Benton RSS Feed
LAYOFFS AT PAPER PROMPT UPROAR OVER DIVERSITY
[SOURCE: New York Times 1/15, AUTHOR: Maria Aspan]
The recent layoffs at the embattled Philadelphia Inquirer have resulted in a round of finger-pointing over their disproportionate impact on diversity in the newsroom. On Jan. 3, the Inquirer began laying off 71 newsroom employees, or 17 percent of its staff, based on seniority guidelines in the newspaper union’s contract. According to the Newspaper Guild of Greater Philadelphia, 17 of the 71 journalists laid off, or about 24 percent, are minorities. In a Jan. 3 letter to Brian P. Tierney, the publisher of The Inquirer and The Daily News, the National Association of Black Journalists protested the sharp decline in newsroom diversity. Mr. Tierney and union leaders expressed dismay at the impact on newsroom diversity -- and promptly blamed each other.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/15/business/media/15philly.html
(requires registration)
Layoffs at Paper Prompt Uproar Over Diversity
CHANDLERS MAY BID FOR TRIBUNE AS LAST RESORT
[SOURCE: Los Angeles Times, AUTHOR: James Rainey and Thomas S. Mulligan]
Tribune probably will attract few, if any, bids for the entire company by Wednesday's deadline, and any offers it does receive are expected to be close to the current share price. Some following the Tribune saga said they expected at least a few bids for the media giant -- perhaps including one from the Chandlers themselves. A successful Chandler bid would put the family back in control of The Times after a 118-year reign that ended in 2000 when the paper and other holdings were sold to Tribune. Those following the deal closely believe that the family would make such a bid as a fallback. Despite myriad potential pitfalls, they said the most consistent interest in a deal has been expressed by a group composed of three private equity firms -- Madison Dearborn Partners of Chicago, Apollo Management of New York and Providence Equity Partners of Rhode Island. The consortium has long been viewed as a contender for Tribune because of Madison Dearborn's Chicago roots and its reported interest in hometown assets such as the Cubs and WGN-TV. Former Tribune Chief Executive John W. Madigan was a Madison Dearborn partner until he took a leave of absence in the fall and later resigned. Tribune's control of the Cubs could be viewed as particularly attractive to Madison Dearborn CEO John Canning, a onetime college catcher and avid baseball man who has said he would like to own a major league team. Canning already owns several minor league clubs and has a minority interest in Major League Baseball's Milwaukee Brewers. (So, yeah, Cubs fans... the upside may be that our team is run as well as the brewers soon.)
http://www.latimes.com/business/printedition/la-fi-tribune15jan15,1,1692...
(requires registration)
See also --
* Odd Couple Ponder Bid for Tribune
Will there be a bid for Tribune from Eli Broad, the straight-talking billionaire whose art collection and philanthropic efforts to revitalize downtown Los Angeles have put him happily in the public eye, and Ronald W. Burkle, the supermarket mogul, Democratic fund-raiser and F.O.B. (friend of Bill Clinton) who tries -- usually unsuccessfully -- to avoid publicity?
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/16/business/media/16tribune.html
* Newspaper Ownership Is Turning The Page
[SOURCE: Washington Post, AUTHOR: Frank Ahrens]
A look at parallels between possible Trib sale and that of the orange County Register.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/15/AR200701...
(requires registration)
Chandlers may bid for Tribune as last resort
AMAZON.COM MEETS WITH FCC ON NET NEUTRALITY
[SOURCE: Lasar's Letter on the FCC, AUTHOR: Matthew Lasar]
Amazon.com's Vice President for Global Public Policy Paul Misener started the work year off with a meeting with Federal Communications Commission Chair Kevin Martin on net neutrality. Misener met with Chairman Martin and his assistant Michelle Carey on Thursday the 11th. At the gathering the VP reiterated "Amazon.com’s continuing concern that network operators may impair and constrain American consumers’ access to lawful online services and information that otherwise would be available," according to the company's public filing. Misener urged continued FCC oversight on the issue "with respect to the network neutrality policy statement adopted by the Commission August 2, 2005." The latest Amazon.com visit may signify a wait-and-see attitude since the FCC approved the AT&T/BellSouth merger on December 29th, 2006. In exchange for the go-ahead, AT&T promised to "maintain a neutral network and neutral routing in its wireline broadband Internet access service." But several parties involved in the merger debate continue to file with the FCC, urging the Commission to exercise vigilance in holding AT&T to its promises on net neutrality and other commitments.
