Benton RSS Feed

Coverage Type 

AT&T/BELLSOUTH MERGER FACES ONEROUS CONDITIONS
[SOURCE: Financial Times, AUTHOR: Stephanie Kirchgaessner]
AT&T’s $68bn takeover of BellSouth will face a tough political climate in Washington in 2007 when Democrats take control of the Congress, virtually ensuring that the former Ma Bell will have to agree to harsher conditions. The possibility that the telecoms mega-merger would be approved by the Federal Communications Commission before the end of this year appeared to disintegrate on Monday after Robert McDowell, a Republican commissioner at the FCC, said he would abstain from deadlocked negotiations over the transaction at the regulatory agency. The decision marks the beginning of what is likely to be a difficult period for Kevin Martin, FCC chairman and a savvy political operator who has, until now, faced few serious hurdles on his agenda. Among other issues, Mr Martin will probably be forced to defend the FCC’s future decision on the AT&T deal and separate deliberations on media ownership limits before Democratic lawmakers next year. With Commissioner McDowell out of the game, AT&T will be forced to succumb to at least some of the demands of the FCC’s two Democratic commissioners, who are expected to have the backing of the new Democratic majority in the Congress on issues ranging from net neutrality to “special access” price freezes, covering competitors’ access to its network.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/cff8bf82-8f8d-11db-9ba3-0000779e2340.html
(requires subscription)

BARTON WANTS FCC TO MOVE FORWARD WITH AT&T/BELLSOUTH MERGER
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
Outgoing House Commerce Committee Chairman Joe Barton (R-TX) wants the FCC to get on with approving the AT&T/Bell South merger -- and without any general conditions. In a statement he said he was confident Commissioner Robert McDowell's decision would have been fair, and now that he had decided not to vote on the merger the four commissioners need to put the pedal to the metal. He says the merger will create video and broadband competition and urged the commission to "bring its review to a close rather than delay these consumer benefits."
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6401511.html?display=Breaking...


AT&T/BellSouth Merger Faces Onerous Conditions
Coverage Type 

A DOSE OF REALITY TV FOR CONGRESS
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Editorial Staff]
[Commentary] If Democratic leaders truly want to put some nip into the new Congress, they should finally free up television coverage of floor debates so citizens can see the unvarnished state of the people’s forum. Current TV restrictions allow only static head-on shots of whoever has the floor, lending chamber proceedings all the excitement of a postage stamp. The speaker’s office has been wary of allowing free-ranging cameras since coverage was permitted 28 years ago. Visitors to the chamber galleries can plainly see scenes denied to TV watchers -- sideline wheeling and dealing; the representative more interested in the newspaper than the debate; the senator nodding off, understandably perhaps; and the near-empty chamber surrounding the orator speaking for the stationary camera. That’s the reality of politics. Americans should be allowed to see it on TV.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/20/opinion/20wed4.html
(requires registration)

* Eyes on Congress
[Commentary] "Politicians should not be editing coverage of themselves. C-SPAN has proved itself to be an indefatigable and impeccably nonpartisan documentarian of our democracy in Washington. Its cameras and technicians should be doing this job."
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2006/1...



Coverage Type 

EFFORT TO LIMIT COMMERCIALS MAY BE REVIVED
[SOURCE: San Francisco Chronicle, AUTHOR: George Raine]
An alarming growth in the rate of overweight children and the political sea change in Congress make it likely that lawmakers will consider restricting the marketing of food to kids. With a briefcase full of warnings about the mushrooming childhood obesity rate, Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) will become the chairman of the Senate Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee next month. He is expected to use the position to argue, as he did in a 2004 speech, that "the marketing of junk food, especially to kids, is out of control.'' Sen Harkin introduced a bill that year that would have restored the authority of the Federal Trade Commission to regulate the marketing of foods and beverages to children younger than 18. To do so, the FTC would have to find evidence that consumption of certain foods is detrimental to the health of children. The bill stalled in committee.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/12/20/KIDSADS.TMP


http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/12/20/KIDSADS.TMP
Coverage Type 

