Benton RSS Feed

Coverage Type 

TEEN EXPOSURE TO ONLINE PORNOGRAPHY COMMON
[SOURCE: Reuters, AUTHOR: Michael Conlon]
About four in every 10 U.S. youngsters age 10 to 17 report they've seen pornography while on the Internet, two-thirds of them saying it was uninvited. Many of the encounters with online pornography, both sought-out and accidental, were related to use of file-sharing programs to download images, a report from the University of New Hampshire in Durham says.
http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=internetNews&storyID...



Benton's Communications-related Headlines For Monday February 5, 2007

To view Benton's Headlines feed in your RSS Aggregator, paste
http://www.benton.org/index.php?q=taxonomy/term/6/all/feed into your reader.
For upcoming media policy events, see http://www.benton.org

DIGITAL TELEVISION TRANSITION
Americans Unaware Of Digital TV Switch
Court Case Threatens Digital-TV Transition
Viewers Must Chip In For DTV Converters
Religious Group Continues Fight for Digital Must-Carry Rules
CBS: Multicasting Hurts HD Picture Quality

CONTENT
Television's Power Shift: Cable Pays for 'Free' Shows
Turner To Pay for Costs of Disastrous Marketing Campaign
Dearth of Drama Despite Demand
YouTube to Viacom: We Will Pull Your Clips
Kerry Wants Martin To Investigate Sports Exclusivity
TiVo sees if you skip those ads

INTERNET/TELECOM
Lightspeed's Slow Start
Five Questions for Jeff Chester

QUICKLY -- Conflict in Plane Sight; Teen exposure to online pornography common

DIGITAL TELEVISION TRANSITION

AMERICANS UNAWARE OF DIGITAL TV SWITCH
[SOURCE: TVPredictions.com, AUTHOR: Phillip Swann]
On February 17, 2009, all TV stations must switch their analog
signals to digital. At that time, viewers will be unable to watch
television unless they buy a Digital TV; subscribe to a cable or
satellite service; or get a converter box that will allow their old
analog sets to display the digital signals. But millions of Americans
are unaware of the transition according to a survey by the
Association of Public Television Stations. The APTS asked people who
now receive their TV signals over the air if they know that the
nation will switch from analog to digital TV signals on February 17,
2009. Sixty-one percent said they had no idea the transition was
taking place while 10 percent said they had limited awareness and
another 25 percent said they were somewhat aware or very aware. The
APTS says an estimated 21 million homes now get their signals over
the air. The group says it will urge Congress to increase funding to
educate Americans about the switch.
http://www.tvpredictions.com/aptv020307.htm
* APTS Survey Demonstrates Need for DTV Consumer Outreach
http://www.apts.org/news/DTVSURVEY.cfm
http://www.apts.org/

COURT CASE THREATENS DIGITAL-TV TRANSITION
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: Ted Hearn]
Public Citizen, a nonprofit consumer-advocacy group in Washington
D.C., is trying to get the courts to strike down the Deficit
Reduction Act of 2005 signed by President Bush Feb. 8, 2006. The DRA
-- passed without a single Democratic vote in the House -- included
provisions governing the analog-TV cutoff. Public Citizen's argument
isn't that the mechanics of the digital-TV transition were
unconstitutional. Instead, it claimed that the analog cutoff is
unconstitutional because it was included in a law that was enacted
unconstitutionally in violation of Article 1, Section 7, Clause 2 of
the U.S. Constitution -- language that requires the House and Senate
to pass identical bills, also called the bicameral-passage
requirement. "The DRA was presented to the president in violation of
that requirement: The Senate passed one version of a bill, the House
another, and then the Senate's version was presented to the
president, who signed it. Under the Constitution, that bill has not
become a law," Public Citizen said in an October 2006 court brief. On
Feb. 9 when a three judge-panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
D.C. Circuit will hear arguments on whether the inconsistency should
invalidate the law that called for the demise of analog-TV service.
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6413076.html?display=Breaking+News

