September 2009

Big Broadband Ideas

Big Ideas With the Potential to Substantially Change the Community

Competition and Commerce in Digital Books

House Committee on the Judiciary
2141 Rayburn House Office Building
10 am
http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/hear_090910.html

Witnesses include:

  • Google Chief Legal Officer David Drummond
  • National Federation of the Blind President Marc Maurer
  • Authors Guild Executive Director Paul Aiken
  • University of Chicago law professor Randal Picker
  • Amazon Vice President Paul Misener
  • Consumer Watchdog John Simpson
  • Register of Copyrights Marybeth Peters
  • Center for American Progress Senior Fellow David Balto


Grand Hyatt Washington
Washington, DC
September 9-10, 2009
http://www.gov2summit.com/gov2009/

8:00am
Wednesday, 09/09/2009
Location: Independence Foyer Breakfast - Sponsored by HP (1h)

9:00am
Opening Welcome
Wednesday, 09/09/2009
General
Location: Independence Ballroom A Tim O'Reilly (O'Reilly Media, Inc.), Richard O'Neill (The Highlands Group)
Tim O'Reilly and Dick O'Neill welcome you to Gov 2.0 Summit. Read more.

9:15am
From the Digital Commonwealth to the Digital Nation
Wednesday, 09/09/2009
General
Location: Independence Ballroom A Tim O'Reilly (O'Reilly Media, Inc.), Aneesh Chopra (Federal Office of Science and Technology Policy)
Sounding a Web 2.0 theme 250 years ago, Benjamin Franklin spoke of the power of doing good by collective action for public benefit. In this far-reaching conversation, Tim will explore with new Federal CTO Aneesh Chopra his ideas for harnessing technology to build a digital commonwealth and a digital nation, a new model for cooperation between citizens and their government. Read more.

9:35am
Technology Insight
Wednesday, 09/09/2009
General
Location: Independence Ballroom A Clay Shirky (shirky.com)
Internationally regarded author and pundit Clay Shirky tells us what real problems we can solve with social media. Read more.

9:45am
Apps for America II
Wednesday, 09/09/2009
General
Location: Independence Ballroom A Clay Johnson (Sunlight Labs)
Just as the federal government begins to provide data in Web developer-friendly formats, Sunlight Labs is organizing Apps for America 2: The Data.gov Challenge to demonstrate that when government makes data available, it makes itself more accountable and creates more trust and opportunity in its actions. Read more.

9:55am
The Civic Experience
Wednesday, 09/09/2009
General
Location: Independence Ballroom A Tom Steinberg (mySociety)
Tom Steinberg demonstrates the beginnings of the "art of the possible" with MySociety.org successes in the UK. Tom has shown the UK government what a joined-up web presence is through his work for the MySociety charity. "The common theme is cheap and cheerful open web technology tipping the relationship between people and government, in favor of the people". Read more.

10:05am
RAPID FIRE: Setting the Stage
Wednesday, 09/09/2009
General
Location: Independence Ballroom A Adrian Holovaty (EveryBlock), Carol Dumaine (Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence at the U.S. Department of Energy), Scott Heiferman (Meetup), Peter Corbett (iStrategyLabs), Michael Tiemann (Open Source Initiative)
Here we get a glimpse of what this Summit will demonstrate, that is, how users can create applications with government data in new ways for citizen use, how government agencies and non-profits can engage both outside and inside their agencies to improve performance and extend reach in achieving goals at a scale previously unattainable. Read more.

10:30am
Wednesday, 09/09/2009
Location: Independence Foyer Morning Break - Sponsored by Intel (30m)

11:00am
Congress and Social Media
Wednesday, 09/09/2009
General
Location: Independence Ballroom A John Culberson (7th District of Texas)
Details coming soon. Read more.

11:20am
Thinking About "Government as a Platform"
Wednesday, 09/09/2009
General
Location: Independence Ballroom A Mitchell Kapor (Mitchell Kapor Foundation)
Mitch Kapor raises a series of provocative questions about the "government as platform" meme. As we raise this metaphor to think about the roles of app creators and government data providers and how we might see a change in governance in the process, Mitch will ask us to carefully consider a number of questions that are fundamental to realizing this model. Read more.

11:30am
Creating an Effective Platform
Wednesday, 09/09/2009
General
Location: Independence Ballroom A John Markoff (New York Times), Vinton Cerf (Google), Jack Dorsey (Twitter), Tim Sparapani (Facebook)
What can we learn from the most successful platforms and apps creators in Silicon Valley? Joining us are the leaders from the gold standards of platform and app development to tell us how they do it. Our moderator for this exciting session is the dean of technology journalists, the New York Times' John Markoff. Read more.

12:00pm
Wednesday, 09/09/2009
Location: Independence Level Lunch - Sponsored by Microsoft (1h)

1:00pm
The Killer App of Gov2.0: A Conversation with Microsoft Chief Research and Strategy Officer, Craig Mundie
Wednesday, 09/09/2009
General
Location: Independence Ballroom A Craig Mundie (Microsoft Corporation), Tim O'Reilly (O'Reilly Media, Inc.)
All good platforms have "killer apps" that drive their adoption, so if government becomes a platform, what is the killer app that will make Gov 2.0 matter to every citizen, not just the technical elite? Is it electronic medical records? Is it broadband for education? Is it the smart grid? What are the policy issues that we'll need to address in order to make this technology reach every American? Read more.

1:20pm
GeoEnabling Gov 2.0
Wednesday, 09/09/2009
General
Location: Independence Ballroom A Jack Dangermond (ESRI)
Maps and GIS are changing. They're becoming richer, smarter, and more pervasive. There are new styles, patterns, and techniques. As a result, geographic knowledge will become pervasive in society. This "GeoWeb" offers many opportunities for government to be creative with this new media environment: creative cartography and spreading geographic knowledge everywhere. Read more.

1:30pm
RAPID FIRE: Location, Location, Location
Wednesday, 09/09/2009
General
Location: Independence Ballroom A Andrew Turner (FortiusOne), Robert Greenberg (G&H International Services, Inc), Mikel Maron (OpenStreetMap), Dave Warner (MindTel)
Perhaps the largest and most usable data applications to emerge from the Web/Gov2.0 in the near term are geospatial apps. There is amazing work going on here as we will see in the group of rapid fires we have assembled for you. Read more.

1:50pm
Measurables
Wednesday, 09/09/2009
General
Location: Independence Ballroom A Hal Varian (Google), Tim O'Reilly (O'Reilly Media, Inc.)
Being able to measure outputs to gauge success becomes more important and more possible in a data-driven world. Real time economics is one of several important new ideas that will be essential to implement to achieve the goals of the new administration, in using technology to reinvent government. Tim O'Reilly checks in with Hal on how he sees these possibilities. Read more.

2:15pm
Data Driven Measurement of Education Practices
Wednesday, 09/09/2009
General
Location: Independence Ballroom A Brad Jupp (Office of Secretary of Education)
Secretary of Education Arne Duncan has recently made data driven improvements in education processes and delivery a priority. Senior Advisor to the Secretary, Brad Jupp, will tell us what the Department is doing in this regard and how it sees the use of data to make major gains. Read more.

2:30pm
Honest Signals: Low Hanging Data Ripe for Predicting
Wednesday, 09/09/2009
General
Location: Independence Ballroom A Alex "Sandy" Pentland (MIT and Sense Networks)
Join MIT Professor Sandy Pentland, co-founder of SenseNetworks, for a provocative look at what is emerging in the world of data and mining. Read more.

2:45pm
Seeing Data as Change Over Time
Wednesday, 09/09/2009
Location: Independence Ballroom A Ola Rosling (Google, Inc.)
Ola Rosling, of Google and co-founder of Gapminder.org shows us what the tools he is building can do with government data to see change over time, telling a remarkable, dynamic story in the process. Read more.

3:00pm
Wednesday, 09/09/2009
Location: Independence Foyer Afternoon Break (25m)

3:25pm
Bev Godwin on Web and New Media Practices
Wednesday, 09/09/2009
General
Location: Independence Ballroom A Bev Godwin (U.S. General Services Administration)
Bev Godwin will discuss the collaboration on best web and new media practices across government agencies. Read more.

3:30pm
Showcasing Innovators for Government
Wednesday, 09/09/2009
General
Location: Independence Ballroom A Mark Drapeau (National Defense University), Laurel Ruma (O'Reilly Media, Inc.)
This is an Ignite style set of presentations by the six (6) winners of the Gov 2.0 Expo Showcase contest held on Sept 8th. Read more.

4:10pm
"Citizen Gain": The New, New Journalism and Governance
Wednesday, 09/09/2009
General
Location: Independence Ballroom A Steven Berlin Johnson (Outside.in), Andrea Seabrook (NPR), Monica Guzman (SeattlePI.com), Hal Roberts (Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School)
On this panel, Steven will engage in a freewheeling conversation with a panel of journalists and media technologists. Read more.

