Benton RSS Feed
HANDICAPPING SENATE TELECOM BILL
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
There is no timeline for the Senate's markup of an omnibus telecommunications reform bill, though it can be expected to be considered in the next two or three weeks. Senate staffers were busy working on draft language of its version over the Easter break. Issues likely to be addresses in the bill include video franchising reform, network neutrality language, municipal broadband, universal service, and allowing unlicensed wireless devices in so-called "white spaces" in the broadcast band. "Possibles" are a broadcast flag digital content-protection scheme, protection of kids from Internet content, and DTV-related items that had to be stripped from DTV hard date legislation that passed earlier in the year, like cable's downconversion of a DTV signal and the outlines of a consumer education campaign on the Feb. 17, 2009 switch to a digital TV transmission standard.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6327594?display=Breaking+News
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6327594?display=Breaking%20News
CHILDREN NOW TAKES ISSUE WITH WAIVER
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
Allbritton, McGraw-Hill, and Media General are among the broadcast groups who planned to file comments with the FCC by close of business Monday--when public comments were due--asking for the waiver for DTV public interest channels -- news, weather, politics. They argue that the FCC was simply choosing one type of public interest -- kids -- over another, and suggested kids shows might break up the flow of those channels. Children Now's Christy Glaubke counters: "Not only do broadcasters have the ability under the rules to program their children’s educational shows on any of their digital channels as long as they have carriage, but there is no reason to believe that a mere three hours per week of children’s educational programming would harm a public interest channel. Some broadcasters, such as NBC, are actually using this rule as an opportunity to create shows for kids about the weather or news. These programs will add much-needed diversity to the educational programming that is currently being offered to kids and may even create a new audience for weather and news programming. Finally, it is important that kids get something in return for the billions of dollars worth of spectrum that broadcasters are receiving for free."
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6327740?display=Breaking+News
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6327740?display=Breaking%20News
FAMILY GROUPS PUSH INDECENCY BILL
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
The Parents Television Council, Concerned Women For America, Focus on the Family, and the Family Research Council have scheduled a conference call for Tuesday to push for a Senate bill that would boost indecency fines by at least 10 times. The family groups say they want to "curb the deluge of indecent programming that’s already flooding the living rooms of families across the U.S." Elsewhere, the Christian Coalition is also pushing for action Tuesday. It put out an alert to members telling them to contact their legislators Tuesday and demand passage of the Senate bill, pointing out that it has been a year since the House passed the version introduced by House Telecommunications Subcommittee Chairman Fred Upton (R-MI). The coalition is calling on Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN) for an immediate Senate floor vote on the House bill, which would avoid having to conference the already-passed House bill with a Senate version that had differences in, say, the amount of the fine.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6327455?display=Breaking+News
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6327455?display=Breaking%20News
WEBS GEARING UP FOR SUPREME SHOWDOWN WITH THE FCC
[SOURCE: Variety, AUTHOR: Michael Learmonth]
Ten days ago, all four broadcast networks, their 800 affiliated stations and the Hearst-Argyle station group walked in rare lockstep and filed a challenge arguing that three specific FCC indecency decisions are unconstitutional and inconsistent. The appeals involve a guest on CBS' "The Early Show" referred to someone as a "bulls****er, ABC's drama "NYPD Blue" and Fox's "Billboard Music Awards" in which Nicole Richie said, "have you ever tried to get cow s*** out of a Prada purse? It's not so f***ing simple." The challenge, expected to be heard by a court of appeal in the next few months, could end up reining in the agency that critics claim is exceeding its authority. It could also set the stage for a Supreme Court showdown -- the first consideration of the government's role in policing broadcast content since 1978. Given the entertainment industry's dearth of friends on Capitol Hill, it's no surprise broadcasters turned to the courts for relief.
http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117941849?categoryid=14&cs=1&nid=2596
* the End of "live" TV
http://www.dtgeeks.com/index.php/blogs/community_comment/the_end_of_live...
