July 2013

The perils of online college learning

[Commentary] Let it not be said that San Jose State University hasn't taught the world a valuable lesson in the promises and pitfalls of the fancy new craze for online university learning.

The Cal State University campus set itself up as a pioneer in the field in January, when it announced plans to enroll up to 300 students in three introductory online courses; the fee would be $150, a deep discount from the usual cost of more than $2,000. The chances that careful evaluation of the San Jose experiment will reduce the hype surrounding online learning are slim. Online learning is seen today as the answer to virtually every problem facing higher education, especially public higher ed. The underlying problem with the online learning craze is that its proponents vastly overvalue the tools provided by the online platform and treat the content — that is, the material being learned — as a commodity.

Google Play offers digital textbooks for up to 80% off print versions

Google made another important announcement that flew under the radar: Google Play Textbooks.

Google said it will start renting out digital school textbooks in early August, just in time for school. And renting through Google could save students quite a bit of money. "You can rent textbooks for six months at up to 80% off the cost of a typical print textbook," a Google spokesman said. By going into the Google Play store, users can rent a textbook and then view it in the Google Play Books app, on Android and Apple iOS devices.

LA Unified School District Wants iPads for All 640,000 Students

The Los Angeles Unified School District awarded Apple a $30 million contract to provide its students with iPads. Under its terms, the company will supply about 31,000 iPads to 47 LAUSD schools, each preloaded with a bunch of educational software. But evidently that’s just the first phase of the program.

According to an LAUSD representative, the nation’s second-largest school district hopes to provide iPads to all 640,000 students by late 2014. Which means it’s going to buy a few hundred thousand more iPads over the next year — though it’s not yet sure how it’s going to do it. “We’re hoping that we will get a lot of private donors,” Mark Hovatter, chief facilities executive for LAUSD.

The presidential media pool lacks racial depth

When the first black president of the United States walked into the White House press room to talk about Trayvon Martin and the complexities of race in America, the people poised to convey his remarks to the world were overwhelmingly of one race — white.

At a time when one of the most contentious subjects in Washington is immigration reform — an issue of great import to many Hispanics — the people questioning the President on a regular basis are unlikely to be Hispanic themselves. But does that matter? Of the 53 correspondents who regularly report from the White House, seven are African American or Asian American, according to head counts by a dozen White House correspondents, journalism organizations and other sources (figures on other minorities aren’t available). The mainstream news media have always been disproportionately populated by white journalists. The numbers haven’t budged over decades, and may in fact have declined over time.

T-Mobile drops monthly payments, boosts fees

T-Mobile said that it is temporarily eliminating upfront payments on new phones, but it is increasing the prices for some models through higher monthly payments.

Unlike rival carriers, T-Mobile charges the full retail price of phones, spread over two years, but reduces monthly service fees for voice, text and data. AT&T, Verizon, Sprint and others typically charge $200 or so up front for high-end phones and make up for the rest of the phone's cost through higher service fees over the life of a two-year contract. Under a new payment plan introduced in March, T-Mobile charges a down payment for the phone and monthly installments until the device is paid off in two years. For instance, customers pay $146 up front for an iPhone 5 and $21 a month for two years for a total cost of $650. That's about the same price Apple charges when someone buys the phone without a two-year contract for use at another carrier. In eliminating the down payment, starting July 27, some phones will be cheaper. For instance, customers will be paying $600 overall for Samsung Electronics Co.'s Galaxy S4, compared with $630 currently. Apple's iPhone 5 will be $2 cheaper, at $648 overall.

FCC’s Media Bureau Seeks Comment on TiVo Petition

The Federal Communications Commission’s Media Bureau has set a comment schedule for TiVo's petition asking the FCC to ensure that cable customers can continue to use retail set-top boxes, like TiVo's, that employ CableCARD security technology.

The FCC has set Sept. 16 for comments and Oct. 9 for reply comments on TiVo's petition to reinstate CableCARD rules after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit essentially gutted them as part of a decision that the FCC lacked authority to apply encoding rules to all pay-TV providers, including satellite operators. The decision was not aimed at CableCARDs, but it raised questions about cable obligations to support consumer access to the cards, and TiVo wants the FCC to make it clear those obligations still apply, since CableCARDs also allow access to TiVo recording devices.