http://www.lasarletter.net/drupal/node/282
Amazon.com meets with FCC on network neutrality
DOCUMENTS BORNE BY WINDS OF FREE SPEECH
[SOURCE: New York Times 1/15, AUTHOR: Tom Zeller]
A showdown is scheduled for a federal courtroom in Brooklyn rthis week, where words like “First Amendment†and “freedom of speech†and “prior restraint†are likely to mix seamlessly with references to “BitTorrent†and “Wiki.†It is a messy plot that pits Eli Lilly, the pharmaceutical giant at the center of several articles in The New York Times suggesting that the company tried to hide or play down the health risks of its leading antipsychotic drug, Zyprexa, and lawyers representing various individuals, organizations and Web sites -- all arguing that their online speech has been gagged. The case has attracted the attention of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the venerable digital rights group based in San Francisco, and one of its lawyers, Fred von Lohmann, who is now representing an anonymous Internet user caught up in the legal fracas. “One of the core missions of the foundation’s 16-year history has been to establish that when you go online, you take with you all the same civil rights with you had with you in prior media,†said Mr. von Lohmann. “But of course, you need to fight for that principle.â€
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/15/technology/15link.html
(requires registration)
Documents Borne by Winds of Free Speech
BLOGGERS TAKE ON TALK RADIO HOSTS
[SOURCE: New York Times 1/15, AUTHOR: Noam Cohen]
A San Francisco talk radio station pre-empted three hours of programming on Friday in response to a campaign by bloggers who have recorded extreme comments by several hosts and passed on digital copies to advertisers. The lead blogger, who uses the name Spocko, said that he and other bloggers had contacted more than 30 advertisers on KSFO-AM to inform them of comments made on the air and to ask them to pull their ads. The comments were also posted on Spocko’s Web site, spockosbrain.com. In response, ABC Radio Networks, which owns KSFO and which in turn is owned by the Walt Disney Company, sent letters to the site’s service provider, demanding the clips be taken down from its servers. The provider complied, raising the issue of what constitutes fair use of copyrighted material by a critic.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/15/technology/15radio.html
(requires registration)
Bloggers Take on Talk Radio Hosts
SOMALIA'S TRANSITIONAL GOVERNMENT SHUTS DOWN 3 RADIO STATIONS
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Jeffery Gettleman]
Somalia’s transitional government shut three of the country’s biggest radio stations on Monday, accusing them of broadcasting incendiary propaganda. Executives of the radio stations, however, said that was no excuse to force them off the air. “All we have done is voice different opinions,†said Mohammed Amiin, deputy chairman of Shabelle Media Network. “We never expected this to happen.†Abdirahman Dinari, spokesman for the transitional government, accused Shabelle, along with the other stations, of making false reports to stir up the people against the government. “They said our soldiers were looting the markets and harassing people, which was totally untrue,†he said. “They are using the media to undermine the government. They have been doing this for months.†Security officials have summoned station owners to a meeting on Tuesday, and Mr. Dinari said there was a possibility that the stations would soon be back on the air, after they were given a warning.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/16/world/africa/16somalia.html
(requires registration)
Somalia’s Transitional Government Shuts 3 Radio Stations
AT&T TO OFFER $20 'NAKED' DSL SERVICE
[SOURCE: USAToday 1/12, AUTHOR: Leslie Cauley]
Cheaper high-speed Internet service is coming. Within a few months, AT&T is expected to start charging $19.95 a month for "naked" DSL, meaning you don't have to buy any other AT&T service, including phone, to get that rate. It currently charges $45 for a stand-alone broadband subscription. AT&T also is developing $10 DSL for new subscribers who also buy AT&T-branded phone service. AT&T plans to offer both services for at least 30 months. The clock starts as soon as the media giant starts selling them in any of the 22 states where it is the incumbent local phone company, including California, Florida, Illinois and Texas. Why so cheap? Three words: Federal Communications Commission. The FCC, which has broad regulatory control over the U.S. telecommunications industry, recently approved AT&T's acquisition of BellSouth. To get needed votes from the FCC's two Democratic members, AT&T agreed, reluctantly, to offer these DSL bargains. AT&T is required to roll out the $19.95 offer within one year and the $10 rate within six months. Gene Kimmelman, public policy director of Consumers Union, says he expects AT&T to move faster. Under the terms of the FCC agreement, AT&T is required to offer naked DSL for $19.95 in markets that are at least 80% upgraded for broadband. That describes many of AT&T's biggest markets, says Kimmelman, who helped negotiate the settlement. Under the deal, AT&T's cheap DSL products will clock in at 768 kilobits per second. While that's slower than the 1.5 to 3 megabits popular with many U.S. consumers, "it's more than good enough" for Internet telephony, Kimmelman says. As such, he thinks the twin offers could help spur sales of Internet telephony across the USA. "This opens the door for consumers" to pick other local and long-distance providers," Kimmelman says.
http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/technology/2007-01-15-naked-dsl...
