February 2008

Clinton Outspent By Obama Online

CLINTON OUTSPENT BY OBAMA ONLINE
[SOURCE: OnlineMediaDaily, AUTHOR: Mark Walsh walsh@mediapost.com]
Barack Obama has run the most effective online campaign among the 2008 presidential candidates. Of the $32 million he raised in January, for example, $28 million came from online donors. Even so, figures in the candidates' latest spending reports covering January underscore the gap in their online efforts. The Obama campaign paid more than $89,000 to Google and $18,252 to Microsoft for online advertising and a total of $32,372 to Yahoo and Yahoo Search Marketing. Obama paid another $23,564 to Yahoo subsidiary Right Media, an online ad exchange which handles mainly remnant advertising. A further $1,821 went to Facebook, where Obama has attracted more "friends" than any other candidate, and $88,540 went to political consulting firm Blue State Digital. The Clinton campaign, by contrast, reported only a $13,674 payment to Google during the same period.
http://publications.mediapost.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.san&s=77...

Barack Obama Launches Local Web Campaign

BARACK OBAMA LAUNCHES LOCAL WEB CAMPAIGN
[SOURCE: MediaWeek, AUTHOR: Mike Shields and Katy Bachman]
On Tuesday, Sen Barack Obama (D-IL) launched an aggressive local Web campaign. The Obama Web campaign, placed by Centro on 26 local TV, radio and newspaper Web sites in Ohio and Texas, features a Sliding Billboard at the top of the Web page with a 30-second video embedded in the expandable unit. Depending on the site, the ad plays different video ads. Some of the media sites that are carrying the ads include Belo's The Dallas Morning News and its ABC affiliate, WFAA-TV; Ohio.com; and The Houston Chronicle (www.chron.com). The buy also includes radio and TV stations that are part of the WorldNow Ohio and Texas Networks. In addition, Sen Obama initiated a buy earlier this week with online video ad network Broadband Enterprises to run 30-second spots on various local TV, radio and newspaper Web sites, including the Clear Channel stations WKOI in San Antonio and WKRC in Cincinnati.
http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/news/recent_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=10037...

Scripps Giving Free Airtime to Candidates

SCRIPPS GIVING FREE AIRTIME TO CANDIDATES
[SOURCE: tvnewsday]
The E.W. Scripps Co. is launching Democracy 2008, a public discourse initiative that will make free airtime available to political candidates on the company’s nine network-affiliated television stations. They are: ABC affiliates WXYZ Detroit; WCPO Cincinnati; WEWS Cleveland; WFTS Tampa, Fla.; WMAR Baltimore; and KNXV Phoenix; and NBC affiliates WPTV West Palm Beach, Fla.; KSHB Kansas City, Mo.; and KJRH Tulsa, Okla. The Scripps stations will provide five minutes of free airtime to candidates nightly between 5 p.m. and 11:35 p.m. in the 30 days preceding the general elections. The stations also will provide free airtime as needed during the 30 days preceding primary elections. The Scripps television station had a similar free airtime policy during the national elections in 2000, 2002, 2004 and 2006.
http://www.tvnewsday.com/articles/2008/02/27/daily.6/

Comcast Manipulating NAACP on Net Neutrality

COMCAST MANIPULATING NAACP ON NET NEUTRALITY
[SOURCE: OpenLeft, AUTHOR: Matt Stoller]
[Commentary] Do Comcast and the NAACP have a cozy relationship? A flyer calling for a rally protesting the FCC under the NAACP's name, put out by a PR firm, and disavowed by the local NAACP as simply a 'draft', was going around on the same day as a net neutrality hearing that Comcast packed with a crowd they hired to prevent net neutrality advocates from attending. And on that very same day, this letter to the editor in the Washington Post attacking net neutrality shows up, from Jose Marquez of the Latinos in Information Sciences and Technology, an astroturf group sponsored by Sprint, the cell phone carrier most aligned with Comcast and the cable industry. In addition, the founder of the National Black Chamber of Commerce, a right-wing group that pushed for the privatization of Social Security in 2005, wrote this piece attacking FCC Chair Kevin Martin for being a racist. A cynic might say that Comcast, caught red-handed blocking and manipulating the Internet traffic of their users is trying to divert attention from the FCC investigation and possible subpoena threat by state AG's by doing a PR campaign around cries of racism. I just think that the NAACP should be a lot more careful in how and when their name shows up when large conservative corporations would want to use their name to distract from their lawbreaking.
http://www.openleft.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=4209

FCC 'Do-Over' on Net Neutrality Hearing?

FCC 'DO-OVER' ON NET NEUTRALITY HEARING?
[SOURCE: Portfolio, AUTHOR: Sam Gustin]
Following Comcast's acknowledgement that it had hired people to take up seats at an overcrowded Federal Communications Commission hearing at Harvard on Monday, the regulator agency is mulling whether a hold another public hearing on net neutrality. FCC spokesman Rob Kenny declined to speak publicly about the possibility of additional hearings, which were first reported on the blog Valleywag. From the outset of the FCC's investigation, the agency had held out the possibility of further hearings on Comcast's controversial "network management" practices.
http://www.portfolio.com/views/blogs/daily-brief/2008/02/27/fcc-do-over-...

Internet Company Sued for Holding Names

INTERNET COMPANY SUED FOR HOLDING NAMES
[SOURCE: Associated Press, AUTHOR: Anick Jesdanun]
A company that sells Internet addresses is being sued for its controversial practice of holding a domain name in reserve if someone checks for its availability but does not buy it right away. Although Network Solutions termed its new program a consumer-protection measure, the moves make it difficult for interested parties to shop around for better prices. The company charges $35 a year for a name - a few times more than what many of its rivals charge.
http://news.lp.findlaw.com/ap/high_tech/1700//02-27-2008/20080227100502_...

