Benton RSS Feed

Coverage Type 

SPEED MATTERS
[SOURCE: Communications Workers of America]
The Communications Workers of America has adopted "five key principles" for improving the US's place in the high-speed Internet economy: 1) Speed and Universality Matter for Internet Access -- High-tech innovation, job growth, telemedicine, distance learning, rural development, public safety and e-government require truly high speed, universal networks. 2) The U.S. “High Speed” Definition is Too Slow -- The FCC defines “high speed” as 200 kilobits per second (kbps) downstream. Government policies should immediately set “high speed” definition at 2 megabits per second (mbps) downstream, 1 upstream. 3) A National "High Speed Internet for All" Policy is Critical-- The U.S. must adopt policies for universal access and set deployment timetables: 10 mbps down, 1 mbps up by 2010, with new benchmarks set for succeeding years. 4) The U.S. Must Preserve an Open Internet -- High speed, high capacity networks will eliminate bandwidth scarcity and will promote an open Internet. Consumers are entitled to an open Internet allowing them to go where they want when they want. Nothing should be done to degrade or block access to any websites. Reserving proprietary video bandwidth is essential to finance the build-out of high speed networks. 5) Consumer and Worker Protections Must Be Safeguarded -- Public policies should support growth of good, career jobs as a key to providing quality service. Government should require public reporting of deployment, actual speed and price.
http://www.speedmatters.org/why/principles.html


Speed Matters

Benton's Communications-related Headlines For Friday October 27, 2006

To view Benton's Headlines feed in your RSS Aggregator, paste
http://www.benton.org/index.php?q=taxonomy/term/6/all/feed into your reader.
For upcoming media policy events, see http://www.benton.org
This and every issue of Headlines is available online at
http://lists.benton.org/lists/arc/headlines/
See this issue of Headlines online at
http://lists.benton.org/lists/arc/headlines/2006-10/msg00011.html

EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS
Professor Pitches Emergency Communications Re-Think

MEDIA & ELECTIONS
Federal Rules Help Shield Creators of Political Advertisements
FCC rejects complaint about Schwarzenegger on 'Tonight Show'
Band's film ads hit sour note

MEDIA OWNERSHIP
Fox calls for the removal of all FCC media ownership rules
Comcast's Earnings Surge on Sales of Digital Services

QUICKLY -- FCC's Martin on Administrative Law; Speed Matters;
Broadband: The Communication Service we can Least Live Without

EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS

PROFESSOR PITCHES EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS RE-THINK
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
Discussing scenarios for reforming public safety communications and
coordination, Jon Peha, a professor of electrical engineering and
public policy at Carnegie Mellon, argues against what he says are the
basic assumptions that local flexibility should trump standardization
and regional coordination, that commercial media's role is limited,
and that public safety spectrum should not be shared. Citing changed
technology and a changed world after 9/11, he argues responsibility
should be shifted from independent local government agencies to the
federal government and commercial providers. He also says municipal
Wi-Fi networks should have an expanded role so that the public safety
spectrum can be shared with other users. He says that spectrum being
vacated by legacy TV users is the ideal place to build a new
emergency communications system, rather than manage spectrum
according to "the same old policies." He suggests that funds for the
new system could come from an auction of reclaimed analog television
spectrum, perhaps by saying that any revenues beyond the $10 billion
the Government Accountability Office has projected for the treasury
be earmarked for public safety -- some have predicted the take could
be twice that amount or more. But he also argues that funding should
not hinge on what he calls an accounting trick. "Surely in the age of
terrorist threats on American soil," he argues, "policy-makers need
no such excuses to spend money that will advance homeland security
and public safety, especially when the short-term expenditures will
lead to long-term savings."
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6385577?display=Breaking+News
* New Report Calls for Fundamental Reform in Public Safety Spectrum
and Wireless Communications Policy
http://www.newamerica.net/programs/wireless_future

