before a choice is removed from the market, regardless of how the carrier has written its tariff.

A Reason to Celebrate: FCC Examines Future of the Phone Network

The Federal Communications Commission’s November 21 meeting was a step forward for the 303 million people residing the in US who depend on some kind of phone service for their personal, business, and emergency communications. The FCC voted to move forward on two proposals that examine the future of the phone network and 911 emergency services. This vote builds on the FCC’s bipartisan, unanimous consensus around core network values that include public safety, universal access, competition, and consumer protection. Public input to the FCC will be instrumental in developing federal guidance for the phone network transitions that protects consumers and vulnerable populations.

The open comment period is an opportunity for people who care about phone service to make their voices heard. Rural voices, grassroots organizations, consumer advocacy groups, and state agencies who have been vocal on this issue should continue to highlight the importance of a reliable, affordable, and universally available network that includes all communities. This stakeholder input will be critical in ensuring that the digitally underserved do not become the permanently unserved. To be clear, this is a policy debate as much as technical one. Any future failure of the phone network, or elimination of service for communities who previously had access before a technological transition, will be the fault of bad policy. We have an opportunity to preserve the values that expanded phone service from coast to coast and cannot be the first industrialized nation to step back from a communications network that effectively served all households for the past 100 years. Public Knowledge will continue to urge the public and Congress to support the FCC’s step forward in protecting the phone network’s core values, and ensuring that this technology transition does not widen the communication gap in this country but serves instead as an upgrade for everyone.

TDM-to-IP Transition: FCC Considers “Facilitating” Sale of Retired Copper

The Federal Communications Commission is considering putting policies in place to “facilitate” the sale or auction of copper infrastructure that telephone service providers plan to retire as part of the TDM-to-IP transitions, FCC officials said. Additionally the commission is considering policies aimed at ensuring consumers have battery-powered telephones so that they will be able to make phone calls in the event of a power outage, officials said.

Moves that the commission is considering with regard to the TDM-to-IP transition fall into several broad categories, officials explained:

  • Establishing reasonable expectations for phone service during an outage in a technology-neutral manner
  • Defining copper retirement, seeking comment about how to ensure that new services meet consumers’ needs before legacy services are retired, and seeking comment about whether service providers are allowing copper facilities to deteriorate in anticipation of a transition to fiber facilities
  • Establishing policies to promote competition during a TDM-to-IP transition by requiring carriers to replace legacy wholesale services with equivalent services at equivalent rates, terms and conditions (this is the category in which the copper auction idea is floated)

FCC seeks comment on Indoor Location Accuracy "Roadmap"

By this Public Notice, the Federal Communications Commission’s Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau seeks comment on the “Roadmap for Improving E911 Location Accuracy” (Roadmap), filed in the E911 Location Accuracy proceeding (PS Docket No. 07-114) by the Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials (APCO), the National Emergency Number Association (NENA), AT&T Mobility, Sprint, T-Mobile USA, and Verizon (Parties).

The Parties assert that the Roadmap “marks a new course using indoor technologies to deliver a ‘dispatchable location’ for indoor 9-1-1 calls” and that it “contrasts with current and proposed outdoor technologies that provide estimates of location and face challenges with indoor location accuracy.” The Parties further state that “the Roadmap commits to meaningful improvements and FCC-enforceable timeframes to deliver effective location solutions.” The FCC notes that some public safety organizations have submitted ex parte filings critical of the Roadmap and supportive of the original proposals in the FCC’s Third Further Notice.

Request for Updated Information and Comment on Wireless Hearing Aid Compatibility Regulations

By this Public Notice, the Federal Communications Commission’s Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (Wireless Bureau) and the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau (CGB) request updated information to assess whether the FCC’s hearing aid compatibility rules for wireless handsets effectively meet the needs of individuals who are deaf and hard of hearing.

Since the Wireless Bureau last developed the record on these issues in 2012, a number of developments have occurred, including the deployment of LTE networks and LTE only handsets, wider use of and reliance on Wi-Fi calling, increasing consumer demand for data-centric mobile services on wireless devices, and continued growth in the number of wireless-only households. The Wireless Bureau and CGB therefore seek updated information to better understand the current consumer experience, to explore technical or other barriers to the provision of hearing aid compatible devices on new wireless technologies, and to consider recommending changes to the FCC’s rules that may be necessary to ensure that wireless handsets used with advanced communications services are accessible in light of directives contained in the Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act (CVAA). Accordingly, the FCC seeks to refresh the record on two principal issues. First, should the FCC revise the hearing aid compatibility requirement to apply in a technologically neutral way to all mobile wireless devices that can be used for voice communications? Second, should the FCC consider moving away from the fractional compliance regime that exists today and implement a requirement that all mobile wireless devices must comply with the hearing aid compatibility rules?