http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117941849?categoryid=14&cs=1&nid=2596
REHR: TO DC: CLARIFY INDECENCY
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
In his first major speech as the new president of the NAB, David Rehr said Monday that the broadcast media have to emphasize parental control and defend the First Amendment, but he also said they have "no objection to playing by the decency rules" so long as Congress and the FCC will draw the lines more clearly. "The FCC's recent indecency fines [a package of proposed fines and findings against TV shows for language and sexual situations] did little to clarify these rules," he said. "We need clearer guidance from the FCC and Congress on where the lines are drawn." While Rehr told an NAB opening-session crowd that they "cannot forget the importance of the First Amendment," and that NAB will "defend it wholeheartedly," he also threw in a caveat saying: "No one should imply that protecting the First Amendment is tantamount to promoting the right to be obscene." The distinction between obscenity and indecency, however, is that the media have no protection from obscenity, which is illegal, while indecency is protected speech, though currently channeled to times of day when the FCC considers kids least likely to be tuning in (10 p.m. to 6 a.m.).
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6327626?display=Breaking+News
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6327626?display=Breaking%20News
ENTERTAINMENT GROUPS TARGET TV INDECENCY WITH EDUCATION EFFORT
[SOURCE: Associated Press, AUTHOR: Gary Gentile]
A coalition of entertainment groups will launch a $300 million educational campaign next month to urge parents to control what their children watch on television, the groups said Monday. The effort by TV networks, cable and satellite television companies, local broadcasters and Hollywood studios is an attempt to forestall government control of content by demonstrating that a voluntary program can work. Jack Valenti, former head of the Motion Picture Association of America, announced the effort Monday during his keynote speech to the National Association of Broadcasters. "We want to tell American parents that they, and they alone, have total power to control every hour of television programming," Valenti said. He said the groups would enlist the not-for-profit Ad Council to develop advertising that cable systems, networks and local stations have agreed to air in what Valenti termed an "avalanche of messages." The material will also be distributed to churches and advocacy groups. The group will also work with the Consumer Electronics Association to raise awareness about the presence of V-chips in TV sets that allow the blocking of some programming.
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2006/04/24/financial/f10002...
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2006/04/24/financial/f100022D03.DTL
REHR OUTLINES FIVE-POINT PLAN
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: Allison Romano]
National Association of Broadcasters new President and CEO David Rehr outlined Monday five areas where broadcasters "can go on offense immediately": 1) Broadcasters' future hinges on their ability to exploit every new technology -- on every new platform. Content is still king -- but distribution is key. 2) Broadcasters must promote the benefits of digital television and digital radio. 3) Broadcasters must promote greater competition among cable, satellite and telecom companies. Competition means consumers will have more choices -- and it also means broadcasters will have more revenue streams from the content they provide. 4) Concerning indecency, the NAB will take a leading role in empowering parents to control what comes into their homes. 5) The NAB is moving away from using the word "lobbyist" -- which has been defensive and reactive -- and adopting the word "advocacy" which conveys positive offense in framing the debate. The NAB needs you to be advocates for our industry, not just in Washington, but at home. We intend to step up our grassroots activism of local broadcasters to educate Members of Congress, the FCC and their staffs – about the realities of our business. Rehr called on broadcasters to "be more involved in electing Members of Congress who oversee the future of our business. We must have more pro-broadcaster Members of Congress. In fact, we must elect more broadcasters to Congress! It is with this goal in mind that I encourage you to support the NAB Political Action committee."
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6327604?display=Breaking+News
* NAB’s Rehr Expects Cable Cash
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6327569.html?display=Breaking+News
* US TV stations seek share of networks' new revenue
http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=technologyNews&story...
* NAB's Rehr: Deal-Bass Won't Pass
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: Ted Hearn]
A House amendment designed to strengthen the hand of cable and satellite companies in carriage negotiations with TV stations across the country will go down to defeat in the Commerce Committee later this week, predicted National Association of Broadcasters President David Rehr Monday.
