May 2010

Genachowski and Rep Miller exchange Thoughts on Public Safety

On February 1, Rep Candice Miller (R-MI) wrote a letter to Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski pointing out that the FCC's 2004 rule that mandated all non-Federal public safety licensees using 25 kHz radio systems migrate to narrowband 12.5 kHz channels by January I, 2013 seems to have become an issue of consternation for local 9-1-1 emergency dispatch centers.

Public safety agencies who are working to become compliant with this federal rule have raised some valid objections during the transition process which may warrant a closer look by the FCC. She said recent advances in communication technology are preventing public safety agencies from making long-term investments that reflect the reality of the present day and local municipalities are faced with a tough choice of spending limited resources in the short-term to fulfill the FCC's mandate when they would prefer to invest in communications systems that employ a long-term strategy utilizing the best-available technology on the market.

On May 10, Chairman Genachowski wrote back to Rep Miller saying that the FCC realizes the economic difficulties faced by state'and local jurisdictions have rendered the 2013 deadline problematic for some. He continued: "Failure to complete the migration process on schedule, however, will cause difficulties in other areas. Public safety licensees operating wideband systems after the deadline will experience reduced interoperability with narrowbanded systems, and continued wideband operations also could cause harmful interference to public safety licensees operating on adjacent narrowband channels. Completion of the migration process, conversely, will free up spectrum for new public safety operations."

National Telecommunications and Information Administration
June 3, 2010
1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time.

The National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) will host a public meeting concerning the nature of data related to broadband Internet access and use that the agency collects, data needs of researchers, and future broadband research.

For further information regarding the meeting, contact James McConnaughey, NTIA, at (202) 482- 3161 or JMcConnaughey@ntia.doc.gov

The meeting will include a discussion of the following topics, including specific areas of inquiry:
1. Internet access at home and outside the home
2. Internet use at home and outside the home
3. Computer access at home and outside the home
4. Computer use at home and outside the home
5. Key demographic variables
6. Key geographic variables
7. Non-adoption issues: Internet
8. Non-adoption issues: Computers

The meeting will also seek input on:
A. The timing ("periodicity") of future data collections.
B. The data format preferred by researchers including those for distributing broadband-related data on the Web to promote maximum transparency for researchers and the interested public.
C. An updated version of the October 2003 Current Population Survey Computer and Internet Use Supplement survey instrument http://www.bls.census.gov/cps/computer/2003/quest2003.pdf.
Specific information regarding the status of and data from specific applications for the Broadband Technology Opportunities Program (BTOP) and the State Broadband Data and Development Grant Program (State Broadband Data Program) will not be discussed at the meeting.



FTC Approves Google-AdMob Deal

The Federal Trade Commission has closed its investigation of Google's proposed acquisition of mobile advertising network company AdMob after thoroughly reviewing the deal and concluding that it is unlikely to harm competition in the emerging market for mobile advertising networks.

In a statement, the FTC said that although the combination of the two leading mobile advertising networks raised serious antitrust issues, the agency's concerns ultimately were overshadowed by recent developments in the market, most notably a move by Apple Computer Inc. - the maker of the iPhone - to launch its own, competing mobile ad network. In addition, a number of firms appear to be developing or acquiring smartphone platforms to better compete against Apple's iPhone and Google's Android, and these firms would have a strong incentive to facilitate competition among mobile advertising networks. "As a result of Apple's entry (into the market), AdMob's success to date on the iPhone platform is unlikely to be an accurate predictor of AdMob's competitive significance going forward, whether AdMob is owned by Google or not," the Commission's statement explains. The FTC stressed that mergers in fast-growing new markets like mobile advertising should get the same level of antitrust scrutiny as those in other markets. The statement goes on to note that, "Though we have determined not to take action today, the FTC will continue to monitor the mobile marketplace to ensure a competitive environment and to protect the interests of consumers."

OPASTCO tenacious in opposition to National Broadband Plan

The Organization for the Promotion and Advancement of Small Telecommunication Companies has problems with the National Broadband Plan.

OPASTCO President John Rose says:

  • The plan's goal of ensuring that all Americans can get broadband at speeds of at least 4 Mb/s is too low to support some of the plan's other goals, particularly those involving education and health care. And although the National Broadband Plan calls for reviewing bandwidth requirements every four years, OPASTCO thinks a yearly review would be more appropriate.
  • If small carriers are required to move off rate of return regulation and into a price cap approach, they could have difficulty obtaining the funding from lenders that would be required for them to continue to invest in their networks. Lenders liked the predictability that the rate of return approach offered, and without that predictability they will view loans to small carriers as more risky.
  • Despite the plan's recognition that intercarrier compensation reform would need to go hand in hand with Universal Service reform, the organization has not seen intercarrier compensation given commensurate priority.

