January 2009

Regulators Ordered to Leave Work Unfinished

In its first hours, the Obama administration took an initial step to put its imprint on the government, ordering work halted on all federal regulations left unfinished at the end of the Bush era until they can be reviewed by the new president's team. White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel dispatched a memo yesterday afternoon to federal agencies and departments, directing them to stop pending rules until the new administration has time to conduct a "legal and policy review" of each one. The directive has become a first-day tradition among presidents, dating to Ronald Reagan in 1981, helping incoming administrations put their own philosophical stamp on the regulatory work that is a subtle but potent tool of presidential power. Presidents George W. Bush and Bill Clinton did the same thing. Emanuel's memo does not apply to last-minute Bush administration rules that have taken legal effect.

Where should Obama spend his tech stimulus?

The new administration has promised to stimulate the U.S. economy by spending billions of dollars on high tech. The question is what kind of projects should money allocated to high tech go to? How is it best spent? For some, such an investment holds great promise. "If we pull this off right, we will build an infrastructure that will make us the world's leader in the 21st century," says John Seely Brown, co-chairman of Deloitte's Center for Edge Innovation and formerly chief scientist at the famed Xerox Palo Alto Research Center. Others are pessimistic that the stimulus money will really make its way into high-tech investments: "It's more apparent how the cement industry will benefit rather than IT," says Ken McGee, a Gartner vice president. InfoWorld asked several thought leaders for their advice to President Obama.

Incentives Push More Doctors to E-Prescribe

With a host of new incentives, doctors are finally beginning to scrap pen and paper in favor of electronic prescriptions. Medicare this month began paying doctors a bonus if they switch their patients over to e-prescribing. Some private health plans also have begun offering extra payments along with free equipment, such as digital handheld devices. And a coalition of technology companies is giving doctors free software to encourage them to ditch their paper prescription pads. As a result, the number of physicians prescribing medicines electronically has more than doubled in the past year to about 70,000, or about 12% of all office-based doctors. E-prescribing allows doctors to transmit prescriptions via a secure Internet network directly to pharmacies using an office or laptop computer or a digital handheld device. The practice has been shown in studies to reduce prescription errors and to cut costs for consumers and health-care providers. It also encourages patients to get more of their prescriptions filled, because it reduces the time spent waiting at drug stores. The Obama administration's plan to invest $50 billion over five years to encourage broader adoption of health-information technology is expected to include additional incentives for electronic prescribing. But there are still barriers to full-fledged adoption of e-prescribing. Federal drug laws, which are under review, prohibit electronic prescribing of controlled medications such as narcotics, insomnia drugs and anti-depressants. Safety experts also warn that selecting prescriptions on a computer screen can cause a doctor to inadvertently enter, for instance, a quick-release version of a drug instead of a long-acting formulation because they appear in sequence on an e-prescribing program.

Technical Difficulties

In less than a month, on Feb. 17, all full-power stations plan to shut off analog signals and air digital-only broadcasts. Viewers with older analog TV sets will need to hook up a converter box to receive over-the-air programs. Digital TV sets will automatically receive the new signals. Cable and satellite subscribers should not be affected by the switch. But many consumers are discovering that upgrading to a digital set or adding a converter box may not be enough to get a reliable digital signal. Some will also have to buy more powerful antennas to install in living rooms or on roofs, adding expense and frustration for the nearly 14 million households who rely on over-the-air signals. New digital audiences will probably discover the "digital cliff" the all-or-nothing quality of digital reception. The picture is excellent until the signal weakens or is interrupted, causing the picture to disappear completely. Digital signals are supposed to travel farther over flat terrain, but they are susceptible to interference from hills, trees, buildings, bad weather or planes flying overhead. An analog picture degrades gradually, getting more static and snow as signals weaken.

