June 2008

ICANN: Meddling with DNS poses security problem

The interception of Internet traffic to snoop on phone calls or track surfers' behavior is a hot topic -- but what's keeping members of ICANN's Security and Stability Advisory Committee up at night is the interception of traffic to and from sites that don't even exist. They explained why in a session at ICANN's public meeting. There are still a few possible domain names out there that have not yet been registered, and if you accidentally type one of them into your browser's address bar, you ought to receive an error message from the Domain Name System (DNS) signalling that the domain does not exist. What happens to those error messages is of concern to SSAC's members, who advise on the security and integrity of the domain name systems that the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) coordinates. Some ISPs (Internet service providers) and domain name registrars see the error messages as a missed opportunity to "help" their customers find the site they are looking for -- and to make a little money on the side. They do this by intercepting the error messages and modifying them to point to a Web site that they control, typically carrying advertisements related to the domain name typed.
http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/06/24/Meddling_with_DNS_poses_securi...

McCain and the Internets

Having admitted he's a computer "illiterate," Sen John McCain (R-AZ) held a town hall Tuesday night via telephone. Mark Soohoo, McCain's deputy e-campaign director, drew guffaws at an Internet conference in New York when he tried to dig his candidate out of a techno black hole. “It’s a mistake to assume John McCain has no knowledge of this,” Soohoo said during a panel discussion with the Internet strategists of some other presidential campaigns. “You don't necessarily have to use a computer to understand how it shapes the country,” he said. Tracy Russo, who worked for John Edwards, as an Internet strategist, responded, "You actually do,” suggesting that a person gains a certain frame of reference from being online. Andrew Rasiej, a Democrat and founder and executive producer of the Personal Democracy Forum, which was holding the conference, said later that Sen McCain’s lack of familiarity with computers and the Internet “shows he doesn't understand how the world works and that he doesn't understand what it would mean to be president.” McCain’s relationship with the Internet also stands in stark contrast to that of his opponent, Sen Barack Obama (D-IL), whose campaign has made expert use of the Internet for fund-raising and organizing and recently surpassed the 1-million mark of “friends” on Facebook. (Sen McCain has fewer than 200,000.)
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/06/24/mccain-and-the-internets/
(requires registration)

McCain's Campaign Funding Hypocrisy: Why Are the Media Looking the Other Way?

The mainstream media's overheated response to Sen Barack Obama's decision to opt out of the public campaign finance system is a textbook example of journalists protecting Sen John Mccain (R-AZ) and his bald-faced hypocrisy. Amidst all the attacks on Obama's "flip-flop," how much have you read in the MSM about the fact that McCain has "completely reversed himself" on public financing -- and is currently breaking the law on a daily basis, making a mockery out of a campaign finance system he helped create? In the fall of 2007, McCain opted into the public financing system for the GOP primaries, which meant he'd later receive just over $5 million in public funds in exchange for agreeing to a fundraising limit of around $54 million for the entire primary process, which ends when he accepts the nomination at the Republican National Convention in September. By late November, his campaign was practically broke, so McCain took out a pair of $1 million loans, using the public funds he would receive as collateral. Cut to Super Tuesday, when McCain had the Republican nomination all but wrapped up. Suddenly, he didn't want to be bound by that $54 million limit, so his campaign did a 180 and opted back out of the public financing system. Yet few in the media saw fit to point out this glaring contradiction in McCain's cries about broken commitments made to the American people. Indeed, as Media Matters points out, the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, the Philadelphia Inquirer, the CBS Evening News, NBC's Nightly News, Fox News' Special Report, and CNN all dutifully reported McCain's claims about Obama without mentioning McCain's campaign finance chicanery.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/mccains-campaign-fundin...

Ten Things Obama Can Do With All That Money

Having opted out of public funding for his run for president, how can Sen Barack Obama spend all the money he's raising? 1) Hire every available Democratic media consultant (and, thus, unify, the Democratic message). 2) Buy a lot of radio and cable ads in swing states. 3) Target the sports talk radio demographic both locally and nationally. 4) Buy ads on college football, the Ryder Cup, Major League Baseball playoffs and, yes, the NFL. 5) Run 60-second ads. 6) Make blockbuster web videos. 7) Buy TV ads in all 50 states the day after the Democratic National Convention. 8) Look into buying ad space from skywriters, pump-top TV, rooftops near airports, elevators screens, cellphones, mall kiosks. 9) Make "live" political ads.
http://adage.com/campaigntrail/post?article_id=127917