4:40pm
Kojo Nnamdi One-on-One with Macon Phillips
Wednesday, 09/09/2009
General
Location: Independence Ballroom A Kojo Nnamdi ("The Kojo Nnamdi Show" & "Evening Exchange"), Macon Phillips (The White House)
Radio host Kojo Nnamdi joins the Director of New Media at the White House Macon Phillips in a conversation about how the White House is using new media, and what is different about working from inside government than the assumptions that people working on the outside take for granted. What regulations might need to change to make it easier for government to use social media effectively? Read more.

5:00pm
Open Government, Open Policy Making
Wednesday, 09/09/2009
General
Location: Independence Ballroom A Beth Noveck (Executive Office of the President/OSTP)
Beth Noveck, United States Deputy Chief Technology Officer and Director of the White House Open Government Initiative, is leading the Administration's work on transparency, participation, and collaboration. She spearheads policy, projects, and platforms that foster open government across the Executive branch. Read more.

5:15pm
Diplomacy 2.0: Social Media, Diplomacy, and Co-Creation of Dialogue
Wednesday, 09/09/2009
General
Location: Independence Ballroom A John Podesta (Center for American Progress), James Fallows (The Atlantic)
With the rise of networks, and the connectedness of citizens globally to each other, there are new opportunities to adopt social media to share messages and to co-create dialogues with other nations and citizens. Welcome to Diplomacy 2.0, the connection of states, peoples, organizations and institutions to each other for human betterment. Read more.

Thursday, 09/10/2009
7:30am
Thursday, 09/10/2009
Location: Independence Foyer Breakfast - Sponsored by Palantir (1h)

9:30am
Thursday, 09/10/2009
Location: Independence Foyer Break (15m)

9:45am
"By the People..."
Thursday, 09/10/2009
Location: Independence Ballroom A Carl Malamud (Public.Resource.Org, Inc.)
Open government pioneer Carl Malamud draws on his own experience to put the changes we are witnessing today into perspective, drawing on 200 years of American history and showing why access to the working of government by private citizens is crucial for our economy and for our democracy. Read more.

10:05am
A Conversation with Federal Government CIO Vivek Kundra
Thursday, 09/10/2009
Location: Independence Ballroom A Vivek Kundra (Office of Management and Budget), Ellen Miller (Sunlight Foundation)
What is the state of data.gov and other government transparency initiatives? Open data is one of the foundations of the digital commonwealth. It fosters re-use and innovation, and also helps citizens hold government accountable. But it also raises privacy and security issues. Ellen and Vivek will tackle these issues and more in a conversation on the key issues of the Summit. Read more.

10:25am
Clouds Over Washington: The Cloud and How It Can Serve Government
Thursday, 09/10/2009
Location: Independence Ballroom A Werner Vogels (Amazon.com), Tim O'Reilly (O'Reilly Media, Inc.), Casey Coleman (U.S. General Services Administration)
What might be happening that could clarify things or make complexity knee bending and overwhelming for government agencies? In this discussion we explore how the move to cloud computing might provide significant benefit to openness, transparency, and easier collaboration-or result in significant problems. Read more.

10:50am
Lean Startups: Doing More with Less
Thursday, 09/10/2009
Location: Independence Ballroom A Eric Ries (Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers)
Startups aren't just for the garage anymore. A new kind of entrepreneur is emerging from startup hubs worldwide. They are mastering not just new technologies but the discipline to create value for real people. The lean startup is a look at this new trend and ways it can be applied by organizations large and small. Read more.

11:00am
Thursday, 09/10/2009
Location: Independence Foyer Morning Break (30m)

11:30am
How Data Can Improve Health Care and Reduce Costs
Thursday, 09/10/2009
Location: Independence Ballroom A Elliott Fisher (The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice)
How might we use data as a platform to improve health care and reduce costs? In this session we examine some of the possibilities that access to data might have for Health2.0. Read more.

11:50am
RAPID FIRE: Healthcare
Thursday, 09/10/2009
Location: Independence Ballroom A Carleen Hawn (Healthspottr), James Heywood (PatientsLikeMe )
More information coming soon. Read more.

12:05pm
Instrumenting the Edges to Predict: H1N1 Virus
Thursday, 09/10/2009
Location: Independence Ballroom A Michael McDonald (Global Health Initiatives, Inc.), Eric Rasmussen (InSTEDD), James Stogdill (Gestalt, now part of Accenture)
Details coming soon. Read more.

12:30pm
Thursday, 09/10/2009
Location: Independence Level Lunch - Sponsored by Booz Allen (1h)

1:30pm
Real-world Social Networking for Gov 2.0
Thursday, 09/10/2009
Location: Independence Ballroom A Dean Halstead (Microsoft)
Just as social networking has transformed the way people use the Web, in how they share information about themselves, events and even their opinions, it has altered the expectations of government and created a new level of democracy that enables fast and easy participation and collaboration. Read more.

1:40pm
What's Next? Follow the Money
Thursday, 09/10/2009
Location: Independence Ballroom A Lloyd Howell (Booz Allen Hamilton)
As the Internet has evolved from static, one-way information hubs to interactive platforms, organizations are flocking to the Web to take advantage of the increased stakeholder engagement, ecommerce, and low cost storage space available in the cloud. With all of these benefits, however, come increased concerns about security, identity, and privacy. Read more.

1:50pm
How Palantir is Empowering Human Analysis in the US Government
Thursday, 09/10/2009
Location: Independence Ballroom A Shyam Sankar (Palantir Technologies)
Palantir will discuss how they are applying the technology they developed for the intelligence community and the lessons learned battling cyber-fraud at PayPal to empower human analysts and create transparency. Read more.

1:55pm
Transparency, Technology and You
Thursday, 09/10/2009
Location: Independence Ballroom A Chris DiBona (Google, Inc.)
In this short talk, Google's Public Sector and Open Source Programs Manager, Chris DiBona, will talk about how transparency is a social problem first and a technology problem second. He will draw on his experience with open source projects to show how, with a bit of tenacity, we can all make government more transparent and participatory. Read more.

2:00pm
The State of the USA
Thursday, 09/10/2009
Location: Independence Ballroom A Chris Hoenig (The State of the USA, Inc.)
Details coming soon. Read more.

2:10pm
Cybersecurity Challenge
Thursday, 09/10/2009
Location: Independence Ballroom A Alan Paller (SANS Institute), Michael Coppola (United States Cyber Challenge, SANS Netwars)
More information coming soon. Read more.

2:20pm
Innovation from Within: Apps for Security Program in Armed Forces
Thursday, 09/10/2009
Location: Independence Ballroom A Linton Wells, II (National Defense University), Jeffrey A. Sorenson (U.S. Army), Nickolas Justice (US Army), Carlos Castillo (Warfighter Technologies), Paul Lin (Warfighter Technologies)
The world is changing and defense information technology is changing too; from its industrial age roots it is seeking to better harness innovation at the edge. In this session we will explore how the Army is working to encourage emergent innovation and how technology and approaches outside of the DoD might illuminate the way forward. The session will close with some examples from the field. Read more.

2:50pm
Identity
Thursday, 09/10/2009
Location: Independence Ballroom A Judith Spencer (General Services Administration), Mary Ruddy (Meristic, Inc.), John Clippinger (Berkman Center Harvard University)
The promise of Web2.0/Gov2.0 realizing its full impact may be dependent on getting to a concept of citizen-centric identity that works for everyone and enables the promise of "government-as-a platform". Read more.

3:10pm
Social Media and Security
Thursday, 09/10/2009
Location: Independence Ballroom A Bruce McConnell (U.S. Department of Homeland Security), Rick Wesson (Support Intelligence), Price Floyd (Department of Defense)
Resilient enterprises overcome vulnerabilities and ensure functionality in the face of any threat. What steps can be put in place now to ensure uninterrupted functionality in the face of cyber threats? How might the private sector and the public sector join together to create greater resilience? Read more.

3:30pm
Thursday, 09/10/2009
Location: Independence Foyer Afternoon Break (30m)

4:00pm
.Gov Websites That Work
Thursday, 09/10/2009
Location: Independence Ballroom A Allan Holmes (nextgov.com)
.Gov can play too! More and more attention is being paid to government websites—everyone is getting in on the game and it is beginning to show. Allan Holmes, Executive Editor of Government Executive magazine, shares his insights on what works and why. Read more.

4:15pm
Broadband as Platform
Thursday, 09/10/2009
Location: Independence Ballroom A Julius Genachowski (Federal Communications Commission ), Kevin Werbach (University of Pennsylvania), Eugene Huang (National Broadband Task Force - Federal Communications Commission )
Julius Genachowski, Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, is interviewed by Kevin Werbach, University of Pennsylvania business professor and technology analyst. Read more.

4:45pm
Strategies for Success: Driving Openness, Participation, and Collaboration in a Bureaucratic World
Thursday, 09/10/2009
Location: Independence Ballroom A Lena Trudeau (National Academy of Public Administration), David Wennergren (Department of Defense), Michele Weslander Quaid (US Government), Alan Cohn (U.S. Department of Homeland Security )
Leaders in government are recognizing the benefits of technology-enabled collaboration. Join us for a moderated panel session in which you will hear from leaders who are embracing web 2.0 technologies to connect with citizens, engage their stakeholders, and solve their most pressing business problems. Read more.