NAB: FCC Needs to Collect Comprehensive Wireless Spectrum Use/Efficiency Data

The Federal Communications Commission asked for input on the state of the wireless industry and the National Association of Broadcasters has some advice for it: Figure out how, where and to what extend wireless carriers are using the spectrum they already have.

NAB argues that neither the FCC nor Congress can advance sound spectrum policy -- that would appear to include holding a broadcast spectrum auction to relieve the perceived crunch -- until it collects that data. NAB says that while wireless carriers are busy telling the FCC in their comments that they need more spectrum, the FCC should instead be focused on "whether and how intensely licensees use spectrum and where," NAB says. "Without this critical information, the Commission cannot make optimal -- or even rational -- spectrum management decisions."

Some privacy advocates question mobile apps agreement

A proposed code of conduct for mobile app developers intended to make them explain how user data is collected and used does not have a clear enforcement mechanism, one privacy advocate said.

The code was negotiated this week by several trade groups and the U.S. National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA). While many participants in the NTIA's mobile privacy negotiations voiced support Thursday for the transparency code of conduct, Consumer Watchdog criticized the document and the NTIA process. Just two participants voted to fully endorse the code, while 20 supported it, 17 voted for further consideration and one objected. Participants voicing support had no obligation to adopt the code, the NTIA said. "This is absurd Orwellian doublespeak," John Simpson, Consumer Watchdog's Privacy Project director, said in an email. "A company can put out a press release saying it supports the transparency code, boosting its public image and then do absolutely nothing." Several consumer and privacy groups voted to support the code, including the American Civil Liberties Union, Consumers Union, the Center for Democracy and Technology and the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

The Consumer Federation of America said both the code and the process that produced it are seriously flawed. "While the idea of short-form notices is appealing, the information that they would provide under this code falls far short of what is needed to tell mobile application users what is really happening with their data," said Susan Grant, director of consumer protection at CFA. "It does not explain how their data will be used beyond what is necessary for the function of the app. Moreover, the information about what kind of data is collected and with whom it is shared is very limited. Most disturbingly, while the code calls for mobile app developers to disclose whether users' data will be shared with certain types of third parties, such as social networks and ad networks, no disclosure is required when the data is shared with the very same types of entities if they are part of the same corporate structure as the app developer." Grant expressed frustration at the process -- NTIA voted on the draft at its last meeting -- and the work product, but abstained rather than dissented in deference to the work of other nonprofits on the code.

The Center for Digital Democracy, which has long expressed concerns about the multistakeholder process that produced NTIA's draft of a code of mobile app conduct, also abstained from that draft.

How Nancy Pelosi Saved the NSA Surveillance Program

The obituary of Rep. Justin Amash's amendment to claw back the sweeping powers of the National Security Agency has largely been written as a victory for the White House and NSA chief Keith Alexander, who lobbied the Hill aggressively in the days and hours ahead of the shockingly close vote. But Hill sources say most of the credit for the amendment's defeat goes to someone else: House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi.

It's an odd turn, considering that Pelosi has been, on many occasions, a vocal surveillance critic. But ahead of the razor-thin 205-217 vote, which would have severely limited the NSA's ability to collect data on Americans' telephone records if passed, Pelosi privately and aggressively lobbied wayward Democrats to torpedo the amendment, according to a Democratic committee aide with knowledge of the deliberations. "Pelosi had a big effect on more middle-of-the road hawkish Democrats who didn't want to be identified with a bunch of lefties [voting for the amendment]," said the aide. "As for the Alexander briefings: Did they hurt? No, but that was not the central force, at least among House Democrats. Nancy Pelosi's political power far outshines that of Keith Alexander's."

Survey -- Majority of TV Viewers Say a Commercial Is Likely to Motivate Them to Buy a Product

A majority of TV viewers in the U.S. say there is some likelihood that they will act on a commercial they watch on TV, online or on a mobile device. The survey found that 97% of U.S. adults say they watch TV programming, with 59% saying a commercial could motivate them to make a purchase.

Conducted by Harris Interactive from June 24-26 with 2,029 adults from across the country answering, the survey found that 72% say they watch TV through cable boxes, 21% adding they watch broadcast TV without cable, and 33% saying they watch TV on other devices—via computer, smartphone or tablet. Overall, 18% of polled viewers watch TV via a smartphone. Millennials, ages 18-34, are more likely to watch TV on a smartphone than any other age group: 28% of millennials watch TV via a smartphone, compared to 22% of those ages 34-44, 17% ages 45-54 and 7% ages 55-plus.