June 2010

Literacy and Media Access

The discrepancy in education between urban and rural areas of India has always difficult to overcome. While some camps opt for strict formal education, others promote alternatives such as media access in rural areas. Recently there have been a few, but innovative approaches to tackle illiteracy as well as education in general. Needless to say, program facilitators have researched and implemented methods according to the needs of specific rural populations.

Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights
Senate Committee on the Judiciary
Wednesday, June 9, 2010
2:00 p.m

Witnesses

The Honorable Christine A. Varney
Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division
U.S. Department of Justice
Washington, DC

The Honorable Jonathan D. Leibowitz
Chairman
Federal Trade Commission
Washington, DC



FCC Public Forum on Comcast-NBCU/GE Joint Venture

Tuesday, July 13, 2010
1:00 - 8:00 p.m.

The Federal Communications Commission will hold a public forum to discuss the Comcast/NBCU/GE joint venture proposal. The forum will consist of two panels in the afternoon, followed by a special segment from 6:00 - 8:00 p.m. for the public to ask questions and share their views about the proposed merger.

Agenda and Panelists
(Central Standard Time)

1:00 p.m. Introduction and Opening Remarks
Commissioner Michael Copps, Federal Communications Commission

1:15 p.m. Panel 1: Online Video Distribution Considerations
John Flynn, Senior Counsel to the Chairman for Transactions, FCC (Moderator)

  • Jeffrey Blum, Deputy General Counsel, DISH Network
  • Susan Crawford, Professor, Cardozo Law School, and Visiting Research Collaborator, Princeton University
  • Markham C. Erickson, Partner, Holch & Erickson LLP, and Executive Director, NetCoalition
  • Travis Parsons, Senior Director, Business Development, Sezmi
  • Josh Silver, President and CEO, Free Press
  • Scott Wallsten, Vice President for Research and Senior Fellow, Technology Policy Institute
  • Susan Whiting, Vice Chair, The Nielsen Company

3:00 p.m. Break

3:15 p.m. Panel 2: Multichannel Video Programming Distributor Considerations
William Lake, Chief, Media Bureau, FCC (Moderator)

  • Colleen Abdoulah, President and CEO, WOW! Internet, Cable and Phone
  • Tyrone Brown, President, Media Access Project
  • Brian Lawlor, President-Chairman, NBC Television Affiliates and Senior Vice President of Television, The E.W. Scripps Company
  • William Rogerson, Professor of Economics, Northwestern University
  • Ken Solomon, Chairman & CEO, The Tennis Channel
  • James Speta, Professor, Northwestern University School of Law

5:00 p.m. Break

6:00 p.m. Public Comments

8:00 p.m. Adjournment

Open captioning of the forum will be provided. Other reasonable accommodations for people with disabilities are available upon request. Include a description of the accommodation you will need and a way we can contact you if more information is needed. Last-minute requests will be accepted, but may not be possible to fill. Send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (tty).

For further information, please contact Jessica Almond by phone, 202-418-2721 or email, jessica.almond@fcc.gov.



US Falls From Internet Elite, Aims to Catch Iceland, Hungary

After ranking third in the world a decade ago, the U.S. has dropped to 15th in the proportion of citizens receiving fast Web service, or broadband, according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

South Korea, Iceland and Germany are among the countries that ranked higher in 2009, the Paris-based group says. Connections were both faster and cheaper in 12 countries, including Hungary and Denmark. "We are not on the Olympic podium when it comes to broadband," said Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski. "Other countries are not standing still and neither should we." Countries that rank higher than the U.S. are densely populated, use subsidies, and promote computer use, said Robert D. Atkinson, president of the Washington-based Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, which studies innovation policy. "The U.S. is behind because we're a big, spread-out country with lots of people who don't own computers," Atkinson said in an interview. In France and elsewhere in Europe, "pretty intense competition" has led to lower prices, innovative services and fast connections, Taylor Reynolds, a Paris-based economist with the OECD, said in an interview.

Pelosi: If the House takes up legislation to gut a free and open Internet "it's not going to be a Democratic initiative"

Over the last few weeks, dozens of House members from both sides of the aisle have signed on to a lobbyist-driven letter advocating to give control of the Internet to Comcast and AT&T by preventing the FCC from protecting the Internet, broadband expansion efforts, and net neutrality. The misleading pack-of-lies letter has prompted some in Congress, Democrats and Republicans, to talk about revamping the 1996 Telecommunications Act with an eye towards giving the telecom companies and their lobbyists what they want.

On June 1, Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) threw cold water on those plans. Describing herself as a "big net neutrality advocate," she said that she has a hard time seeing how any legislation that guts net neutrality, the national broadband plan, or other Internet-focused priorities would get through Congress. The Speaker said, "I don't know how many options they have unless they choose to work with Republicans, but it's not going to be a Democratic initiative." She added that making sure the Internet is open, free, and vibrant is a big priority for House Democrats, "Part of the innovation agenda I advocated for when I became Leader was universal broadband. We had hoped to get it done within five years. We just got the bill passed three years ago under President Bush, but we had no funding. Now we want to have the resources to take us to that place so we don't have a disparity between urban and rural populations. Reclassification, net neutrality, universal access for every American, these are priorities for us. And we see it not in isolation but as part of a new prosperity, as a job creator, to make America healthier, smarter and an international leader."

