Benton RSS Feed
NTIA HAS NO PLANS TO CONDUCT MINORITY BROADCAST OWNERSHIP STUDY
[SOURCE: National Association of Hispanic Journalists press release ]
The National Telecommunications and Information Agency has no plans to conduct a study on the current state of minority broadcast ownership in the United States. The National Association of Hispanic Journalists (NAHJ) sent a letter to U.S. Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez April 3 calling on the department to conduct a minority ownership study. The NTIA, which is an agency within the U.S. Commerce Department, has conducted several studies monitoring trends affecting minority owners. The last report was released at the end of the Clinton Administration. Responding on behalf of Sec. Gutierrez, NTIA’s John M.R. Kneuer informed NAHJ President Veronica Villafañe that his agency had no present plans to conduct a minority ownership study, but that the Administration shared the association’s concern that “American media reflect the diversity of the nation’s people.†The last report the NTIA published was in December 2000. It found that people of color only made up 3.8 percent of all broadcast station owners and that media consolidation posed a serious threat to the future of minority ownership. NAHJ believes it is critical for the FCC and the public to understand the impact of regulatory action on minority owners. The association is concerned that any action to further deregulate the nation’s broadcast ownership regulations will reduce the number of minority owners and diverse news coverage, thus stifling diversity.
http://www.nahj.org/nahjnews/articles/2006/april/ntiaresponse.shtml
Read NAHJ's Letter to Sec. Gutierrez: http://www.nahj.org/nahjnews/articles/2006/april/gutierrezletter.shtml
Read Response Letter from NTIA: http://www.nahj.org/nahjnews/articles/2006/april/NTIAResponseLetter.pdf
NTIA's Dec. 2000 study on challenges to minority ownership: http://search.ntia.doc.gov/pdf/mtdpreportv2.pdf
FCC study on barriers to minority ownership: http://www.fcc.gov/opportunity/meb_study/historical_study.pdf
* NTIA Has No Plans To Study Minority Ownership
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6331818?display=Breaking+News
NTIA has No Plans to Conduct Minority Broadcast Ownership Study
CIVIL RIGHTS ON DEMAND
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
After talks with a group identified as "35 civil rights leaders," Verizon says it will add a "community studio" feature to its FiOS video service. The studio will consist of a library of on-demand public interest and civil rights content. That will be in addition to the public, educational and government channels FiOS already provides per its franchise agreements with local communities. Among the groups that will get to put content on the channel are the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, the National Hispanic Media Coalition, American Association for People with Disabilities, Black Leadership Forum, and U.S. Distance Learning Association.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6331808?display=Breaking+News
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6331808?display=Breaking%20News
THE FIGHT OVER YOUR TV SET
[SOURCE: San Francisco Chronicle, AUTHOR: Editorial Staff]
[Commentary] An editorial in favor of California video franchising legislation. The measure would give phone giants such as AT&T and Verizon permission to use their wires statewide to offer video alongside cable firms, who now control the market. The Chronicle paints a picture of two goliaths -- cable and telephone companies -- fighting. There's some caution about 1) cities losing the franchise fees they negotiated and other features such as local programming or construction schedules and 2) red-lining poor areas by concentrating service in wealthier areas. But the Chronicle concludes: "What's significant is the competition that a cable-versus-phone rivalry can mean to this household expense. Consumers have watched as the merger and technology game played out, and now it's time to collect the benefits."
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2006/0...
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2006/05/04/EDG…
AT&T FILES MORE LAWSUITS
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: Linda Haugsted]
Ten Illinois communities have delayed plant improvements AT&T needs to make to launch the telephone company's video service. AT&T has now sued 7 of them and the other expect legal action soon. The telephone company is taking a hard line against communities that approve moratoria on siting permits. City regulators say they need time to figure out how to safely site the large control boxes -- called 52Bs in the telco's shorthand -- in the public rights-of-way. AT&T said in the lawsuits that any conditions on the siting permits, such as language indicating that a cable franchise may be needed at a later time, are improper, unlawful and unenforceable under state and federal law. See ya in court.
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6331622.html?display=Breaking+News
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6331622.html?display=Breaking%20News
TV CLUTTER CONTINUES TO WORRY ADVERTISERS
[SOURCE: AdAge, AUTHOR: Willow Duttge]
It's upfront time and marketers' fears about advertising on TV might be coming to fruition. Clutter continues to remain high during prime-time network programming and increased by 5% on cable overall, according to MindShare's 2005 Clutter Watch survey. For the first time since Mindshare began tracking in 2000, cable ran more clutter than broadcast networks. Among the broadcast networks, ABC gets the prize for the most non-program minutes (a category that includes network commercials, local commercials, PSAs and promos) -- 15 minutes and 26 seconds per hour. However, Fox beat out ABC when it came to total commercial minutes. Fox had 11 more seconds of commercials than ABC, at 12 minutes 55 seconds. UPN has the least clutter, but not by much. UPN's total non-program time was still up to 14 minutes and 26 seconds and total commercial minutes were nearly 12 minutes. MTV was the cable clutter leader, with more than 16 minutes of non-program material. But close behind with more than 15 minutes of non-program material were Discovery, Lifetime, USA and Spike. ESPN had the least non-program minutes, while TNT had the least minutes of commercials. Even though TV is less cluttered than print and online, viewers believe TV has too much advertising, according to MindShare's research.