Senate Committee on Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs
Thursday, September 10, 2009
10:00 AM
Dirksen Senate Office Building, room 342

Witnesses

The Honorable Robert L. Nabors II
Deputy Director
Office of Management and Budget

The Honorable Jon D. Leibowitz
Chairman
Federal Trade Commission

The Honorable Earl E. Devaney
Chairman
Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board

J. Christopher Mihm
Managing Director, Strategic Issues
U. S. Goverment Accountability Office




House Subcommittee on Communications, Technology, and the Internet
Thursday, September 10, 2009,
2123 Rayburn House Office Building

The hearing will examine the implementation of the broadband programs created by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Specifically, the hearing will focus on the Broadband Technology Opportunities Program established within the National Telecommunications and Information Administration of the Department of Commerce, and the Broadband Initiatives Program administered by the Rural Utilities Service within the Department of Agriculture.

WITNESSES:

  • Larry E. Strickling, Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information, National Telecommunications and Information Administration, Department of Commerce
  • Jonathan Adelstein, Administrator, Rural Utilities Service, Department of Agriculture


Federal Communications Commission
Room TW-C305 (Commission Meeting Room)
445 12th Street SW
Washington, DC 20554

October 20, 2009
9:15am

Contact:
Cheryl King
Deputy Chief
Disability Rights Office
Cheryl.King@fcc.gov
(202) 418-2284
http://broadband.gov/ws_accessibility_disabilities.html

FCC Participants:
• Cheryl J. King, Deputy Chief, Disability Rights Office
• Elise Kohn, Deputy Director, Adoption and Usage, Omnibus Broadband Initiative
• John Horrigan, Consumer Research Director, Omnibus Broadband Initiative
• Kristen Kane, Director of National Purposes, Omnibus Broadband Initiative
• Stagg Newman, Chief Technologist
• Elizabeth Lyle, Policy Advisor, Omnibus Broadband Initiative

Panel 1: Leveraging Federal and State Resources to Make Broadband Accessible and Affordable
• Gary Bojes, Ph.D., Senior Level Program and Policy Advisor, Rural Utility Service, Department of Agriculture
• C. Marty Exline, Director, Missouri Assistive Technology Program
• Jennifer Sheehy, Director of Policy and Planning, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, Department of Education
• Terry Weaver, Director, IT Accessibility and Workforce Division, General Services Administration
• Daniel Weitzner, Associate Administrator, Office of Policy Analysis and Development, National Telecommunications and Information Administration

Panel 2: Accessibility and Affordability Barriers to Broadband and Internet Use Faced by People with Disabilities
• Eric Bridges, American Council of the Blind
• Rosaline Crawford, Esq., Director, Law and Advocacy Center, National Association of the Deaf
• Paula Durbin-Westby, Member, Board of Directors, The Autistic Self Advocacy Network
• Margaret V. (Peggy) Hathaway, VP for Public Policy, Spinal Cord Advocates
• Rebecca Ladew, East Coast Representative, Speech Communications Assistance by Telephone, Inc.
• Elizabeth Spiers, Director of Information Services, American Association of the Deaf-Blind
• Jim Tobias, President, Inclusive Technologies
• Elizabeth Weintraub, Member, Council on Quality and Leadership

Panel 3: Advancing National Purposes for People with Disabilities
• Sheri Farinha, Executive Director, NorCal Center and Co-Chair, E911 Stakeholders Council
• Jim Fruchterman, President, Benetech
• Margaret V. (Peggy) Hathaway, Esq., Vice-President for Public Policy, Spinal Cord Advocates
• Ishak Kang, CEO/Founder, dot UI
• Katherine D. Seelman, Ph.D., Professor, Rehabilitation Science and Technology, University of Pittsburgh

Panel 4: Technological Barriers and Solutions
• Greg Elin, Chief Technology Officer, United Cerebral Palsy and Executive Director, Life Without Limits
• Jim Fruchterman, President, Benetech
• Dale Hatfield, Ph.D., Executive Director, Silicon Flatirons
• Rich Schwerdtfeger, Distinguished Engineer, SWG Accessibility Architect/Strategist, IBM
• John Snapp, Senior Technical Officer, Intrado
• Gregg Vanderheiden, Ph.D., Director, Trace Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison

Policy Roundtable:
• Rob Atkinson, President, Information Technology and Innovation Foundation
• Ellen Blackler, Executive Director, AT&T
• Alan Brightman, Senior Policy Director, Yahoo!
• Kathryn Brown, Senior Vice President, Public Policy Development and Corporate Responsibility, Verizon
• Deborah Buck, Executive Director, Association of Assistive Technology Act Programs
• David Capozzi, Executive Director, U.S. Access Board
• Larry Goldberg, Director, Media Access Group, WGBH
• Patrick Halley, Director, Government Affairs, National Emergency Numbering Association
• Dale Hatfield, Executive Director, Silicon Flatirons
• Matthew Knopf, Vice President, Business Development, PLYmedia
• Jane Mago, Executive VP and General Counsel, National Association of Broadcasters
• Helena Mitchell, Ph.D., Executive Director CACP and Principal Investigator, Wireless RERC, GA Tech
• Randy Pope, American Association of the Deaf-Blind
• Ken Salaets, Director, Global Policy, Information Technology Industry Council
• Paul Schroeder, Director, Programs and Policy, American Foundation for the Blind
• Grant Seiffert, President, Telecommunications Industry Association
• Dane Snowden, VP, External and State Affairs, CTIA - The Wireless Association
• Claude Stout, Executive Director, Telecommunications for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing, Inc.
• Karen Peltz Strauss, Co-Chair, Coalition of Organizations for Accessible Technologies
• Jim Tobias, President, Inclusive Technologies
• Gregg Vanderheiden, Director, Trace Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison

Barriers, Opportunities, and Policy Recommendations will continue the open discussion among the FCC and all who have a stake in the future of broadband and its accessibility for people with disabilities, including the disability community, network and service providers, equipment manufacturers, and software producers, technologists, economists, academics, representatives from trade associations and non-profits, and representatives from tribal, local, state, and federal governments.

The goal of this follow-up workshop is to clearly identify (i) accessibility and affordability barriers faced by people with disabilities in accessing broadband capabilities; (ii) opportunities that broadband can present for people with disabilities; and (iii) policy recommendations that will address the barriers to broadband for people with disabilities and maximize the opportunities related to broadband for people with disabilities.

In conjunction with the panels, there will be exhibits of assistive technologies that are used by people with disabilities to access broadband technologies as well as universally designed mass market broadband technologies that can be used by people with disabilities.

  • What are the specific barriers to broadband accessibility and affordability for (i) people with sight disabilities; (ii) people with hearing disabilities; (iii) people with speech disabilities; (iv) people who are deaf blind; (v) people with mobility disabilities; and (vi) people with intellectual disabilities and social communication disabilities, including autism?
  • What are the technological barriers, solutions, and costs as they relate to broadband networks, services, equipment, software and tech support that affect people with disabilities?
  • What is the potential for broadband to further education, job creation/entrepreneurial activities, health care, civic participation, emergency preparedness and response, telework, social networking, and other national purposes for people with disabilities?
  • What programs and services currently exist that provide or subsidize broadband equipment and broadband internet access for people with disabilities, and what lessons have been learned from these programs?
  • What specific policy recommendations related to disability access should be included in the National Broadband Plan?


National Broadband Plan Workshop
(Diversity and Civil Rights Issues in Broadband Policy)

Room TW-C305 (Commission Meeting Room)
445 12th Street SW
Washington, DC 20554

October 2, 2009
9:30am

Contact:
Mark Lloyd
Associate General Counsel and Chief Diversity Officer
Mark.Lloyd@fcc.gov
(202) 418-7390

Government Participants:

  • Mark Lloyd, Associate General Counsel & Chief Diversity Officer, FCC
  • John Horrigan, Consumer Research Director, Omnibus Broadband Initiative, FCC
  • Maureen Lewis, Director of the Minority Telecommunications Development Program, National Telecommunications and Information Administration
  • Wizipan Garriott, Policy Advisor, Indian Affairs, Department of the Interior

Panel 1: What are the gaps in broadband access and adoption? And what is the best way to measure those gaps?

  • Mark Pruner, President & Co-founder, Native American Broadband Association
  • Catherine Sandoval, Assistant Professor, Santa Clara University School of Law
  • Jorge Reina Schement, Dean, School of Communication & Information; Professor II, Bloustein School of Public Policy, Department of Latino-Hispanic Caribbean Studies, Rutgers University.
  • Jim Tobias, President, Inclusive Technologies

Panel 2: What does the law compel or limit regarding government action to close gaps in broadband access and adoption?