YOUTUBE JOURNALISM
[SOURCE: Los Angeles Times, AUTHOR: Moisés Naím, Foreign Policy Magazine]
[Commentary] Welcome to the "YouTube effect." It is the phenomenon whereby video clips, often produced by individuals acting on their own, are rapidly disseminated worldwide on websites such as YouTube and Google Video. YouTube has 34 million monthly visitors, and 65,000 new videos are posted every day. Most are frivolous, produced by and for the teenagers who make up the majority of the site's visitors. But some are serious. YouTube includes videos posted by terrorists, human rights groups and U.S. soldiers in Iraq. Some are clips of incidents that have political consequences or document important trends, such as global warming, illegal immigration and corruption. Some videos reveal truths. Others spread propaganda and outright lies. YouTube is a mixed blessing: It is now harder to know what to believe. The good news is that the YouTube effect is already creating a strong demand for reliable guides — individuals, institutions and technologies — that we can trust to help us sort facts from lies online. The millions of bloggers who are constantly watching, fact-checking and exposing mistakes are a powerful example of "the wisdom of crowds" being assisted by a technology that is as open and omnipresent as we are.
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-oe-naim20dec20,1,21...
(requires registration)


YouTube journalism

Benton's Communications-related Headlines For Wednesday December 20, 2006

The last working men and woman in Washington, the=20
fab five FCC commissioners, are meeting today to=20
make decisions on, most notably, cable=20
competition. Since there's only reruns on TV this=20
week, check out the meeting live at=20
http://www.fcc.gov/realaudio/ Starts at 9:30am (eastern).

TELECOM/CABLE
Phone Firms Await FCC on Cable Ruling
McSlarrow: Martin a Micromanager
AT&T/BellSouth Merger Faces Onerous Conditions
Barton Wants FCC to Move Forward with AT&T/Bell South Merger
Michigan Broadcasters Praise Franchise Reform

QUICKLY -- A Dose of Reality TV for Congress;=20
Effort to limit commercials may be revived; YouTube journalism

TELECOM/CABLE

PHONE FIRMS AWAIT FCC ON CABLE RULING
[SOURCE: Washington Post, AUTHOR: Alan Sipress]
Telephone companies could get a major boost today=20
in their efforts to penetrate the cable=20
television market when the Federal Communications=20
Commission considers a measure that would give=20
state and local officials less latitude in=20
awarding cable franchises. FCC Chairman Kevin J.=20
Martin, a leading advocate of the rule, has=20
argued that government officials often stymie=20
competition by delaying decisions on awarding=20
cable franchises to telephone companies and by=20
imposing exorbitant fees and conditions. As a=20
result, cable operators often have been able to=20
maintain a virtual monopoly on television=20
services, resulting in steadily increasing prices=20
for consumers, according to Martin. Though the=20
draft proposal will not be made public until=20
today, it has already drawn sharp criticism from=20
cable companies -- which argue that it would=20
unfairly penalize them -- and local and state=20
officials, who balk at efforts to curtail their=20
authority in awarding franchises.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/19/AR200612...
1429.html
(requires registration)
* FCC vote could speed up telco TV
http://news.com.com/FCC+vote+could+speed+up+telco+TV/2100-1037_3-6144945...
ml?tag=3Dnefd.lede

MCSLARROW: MARTIN A MICROMANAGER
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: Ted Hearn]
Federal Communications Commission Chairman Kevin=20
Martin supports a regulatory agenda for the cable=20
industry that's at odds with his otherwise=20
free-market outlook for telecommunications,=20
National Cable & Telecommunications Association=20
President Kyle McSlarrow said Tuesday. =93What I=20
see, when you put all of those dots together, is=20
an agenda that really represents one of the most=20
sweeping regulatory examples of government=20
micromanagement. I have to say I am puzzled by=20
that,=94 McSlarrow said in a year-end conference=20
call with journalists. The =93dots,=94 as McSlarrow=20
called them, referred to Chairman Martin=92s=20
support for the a la carte sale of cable=20
channels; mandatory carriage of TV stations=92=20
digital-multicast services; public access to=20
cable-programming contracts; and=20
phone-company-friendly terms on entering cable=20
markets. =93As I survey that last couple of years,=20
I just think there is a disconnect when I think=20
about the FCC and the agenda -- the disconnect=20
between the rhetoric of free markets and=20
deregulation and the reality of the types of=20
proposals that are being proffered by the=20
leadership of the commission,=94 McSlarrow said.=20
Asked why Martin has problems with cable,=20
McSlarrow replied: =93You'd have to ask him. All I=20
can say is that I just think there is a=20
fundamental misunderstanding of what actually our=20
industry is doing. It=92s almost like they are moving through a time warp.=
=94
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6401350.html?display=3DBreaking+News
* McSlarrow: FCC Stuck in a Time Warp
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6401206?display=3DBreaking+News
* NCTA's McSlarrow Blasts FCC on Cable Issues
http://www.tvweek.com/news.cms?newsId=3D11253