MEDIA & ELECTIONS

FEDERAL RULES HELP SHIELD CREATORS OF POLITICAL ADVERTISEMENTS
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Anne Kornblut & Jim Rutenberg]
When an advertisement mocking Representative Harold E. Ford Jr. set
off controversy in the Tennessee Senate race last week, a question
quickly arose: Who was behind the provocative and, critics said,
racially loaded television spot? No Republicans wanted to take
credit. When the identity of the producer, Scott Howell, emerged,
Democrats quickly pounced on his history of bare-knuckled tactics and
close relationship with Karl Rove as evidence of a familiar
Republican approach. And the incident quickly set off a wave of
denials and denunciations from Republican officials, including the
national party chairman and Senator John McCain of Arizona, who has
hired Terry Nelson, another consultant affiliated with the spot.
Campaign finance regulations limit how much money the political
parties can spend on campaigns with which they coordinate. But they
allow parties to spend without limit if they set up committees that
operate independent of the party leadership. Advocates for stricter
campaign finance laws say the regulations, a result of court
decisions several years ago, do little more than provide a fig leaf
for the parties, insulating them from controversy like the one that
is now engulfing the advertisement in Tennessee. All independent
expenditure units are required to sign legal papers promising not to
have contact with the campaign that they are hired to advocate on
behalf of, and to receive only financial support, not strategic
advice, from the national party.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/27/us/politics/27ads.html
(requires registration)
* RNC pulls ad in Tenn. amid racism charges
http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20061027/a_eline27.art.htm
* Compounding a Political Outrage
[Commentary] Strategists from both political parties use the
"independent" route of the campaign law for launching sleaze and
disclaiming provenance. Voters across the nation are hard-pressed to
separate wheat from chaff in the whirlwind of political ads. But one
of the few keys they have in figuring out who's responsible for
something particularly egregious is the tag line required at each
commercial's close.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/27/opinion/27fri2.html
* The Year Of Playing Dirtier
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/26/AR200610...

FCC REJECTS COMPLAINT ABOUT SCHWARZENEGGER ON 'TONIGHT SHOW'
[SOURCE: Associated Press, AUTHOR: Michael Blood]
The Federal Communications Commission dismissed a complaint Thursday
that accused "The Tonight Show with Jay Leno" of playing favorites in
the race for California governor. The complaint, filed on behalf of
Democratic challenger Phil Angelides, argued that the NBC show
violated the equal time provision in federal law when Gov. Arnold
Schwarzenegger appeared as a guest on Oct. 10, less than a month
before the election. Angelides also asked to appear but was not
scheduled. Federal rules require broadcast stations to give equal
time to candidates who appear on the air. The rules do not apply to
news programs, interview shows and documentaries in which the
candidate is not the sole focus. The agency concluded that
Schwarzenegger's appearance was exempt. "Nor do we find that the
decision to invite Schwarzenegger on 'The Tonight Show with Jay Leno'
was motivated by partisan purposes," the agency said in a ruling by
Robert L. Baker, assistant chief of the policy division's media
bureau. Steven Maviglio, an Angelides campaign spokesman, accused the
Bush administration of bending the law to side with the Republican governor.
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2006/10/26/politics/p175547...
* FCC Upholds Tonight News Exemption
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6385719.html?display=Breaking...

BAND'S FILM ADS HIT SOUR NOTE
[SOURCE: Los Angeles Times, AUTHOR: Richard Verrier]
A new documentary on the backlash against the Dixie Chicks after
critical remarks the group's lead singer made about President Bush
has brought disharmony between the film's distributor and two TV
networks. On Thursday, Weinstein Co. alleged that NBC and the CW had
refused to air nationwide commercials to promote "Shut Up & Sing."
Weinstein said NBC wrote that the network "cannot accept these spots
as they are disparaging to President Bush." The CW also rejected the
ads, Weinstein said, saying in a letter that it did "not have the
appropriate programming in which to schedule this spot." Harvey
Weinstein, who runs the company with his brother, Bob, said the
networks were stifling free speech. "It's a sad commentary about the
level of fear in our society that a movie about a group of courageous
entertainers who were blacklisted for exercising their right of free
speech is now itself being blacklisted by corporate America," he said.
http://www.latimes.com/business/printedition/la-fi-dixie27oct27,1,531911...
(requires registration)

MEDIA OWNERSHIP

FOX CALLS FOR THE REMOVAL OF ALL FCC MEDIA OWNERSHIP RULES (EXCEPT
FOR THE RULE FOX LIKES)
[SOURCE: Lasar's Letter on the FCC, AUTHOR: Matthew Lasar]
Arguing that the Internet has completely changed the media landscape,
two Fox media companies have asked the FCC to eliminate its media
ownership rules "once and for all." Except for the UHF discount on
the national TV station ownership cap. Fox argues for elimination of
the local TV ownership rule and the newspaper/broadcast station
crossownership bans. "[T]he media marketplace of 2006 has become so
robustly competitive," Fox Entertainment Group and Fox Television
Holdings' October 23rd public filing concludes, "and offers so many
diverse voices on subjects too numerous to count, that the broadcast
ownership rules cannot possibly survive the scrutiny required by" law.
http://lasarletter.com/freepage.php?id=200610251