Telephone Poles

Whoops. The title of this blog post is wrong. It should be "utility poles," which points to one of the many ironies in the hidden life of the ubiquitous utility pole.

Most of what are commonly known as telephone poles are actually owned by the electric utility -- 70% of them, in fact. But whether a telephone company or other utility owns the poles, every other kind of company that hangs anything on these poles pays the utility company for the privilege, and under current federal rules a cable company and a telephone company pay different rates for attaching their lines to a pole. But now that broadband and IP communications are merging voice, data and video, charging different rates for different types of communications services seems to make less and less sense. Make no mistake about it: the humble telephone, er, utility pole, is hot real estate. Companies pay, on average, anywhere between $7 per foot and $20 per foot for a pole attachment. Multiplied by hundreds of thousand of poles, that can have an impact on whether services are delivered to a community or not. Utility poles are essential infrastructure, and infrastructure costs can affect the price or availability of service, the National Broadband Plan found. In rural areas, where there may be more poles per mile than people, the cost of pole attachments could deter broadband deployment. Or in other instances, a cable company planning to bundle voice, data and video in the coaxial cable might be deterred if the voice service would subject the company to a higher pole attachment rate.

21st Century Emergency Alerting

The Federal Communications Commission's (FCC's) Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau (PSHSB) and the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA's) National Continuity Programs (NCP) will hold a workshop on : Leveraging Multiple Technologies to Bring Alerts and Warnings to the Public.

The workshop will be held on Thursday, June 10, 2010, from 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. in the Commission Meeting Room (TW-C305). The workshop will highlight the status of and relevant details related to the Integrated Public Alert and Warning System, including the Next Generation Emergency Alert System (EAS) and the Commercial Mobile Alert System. This public meeting will also provide FEMA, the FCC and other Federal partners an opportunity to gather feedback on outstanding issues related to these systems, the upcoming National EAS test, and the FCC's upcoming inquiry proceeding on next generation alerting.

FCC Offers Further Guidance on 700 MHz Waiver Order

On May 12, 2010, the Federal Communications Commission released an order (Waiver Order) granting conditional waivers to twenty-one public safety entities (Waiver Recipients) for early deployment of public safety broadband networks in the 700 MHz public safety broadband spectrum (PSBB Block). The Waiver Order establishes technical, operational and governance conditions for early deployment and requires each Waiver Recipient to submit to the Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau (Bureau), within a specified time window, a detailed plan for achieving interoperability with other public safety broadband networks (Interoperability Showing). In this Public Notice, the FCC provides further guidance to the Waiver Recipients on the required contents of the Interoperability Showing. After receiving approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to perform the information collections contemplated in the Waiver Order, the Bureau will release a Public Notice announcing the opening of a thirty-day window during which a Waiver Recipient must submit its Interoperability Showing to the Emergency Response Interoperability Center (ERIC).

US happy with 4Mbps baseline; Europe demands 30Mbps for all

The grand master plan for European broadband is out, and one target leaves the United States in the digital dust—a goal of 30 Mbps "or above" for all Europeans by 2020.

White House refreshes Data.gov

On Friday the White House relaunched Data.gov, its online clearinghouse for government data.

The site launched one year ago with the aim of providing the public and developers with a one-stop shop for all federal data feeds and databases. After starting with only 47 data sets, the site now boasts more than 270,000 on a wide range of topics. Traffic has increased from 2 million hits May 21, 2009, to an expected 98 million today, according to federal Chief Information Officer Vivek Kundra. In the future, the White House wants to post new statistics in as close to real time as possible, he said, adding the Obama administration does not want too many people massaging the data before it is released.

The administration also is making an effort to reach beyond techies and advocacy groups and lure the general public to Data.gov. The new site will add more feedback mechanisms for people to tell the government what kinds of applications and other electronic information they want featured on Data.gov. For assistance, the White House has hired a former NASA official, who is well-versed in citizen outreach, to drive interest in statistical analysis among grade school students.

Google TV: What Does It Mean for Advertisers?

Google opened up an entirely new store of inventory for advertisers with Google TV, an interactive platform that collapses the wall between TV and Internet in the living room.

The service, created with hardware partners Sony, Logitech and Intel, will launch this fall on TVs, set-top boxes and Blu-ray players. "Every ad on TV has the potential to become interactive," Google TV Technical Director Vincent Dureau said at the I/O developer conference, where the platform was announced. "Your TV content just became more interesting." TV is the final screen for the search giant after it made its name in online search 10 years ago and moved into mobile with Android in 2007. While interactive TV has long been in the works from other providers, technology and a host of other issues have kept it from reaching a scale that would attract more money from major advertisers. Google's existing relationships with advertisers for search and display ads, though, could theoretically turn the tide for interactive TV.