  • Mary Frances Berry, Geraldine R. Segal Professor of American Social Thought & Professor of History, University of Pennsylvania
  • Mara Einstein, Associate Professor of Media Studies, Queens College; Adjunct Associate Professor, Stern School of Business, New York University
  • Allen S. Hammond IV, Phil and Bobbie Sanfilippo Law Professor, Director of the Broadband Institute of California, Santa Clara University
  • David Honig, Executive Director, Minority Media and Telecommunications Council
  • Geoffrey Blackwell, Director, Strategic Relations and Minority Business Development, Chickasaw Nation Industries

Panel 3: What works now to close the gap in broadband access and adoption?

  • Laura L. Efurd, Vice President & Chief Community Investment Officer, ZeroDivide
  • Patricia Bransford, President, The National Urban Technology Center
  • George T. Laub, Managing Director, Council Tree Investors
  • Antoinette Cook Bush, Partner, Communications Group, Skadden Arps
  • Heather Dawn Thompson, Partner, Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal LLP.

In the 1996 Telecommunications Act, Congress has instructed the FCC to regularly report on whether advanced telecommunications services were being made available to all Americans in a timely fashion. Yet there remains considerable debate as to whether broadband services are being deployed in a way that allows all Americans to benefit. The diversity of our nation, our different cultures and religions and languages, is one our great strengths. This diversity also requires the government to take special care to ensure that the needs of all Americans are reasonably addressed. Structural poverty, continuing segregation, unequal opportunities in education, and discrimination in financial markets can all have a profound affect on access to broadband and adoption rates. These challenges affect some groups more than others. How do we create a national broadband plan that recognizes the different needs of a diverse America, but also adheres to the core American principle of equal treatment under the law?

  • A decade ago, the notion of the digital divide had resonance at a time when less than half of all Americans used the internet, mostly using dial-up internet connections from desktop computers. Today, there are smaller holes in the fabric of access than a decade ago, in part because the nature of access has evolved from slow and stationary to fast and mobile. Yet differences in access persist. How does adoption of broadband vary across different social and demographic segments, such as race and ethnicity, educational attainment, income, and geography? Do different population segments use different access networks (wireline versus wireless) and devices differently? Are there different choices and costs for different groups of Americans? Are the consequences of being offline in today's broadband-connected world different than a decade ago?
  • What is the best way to capture the facts about different groups of Americans? Do telephone surveys or census reports or community-based research do a better job of helping us understand the access, adoption and use of advanced telecommunications services in communities with varying cultures and languages?
  • Are the education, health care, energy and environmental benefits, public safety and e-government applications of different importance to different communities?
  • What is constitutionally permitted in creating a national broadband plan that would address the different needs of different gender, racial and ethnic groups?
  • Does the market now serve the needs of a diverse America? Are there FCC or legislative policies that can create incentives for markets to better serve the needs of a diverse America?
  • Is there an appropriate direct role for local, state and federal government to connect all American to advanced telecommunications infrastructure? Is the universal service fund working to close disparities in access and adoption?


Federal Communications Commission
Room TW-C305 (Commission Meeting Room)
445 12th Street SW
Washington, DC 20554

September 17, 2009
1:30 pm

Contact:
Charles Mathias
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau
Charles.Mathias@fcc.gov
(202) 418-7147
http://broadband.gov/ws_spectrum.html

FCC Participants:

  • Commissioner Meredith Attwell Baker
  • John Leibovitz, Deputy Bureau Chief, WTB
  • Nese Guendelsberger, Acting Chief, Spectrum and Competition Policy Division, WTB
  • Carlos Kirjner, Senior Advisor to the Chairman on Broadband
  • Ruth Milkman. Bureau Chief, WTB
  • Margaret Wiener, Chief, Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, WTB
  • David Goldman, Acting Legal Advisor, Office of Chairman Julius Genachowski
  • Scott Deutchman, Deputy Chief of Technology Officer, Telecommunications, Office of Science and Technology Policy
  • Julius P. Knapp, Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology
  • Rashmi Doshi, Chief, Laboratory Division, Office of Engineering and Technology
  • Robert Alderfer, Office of Management and Budget
  • Jon Peha, Chief Technologist

Powerful new technologies increasingly allow Americans of all backgrounds and walks of life to access the Internet at a fixed location or on the go and for machines to communicate with one another with no human intervention. The need for robust wireless broadband connections is becoming increasingly important to deliver to all Americans these and many other applications and services. Wireless broadband promises to transform education, healthcare, energy conservation, social services, civic involvement and entertainment and bring abundant benefits to consumers and businesses alike. However, wireless broadband can only reach its full potential where there is access to adequate and appropriate radio frequency spectrum.

The Spectrum Workshop will consist of three panels that will look at critical elements in the development of America's wireless broadband infrastructure. The first panel, Wireless Broadband Spectrum: Supply and Demand, will focus on spectrum requirements, asking, in particular, about the scope of existing spectrum gaps that can hinder wireless broadband network deployments. We will explore the expected capacity of existing spectrum authorized for wireless broadband use as well as announced wireless broadband deployments. In addition, we will focus on the trade-offs that are inherent in deploying a wireless broadband network where high throughput is often required to a large number of users. In particular, we will focus on the factors that would make it uneconomical for an operator to provide robust broadband service as its business grows or to increase throughput and capacity in a given area and strategies that might be used to address them. We will also look at the different types of applications and services that are likely to drive the adoption of wireless broadband services.

The second panel, Sources of Spectrum: Opportunities on the Horizon, will look at sources for new spectrum, asking, in particular, how the Commission should evaluate spectrum opportunities in the prime bands below 3.7GHz. Areas of discussion will include cost-effective approaches to determining the actual use of spectrum in a given band and the ability of secondary spectrum markets, to improve access to already authorized spectrum, particularly in rural areas.

Finally, the third panel: Innovating in Spectrum Access—Technological Advances and Other Approaches to Facilitate More Productive Spectrum Use, will focus on innovation. It will assess the new and innovative technologies that have recently been developed to facilitate more productive and efficient spectrum use, including software defined radios, new signal detection and contention-sensing technologies, as well as new rules of spectrum etiquette. The discussion will specifically focus on policies that could be adopted to help accelerate innovation and technological advances in gaining access to sufficient spectrum.

First Panel: 4G Spectrum: Supply and Demand.

  • What is the magnitude of the looming spectrum gap for wireless broadband networks?
  • What are the tradeoffs that are inherent in deploying a wireless broadband network where high throughput is often required to a large number of users?
  • What are the factors that would make it uneconomical for either an incumbent or a start-up operator to continue to increase throughput and capacity in a given area and strategies that might be used to address them?
  • What are the applications and services that will drive wireless broadband network uptake?
  • To what extent does/will spectrum availability for wireless backhaul be a factor in wireless broadband network deployments?
  • Tarun Gupta, Vice President of Strategic Development, FiberTower
  • Rajiv Laroia, Ph.D. Senior Vice President of Technology, Qualcomm
  • Gavin R. Leach, Vice President for Finance & Administration, Northern Michigan University
  • Kris Rinne, Senior Vice President, Architecture and Planning, AT&T, Inc.
  • John Saw, Ph.D., Senior Vice President & Chief Technology Officer, Clearwire
  • Bill Stone, Executive Director, Network Strategy, Verizon Wireless

Second Panel: Sources of Spectrum: Opportunities and Mechanisms.

  • How should the Commission evaluate spectrum opportunities in the frequency bands below 3.7GHz?
  • Is it possible to prioritize frequency bands within each of the ranges of spectrum to more readily address the gaps identified?
  • What are the most cost effective approaches to determining the actual use of spectrum in a given band?
  • What role has secondary spectrum markets played in smaller entities gaining access to already licensed spectrum , particularly in rural areas?
  • What can be done to allow secondary spectrum markets to operate more effectively and more efficiently?
  • Are the other methods we should consider such as micro-leasing?
  • Coleman Bazelon, Ph.D., Principal, The Brattle Group
  • Michael Calabrese, Vice President, New America Foundation
  • Kathleen O'Brien Ham, Vice President, Federal Regulatory Affairs, T-Mobile USA, Inc.
  • William Webb, Head of Research and Development & Senior Technologist, Ofcom

Third Panel: Innovating in Spectrum Access—Technological Advances and Other Approaches to Facilitate More Productive Spectrum Use.