VIEWERS MUST CHIP IN FOR DTV CONVERTERS
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
National Telecommunications and Information Association Director John
Kneuer, appearing on C-SPAN's The Communicators," said government
subsidies will not cover the full costs for digital-to-analog set-top
boxes. Viewers of analog-only sets will be required to buy the boxes
if they want to watch TV on those sets after Feb. 17, 2009, which
will be only 28 days after our next President is sworn in. Assistant
Secretary Kneuer said he was limited in what he could say about the
rules the NTIA is developing for the set-top box subsidy program, but
when asked whether there would be a means test, he suggested there
may not be. "You build a record and you look at that record," he
said. "In this case we have a fairly broad consensus in the record
that while trying to be fiscally responsible and not wanting to fund
luxury consumer electronics equipment there is a broad sense that
there is very broad cross-section of Americans that are going to be
impacted by this and that to the extent possible, they should be
eligible." Asked about comments in the trade press that the
transition was analogous to Y2K and whether or not there was a plan
B, Asst Sec Kneuer said he wasn't going to second-guess Congress
adding that NTIA is putting in place a way to track and record the
transition "as it takes place" so it can identify problems. He said
NTIA will have an opportunity if it identifies transient problems to
take corrective action by taking that information to Congress. Kneuer
said he would seek corrective changes from Congress if need be, but
hasn't had the need to so thus far.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6413194.html?display=Breaking...
* Digital TV Chief: Converter Boxes Will Not Be Free
http://www.tvpredictions.com/dtv020307.htm
* For more info on the transition see "Getting to February 2009:
Implementing the Digital TV Transition"
http://www.benton.org/index.php?q=node/1257

RELIGIOUS GROUP CONTINUES FIGHT FOR DIGITAL MUST-CARRY RULES
[SOURCE: Lasar's Letter on the FCC, AUTHOR: Matthew Lasar]
The head of a Christian broadcasting association has filed fresh
comments with the Federal Communications Commission calling for the
agency to make cable services carry all multicast TV signals
broadcast in the area. "The single most important issue facing all
independently owned stations is multicast must-carry/anti-stripping,"
Bob D'Andrea, President of the Christian Television Network (CTN),
wrote to the FCC. "Without multicast must-carry/anti-stripping in
digital television, smaller stations will struggle and local viewers
may eventually lose access to valuable community oriented programs."
Much of D'Andrea's January 16th filing comes from comments he made at
the FCC's recent hearing on media ownership issues in Nashville,
Tennessee. CTN's president argues that 1) "Anti-stripping" rules --
prohibitions against cable companies cherry picking which signals to
carry -- are embedded in the 1992 Cable Television Consumer
Protection and Competition Act of 1992. "The anti-stripping concept
is merely an extension of existing law," D'Andrea writes. 2) Must
carry will create a more level playing field for smaller
broadcasters. D'Andrea describes the digital TV future as one
dominated by "a few ultra large cable companies" that will "carry all
the programming and will dictate to customers what they will watch"
unless the FCC acts on this issue. 3) The programming offered by the
Religious Voices in Broadcasting (RVB) network represents a positive
alternative to the "violent, profane, indecent and pornography
programming" that has "inundated cable-only channels." D'Andrea's
filing extolls RVB shows targeted to youth, such as Pulse TV, geared
towards Christian music videos, and Underground, a program that
showcases urban Christian hip-hop artists. 4) The FCC unfairly
requires broadcasters to go digital without requiring cable companies
to carry all their new signals. D'Andrea estimates the re-engineering
cost to Nashville's WHTN, a Christian oriented TV outlet, at 2
million dollars. "Our stations are struggling with the burden of
developing digital programming plans in an uncertain regulatory
environment," D'Andrea writes, "while simultaneously financing the
costs of an unfunded, federally mandated digital build out..."
http://www.lasarletter.net/drupal/node/320

CBS: MULTICASTING HURTS HD PICTURE QUALITY
[SOURCE: TVPredictions.com, AUTHOR: Phillip Swann]
A top CBS executive says the network's HDTV picture quality is
diminished when a local station decides to add a subchannel to its
digital feed. Known as multicasting, many local stations today are
broadcasting multiple feeds instead of just one high-def channel via
their digital spectrum. The extra feeds, which often include local
weather channels, splits the digital transmission into parts, thereby
possibly diluting the high-def picture quality. The local stations
hope the extra channels will generate more advertising. But Ken
Aagaard, CBS Sports' senior vice president of operations and
production services, tells the Syracuse Post-Standard that his
network's engineers believe any digital subchannel takes away from
the HD quality. The issue of HD picture quality is a growing concern
in the industry, particularly among high-def owners who often feel
cheated by what they see on screen. On Internet message boards, HD
enthusiasts often accuse local stations and the cable and satellite
operators of purposely squeezing the high-def signal to make room for
other channels and services.
http://www.tvpredictions.com/cbs020207.htm

