[Commentary] Reps Joe Barton (R-TX) and Cliff Stearns (R-FL) have introduced the FCC Reform Act which would:
1) Require the FCC to publish the proposed language of actual rules, provide 30 days for comment and 30 days for reply comments, and then another 30 days for consideration on the record, before adopting, eliminating or modifying any new rule.
2) Require that "members of the Commission have adequate time, prior to being required to decide an issue . . . to review the proposed Commission decision document, including any specific language that is proposed to be adopted, as, modified in, or deleted from a regulation." I presume this is before we get to the needed 90 days for public participation.
3) Set deadlines for things by category. e.g., how long will it take to do complaints.
4) Publish any item actually adopted within 30 days.
5) Whenever official items adopted aren't published in 30 days, send a letter to the Chair and ranking members of the House Commerce Committee and Telecom Subcommittee.
6) Any year the FCC screws up on these deadlines, it will publish a big "here's all the times we didn't get stuff out on time" report.
7) Publish a list of what's on circulation. If an item is on circulation more than 60 days, publish who has refused to vote.
8) For regular reports on industry statistics (like the various annual "state of competition reports"), publish the schedule for when these are supposed to come out and notify the Chair and Ranking members of Committee and Subcommittee when they are late.
The problems the Barton-Stearns bill tries to address are real and long-standing. Wherever we ultimately end up, this looks like a good place to start the discussion.