AT&T bill holds key to Internet future in TN

AT&T BILL HOLDS KEY TO FUTURE
[SOURCE: The Daily News Journal (Murfreesboro, TN), AUTHOR: Ed Kimbrell]
[Commentary] For the past few weeks, behind closed doors at the state Capitol, American Telephone and Telegraph, Comcast cable, the Tennessee Municipal League, and selected legislators have been trying to forge a tortured compromise about the Internet's future in the state. What's at stake here? Simply, the future. There are billions of dollars of potential revenue on the table. AT&T is the largest wireless telephone provider in the nation, and if it bundles TV, Internet and telephone service into one package, it will be very difficult to turn it down by the average consumer. Cable argues AT&T will not provide universal service, picking only the lucrative cities and towns and leaving the rest unserved. AT&T already bundles wireless and wired telephone service. So, simply put, it could dominate the information and entertainment environment in the state at a time when the telephone is becoming the dominant information technology in the world. Only fools predict Oscar winners, Supreme Court decisions, and what our Legislature will decide, but it's obvious this is one of those times when law and compromise are overwhelmed by new technology. There's no Solomon able to make a decision about the cable-telephone war. Don't be surprised if the outcome this year isn't any different than last year's stalemate, because no one at the table wants to lose.
http://dnj.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080228/OPINION02/802280319/1...

Nielsen Forms Hispanic/Latino Advisory Council

NIELSEN FORMS HISPANIC/LATINO ADVISORY COUNCIL
[SOURCE: MediaWeek, AUTHOR: Katy Bachman]
Nielsen announced Wednesday it had formed a national Hispanic/Latino Advisory Council to help the research company recruit, measure and accurately report on Hispanic TV households. The first meeting of the independent advisory group is March 4 in New York. Members are: Ernest Bromley, president and CEO of Bromley Communications; Jenny Alonzo, executive vp, marketing/brand of Mio.TV; Dr. Juan Andrade, president and executive director of the United States Hispanic Leadership Institute (USHLI); Dr. David Hayes-Bautista, PhD, Professor of medicine and director of the Center for the Study of Latino Health and Culture at the School of Medicine, UCLA; Jose del Cueto, CEO of Del Cueto Media Group; Guarione M. Diaz, president and CEO, Cuban American National Council, Inc.; Dr. Henry Flores, senior policy analyst, William C. Velasquez Institute; Luís A. Miranda, Jr., managing partner of The MirRam Group, Inc.; Lillian Rodríguez López, president of the Hispanic Federation; Catherine M. Pino, co-founder & principal of D&P Creative Strategies; and Susana Valdez, chief of staff to Mayor Manny Diaz, City of Miami.
http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/news/recent_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=10037...

Nominees for Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board

NOMINEES FOR PRIVACY AND CIVIL LIBERTIES OVERSIGHT BOARD
[SOURCE: The White House]
President George W. Bush announced his intention to nominate the following individuals to serve in his Administration:

1) The President intends to nominate Daniel W. Sutherland, of Virginia, to be Chairman of the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board for an initial term of six years. Mr. Sutherland currently serves as an Officer for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties at the Department of Homeland Security. Prior to this, he served in the Office of Civil Rights at the Department of Education. Earlier in his career, he served at the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice and on the Domestic Policy Council at the White House. Mr. Sutherland received his bachelor's degree from the University of Louisville and his JD from the University of Virginia School of Law.

2) The President intends to nominate Ronald Daniel Rotunda, of Virginia, to be a Member of the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board for an initial four-year term.

3) The President intends to nominate Francis X. Taylor, of Maryland, to be a Member of the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board for an initial two-year term.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2008/02/20080226-9.html

* Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board
The Board advises the President and other senior executive branch officials to ensure that concerns with respect to privacy and civil liberties are appropriately considered in the implementation of all laws, regulations, and executive branch policies related to efforts to protect the Nation against terrorism. This includes advising on whether adequate guidelines, supervision, and oversight exist to protect these important legal rights of all Americans.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/privacyboard/

* Ronald D. Rotunda
http://www.law.gmu.edu/faculty/directory/rotunda_ronald
* Brig. Gen. Francis X. Taylor
http://www.af.mil/bios/bio.asp?bioID=7344

GOP Uses Surveillance Bill to Bash Democrats

GOP USES SURVEILLANCE BILL TO BASH DEMOCRATS
[SOURCE: Washington Post, AUTHOR: Dan Eggen]
Republicans are convinced that highlighting their counterterrorism policies will be a political winner in this presidential election year, and they have focused this week on Democratic opposition to their version of a new surveillance bill as a way to paint Democrats as soft on national security. Democrats respond that they are unfazed by the attacks, arguing that most Americans doubt the credibility of President Bush and Republicans when it comes to warning about security threats. President Bush and GOP lawmakers have been releasing a blizzard of public statements and organizing multiple news conferences to pressure the House to adopt a Senate bill renewing and expanding a temporary surveillance law called the Protect America Act. The measure would grant legal immunity to telecommunications companies over their cooperation in warrantless wiretapping done after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. House Democratic leaders oppose the immunity provision and maneuvered to allow the temporary statute to expire on Feb. 16. The administration has repeatedly said that telecom firms need protection from lawsuits in order to cooperate with the government.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/27/AR200802...
(requires registration)