COMCAST'S EARNINGS SURGE ON SALES OF DIGITAL SERVICES
[SOURCE: Bloomberg News]
Comcast, the world's largest cable-television provider, said Thursday
that third-quarter profit soared fivefold on the purchase of Adelphia
and record sales of telephone and digital television services. The
Philadelphia-based company reported that net income jumped to $1.22
billion from $222 million a year earlier. Sales rose 22% to $6.43
billion. Comcast added more phone, digital TV and high-speed Internet
customers than analysts predicted. The company's offer of all three
services for $99 a month fueled the growth, Chief Executive Brian
Roberts said. Next quarter will be "as good or better," Roberts told
analysts Thursday. Comcast signed up 483,000 new digital voice
customers, up from 72,000 a year earlier, and 558,000 digital cable
customers, a 77% increase. About 536,000 customers bought high-speed
Internet, the most for a quarter in two years.
http://www.latimes.com/business/printedition/la-fi-comcast27oct27,1,5961...
(requires registration)
* Comcast Surges on Earnings Report
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6385003.html?display=Breaking+News

QUICKLY

FCC CHAIRMAN MARTIN AT THE 2006 ABA ADMINISTRATIVE LAW CONFERENCE
[SOURCE: Federal Communications Commission]
Speaking to lawyers at an administrative law conference, Federal
Communications Chairman Kevin Martin said the Commission must find a
way to "establish consistent regulatory frameworks to apply to" the
services it has traditionally regulated -- wireline and wireless
services, broadcasting and cable TV -- since they are now moving to
competing against eachother. "And I believe we should do so by
removing regulations wherever possible," he added. " We should remove
legacy rules from new investment and make sure that our regulations
do not favor one company's investment in technology over another's."
He then went on to discuss (1) the Supreme Court's recent Brand X
decision - and the ability of an agency's interpretation to stand in
the face of prior court decisions; (2) the legal standard for our
periodic Regulatory Review; and (3) the standard for forbearance petitions.
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268089A1.doc

SPEED MATTERS
[SOURCE: Communications Workers of America]
The Communications Workers of America has adopted "five key
principles" for improving the US's place in the high-speed Internet
economy: 1) Speed and Universality Matter for Internet Access --
High-tech innovation, job growth, telemedicine, distance learning,
rural development, public safety and e-government require truly high
speed, universal networks. 2) The U.S. "High Speed" Definition is Too
Slow -- The FCC defines "high speed" as 200 kilobits per second
(kbps) downstream. Government policies should immediately set "high
speed" definition at 2 megabits per second (mbps) downstream, 1
upstream. 3) A National "High Speed Internet for All" Policy is Critical
The U.S. must adopt policies for universal access and set deployment
timetables: 10 mbps down, 1 mbps up by 2010, with new benchmarks set
for succeeding years. 4) The U.S. Must Preserve an Open Internet --
High speed, high capacity networks will eliminate bandwidth scarcity
and will promote an open Internet. Consumers are entitled to an open
Internet allowing them to go where they want when they want. Nothing
should be done to degrade or block access to any websites. Reserving
proprietary video bandwidth is essential to finance the build-out of
high speed networks. 5) Consumer and Worker Protections Must Be
Safeguarded -- Public policies should support growth of good, career
jobs as a key to providing quality service. Government should require
public reporting of deployment, actual speed and price.
http://www.speedmatters.org/why/principles.html

SURVEY REVEALS NORTH AMERICAN HOUSEHOLDS RATE BROADBAND AS MOST
IMPORTANT WIRELINE SERVICE
[SOURCE: In-Stat press release]
According to the results of a new survey of US and Canadian consumers
that segments households by demographics, all segments rated
broadband "the communication service they can least live without,"
reports In-Stat.
http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/index.jsp?ndmViewId=news...
--------------------------------------------------------------
...and we are outta here. Have a slow news weekend -- and a great
Halloween party.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Communications-related Headlines is a free online news summary
service provided by the Benton Foundation (www.benton.org). Posted
Monday through Friday, this service provides updates on important
industry developments, policy issues, and other related news events.
While the summaries are factually accurate, their often informal tone
does not always represent the tone of the original articles.
Headlines are compiled by Kevin Taglang headlines( at )benton.org -- we
welcome your comments.
--------------------------------------------------------------

Coverage Type 

While the FCC faces pressure to do something about net neutrality, analysts say the AT&T-BellSouth merger is unlikely to be the forum where it chooses to do so. Congress debated net neutrality this year amid heavy lobbying from the telecom and tech industries but never brought legislation to a floor vote. "The FCC is not going to set policy for a whole industry based on concessions on one merger," Frost Bank analyst Le Keough said.