AT&T to offer $20 'naked' DSL service
CELL PHONE SUBSIDIES ENRICH TELECOMS
[SOURCE: Associated Press, AUTHOR: Bob Porterfield]
Cellular subscribers are paying hundreds of millions of dollars each year to subsidize landline telephone service, enriching big telecommunications companies while providing little or no benefit to cell phone users. The subsidies are intended to reimburse the companies for providing traditional phone service in rough terrain and rural areas where stringing lines can be costly. But rampant development has transformed some of these backwaters into booming subdivisions, with no real adjustment to the distribution formula; others, like the oceanfront celebrity playground of Malibu, are receiving subsidies simply because of their difficult topography. Outdated formulas for tabulating the surcharges - coupled with feeble government oversight - have meant a windfall for phone companies, which are fighting to preserve them.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/C/CELLULAR_SURCHARGES?SITE=RIWOO&SE...
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/C/CELLULAR_SURCHARGES?SITE=RIWOO&SECTION=HO…
ENJOYING TECHNOLOGY'S CONVENIENCES BUT NOT ESCAPING ITS WATCHFUL EYES
[SOURCE: Washington Post, AUTHOR: Ellen Nakashima]
Many Americans use modern gadgets to make life easier and along the way create a data trail that others can access and preserve, sometimes permanently. Every Internet search resides on a computer somewhere. Comings and goings are monitored by security cameras. Phone calls are logged by telecommunications companies. This explosion in data collection has been embraced by many Americans as a trade-off for convenience and discounts. But it also has raised questions about personal privacy at a time when the government is increasingly tapping into these reservoirs of telling details to fight crime and terrorism. The new Congress has begun to examine the uses and abuses of data gathering for security and commerce. A look at one person's activity one recent day helps to illustrate what they're likely to find: that ordinary Americans leave a trail of digital data that is being gathered, stored and analyzed, and that these people seldom realize it.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/15/AR200701...
(requires registration)
* E-mail
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/15/AR200701...
* Cellphones
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/15/AR200701...
* GPS Tracking
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/15/AR200701...
* Security Cameras
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/15/AR200701...
* The Legal Tangles Of Data Collection
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/15/AR200701...
HOW TO BURY A SECRET: TURN IT INTO PAPERWORK
[SOURCE: Washington Post, AUTHOR: Lynne Duke]
At the stroke of midnight on Dec. 31, something profound happened in the government secrecy system. With little fanfare, the paradigm of secrecy shifted. The days when secrets would be secret forever officially ended that night. Some 700 million pages of secret documents became unsecret. No longer were they classified. They became . . . public. Imagine it: Some 400 million formerly classified pages at the National Archives, another 270 million at the FBI, 30 million elsewhere, all emerging into the sunshine of open government, squinting and pale, like naked mole rats. This would seem a victory for freedom of information, just as President Bill Clinton envisioned when he signed Executive Order 12958 in 1995 (affirmed by President Bush in 2003), which mandated that 25-year-old documents be automatically declassified unless exempted for national security or other reasons. But it is not so simple. There is a dirty little secret about these secrets: They remain secreted away. You still can't rush down to the National Archives to check them out. In fact, it could be years before these public documents can be viewed by the public. Fifty archivists can process 40 million pages in a year, but now they are facing 400 million. The backlog, inside the National Archives II facility in College Park, measures 160,000 cubic feet inside a massive classified vault with special lighting and climate controls to preserve old paper. Row upon row of electronically operated steel shelves, all a pale gray, hold hundreds of thousands of document boxes buffered to fight destructive acidity. The place feels like the set of a science fiction movie, all pristine and orderly and hushed. Inside the boxes are documents that have to be scrutinized and processed according to the classification instructions written on them by staffers in any one of several agencies, which leaves archivists with a task not unlike deciphering a 25-year-old crime scene.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/15/AR200701...
(requires registration)
How to Bury a Secret: Turn It Into Paperwork