  • What technologies have been developed to facilitate more innovative and intense spectrum use, and access to spectrum, including software defined radios, new signal detection and contention-sensing technologies?
  • Are there any new rules of spectrum etiquette that would permit more intense and dynamic use and access to spectrum?
  • What policies can be adopted to help accelerate innovation and technological advances in spectrum access and use?
  • Ranveer Chandra, Ph.D., Researcher, Networking Research Group, Microsoft
  • Bruce Fette, Ph.D., Program Manager, Strategic Technology Office, DARPA XG Project
  • Paul Kolodzy, Ph.D., Independent Telecommunications Consultant, Kolodzy Consulting, LLC
  • Paul Mankiewich, Ph.D., Chief Technology Officer, Wireless Networks Division, Alcatel Lucent
  • Dr. Joseph Mitola III, Distinguished Professor & Vice President, Research Enterprise Stevens Institute of Technology


Federal Communications Commission
Room TW-C305 (Commission Meeting Room)
445 12th Street SW
Washington, DC 20554

September 17, 2009
9:30am-12 noon

Contact:
Andrew Nesi
Office of Strategic Planning & Policy Analysis
Andrew.Nesi@fcc.gov
(202) 418-3601
http://broadband.gov/ws_bb_ecosystem.html

The free flow of information among a wide range of users has had much to do with the growth in adoption and use of broadband. If this information flow is a driver of adoption, digital content is the valued passenger that makes the journey worthwhile. Much of this content comes from users themselves - email messages, family photos shared on social networking sites, or homemade videos uploaded to the internet. Much of this content also originates from industries that undertake sizable investments in talent and other inputs to add value to digital offerings.

Digital products such as music and video are subject to cheap and easy reproduction and distribution - and some online users benefit from this content without paying for it. Such consumption comes at the expense of creators of this content who are not compensated when users consume such content at little or no cost.

At the same time, efforts to thwart unwarranted digital reproduction can have problematic side effects if such efforts, intentionally or not, inhibit the appropriate sharing of digital information. Monitoring internet traffic to prevent illegal file-sharing might be seen as unduly invading the privacy of users, perhaps lessening the frequency and volume of online information exchanges, and infringing on freedom of speech.

Additionally, efforts to crack down on illegal file-sharing or adopt overly restrictive intellectual property rules may dampen incentives for innovation in application development and devices on the edge of the network, as well among potential new entrants to the content industries.

Government Participants:

  • John Horrigan, Consumer Research Director, Omnibus Broadband Initiative, FCC
  • Kris Monteith, Deputy Bureau Chief, Media Bureau, FCC
  • Phillip Weiser, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division, Department of Justice
  • Susan DeSanti, Director, Office of Policy Planning, Bureau of Competition, Federal Trade Commission

Panelists:

  • Dan Glickman, Chairman & Chief Executive Officer, Motion Picture Association of America
  • Patrick Ross, Executive Director, Copyright Alliance; Chairman, Copyright Alliance Education Foundation
  • Kathy Garmezy, Assistant Executive Director/Government and International Affairs, Directors Guild of America
  • Frederick D. Huntsberry, Chief Operating Officer, Paramount Pictures
  • Gigi B. Sohn, President & Co-Founder, Public Knowledge
  • Michael W. Carroll, Professor of Law, American University, Washington College of Law
  • Michael Bracy, Policy Director, Future of Music Coalition
  • Alex Shapiro, Composer
  • Charles B. Slocum, Assistant Executive Director, Writers Guild of America, West

This workshop will address issues pertaining to online content and its role in the broadband ecosystem. Questions to be addressed include:

  • How does the illegal copying of online content impact job creation in sectors of the economy that produce digital content?
  • What measures should be taken to address piracy and other mechanisms for illegal delivery of content? What agencies should have jurisdiction?
  • What are the tradeoffs between content protection and innovation in industries other than content?
  • Are there business and regulatory models that preserve innovation, increase consumer choice, and deliver economic returns to content owners?
  • What are other countries doing to protect content online and to encourage the availability of content that may help drive broadband adoption? What are the best practices in these areas?
  • Do measures to address piracy have the potential to raise barriers to market entry by, for instance, making it more difficult to market their products?


Sept 4, 2009 (Framework for Universal Broadband)

BENTON'S COMMUNICATIONS-RELATED HEADLINES for SEPTEMBER 4, 2009

Enjoy Labor Day weekend; Headlines will return Tuesday, Sept 8


NATIONAL BROADBAND PLAN/THE STIMULUS
   House Panel Will Get Broadband Update
   A Framework for Universal Broadband
   Levin Says FCC's Broadband Plan Is Start of 'Dynamic Process'
   A National Broadband Plan: The Social Entrepreneurship Model
   FCC should look to thousands of stimulus applications to define broadband
   FCC Focuses On Big-Picture Ideas At Broadband Workshop
   Will Google or Cisco Determine Our Future Broadband Networks?
   The Broadband Apps and Devices Workshop
   Broadband Benchmarks
   Vermont organizations file for over $130 million of broadband stimulus funds
   The smart grid opportunity
   Telstra Wants Role in Australia's National Broadband Network

MORE ON BROADBAND
   Net Neutrality and the Law
   US Broadband Growth Continues to Slow
   Study On Flexible Pricing Assumes Broadband's Price Only Going Up
   Virginia Sees Savings from Telework Day

WIRELESS
   CTIA's Largent Outlines Policy Priorities
   FCC Seeks Comment on Recommendations for the 2011 World Radiocommunication Conference
   Wireless will be used to make electrical grid smart

TELECOM
   FCC's Annual Telecom Industry Report

TELEVISION
   The AT&T PEG fiasco
   FCC Issues Reminders to TV Stations, Cable Operators

GOVERNMENT & COMMUNICATIONS
   Obama's health care message hard to control online
   Fox unlikely to air president's speech
   Bush Records Fully Digitized Later This Month
   First responders should use service agreements for telecom equipment

JOURNALISM
   Right Ebbs, Left Gains as Media 'Experts'
   Kennedy's Death Drives Online Narrative
   Memo to ABC: Ditch High-Priced Anchor and Hire Actual Reporters
   A radical plan to save old media

DIGITAL CONTENT
   Advocates: Google Books can bridge digital divide
   FTC: Google Books Raises Privacy Fears

Recent Comments on:
Blair Levin: Spectrum Key to Internet Buildout

MORE ONLINE
   Federal Government Needs Massive Hiring Binge
   USocial Will Sell You Followers and Friends
   Concern grows over emphasis on technology to push transparency
   Court Rejects Challenge To Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act

back to top

NATIONAL BROADBAND PLAN/THE STIMULUS


HOUSE PANEL WILL GET BROADBAND UPDATE
[SOURCE: CongressDaily, AUTHOR: Andrew Noyes]
Officials from the Commerce Department's National Telecommunications and Information Administration and Agriculture Department's Rural Utilities Service are expected to give the House Commerce Committee an update on implementation of the $7.2 billion broadband stimulus program on Thursday September 10.
http://benton.org/node/27637
Recommend this Headline
back to top


A FRAMEWORK FOR UNIVERSAL BROADBAND
[SOURCE: Federal Communications Commission, AUTHOR: Blair Levin]
Broadband provides lots of benefits to the economy and society, and the more widely available broadband is, the greater the benefits. But there are costs to universal deployment that may not be immediately recouped, such as the expense of laying fiber in rural areas, acquiring rights-of-way, or clearing spectrum for wireless broadband. And once a network is in place, low rates of adoption could delay enjoyment of the economic and societal gains. As government policies inherently affect both the revenues and the costs of broadband, part of the Federal Communications Commission's job, in thinking about a national broadband plan, is to explore whether those policies should be adjusted to increase the revenues and decrease the costs of inputs associated with broadband. Simple, right? Levin has worries, oh, he has worries every day. What if low adoption doesn't provide sufficient incentives to build out and upgrade wireline, cable and wireless networks? With the Universal Service Fund already strained, how do we fund deployment?
http://benton.org/node/27624
Recommend this Headline
back to top


LEVIN SAYS FCC'S BROADBAND PLAN IS START OF 'DYNAMIC PROCESS'
[SOURCE: BroadbandCensus.com, AUTHOR: Andrew Feinberg]
Federal Communications Commission broadband czar Blair Levin dismissed critics of the commission's process in creating a national broadband strategy and promised a steady push forward with clear goals in mind. There is no "secret plan," nor "multiple choice" option that the commission will choose from, Levin cautioned. "It doesn't work like that," he said. Complicating the problem is a lack of good data on broadband availability nationwide. The U.S.'s mapping data "doesn't add up" enough to be useful, he said. The workshops the commission has been conducting are to allow staff to take ownership of parts of the plan and narrow down action items on broader issues, Levin told the group. But the commission will be requesting more information through hearings and "more specific" public notices this fall, he said. The notices will be "very narrow - very focused," he said. "We have a very steep mountain to climb." The overall goal of the broadband plan is the start of a "dynamic process" including Congress and other agencies with the authority to implement the strategy, Levin said. The plan is a "mechanism to drive a dynamic process to improve the broadband ecosystem," he said. He added that the commission's report to Congress will only be the beginning of the process. The plan will not be "self-executing," he cautioned, since the job of the commission is to give options to decision-makers, and not to make any decisions itself.
http://benton.org/node/27639
Recommend this Headline
back to top