AT&T/BELLSOUTH MERGER FACES ONEROUS CONDITIONS
[SOURCE: Financial Times, AUTHOR: Stephanie Kirchgaessner]
AT&T=92s $68bn takeover of BellSouth will face a=20
tough political climate in Washington in 2007=20
when Democrats take control of the Congress,=20
virtually ensuring that the former Ma Bell will=20
have to agree to harsher conditions. The=20
possibility that the telecoms mega-merger would=20
be approved by the Federal Communications=20
Commission before the end of this year appeared=20
to disintegrate on Monday after Robert McDowell,=20
a Republican commissioner at the FCC, said he=20
would abstain from deadlocked negotiations over=20
the transaction at the regulatory agency. The=20
decision marks the beginning of what is likely to=20
be a difficult period for Kevin Martin, FCC=20
chairman and a savvy political operator who has,=20
until now, faced few serious hurdles on his=20
agenda. Among other issues, Mr Martin will=20
probably be forced to defend the FCC=92s future=20
decision on the AT&T deal and separate=20
deliberations on media ownership limits before=20
Democratic lawmakers next year. With Commissioner=20
McDowell out of the game, AT&T will be forced to=20
succumb to at least some of the demands of the=20
FCC=92s two Democratic commissioners, who are=20
expected to have the backing of the new=20
Democratic majority in the Congress on issues=20
ranging from net neutrality to =93special access=94=20
price freezes, covering competitors=92 access to its network.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/cff8bf82-8f8d-11db-9ba3-0000779e2340.html
(requires subscription)

BARTON WANTS FCC TO MOVE FORWARD WITH AT&T/BELLSOUTH MERGER
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
Outgoing House Commerce Committee Chairman Joe=20
Barton (R-TX) wants the FCC to get on with=20
approving the AT&T/Bell South merger--and without=20
any general conditions. In a statement he said he=20
was confident Commissioner Robert McDowell's=20
decision would have been fair, and now that he=20
had decided not to vote on the merger the four=20
commissioners need to put the pedal to the metal.=20
He says the merger will create video and=20
broadband competition and urged the commission to=20
"bring its review to a close rather than delay these consumer benefits."
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6401511.html?display=3DBreaki...
News

MICHIGAN BROADCASTERS PRAISE FRANCHISE REFORM
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
The Michigan Association of Broadcasters is=20
calling the Michigan video franchising bill that=20
passed Dec. 12 a big victory, particularly given=20
a provision that prevents their signal from being=20
converted to lower resolution. MAB has been=20
supporting the bill, which helps telcos get into=20
the video and broadband business by standardizing=20
the franchise process, saying it creates another=20
outlet for its TV station signals. But it is=20
particularly pleased with a provision that=20
prevents new franchisees from downgrading a=20
broadcast signal. MAB says it is the first such=20
protection of the broadcast signal in a state franchise reform bill.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6401462.html?display=3DBreaki...
News

QUICKLY

A DOSE OF REALITY TV FOR CONGRESS
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Editorial Staff]
[Commentary] If Democratic leaders truly want to=20
put some nip into the new Congress, they should=20
finally free up television coverage of floor=20
debates so citizens can see the unvarnished state=20
of the people=92s forum. Current TV restrictions=20
allow only static head-on shots of whoever has=20
the floor, lending chamber proceedings all the=20
excitement of a postage stamp. The speaker=92s=20
office has been wary of allowing free-ranging=20
cameras since coverage was permitted 28 years=20
ago. Visitors to the chamber galleries can=20
plainly see scenes denied to TV watchers --=20
sideline wheeling and dealing; the representative=20
more interested in the newspaper than the debate;=20
the senator nodding off, understandably perhaps;=20
and the near-empty chamber surrounding the orator=20
speaking for the stationary camera. That=92s the=20
reality of politics. Americans should be allowed to see it on TV.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/20/opinion/20wed4.html
(requires registration)
* Eyes on Congress
[Commentary] "Politicians should not be editing=20
coverage of themselves. C-SPAN has proved itself=20
to be an indefatigable and impeccably nonpartisan=20
documentarian of our democracy in Washington. Its=20
cameras and technicians should be doing this job."
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=3D/chronicle/archive/2006...
/19/EDGOULJ65M1.DTL