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6327117.html?display=Breaking+News
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6327604?display=Breaking%20News
GOING UP
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: Mark Fratrik, BIA Financial Network]
[Commentary] During the past six months, several large television groups have become even larger. With LIN Television, Grey Television, and SJL Communications acquiring most of the Emmis television stations, Raycom TV Broadcasting acquiring the Liberty stations, and Media General recently acquiring some of the mid-market NBC stations, transaction activity has risen to a level not seen since the late 1990s and early 2000s. These acquisitions are prime examples of groups' responding to competitive challenges by logically merging assets to improve revenue and cash-flow performance. It's also a show of their commitment to the television business. However, without further relaxation of FCC ownership rules, there will be fewer opportunities for these groups to continue such rapid growth. Specifically, groups with properties in midsize and smaller markets recognize tremendous opportunities in acquiring other stations in their markets, but they cannot move forward because of continuing regulatory rules. Nearly three years after the FCC proposed ownership regulatory relief for TV stations in these markets, no final action has been taken, and the outlook for quick action remains bleak.
http://broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6327136.html?display=Special+Report
* Top 25 Station Groups at a Glance
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John M. Higgins and George Winslow]
B&C's annual list of the top owners of local TV stations in the US. The top 10 are CBS, Fox, Ion Media Networks (Paxson), NBC, Tribune, ABC, Universal, Gannett, Trinity Broadcasting and Hearst-Argyle. See the URL below for the entire list and a look at the deals that have shaped it.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6327137.html?display=Feature&...
http://broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6327136.html?display=Special%20Report
BROKAW: NO CUT AND PASTE FOR POVERTY
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: Allison Romano]
While mobile devices, the Internet and cable TV make information more accessible, "these are merely tools that are an extension, not just of business plans, but of hearts and minds," former NBC Nightly News anchor Tom Brokaw said Monday at the NAB convention in Las Vegas. "There will be no delete button for hate and understanding, no cut and paste for poverty, no hold button for natural disasters. The success of our industry will continue to depend on not how we deliver the news, but what we deliver." Former CBS anchor Dan Rather said that technological innovation is necessary, but should not alter journalists' mission. "What I hope will not change is the understanding that news needs to serve the public interest as its primary goal. That is its greatest calling, to keep freedom and independence alive, and keep it honest."
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6327672?display=Breaking+News
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6327672?display=Breaking%20News
FOX NEWS CHANNEL WANTS $1 PER CUSTOMER ANNIVERSARY GIFT
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Joe Flint joe.flint@wsj.com]
The Fox News Channel, nearing its 10th anniversary, is aiming to triple the fees it charges cable operators to carry the channel. It wants an increase to $1 dollar per month per subscriber, from the 25 cent to 35 cent subscriber fee the network currently earns. CNN gets an average of about 50 cents per subscriber; MSNBC takes in between 30 and 35 cents. Only a handful of cable networks are able to command such a high fee, most notably Walt Disney Co.'s ESPN, which takes in over $2.50 per subscriber. Like ESPN, these channels pay huge sports-rights expenses and get compensated for them. Other channels that command high distribution fees include Time Warner's TNT, which carries Nascar and the National Basketball Association and gets 90 cents, and the Disney Channel, which doesn't sell advertising and gets about $1. While posturing is a big part of these negotiations and industry executives think Fox News doesn't really expect to land a dollar per-subscriber, network executives insist they aren't just bluffing. Fox News has more viewers than any other cable news channel with a prime-time audience of about 1.5 million viewers this year, according to Nielsen Media Research. CNN's prime-time audience this year is about 700,000 viewers while MSNBC has been averaging 350,000 viewers. Fox News's ratings are high enough to make it a top-10 cable network. Fox News is banking that it is now one of the handful of channels which can play hardball with cable and satellite operators if negotiations stall. Like Viacom's Nickelodeon and Disney's ESPN, Fox News has rabid fans who would howl if it wasn't part of their basic cable package. Its mix of news and talk has struck a chord with conservative viewers.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB114592788791534833.html?mod=todays_us_ma...
(requires subscription)
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB114592788791534833.html?mod=todays_us_marketplac…