http://www.adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=108995
* More Clutter on Broadcast, Cable
http://www.tvweek.com/news.cms?newsId=9921
http://www.adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=108995
REPORT: DVR AD SKIPPING COULD BE COSTLY
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: Karen Brown]
JupiterResearch says that consumers are losing valuable information about available goods and services when they erroneously skip advertisements using digital video recorders. No, actually, the company estimates that 53% of digital-video-recorder subscribers are zipping through ads, and if that holds true, as much as $8 billion in cable- and broadcast-TV advertising revenue could be at risk. The report also noted that DVR viewers who skip ads watch an average of 18 hours of television weekly -- not much more than the average 17 hours watched by viewers in non-DVR households. In response, television networks and advertisers need to rethink their strategies -- and that includes dropping the idea of charging DVR customers for primetime reruns.
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6331601.html?display=Breaking+News
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6331601.html?display=Breaking%20News
SIGNING AWAY THE CONSTITUTION
[SOURCE: Center for American Progress, AUTHOR: Eric Alterman]
[Commentary] Last Sunday, the Boston Globe’s Charlie Savage broke a story that, "President Bush has quietly claimed the authority to disobey more than 750 laws enacted since he took office, asserting that he has the power to set aside any statute passed by Congress when it conflicts with his interpretation of the Constitution." Amazingly, most of the mainstream media does not appear to think this is much of a story. If a tree falls on the front page of the Boston Globe and is heard only in the blogosophere, does that mean it hasn't really fallen? In other words, will the Bush administration’s lawlessness continue unabated without even exciting any interest on the part of the mainstream media? Just how much contempt for Congress and the Constitution is too much?
http://www.americanprogress.org/site/pp.asp?c=biJRJ8OVF&b=1624525
http://www.americanprogress.org/site/pp.asp?c=biJRJ8OVF&b=1624525
SMITHSONIAN TV CONTRACT SPURS PANEL TO CUT FUNDS
[SOURCE: Washington Post, AUTHOR: Jacqueline Trescott]
The secrecy around the production contract between the Smithsonian Institution and CBS/Showtime Networks prompted lawmakers yesterday to cut $5.3 million from the museum's proposed budget. The House subcommittee that oversees the federal contribution to the Smithsonian's budget (that's not the official title) included language in the appropriation bill that forbids the Smithsonian to enter any new contract that would "limit access by the public to the Smithsonian collection." "This exclusive arrangement is inconsistent with a public institution that is largely financed by the American taxpayer, and it was done without any consultation with this committee," said subcommittee Chairman Charles Taylor (R-NC). Rep. David R. Obey (D-WI), the ranking minority member of the full House Appropriations Committee, said the Showtime controversy is another sign of missteps by Smithsonian Secretary Lawrence Small. "I found him through the years to be as crassly commercial as anybody in town," Obey said. "No matter what Mr. Small is paid, and he is paid an exorbitant rate for someone running a public institution, he does not have the right to virtually sell the Smithsonian collections." According to the Smithsonian's 2003 tax return, the latest one available to the public, Small earned $813,000, including a housing allowance.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/04/AR200605...
(requires registration)
Smithsonian TV Contract Spurs Panel To Cut Funds
PHILADELPHIA WI-FI MOVES CLOSER
[SOURCE: Associated Press]
Philadelphia's wireless Internet initiative cleared a critical hurdle on Wednesday, putting the city on track to become the first major metropolitan area with municipal broadband. But full deployment could be delayed a few months until the third quarter of 2007. The project got the green light from the city's technology and information services and public property and public works committees and is now headed for a vote before City Council. The Council is expected to approve the Wi-Fi initiative as early as next week. Under a 10-year contract, EarthLink Inc. will build, operate and maintain a wireless Internet network over Philadelphia's 135 square miles. Full deployment was initially expected next spring, but the project spent two months in committee, which wrangled over issues such as the participation of women and minority businesses. The committees added amendments that gave City Council members more oversight over Wireless Philadelphia, a nonprofit chartered by the city to oversee the Wi-Fi project. Wireless Philadelphia entered into a contract with Atlanta-based EarthLink to provide the high-speed Internet service. Changes include appointing a diversity oversight committee that would make sure Motorola Inc., which EarthLink hired to build the network, will give at least one-fourth of the business to women, minority and disabled business owners. Wireless Philadelphia also has to meet regularly with an advisory group that will be made up of members appointed by the City Council, the mayor and other officials.
http://abclocal.go.com/wpvi/story?section=sci_tech&id=4141478
http://abclocal.go.com/wpvi/story?section=sci_tech&id=4141478
RICE SAYS FREE COUNTRIES MUST INFLUENCE OTHERS TO REMOVE PRESS RESTRICTIONS
[SOURCE: Canadian Press 5/3, AUTHOR: William C. Mann]
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said Wednesday that free countries must try to influence governments who restrict press freedom and named five countries that she said do that, including Russia and China. In a statement marking World Press Freedom Day, Rice said actions against the journalists include physical mistreatment as well as reinforced libel laws, media ownership in the hands of too few people, Internet restrictions and dwindling press outlets. (Wow, can we apply those standards here in the US, too?)
http://www.canada.com/topics/news/world/story.html?id=88371d5f-f753-4d6a...
http://www.canada.com/topics/news/world/story.html?id=88371d5f-f753-4d6a-8233-a4…