EFFORT TO LIMIT COMMERCIALS MAY BE REVIVED
[SOURCE: San Francisco Chronicle, AUTHOR: George Raine]
An alarming growth in the rate of overweight=20
children and the political sea change in Congress=20
make it likely that lawmakers will consider=20
restricting the marketing of food to kids. With a=20
briefcase full of warnings about the mushrooming=20
childhood obesity rate, Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa)=20
will become the chairman of the Senate=20
Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee=20
next month. He is expected to use the position to=20
argue, as he did in a 2004 speech, that "the=20
marketing of junk food, especially to kids, is=20
out of control.'' Sen Harkin introduced a bill=20
that year that would have restored the authority=20
of the Federal Trade Commission to regulate the=20
marketing of foods and beverages to children=20
younger than 18. To do so, the FTC would have to=20
find evidence that consumption of certain foods=20
is detrimental to the health of children. The bill stalled in committee.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=3D/c/a/2006/12/20/KIDSADS.TMP

YOUTUBE JOURNALISM
[SOURCE: Los Angeles Times, AUTHOR: Mois=E9s Na=EDm, Foreign Policy Magazi=
ne]
[Commentary] Welcome to the "YouTube effect." It=20
is the phenomenon whereby video clips, often=20
produced by individuals acting on their own, are=20
rapidly disseminated worldwide on websites such=20
as YouTube and Google Video. YouTube has 34=20
million monthly visitors, and 65,000 new videos=20
are posted every day. Most are frivolous,=20
produced by and for the teenagers who make up the=20
majority of the site's visitors. But some are=20
serious. YouTube includes videos posted by=20
terrorists, human rights groups and U.S. soldiers=20
in Iraq. Some are clips of incidents that have=20
political consequences or document important=20
trends, such as global warming, illegal=20
immigration and corruption. Some videos reveal=20
truths. Others spread propaganda and outright=20
lies. YouTube is a mixed blessing: It is now=20
harder to know what to believe. The good news is=20
that the YouTube effect is already creating a=20
strong demand for reliable guides =97 individuals,=20
institutions and technologies =97 that we can trust=20
to help us sort facts from lies online. The=20
millions of bloggers who are constantly watching,=20
fact-checking and exposing mistakes are a=20
powerful example of "the wisdom of crowds" being=20
assisted by a technology that is as open and omnipresent as we are.
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-oe-naim20dec20,1,21...
15.story?coll=3Dla-news-a_section
(requires registration)
--------------------------------------------------------------
Communications-related Headlines is a free online=20
news summary service provided by the Benton=20
Foundation (www.benton.org). Posted Monday=20
through Friday, this service provides updates on=20
important industry developments, policy issues,=20
and other related news events. While the=20
summaries are factually accurate, their often=20
informal tone does not always represent the tone=20
of the original articles. Headlines are compiled=20
by Kevin Taglang headlines( at )benton.org -- we welcome your comments.
--------------------------------------------------------------

Coverage Type 

"I find that I have no choice but to abide by the terms of my Ethics Agreement, heed the independent advice of OGE and my personal ethics counsel, and, ultimately to follow my own personal sense of ethics. Accordingly, I disqualify myself from this matter."
-- FCC Commissioner Robert McDowell on his participation in the
AT&T-BellSouth merger

"FCC Commissioner McDowell has courageously elevated professional responsibility over expedience."
-- Media Access Project

"This is too important a transaction to be clouded by the ethical questions that would have come up had the Commissioner taken part in the proceeding."
-- Public Knowledge


http://www.benton.org/index.php?q=node/4304
Coverage Type 

SEN SUNUNU TO UNDERTAKE SEN ALLEN'S TECH AGENDA
[SOURCE: Technology Daily 12/12, AUTHOR: David Hatch]
Sen. John Sununu (R-NH) will inherit the main technology priorities of departing Sen George Allen (R-VA) in an attempt to keep the Virginian's legislative legacy alive. Sen Sununu will carry the Republican torch on three Allen priorities: 1) banning Internet taxes, 2) fostering wireless, high-speed Internet services and 3) restricting spyware. With Democrats taking control of the Senate, the bills with the best chance of passage will probably come from people with "Ds" following their names, but Sen Sununu could be a key co-sponsor. A Republican aide said the New Hampshire lawmaker wants to downsize and streamline the FCC and has reached out to like-minded members on that front.
http://www.njtelecomupdate.com/lenya/telco/live/tb-SAQC1166466007945.html