More on Speed: Just How Satisfied Are Customers?

Consumers are fairly well satisfied with the speed of the broadband they get at home. Having 50 percent say they are "very satisfied" is a strong showing, although it still leaves room for improvement.

Even if people are satisfied with their home broadband speed, however, they may be paying hundreds of dollars a year more than they need to. Consumers still need better information to know what speed they need for the applications they run. And given the split between "very" and "somewhat" satisfied customers, more information on broadband speed would also help consumers choose between different providers. For mobile broadband, the lower numbers show that this service still has a way to go to improve customer satisfaction - which is especially important as more people turn to mobile for their primary Internet connection. It's technologically harder to deliver high speeds by mobile, so the satisfaction gap between fixed and mobile broadband is understandable. But consider that satisfaction with mobile service overall - not broadband speed specifically - is quite high, with 59 percent very satisfied and 33 percent somewhat so. A decade ago, that satisfaction rate might have been hard to imagine. The wireless industry has made tremendous strides in innovation and service quality overall, and we can expect improvements in mobile broadband speed as well. Accurate measurements of mobile broadband speed can be a boost to innovation. These measures can help wireless carriers learn more about where their networks function best and where they may fall short. Most consumers now have a choice of mobile broadband providers, and will be able to use these new measures to choose the providers who will serve them best. Consumer choice, in turn, can increase competition, innovation, and ultimately help lead to better broadband service for all.

FCC-Native Nations Broadband Task Force

The Federal Communications Commission seeks applications for membership on the .

The Task Force will assist the FCC in fulfilling its commitment to increasing broadband deployment and adoption on Tribal lands. The Task Force will be responsible for, among other things, assisting in developing and executing a FCC consultation policy, eliciting input from Native American governments, ensuring that Native American concerns are considered in all Commission proceedings related to broadband, developing additional recommendations for promoting broadband deployment and adoption on Tribal lands, and coordinating with external entities, including other Federal departments and agencies. The Task Force will be comprised of senior FCC staff and elected leaders from Federally-recognized Native American governments or governmental entities (or their designated employees). As with other FCC advisory committees and joint boards, the Chairman of the FCC will appoint the members and designate a Chairman and a Vice-Chairman for the Task Force. In addition, the Chairman may appoint members to fill vacancies and may replace a member at his discretion. The Chairman will designate either himself or another Commissioner to oversee the activities of the Task Force and serve as a liaison between the Task Force and the FCC. Applicants should be willing to commit to a two-year term of service, which requires participation, either in person or by teleconference, in the meetings of the Task Force. It is anticipated that most meetings will take place in Washington, D.C. Attendance in person will be at the applicant's own expense. Members will also have an initial and continuing obligation to disclose any interests in, or connections to, persons or entities who are or will be regulated by, or who have interests before, the Commission.

Public Knowledge Proposes Spectrum Policy Changes

The Federal government should alter its spectrum-allocation policies and procedures so that both the government and the private sector can operate more efficiently, two papers presented today at a Public Knowledge-sponsored conference suggested. The papers, by PK Legal Director Harold Feld and economist Gregory Rose, were presented at the conference, Toward a Sustainable Spectrum Policy: Rethinking Federal Spectrum.

One paper, Breaking the Logjam: Creating Sustainable Spectrum Access Through Federal Secondary Markets, suggested the government consider real-time leasing rather than simply clearing bands entirely for auction.

The second paper, Breaking the Logjam: Some Modest Proposals For Enhancing Transparency, Efficiency and Innovation In Public Spectrum Management, proposed ways to allocate spectrum within the current statutory structure, treating it more like budgeting and purchasing.

Apple and the Regulators

[Commentary] Mobile computers like Apple's iPhone and iPad are among the most transformative information devices since the personal computer. So it makes sense for the Federal Trade Commission and the Justice Department to review Apple's policies governing programmers' access to its devices to see if they violate antitrust laws.

Apple now wants developers to write apps specifically for its gadgets, using approved computer languages. The company also changed its terms of agreement with developers to prohibit them from using software from third parties to "send Device Data to a third party for processing or analysis." Apple argues that these changes are legitimate efforts to offer consumers a flawless experience on its devices. This week, Apple's Steve Jobs declared that Adobe's widely used Flash platform "has had its day." Apple said the ban on sharing data with other programs was a way to protect the privacy of iPhone and iPad users. Yet regulators are concerned about Apple's pattern of behavior. The Justice Department is also investigating whether Apple is abusing its dominance in the digital music market to punish labels that do business deals with rivals like Amazon. The question is whether Apple's policies lock rivals out of fast-growing new markets.

File-Sharing Pioneers Now Selling Music

Rdio, will unveil itself on Thursday amid what is suddenly becoming a crowded market for Internet music services, a field still largely dominated by iTunes from Apple. Rdio will charge $5 to $10 a month for unlimited access to a large music catalog, including songs from the major record labels. This is a similar approach to that of other subscription music services that have not fared well, including the newly independent Rhapsody and Napster, a division of Best Buy. Rdio customers paying the full amount will be able to stream and store songs on a range of mobile devices, beginning with the BlackBerry and iPhone, and soon, phones running the Android operating system from Google. The company is backed through the founders' Atomico Ventures, a venture-capital firm based in London.