Markey: Wait on Online-Ad-Service Technology

House Telecommunications & Internet Subcommittee Chairman Ed Markey (D-MA) has told cable operators and other broadband providers to hold off implementing ad-service technology similar to what Charter Communications was planning to use from online-ad network NebuAd. Chairman Markey and other members of his subcommittee wrote Charter last month asking it to hold off on the NebuAd partnership until concerns about online privacy were addressed. He praised Charter Tuesday for deciding to delay plans to "track the Web sites visited by their customers and disclose this sensitive the data to an ad firm." But Rep Markey went beyond that to advise other broadband providers to follow suit. "Given the serious privacy concerns raised by the sophisticated ad-serving technology Charter Communications planned to test-market," he added, "I am pleased to hear that the company has decided to delay implementation of this program, which electronically profiled individual consumer Web usage. I urge other broadband companies considering similar user-profiling programs to similarly hold off on implementation while these important privacy concerns can be addressed.”
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6572966.html?rssid=193

Crafting TV Ads for the Digital Age

Marketers are already scrambling to figure out how best to adjust their 30-second TV spots for viewing via the web and on iPod screens. But as the nation prepares for the big shift from analog to digital TV on Feb. 17 next year, what could be a major conundrum has opened up for advertisers who love to make use of the wider high-definition screen. While traditional TV sets have for decades featured a 4:3 screen-size proportion, high-definition sets and the programming created for them have a much more rectangular 16:9 scope. Thus, ads crafted for high-definition broadcasts that show up on standard-definition sets could have their right and left sides digitally sliced off. Cries of concern are already surfacing in certain corners of the ad business, particular the creative side. "You work really hard to make the film look beautiful within the frame, and then somebody changes the frame on you," said Andy Langer, chief creative officer at Omnicom Group's Roberts & Tarlow agency. "They won't look as good, and they may not be as effective," he added. The move to digital frees up frequency for wireless broadband, not to mention police and fire communications. It also allows broadcasters to offer more high-definition programming and additional channels of content. But it also creates the potential for an "ad squeeze": Many living rooms, basements and bedrooms will still contain the older TV sets that aren't capable of showing high-definition ads in all their glory. Of the nation's approximately 113 million TV households, only 46 million have sets capable of receiving high-def content, a number that is expected to grow to only 55 million by the end of 2009, according to Forrester Research.
http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=127958

NAB Seeks Removal of Cross-Ownership Provision

The National Association of Broadcasters is trying to get a provision removed from a House Federal Communications Commission appropriations bill that would prevent it from implementing its relaxation of the newspaper-broadcast cross-ownership ban. NAB president David Rehr sent letters to all of the members of the House Appropriations Committee asking them to oppose the provision, which was approved last week by the Appropriations Committee's Financial Services Subcommittee.

Sinclair to Buy Raycom Station for $85M

Sinclair Broadcast Group announced Tuesday that it will buy the assets of WTVR, the CBS affiliate in the Richmond-Petersburg (VA) market, from Raycom Media for $85 million. If the sale is approved, Sinclair will own 59 TV stations around the country.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6572824.html?rssid=193

Digital TV Switch Needs Bill Cosby

[Commentary] Meredith Attwell Baker is the acting head of the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, the Commerce Department unit responsible for overseeing next year's transition to digital signals. Baker is the acting head because the previous official who headed the NTIA, John Kneuer, resigned last year "to pursue new opportunities." Asst Sec Baker has said she wants to resign, too, but her replacement, Neil Patel, has yet to be confirmed by the Senate -- in fact, the Senate hasn't even scheduled a hearing yet on Patel's nomination. So, eight months from the transition date -- February 17, 2009 -- the federal government's effort is being led by an unknown acting agency head who wants to leave her job as soon as possible. Is there any wonder that many industry analysts believe the Digital TV transition is doomed? The federal government needs a high-profile person to head the educational aspects of this program, someone who can communicate how to prepare for the switch in simple terms. And someone who will instantly command respect from minorities and older residents -- the groups that surveys indicate are most clueless about the switch. While many people would fit the bill, one name jumps out: Bill Cosby.
http://www.tvpredictions.com/baker062408.htm

Study: 91% of Hispanics Aware of DTV Transition

The vast majority of broadcast-only Hispanic TV households are aware of the digital-TV transition, up from less than one-third of those households that were aware of the transition last fall. That is according to a new study from the National Association of Broadcasters, which found that 91% of Hispanic households getting their free TV via rooftop or indoor antennas knew about the upcoming DTV switch, compared with 31% in a similar study in September 2007.