Sen. Sununu To Undertake Sen. Allen's Tech Agenda
Coverage Type 

LIFE IN THE SLOW LANE: A GUIDE TO THE UN-NEUTRAL NET
[SOURCE: Center for Digital Democracy]
[Commentary] After more than a year of debate in Washington, the fate of Network Neutrality --and with it the future of the Internet -- remains unresolved. A strong tide of public opposition to new telecommunications legislation in both the House (H.R. 5252) and Senate (S. 2686), led by Save the Internet.com and other advocacy groups, forestalled what would have been a major victory for a relative handful of cable operators and telephone companies. Had Congress completed its rewrite of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, broadband network operators would have been free to institute new "tiered" or "differentiated" levels of service, based on discriminatory, fee-based traffic-management schemes. The matter will now be taken up anew in 2007 in the 110th (and now Democratic-majority) Congress. At stake is nothing less than the future of the Internet. In particular, Congress's handling of the network neutrality issue will determine whether network operators will have the ability to discriminate in their carriage of the data that comprise a major part of society's "central nervous system"--the news and information, emails and websites, that have become a part of everyday life. Instead of the common-carriage, all-data-are-created-equal tradition of the Internet, the new, Un-Neutral Net will allow operators to favor their own content and that of their affiliates, while relegating competitive and unaffiliated content to the slow lanes of the Internet. Network neutrality, it is clear, is more than an idle concern. It is not, as the network owners and their well-paid consultants suggest, a "solution in search of a problem." Rather, the principle of network neutrality represents our last, best hope of preserving a vital noncommercial, civic core in an online environment that grows more commercialized every day. As we have noted elsewhere, the possibilities for democratic discourse, for educational advancement, and for cultural expression will be greatly reduced in a delivery system that favors big business over small, e-commerce over e-democracy, and public relations over public service. Free of such market-based controls, on the other hand, the new broadband networks could bring a vast array of new programming to the home, at once extending the reach of the high-speed Internet (which currently reaches less than half of the nation's households) and enhancing its content (much of which is currently constrained by the bandwidth limitations of inferior broadband service). But for the full potential of the broadband era to be realized, we will need to have a strong policy of network neutrality in place.
http://www.democraticmedia.org/issues/UNN.html


Life in the Slow Lane: A Guide to the Un-Neutral Net
Coverage Type 

YOU -- PERSON OF THIS YEAR, BUT NEXT YEAR'S TOAST?
[SOURCE: The Huffington Post, AUTHOR: Jonathan Rintels, Center for Creative Voices]
[Commentary] Alas, the incredible euphoria of Time Magazine picking You and Me as their Person(s) of the Year for 2006 can't last forever. No more all night parties. No more dancing in the virtual streets. Time to sober up and realize how all this wonderful - and less wonderful - user created content celebrated by Time almost didn't happen; how fragile our ability to post our content on the Internet really is; and, how the telephone and cable companies that monopolize broadband Internet access want 2007 to be the year not of Us, but of Them. The entire phenomenon of a huge audience reaching home brewed content created by Us relies upon consumers having the right - and opportunity -- to choose what websites they visit. Today, we have that, and it's called "Net Neutrality." But the handful of telephone and cable companies that control the market for broadband Internet access - over 98 percent market share for cable and DSL! -- have spent hundreds of millions of dollars this year to persuade Congress and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that they should be able to control what content streams over their "pipes" and what websites their captive customers can visit. The companies' plan is to force content producers to pay extra fees and tolls for so-called "priority" service, while relegating those who don't pay to the Digital Dirt Road. Who will pay those fees and tolls? Those who can afford to - the already fat, established, and constipated Big Media and Old Media -- at the expense of the creative, hustling, innovative, and entrepreneurial. Had this Pay to Play on the Net System been permitted a few years ago, Google would still be in a garage. Rocketboom would be Rocketbust. YouTube? Try TheirTube.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jonathan-rintels/you-person-of-this-year_b...


YOU - Person of This Year, But Next Year's Toast?
Coverage Type 

IMBALANCE IN NET SPEEDS IMPEDED SHARING
[SOURCE: Associated Press, AUTHOR: Anick Jesdanun]
The information superhighway isn't truly equal in both directions. Cable and phone companies typically sell asymmetrical Internet services to households, reserving the bulk of the lanes for downloading movies and other files and leaving the shoulders at most for people to share, or upload, files with others. The imbalance makes less sense as the Internet becomes truly interactive. Users are increasingly becoming contributors and not just consumers, sharing photos, video and podcasts. It's a little-known fact because advertisements for cable and DSL services generally focus on download speeds. Internet content providers are stuck unless they shell out hundreds of dollars a month for business-grade services that provide equal speeds upstream and downstream. Cable and phone providers insist they are keeping up with demand, in many cases increasing both upload and download speeds, but they say they haven't had a huge clamoring for symmetry.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/Y/YE_INTERNET_IMBALANCE?SITE=TXPLA&...


http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/Y/YE_INTERNET_IMBALANCE?SITE=TXPLA&SECTION=…