CONTENT

TELEVISION'S POWER SHIFT: CABLE PAYS FOR 'FREE' SHOWS
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Peter Grant peter.grant( at )wsj.com
and Brooks Barnes]
All over the country, a shift in the balance of power between cable
operators and broadcasters has station owners -- including giants
such as CBS Corp. -- lining up to demand new cash payments. If forced
to pay, cable operators may have to raise prices or see their profits
erode. The struggling broadcast networks such as CBS, on the other
hand, would benefit from a major new revenue stream: cable payments
to the local stations that networks own. Cable companies have been
picking up broadcast stations' signals without paying cash almost
since the birth of cable TV more than 50 years ago. But broadcast
stations are beginning to flex their muscles now. Cable operators
face growing competition from satellite operators and new TV ventures
by phone companies -- both of which pay to retransmit broadcast
signals. Meanwhile, local broadcast stations are seeking new income
to make up for falling ad revenue, as TV viewership of local
programming falls and digital video recorders such as TiVo let
viewers skip ads. Congress also has been tilting the playing field,
gradually allowing broadcast companies to accumulate more stations
and thus bargaining power. The Federal Communications Commission,
which has locked horns with the cable industry on numerous issues
under Chairman Kevin Martin, issued a recent ruling supporting
broadcasters' position, increasing the pressure on cable operators to
back down. Based on the changing dynamics, media research firm Kagan
Research predicted last year that station owners will be able to
collect almost $400 million in retransmission fees from cable by 2010
-- and $1 billion altogether including fees from phone and satellite
operators, up from $230 million last year. The fees some broadcast
stations have been asking could drive cable bills up by around $2 a
month. Some broadcasters already are talking about at least doubling
that over the next few years, and retransmission fights have been
breaking out all over the country.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117064226242297903.html?mod=todays_us_pa...
(requires subscription)
See also --
* MEDIACOM CUTS SINCLAIR DEAL
[SOURCE: Multichannel News]
After months of bickering and lobbying local and federal regulators,
Mediacom Communications cut a retransmission-consent deal with
Sinclair Broadcast Group late Friday. The agreement restores the
local broadcast signals of several Sinclair stations in 12 states,
which the broadcaster had pulled from Mediacom after the eighth
largest U.S. cable operator balked at paying cash in exchange for
retransmission consent. Terms of the deal weren't disclosed.
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6413225.html?display=Breaking+News

TURNER TO PAY COSTS FOR DISASTROUS MARKETING CAMPAIGN
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
The office of Boston Mayor Thomas Menino confirms that Turner
Broadcasting has agreed to pay for the costs associated with its
guerilla marketing campaign gone awry.
A figure of $1 million has been reported, but the Mayor's office
could not confirm that at press time, and Turner said it could not
confirm the payment either. Two of the guerilla marketers face
charges, and the Department of Homeland Security has registered its
displeasure. Turner, a Time Warner Company, has apologized, saying it
recognized the seriousness of the incident. Senator John Kerry (D-MA)
Thursday sent a letter to the chairmen of the Federal Trade
Commission and FCC asking them to make sure the city gets reimbursed,
though it is unclear what power they would have to do so.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6412903?display=Breaking+News
* Kerry Asked Feds To Insure Turner Payments
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6413090?display=Breaking+News
* What Was Turner Thinking?
Turner lost face, but may have won in the end. Even though executives
insist they didn't intend to spark an uproar with the guerilla
campaign for Aqua Teen Hunger Force, the series featuring
anthropomorphic fast food items, the company nonetheless gained tens
of millions of dollars in free publicity for Cartoon Network and its
late-night Adult Swim block, which is available in more than 91
million U.S. cable and satellite homes. Its marginal cost? A $1
million payment to Boston for its troubles, it looked like at week's end.
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6413209.html?display=Top+Stories