A NATIONAL BROADBAND PLAN: THE SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP MODEL
[SOURCE: Government Technology, AUTHOR: Bradford Bowman]
[Commentary] Using broadband infrastructure to promote jobs creation, workforce development and entrepreneurship education through the building of social entrepreneurship and asset-based community development modalities. By definition, Asset-Based Community Development (A-BCD) is a methodology that seeks to uncover and highlight the strengths within communities as a means for sustainable development. The basic tenet is that a capacities-focused approach is more likely to empower the community and therefore mobilize citizens to create positive and meaningful change from within. Instead of focusing on a community's needs, deficiencies and problems, the A-BCD approach helps them become stronger and more self-reliant by discovering, mapping and mobilizing this model using all their local assets. Few people realize how many assets any community has. Using this definition as the premise and incorporating into this model, the empowerment that our communities unknowingly maintain to create positive and meaningful change from within lies with technology. The layperson or average citizen does not realize that the assets needed to generate revenue that stays within their communities, and would support self-sustainability of these communities where we work and live, are literally right there under our noses.
http://benton.org/node/27623
Recommend this Headline
back to top


FCC SHOULD LOOK TO THOUSANDS OF STIMULUS APPLICATIONS TO DEFINE BROADBAND
[SOURCE: Fierce, AUTHOR: Lynnette Luna]
[Commentary] Out of the 2,200 applications asking for nearly $28 billion in broadband stimulus funds from the National Telecommunications & Information Administration (NTIA) and Rural Utilities Service (RUS), how many do you expect will propose to offer 768 kbps downstream and 200 kbps upstream broadband? The Federal Communications Commission should root through the thousands of applications to find out exactly what applicants are proposing. They could get a good picture of what speeds are economically viable in some of the most hard-to-reach areas.
http://benton.org/node/27622
Recommend this Headline
back to top


FCC FOCUSES ON BIG-PICTURE IDEAS AT BROADBAND WORKSHOP
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
The Federal Communications Commission's National Broadband Workshop on "Big Ideas" looked at how outside-the-box developments that could shape the future of broadband. They included the bifurcation of the Internet into a number of virtual private networks and the need for more research and development. David Clark, professor and senior research scientist at MIT's computer lab dominated much of the conversation in the first half of the workshop, which focused on those big ideas. He was even asked to sit in on the following panel -- on Internet TV -- by impressed FCC staffers. In fact, all of the first panels' participants got high marks from staffers. Daniel Weitzner, from the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, suggested bolting the panelists to the floor and make them write the broadband plan. Clark argued that wireless would not become a substitute for wired broadband, saying it would wind up being some combination of both. Fluidity was the concept he drove home, about both the state of broadband and how the national plan should be structured. He said the goal was not a one-time objective but a continuing process, which meant sustainability, a concept cable operators have long said was key to any government proposals.
http://benton.org/node/27621
Recommend this Headline
back to top


WILL GOOGLE OR CISCO DETERMINE OUR FUTURE BROADBAND NETWORKS?
[SOURCE: GigaOm, AUTHOR: Stacey Higginbotham]
At a Federal Communications Commission broadband plan panel titled The Future of the Internet, researchers argued for a new Internet architecture built upon infrastructure currently used in large data centers that would be capable of adapting itself to deliver each individual application. Meanwhile, those associated with think tanks and the broadband industry argued that the most significant Internet-related innovation is already behind us and that we need to think about embedding more intelligence into the network we have. David Clark, professor at the MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, and Taieb Znati, division director for the National Science Foundation, talking up the idea of virtualizing communications networks in order to create several networks optimized for delivering different types of applications. By the way, this focus on the ability to deliver a specific application vs. delivering a set speed is a sticky topic when it comes to defining broadband. Going
http://benton.org/node/27638
Recommend this Headline
back to top


THE BROADBAND APPS AND DEVICES WORKSHOP
[SOURCE: Federal Communications Commission, AUTHOR: Peter Bowen, Shawn Hoy]
On August 27th the FCC helped moderate two workshops on technology, applications and devices, which provoked some fascinating discussions around the current and future state of broadband in America. The first workshop focused on the current state of the network, applications, and devices. The panelists represented a cross-section of network, applications, and devices backgrounds and covered a number of critical points. The first point from the panel was that defining broadband in a way that is sustainable and measurable is a non-trivial task. The second point the panel discussed was that the US is lagging far behind best-in-class countries (South Korea was mentioned most frequently) in terms of performance of and access to the Internet. Finally, the panel also discussed the impact of US policy on innovation. The panelists agreed that policy (ranging from spectrum policy to telco consolidation) has had and will continue to have a significant impact on innovation, both in the telecom and network spaces. The day's second workshop included a group more heavily representing equipment and network providers. The group focused on several topics, including the debate of "What is broadband 'success' for the US?" An interesting segment of this debate centered on the question of what was more important to our 'success' ­ is it more important to increase adoption among those who are served but don't buy broadband, or is it more important to increase the quality of current users' experience. The panel also discussed the importance of basic broadband as a gateway to better broadband for the user ­ the premise is that once a user experiences even a modest broadband connection (and one that doesn't incur per-use charges or tie up the phone line) they will trade up to a higher speed. A final discussion for the second panel was around the short-term and long-term path of innovation and utilization, and implicitly around the "social value" of certain activities.
http://benton.org/node/27620
Recommend this Headline
back to top


BROADBAND BENCHMARKS
[SOURCE: Benton Foundation, AUTHOR: Christopher Naoum]
The September 2nd Federal Communications Commission National Broadband Plan workshop featured a panel of academics, policy directors and telecom executives that came together to discuss the role of metrics and benchmarks for evaluating the various dimensions of broadband across geographic areas and across time. The Benchmarks considered included variables such as broadband deployment and adoption, affordability and prices, quality of broadband services and levels of competition.
http://www.benton.org/node/27600
back to top


VERMONT ORGANIZATIONS FILE FOR OVER $130 MILLION OF BROADBAND STIMULUS FUNDS
[SOURCE: Vermont Economic Development Authority, AUTHOR: ]
Five Vermont organizations have applied for over $130 million of stimulus grants and loans for last mile broadband projects that could, in the aggregate, reduce the number of Vermont households without available high speed Internet to less than 5% of the total. Technologies proposed by the various applicants include fiber to the home, DSL, and wireless. In addition the Vermont Council for Rural Development has requested $2.5 million for a sustainable broadband adoption program to help assure that Vermonters in 24 pilot communities have the equipment, training, and motivation to use broadband. The Vermont Center for Geographic Information has applied for a $1.96 million grant to continue and extend Vermont's broadband mapping effort. The Department of Libraries has applied for 80% stimulus funding of $754,000 for a public computing center project to assure that computers are available in selected libraries for those who do not yet have equipment or broadband connections available at home.
http://benton.org/node/27618
Recommend this Headline
back to top


THE SMART GRID OPPORTUNITY
[SOURCE: TelephonyOnline, AUTHOR: Teresa Mastrangelo]
The smart grid may just become the next big opportunity for providers of both telecom services and equipment — the questions are when and how much. According to Cisco Systems, when it announced its plans to offer smart grid solutions, the smart grid communications infrastructure market is expected to generate as much as $20 billion per year by 2013 — a sizeable sum that could benefit many providers of telecom solutions.Why? Because a high-speed, highly-secure, two-way, IP-based, fully integrated communications architecture that addresses the backbone, metro and last mile (also referred to as spur) segments of the network is key to the smart grid. It is this network that enables real-time information and control, to allow every part of the grid to both "talk" and "listen" from the substation to — and into — the customer premises.
http://benton.org/node/27612
Recommend this Headline
back to top


TELSTRA WANTS ROLE IN AUSTRALIA'S NATIONAL BROADBAND NETWORK
[SOURCE: Reuters, AUTHOR: Georgina Prodhan]
David Thodey, CEO of Telstra, Australia's biggest phone company, says the company is having "productive" and "professional" talks with the Australian government on its potential role in the building of a nationwide super-fast broadband network. The company does not yet know what part it would play in the government's planned new $36 billion) network. The project is expected to take several years to complete.
http://benton.org/node/27617
Recommend this Headline
back to top

MORE ON BROADBAND


NET NEUTRALITY AND THE LAW
[SOURCE: Open Video Alliance, AUTHOR: ]
A Q&A with Free Press Policy Director Ben Scott. He defines network neutrality as "something that you take for granted every time you go online. When you're surfing the web and you're moving from website to website, whether it's your Facebook page or cnn.com or Amazon, you're pretty much in control of your Internet experience. You can go wherever you want, you can read anything you want, you can watch anything you want, you can hear anything you want, and everyone who is offering content on the Internet for you to find is treated the same by the network operator. The phone companies and cable companies that give you access to the Internet through their wires have nothing to say about what you do, content-wise, on the Internet. That concept is known as network neutrality, and it was built into the engineering when the Internet was created. That was the whole idea behind the Internet. That's net neutrality."
http://benton.org/node/27635
Recommend this Headline
back to top