9% Of Viewers Unprepared For DTV Switch

Nine percent of U.S. TV viewers are still unprepared for the changeover from analog to digital come next month, says media agency Mindshare, which could impact the TV audience. These numbers are in line with previous estimates from a number of research companies over the last several months. Some U.S. viewers are doing nothing about the change--although they have at least one TV set in their home that has only analog service. "Now that the government has run out of money for converter box coupons, there are going to be a lot of sets that are not ready, which could impact the TV audience," said Debbie Solomon, managing director of business planning of Mindshare, in a release.

Don't delay the digital TV transition

[Commentary] At the request of the incoming Obama Administration, leading members of Congress have drafted legislation to delay the digital TV transition for close to four months, justifying their action as a way to protect needy Americans from losing access to their local TV station programming. But is this the real reason for the delay? A key assumption behind America's digital TV transition policy is that individual Americans shouldn't be harmed by technological obsolescence even if that obsolescence is in the public interest. But why should the government subsidize a consumer's obsolete fifteen-year-old $100 color TV and not his obsolete four-year-old computer? Every communications industry has had to transition from analog to digital technology over the last few decades. Why treat the broadcasters' transition specially?

Cell networks handle massive volume with few glitches

Months of planning by the USA's biggest cellphone carriers paid off Tuesday, with the Washington, D.C., networks of AT&T, Verizon and Sprint handling millions of additional calls, texts and downloads without any major incidents or failures. As of midday, Sprint was reporting a 211% increase in traffic — voice, data and text — in and around the Mall area in downtown Washington, site of the noon ET presidential inauguration. "There have been some delays in text deliveries and receipt, but otherwise, it's going very, very well," said Sprint spokesman John Taylor. He said calling volume dropped considerably after the swearing-in ceremony. The story was much the same at Verizon, which saw call volume more than triple in the hours leading up to the inauguration. Even so, there were no major disruptions, says Verizon spokesman John Johnson.

He's already Rushed to judgment

Rush Limbaugh made clear that he's prepared to mock, scorn and badger the man with the daunting job of trying to turn our country around. Radio's biggest blusterer doubtless has real problems with President Barack Obama. But he's clearly inspired most by a fresh opportunity to inflate himself to ever greater proportions. Asked recently if he was depressed by the shift in power, he scoffed: "I am energized, I am honored and I am happy to be the last man standing." He greeted Bill Clinton's presidency with the refrain "America held hostage." Now it's "the last man standing." Get ready to hear it for at least four years. In other words, the last true conservative. The last stalwart with no intention of cutting the Democratic president an inch of slack. To do so, Limbaugh suggests, would be to give in to socialism.

Cable Bill High? Phone Costs Up? Now, Let's Talk

A number of savvy customers are realizing that while times are tough for consumers, they are also tough for cable and phone companies. Under intense pressure from Wall Street to keep subscribers as the economy sags and competition intensifies, many carriers are bent on retaining customers even if it means offering big price breaks. On the surface of it, the country's biggest carriers continue to boost prices despite the downturn. In January, Comcast and Time Warner Cable raised year-over-year prices by 6% for TV services, notes Craig Moffett, an analyst at research company Sanford C. Bernstein. AT&T Inc., meanwhile, increased the price of high-end services, such as bundled movie channels, by 30%. Behind the scenes, however, the companies are much more accommodating. Many are offering steep discounts to keep, win or win back customers. Consumers, reeling from the recession, are crafting novel ways to cut costs, including switching to cheaper prepaid cellphone plans and using Web-enabled mobile devices to connect to the Internet instead of buying home broadband connections. Negotiating with cable and phone companies may present a more direct route to saving on communications services costs. And companies are often happy to make deals with customers -- particularly if that allows them to poach them from rivals.

Ofcom proposes big changes to UK broadcast sector

Britain's media regulator proposed a raft of changes to the broadcasting industry on Wednesday, such as allowing mergers between rivals and less regulation, in an attempt to support the embattled sector. Under the proposals, broadcaster Channel 4 could merge with rival Five or form a partnership with the commercial arm of the BBC, and ITV could be freed from the majority of its public service content remit. However, the regulator rejected any suggestion that Channel 4, known for edgy programming and strong news, should take money directly from the licence fee -- a tax on every television-watching household which funds the BBC.