http://www.benton.org/index.php?q=node/3849
Coverage Type 

BUSH, REPUBLICANS TURN TO TALK SHOWS FOR HELP
[SOURCE: Reuters, AUTHOR: Andrea Hopkins]
American radio talk-show hosts have become frontline warriors in a drive by President George W. Bush and his Republicans to pull off a surprise and maintain control of Congress in November 7 elections. In the face of opinion polls favoring Democrats and bad news from Iraq, Bush turned to the powerful hosts of talk radio two weeks before Americans a new Congress. Radio personalities and programs play a political role in many countries. In America, they have become largely a powerful ally for conservatives, even as the rise of Internet blogs has broadened the spectrum of voter voices being heard. Analysts said the rise of other populist media -- most notably the Internet -- along with growing schisms among conservatives over immigration, the Iraq war, budget deficits and social policy will make it tougher this year for talk radio to help Republicans chalk up an election win.
http://today.reuters.com/News/newsArticle.aspx?type=politicsNews&storyID...



Coverage Type 

A NEW CAMPAIGN TACTIC: MANIPULATING GOOGLE DATA
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Tom Zeller Jr]
Fifty or so other Republican candidates have also been made targets in a sophisticated “Google bombing” campaign intended to game the search engine’s ranking algorithms. By flooding the Web with references to the candidates and repeatedly cross-linking to specific articles and sites on the Web, it is possible to take advantage of Google’s formula and force those articles to the top of the list of search results. The articles to be used “had to come from news sources that would be widely trusted in the given district,” said Chris Bowers, a contributor at MyDD.com (Direct Democracy), a liberal group blog. “We wanted actual news reports so it would be clear that we weren’t making anything up.” Each name is associated with one article. Those articles are embedded in hyperlinks that are now being distributed widely among the left-leaning blogosphere. In an entry at MyDD.com this week, Mr. Bowers said: “When you discuss any of these races in the future, please, use the same embedded hyperlink when reprinting the Republican’s name. Then, I suppose, we will see what happens.” An accompanying part of the project is intended to buy up Google Adwords, so that searches for the candidates’ names will bring up advertisements that point to the articles as well. But Mr. Bowers said his hopes for this were fading, because he was very busy. It is far from clear whether this particular campaign will be successful. Much depends on the extent of political discussion already tied to a particular candidate’s name.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/26/us/politics/26googlebomb.html
(requires registration)


A New Campaign Tactic: Manipulating Google Data
Coverage Type 

IN TIGHT RACE, AD ON BLACK CANDIDATE STIRS FUROR
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Robin Toner]
The Tennessee Senate race, one of the most competitive and potentially decisive battles of the midterm election, became even more unpredictable this week after a furor over a Republican television commercial that stood out even in a year of negative advertising. The commercial, financed by the Republican National Committee, was aimed at Representative Harold E. Ford Jr., the black Democrat from Memphis whose campaign for the Senate this year has kept the Republicans on the defensive in a state where they never expected to have trouble holding the seat. The spot, which was first broadcast last week and was disappearing from the air on Wednesday, featured a series of people in mock man-on-the street interviews talking sarcastically about Mr. Ford and his stands on issues including the estate tax and national security. The controversy erupted over one of the people featured: an attractive white woman, bare-shouldered, who declares that she met Mr. Ford at a “Playboy party,” and closes the commercial by looking into the camera and saying, with a wink, “Harold, call me.” Critics asserted that the advertisement was a clear effort to play to racial stereotypes and fears, essentially, playing the race card in an election where Mr. Ford is trying to break a century of history and become the first black senator from the South since Reconstruction.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/26/us/politics/26tennessee.html?ref=today...
(requires registration)
* Corker Radio Ad Has "Jungle Drums" During Mentions Of Ford
http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/blog/electioncentral/2006/oct/25/tn_s...


http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/26/us/politics/26tennessee.html?ref=todayspaper
Coverage Type 

FOES, FRIENDS OF TELECOM DEAL OFFER LAST WORDS
[SOURCE: Atlanta Journal-Constitution, AUTHOR: Scott Leith]
Opponents of the AT&T-BellSouth deal took their last, best shots this week, submitting comments to regulators that at times blistered the huge telecommunications merger. AT&T and BellSouth, meanwhile, cited more reasons the Federal Communications Commission should approve the deal, including support from some Democratic members of Congress and even the Rev. Jesse Jackson. The ongoing debate is part of the give-and-take as the FCC continues to evaluate the AT&T-BellSouth deal. AT&T's purchase of BellSouth can't be closed without FCC approval, and a vote is currently set -- though it could be changed -- for Nov. 3. Already, the FCC has delayed its vote twice and reopened the public comment period. Republican FCC Chairman Kevin Martin probably will need to round up bipartisan support. Though Martin wants to approve the sale without conditions, he faces a 2-2 tie if he can't get at least one Democrat on board. With the issue still up in the air, groups on both sides are lobbying furiously. A look at the latest filings with the FCC, some of which arrived Tuesday night, shows a broad array of worries over the deal, countered by calming words from AT&T.
http://www.ajc.com/services/content/business/stories/2006/10/25/1026bizb...