US BROADBAND GROWTH CONTINUES TO SLOW
[SOURCE: GigaOm, AUTHOR: Om Malik]
[Commentary] The number of new broadband subscribers continues to slow in the US, according to data gathered by UBS Research, driven primarily by market saturation. The Wall Street firm estimates that there are 67 million broadband subscribers in the US, or roughly 60 percent of the nation's households and about 70 percent of those with a PC. The number of net new broadband subscribers during the first half of 2009 was down 27 percent from the first half of 2008, to about 2.1 million. UBS Research expects this downward trajectory to continue. Broadband subscription providers need to counter the slowing growth by offering higher-speed (both up and downstream) subscription packages that command higher monthly fees. Instead, some backward-looking cable operators such as Time Warner Cable are looking to impose bandwidth metering to protect their revenues.
http://benton.org/node/27636
Recommend this Headline
back to top


STUDY ON FLEXIBLE PRICING ASSUMES BROADBAND'S PRICE ONLY GOING UP
[SOURCE: App-Rising.com, AUTHOR: Geoff Daily]
[Commentary] A recently released study's central thesis is that by spreading the costs of network upgrades equally among all users we risk suppressing broadband adoption by raising prices for everyone, whereas if providers can charge more of those who use more we can keep broadband prices for others lower, which should help to bridge the digital divide since cost is the primary reason those who aren't online today don't subscribe to broadband. But the researchers assumed that flexible broadband pricing would only result in more expensive tiers of service being introduced but not any less expensive tiers. It implies that market dynamics alone aren't sufficient to keep prices down. In a truly competitive market a provider would not necessarily be able to raise their rates as it would have to take into consideration what their competitors are doing. Another dangerous assumption of this report is that all operators are investing heavily in their networks and therefore need to be able to charge their customers more to recoup that money. While some operators are investing heavily, many others are not, either because they can't, aren't willing to, or their investments don't cost all that much to make.
http://benton.org/node/27616
Recommend this Headline
back to top


VIRGINIA SEES SAVINGS FROM TELEWORK DAY
[SOURCE: Commonwealth of Virginia, AUTHOR: Press release]
Governor Timothy Kaine announced that Virginia teleworkers saved approximately $113,000, avoided driving 140,000 miles and removed 75.89 tons of pollutants from the air through participation in Telework Day on August 3, 2009. A report compiled by the public-private partnership Telework Exchange also reveals an increase in productivity by participants and reports satisfaction with their teleworking experience. 2,286 federal and private sector employees as well as 1,765 state employees participated in Telework Day in Virginia, for a total of 4,051 participants statewide. Eighty-one percent of participating state employees said they had teleworked before, compared to 78 percent of respondents nationwide, showing that Virginia's efforts to promote teleworking in state government have been successful. The report illustrates the potential impact of teleworking on employees' budgets and productivity, as well as the environment. If all eligible employees teleworked one day per week for a year, teleworkers in the Commonwealth would collectively avoid driving 602 million miles, remove 360,800 tons of pollutants from the air, and save $807 million in commuting costs. Over the course of a year this would equal a $1,822 annual raise for every teleworker in Virginia, and save 46 hours a year in commuting. A survey of Virginia's teleworkers also showed that 69 percent felt they accomplished more than a typical day at the office and 91 percent said that they would be more likely to telework again as a result of their experience. Seventy-eight percent of respondents reported no difficulties in performing their duties on Telework Day.
http://benton.org/node/27615
Recommend this Headline
back to top

WIRELESS


CTIA'S LARGENT OUTLINES POLICY PRIORITIES
[SOURCE: CongressDaily, AUTHOR: Andrew Noyes]
CTIA President Steve Largent says the lobbying organization will use the Federal Communications Commission's recently announced notices of inquiry on innovation and competition in the mobile marketplace to share his industry's success story. Congress and smaller telecom firms have asked the FCC to investigate whether firms like AT&T, Verizon and Sprint Nextel are unfairly dominating the space. Largent points out that wireless prices continue to fall; 95 percent of U.S. consumers have a choice of three or more carriers; consumer satisfaction is up and complaints are down. CTIA is lobbying hard for regulators to make available more spectrum.
http://benton.org/node/27614
Recommend this Headline
back to top


FCC SEEKS COMMENT ON RECOMMENDATIONS FOR WRC 2011
[SOURCE: Federal Communications Commission]
On September 1, 2009, the World Radiocommunication Conference Advisory Committee (WRC-11 Advisory Committee) approved and provided for Federal Communications Commission consideration its recommendations on a number of issues that will be considered by the 2011 World Radiocommunication Conference (WRC-11). The FCC's International Bureau has tentatively concluded the FCC can support the recommendations and is now seeking comment on the recommendations. The comments provided by interested parties will assist the FCC in its upcoming consultations with the U.S. Department of State and National Telecommunications and Information Administration in the development of U.S. positions for WRC-11. The deadline for comments on the proposed preliminary views is September 25, 2009.
http://benton.org/node/27610
Recommend this Headline
back to top


WIRELESS WILL BE USED TO MAKE ELECTRICAL GRID SMART
[SOURCE: RCR Wireless News, AUTHOR: Tracy Ford]
Wireless technology will be used to help utility grids become smarter as the technology can help better manage in the delivery of electricity in real time in a more efficient manner. But how great a role wireless plays in the evolving smart grid has yet to be determined. The smart grid system is something that will take decades to achieve, but real progress is under way. In order for this vision to develop, billing systems and other items that touch the grid will need to be implemented.
http://benton.org/node/27605
Recommend this Headline
back to top

TELECOM


FCC'S ANNUAL TELECOM INDUSTRY REPORT
[SOURCE: Federal Communications Commission]
The Federal Communications Commission released its annual report providing a general overview of revenues in the US telecommunications industry. According to the report, the industry in 2007 reported $299 billion in revenues - a small increase from 2006's $297 billion. The report also shows dramatic shifts in the way universal service support is funded, reflecting the changing level of revenues reported by various sectors of the industry over the past decade. Other findings include: Wireless industry revenues grew 5% during 2007, from $115 billion to $121 billion. Total toll service revenues increased during 2007 - from $64 billion to $65 billion. Telecommunications revenues for incumbent local exchange carriers decreased to $94 billion in 2007, down from $100 billion in 2006. Incumbent local exchange carriers reported that $90 billion of the $94 billion total was for providing fixed local exchange services. Non-incumbent local exchange carriers reported $23 billion of fixed local exchange service revenue for 2007. This represented a 5% growth from the 2006 total.
http://benton.org/node/27611
Recommend this Headline
back to top

TELEVISION


THE AT&T PEG FIASCO
[SOURCE: CEDMagazine.com, AUTHOR: Jeffrey Krauss]
[Commentary] Stupid design blunders have resulted in tremendous user dissatisfaction in the way U-verse digital public, education and government (PEG) services are being delivered. These blunders, coupled with another controversy involving digital PEG channels, could seriously impact the cable industry. The problems led to two FCC complaints from the city of Lansing (MI) and from an alliance of community programming groups. But the FCC, rather than dealing separately with the limitations of AT&T U-verse technology, combined them into the same docket as another dispute, a lawsuit to stop a cable operator (Comcast, in this case) from digitally encoding PEG channels to free up 6 MHz analog channel spectrum. This is a very important issue for the cable industry. It's too bad the FCC combined the relatively straightforward Comcast controversy with the complete mess created by AT&T and Microsoft. But perhaps it is understandable, because both controversies deal with the scope of Section 623(b)(7) of the Communications Act, which says that PEG channels must be carried on the basic tier. That federal law only applies to cable operators if they are rate-regulated and not yet subject to effective competition. But the complainants want that limitation to be swept away. They want an FCC rule saying how cable systems must carry PEG channels, even when subject to effective competition. And they want broad new non-discrimination rules, requiring analog delivery of PEG channels so long as any analog channels are carried, in spite of the efficiencies of digital technology. In summary, the goal of the complainants in both of these cases is to get the FCC to enact broad new federal requirements for PEG channels affecting all cable operators. That won't happen, but AT&T and Microsoft deserve at least a spanking and an admonition to get their house in order. Meanwhile, cable industry lawyers have to deal with more than 6,000 comments in the docket, most of them identical form letters, saying "AT&T and Comcast have been illegally discriminating against PEG channels." The community programming advocates sure know how to crank up a letter-writing campaign, but suing the cable company to stop the conversion of PEG channels to digital is as ridiculous as suing a dry cleaner for $50 million for losing a pair of pants.
http://benton.org/node/27606
Recommend this Headline
back to top


FCC ISSUES REMINDERS TO TV STATIONS, CABLE OPERATORS
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
The Federal Communications Commission issued two public reminders Thursday to TV stations and cable operators, one of an upcoming deadline and the other of an ongoing obligation. The FCC reminded them in one public notice that all nonexempt Spanish-language video has to be closed captioned as of Jan. 1, 2010. In another, it cited the Southern California fires and the current hurricane season as reason to remind program distributors, again including cable and broadcast, of their obligation to make emergency information accessible to the vision- and hearing-impaired.
http://benton.org/node/27628
Recommend this Headline
back to top