Foes, Friends of Telecom Deal Offer last Words
Coverage Type 

FCC LIKELY TO AVOID 'NET NEUTRALITY' DEBATE IN AT&T-BELLSOUTH MERGER DECISION
[SOURCE: San Antonio Express-News, AUTHOR: Sanford Nowlin]
As the Federal Communications Commission mulls conditions on AT&T's $83 billion merger with BellSouth, the Commission faces pressure to turn the process into a fight over network neutrality, the concept that Internet service providers like AT&T should treat all traffic the same. It's pressure, experts add, that the FCC is likely to resist. Analysts said they would be surprised if the FCC deviates too far from the conditions AT&T has already offered up -- especially into territory as controversial as net neutrality. So far, the Justice Department and 18 states have approved the transaction, making the FCC its last regulatory hurdle to clear. "I think pretty much what AT&T proposed will be accepted," said Patrick Comack, telecom analyst for Zachary Investment Research in Miami. "The Democrats on the FCC want to show they won something for consumers, but they aren't going to end up pushing AT&T around too much, especially on net neutrality." While the FCC faces pressure to do something about net neutrality, analysts say the AT&T-BellSouth merger is unlikely to be the forum where it chooses to do so. Congress debated net neutrality this year amid heavy lobbying from the telecom and tech industries but never brought legislation to a floor vote. "The FCC is not going to set policy for a whole industry based on concessions on one merger," Frost Bank analyst Le Keough said.
http://www.mysanantonio.com/business/stories/MYSA102606.01E.BIZfcc.vote....


FCC likely to Avoid 'Net Neutrality' debate in AT&T-BellSouth Merger Decision
Coverage Type 

TIME FOR MERGER, NOT DEBATE, SAYS AT&T
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
AT&T says that its merger with BellSouth is not the proper venue for an extended policy debate on network neutrality. AT&T Executive VP External and Legislative Relations Jim Cicconi said Wednesday, "The proper place to be debating the pros and cons of net neutrality is in the U.S. Congress or in an industry-wide proceeding at the FCC. It is not appropriate or justified to set policy in this area based on applying merger conditions on only one company."
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6384513.html?title=Article&sp...


http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6384513.html?title=Article&spacedesc=…
Coverage Type 

SOUTHERN HOUSE DEMOCRATS URGE FCC TO OK AT&T-BELLSOUTH MERGER
[SOURCE: MarketWatch, AUTHOR: Siobhan Hughes]
House Democrats from the nine-state region into which AT&T plans to expand through its $81.7 billion purchase of BellSouth are urging the Federal Communications Commission to approve the transaction when it meets next week. In a letter to the FCC, the lawmakers asked the Commission to move "expeditiously." AT&T has offered concessions, including offering to provide high-speed Internet service to all residences within its expanded service area by the end of 2007, free modems and $10-a-month broadband service to new customers in BellSouth's southeastern region. Consumer advocates have called the concessions "short-term candy" and have warned that consumers ultimately will wind up paying higher prices if the merger is approved. The House Democrats view AT&T's concessions as "significant new benefits." In the letter, the lawmakers wrote that "most importantly, AT&T-BellSouth has made a commitment to deploy high-speed Internet service to rural areas and lower-income living units. It is time we bridge the digital divide in these communities, and these consumer-focused offerings would go a long way to that end." The letter was signed by Reps. Robert "Bud" Cramer, D-Ala.; Artur Davis, D-Ala.; F. Allen Boyd Jr., D-Fla.; Alcee Hastings, D-Fla.; Kendrick Meek, D-Fla.; Robert Wexler, D-Fla.; Sanford Bishop, D-Ga.; David Scott, D-Ga., Ben Chandler, D-Ky.; Bart Gordon, D-Tenn.; Brad Miller, D-N.C.; and Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla.
http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?guid=%7B6F326F85%2D90EE...


http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?guid=%7B6F326F85-90EE-4CC3-B8AE…