GOVERNMENT & COMMUNICATIONS


OBAMA'S HEALTH CARE MESSAGE HARD TO CONTROL ONLINE
[SOURCE: CNN, AUTHOR: John Sutter]
As the country's messy debate about health care reform continues, some online observers are starting to wonder if President Barack Obama has lost his grip on Internet discourse. They're also wondering if it's possible for any one person -- no matter how powerful -- to control public dialogue on a medium like the Internet, where conversations are driven by millions of users instead of TV pundits and heads of state.
http://benton.org/node/27603
See Also:    Healthcare debate gives Internet advertising a huge shot in the arm
Recommend this Headline
back to top


FOX UNLIKELY TO AIR PRESIDENT'S SPEECH
[SOURCE: Hollywood Reporter, AUTHOR: Nellie Andreeva]
None of the Big Four broadcast networks have indicated that they will air President Barack Obama's address to Congress on health care. Among other things, the nets have been waiting to hear when the address will start, with sources indicating Thursday night that the White House was leaning toward 8 p.m. After a brief honeymoon after Obama's January inauguration, the broadcast networks have become increasingly frustrated by the frequency of his requests for primetime coverage. The pre-emptions wreak havoc on the networks' schedules and cost millions of dollars in lost ad revenue. Regardless of the White House's final start-time decision, Fox is expected to sit out the Obama speech again, referring its viewers to sister cable channel Fox News.
http://benton.org/node/27631
Recommend this Headline
back to top


BUSH RECORDS FULLY DIGITIZED LATER THIS MONTH
[SOURCE: CongressDaily, AUTHOR: Andrew Noyes]
The National Archives is well on its way to loading the electronic records of President George W. Bush into its digitized collection. To date, more than 85 percent of the total volume has been ingested. The incorporation of Bush administration records is the second stage of five increments planned for the electronic records archives. The Presidential Records Act gives the Archives legal custody of the records and the task of responding to special access requirements at the end of an administration. The project should be complete by late September. Presidential records become subject to Freedom of Information Act requests five years after the end of an administration.
http://benton.org/node/27613
Recommend this Headline
back to top


FIRST RESPONDERS SHOULD USE SERVICE AGREEMENTS FOR TELECOM EQUIPMENT
[SOURCE: nextgov, AUTHOR: Jill Aitoro]
First response and law enforcement organizations should consider establishing service agreements with telecommunications providers that would allow them to quickly upgrade the handheld radios they use during emergencies, said former Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff during a panel discussion on Thursday. Typically, law enforcement agents and first responders, including firefighters and emergency medical technicians, buy new radios when existing equipment becomes obsolete, according to the former secretary in the Bush administration. The practice leads to officials who respond to emergencies using outdated equipment that cannot communicate with other emergency response systems.
http://benton.org/node/27607
Recommend this Headline
back to top

JOURNALISM


RIGHT EBBS, LEFT GAINS AS MEDIA 'EXPERTS'
[SOURCE: Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting, AUTHOR: Michael Dolny]
Progressive think tanks gained in media prominence over 2008, despite overall think tank citations declining for the fourth year in a row. The 25 most-cited think tanks in major U.S. media received 13,149 citations in 2008, a 6 percent decline from 2007 levels. The decline primarily hit conservative or right-leaning think tanks, whose share of citations in corporate media fell from 36 percent to 31 percent in 2008 , while progressive or left-leaning think tanks--the only group to actually see an increase in their total citations--went from 17 percent to 21 percent. Centrist think tanks saw little change, still beating both ends of the spectrum with 48 percent of total citations, versus 47 percent in 2007. The overall decline in think tank citations, now in its fourth year, is quite likely simply a reflection of the changing media landscape. As noted last year, the decrease in citations primarily comes from newspapers, not television; as newspapers fold and those that survive shrink their newshole, the overall news output by the outlets surveyed is decreasing. National and international news--the areas national think tanks would most likely be quoted on--are shrinking the fastest of all.
http://benton.org/node/27604
Recommend this Headline
back to top


KENNEDY'S DEATH DRIVES ONLINE NARRATIVE
[SOURCE: Project for Excellence in Journalism, AUTHOR: Mark Jurkowitz]
The blogosphere last week was even more devoted to the death of Senator Ted Kennedy than the mainstream press. And in a sign that social media is not all twenty-somethings whose political memory dates back only to the mid-90s, the posts were filled with personal tributes and remembrances-from both sides of the ideological spectrum. The death of the long-time senator received 38.7% of the links in blogs, according to the New Media Index from the Pew Research Center's Project for Excellence in Journalism. This outpaced the 27% of the mainstream media newshole devoted to Kennedy, according to PEJ'S News Coverage Index, and made it the biggest weekly story in blogs since the Iranian elections the week of June 15th-19th.
http://benton.org/node/27608
Recommend this Headline
back to top


MEMO TO ABC: DITCH HIGH-PRICED ANCHOR AND HIRE ACTUAL REPORTERS
[SOURCE: Slate, AUTHOR: Jack Shafer]
[Commentary] The nightly news broadcasts produced by CBS, NBC, and ABC may have become irrelevant to smart news consumers, yet the nation's dailies continue to pretend it matters who anchors the broadcasts. As the network news audience has dwindled over the past three decades, broadcasters have reconfigured the shows as "infotainment" to boost ratings, aping the dreadful local news that they once disdained, says George Washington University media professor Mark Feldstein. "The journalistic value of these programs is marginal at this point," says Feldstein, and the appointment viewing of tuning in to the nightly news at 6:30 or 7 p.m. is a "relic of the past." If the nightly programs add so little to our news diet and attract so few viewers, then why do they still air? Because they are very profitable. According to a 2007 Philadelphia Inquirer piece by Gail Shister, ABC News was paying Charlie Gibson an estimated $8 million to anchor World News. Whatever they're paying Sawyer to replace him, it's too much. My advice to Sawyer is this: If you really want to improve World News, if you really want to make an indelible mark on journalism, turn down the job and persuade ABC News to divert the millions it ordinarily pays its anchor and spend it on 50 or 80 additional reporters to break stories.
http://benton.org/node/27630
Recommend this Headline
back to top


A RADICAL PLAN TO SAVE OLD MEDIA
[SOURCE: Newsweek, AUTHOR: Daniel Lyons]
[Commentary] Since the dawn of the Internet, news organizations have accepted the notion that the only way to survive the onslaught of the Web is to publish everything online, at no cost to readers, and let anyone in the world synopsize it, refer to it, and copy and link to it. You can't charge for your work—that's rule No. 1 on the Internet. And you can't block others from copying or linking to it—that's rule No. 2. But those rules are starting to look stupid. All the media companies that follow them are going broke, so now they're casting about for a new business model. Some are talking about making readers pay subscription fees. But the most radical idea, and the one I find most intriguing, is being advanced by Mark Cuban, a billionaire Internet entrepreneur. Cuban's advice: declare war on the "aggregator" Web sites that get a free ride on content. These aggregators—sites like Drudge Report, Newser, and countless others—don't create much original material. They mostly just synopsize stuff from mainstream newspapers and magazines, and provide a link to the original.
http://benton.org/node/27629
Recommend this Headline
back to top

DIGITAL CONTENT


ADVOCATES: GOOGLE BOOKS CAN BRIDGE DIGITAL DIVIDE
[SOURCE: C-Net|News.com, AUTHOR: Tom Krazit]
A coalition of civil-rights and disability groups in favor of Google's book-scanning project held a press conference Thursday to marshal support for improving access to knowledge, the key benefit of Google's deal with authors and publishers to create a new kind of digital library. They fear that a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to gain digital access to knowledge previously stored in libraries at expensive universities or rich communities could be hampered by the opposition to the settlement from some authors and privacy advocates. Blind people, for example, have access to a special library run by the Library of Congress that converts print books into formats readable by the visually impaired, but that library--in existence since 1931--only has 70,000 texts, said Chris Danielsen, director of public relations for the National Federation of the Blind. If the settlement is approved in October, it will give "print-disabled" people "access to more books than we have ever had in human history," he said. Providing digital access to literature and textbooks would allow libraries at all schools to simply maintain PCs, rather than having to devote resources toward acquiring and maintaining books, several supporters argued. Many communities in poorer parts of the country don't have the resources to maintain libraries competitive with those in richer communities, and lack of access to knowledge makes it harder for students in those communities to learn, according to Wade Henderson of the Leadership Council on Civil Rights.
http://benton.org/node/27634
Recommend this Headline
back to top


FTC: GOOGLE BOOKS RAISES PRIVACY FEARS
[SOURCE: CongressDaily, AUTHOR: Andrew Noyes]
Federal Trade Commission Chairman Jon Leibowitz on Thursday expressed concern about Google's plan to digitize mass quantities of books, saying it "raises serious privacy challenges because of the vast amount of user information that could be collected." He said he was pleased that Google is taking steps to protect the privacy of Google Books users and noted that the Commission will have an ongoing dialogue with Google and others to ensure consumer privacy is protected when new technologies emerge. "As Google Books evolves we'll work to ensure that the privacy of online readers is fact, not fiction," he said.
http://benton.org/node/27633
Recommend this Headline
back to top