DEARTH OF DRAMA DESPITE DEMAND
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: R. Thomas Umstead]
Industry observers believe that the proliferation of African-American
actors and actresses in mainstream drama serials has made the void of
African-American-targeted originals less obvious to viewers. Still,
some programmers believe that there's a demand for quality and
culturally relevant original dramas among African-Americans and
mainstream viewers. networks have been leery of offering dramas
revolving around African-Americans because of fears that such shows
won't draw the mass audience necessary to lure advertisers, which in
turn help fund high production costs for one-hour dramas that range
from $1 million to $3 million per episode. Indeed, TV's track record
with such shows isn't stellar. While viewers over the years have
shown a willingness to watch African-American life and culture
through sitcoms like Good Times and The Jeffersons in the 1970's, The
Cosby Show in the 1980s, Martin in the 1990s and most recently
Girlfriends and Everybody Hates Chris, the reverse has been true for
dramas. Over the past 20 years dramatic series like Fox
Broadcasting's 413 Hope Street, CBS' family-oriented Under One Roof
starring James Earl Jones and the hospital skein Angels -- all of
which received critical acclaim -- failed to last a full season
before being cancelled due to poor ratings.
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6413019.html
* Networks Pick Comedy over Drama
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6413123.html?display=Feature

YOUTUBE TO VIACOM: WE WILL PULL YOUR CLIPS
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: Anne Becker]
Viacom today said it demanded that YouTube pull more than 100,000
clips of its programming off the popular video sharing site. Viacom
said that after months of discussions, YouTube is unwilling to "come
to a fair market agreement" for the content. YouTube acknowledged it
had received the take-down request from Viacom and said it would
comply with the request. The clips, which come from all of Viacom's
family of cable channels, represent some 1.2 billion video streams on
YouTube, Viacom said. The company is alleging that YouTube, and its
parent company Google, have failed to follow through on promises to
provide filtering tools that would notify Viacom of its clips running.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6412934.html?display=Breaking...
* Viacom to YouTube: Pull 100K Clips
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6412990.html?display=Breaking+News
* Changing the Channel
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Don Tapscott]
[Commentary] After months of fruitless negotiations, Viacom has
ordered Google Inc.'s YouTube to remove all of its content from the
popular video Web site. Noting the company's content accounted for
more than 1.2 billion YouTube video streams, Viacom defended its
decision by saying the enormous YouTube exposure didn't actually
contribute anything to Viacom's bottom line. But by pulling its
content, Viacom is infuriating the millions of fans of its various
programs. Angering customers is typically not a good thing to do.
Viacom is a traditional broadcaster that wants to be paid for its
content. For its part, YouTube says talk of profit-sharing is
premature. Google and other smart companies know that just as people
from every walk of life can self-organize to upload content on the
Web, they can also collaborate to invent new products, create
software or help find a cure for cancer. Throughout the economy,
astute corporations are beginning to harness this mass collaboration
to conceive, design, develop and distribute products in new ways. The
notion that a corporation has to attract, develop and retain the best
and brightest inside its corporate boundaries is becoming
inappropriate in many industries. With costs of collaboration falling
dramatically, companies increasingly source ideas, innovations and
uniquely qualified minds from a vast global pool of talent. As much
as Viacom may resent YouTube's sudden towering presence in the
television industry, the popular Web site has reinvented the
television ballpark, and Viacom should pick up a mitt and stay in the game.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117063820794997826.html?mod=todays_us_op...
(requires subscription)

KERRY WANTS MARTIN TO INVESTIGATE SPORTS EXCLUSIVITY
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
Sen John Kerry (D-MA) has asked FCC Chairman Kevin Martin to
investigate DirecTV's "pending agreement" with Major League Baseball
on an "Extra Innings" package of out-of-market baseball games. "As
you know, Extra Innings is currently available to 75 million
subscribers through cable as well as DirectTV and the Dish Network,"
Kerry wrote to Martin. "However, if this exclusive deal is approved,
only 15 million DirectTV subscribers will be able to purchase Extra
Innings, leaving 50 million Americans without access to out-of-market
games that they currently enjoy and a viable alternative to view
them." Sen Kerry is concerned about the precedent for other sports.
"I am concerned that this deal, and others that may follow, will
separate fans from their favorite teams and reduce competition in the
sports market," he said. "I therefore request that you investigate
this exclusive deal and report to Congress on its implications for
consumers and recommend any changes to law or regulation that will
ameliorate its negative effects."
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6413042?display=Breaking+News

TIVO SEES IF YOU SKIP THOSE ADS
[SOURCE: San Francisco Chronicle, AUTHOR: David Lazarus]
[Commentary] TiVo revealed the other day that it's offering TV
networks and ad agencies a chance to receive second-by- second data
about which programs the company's 4.5 million subscribers are
watching and, more importantly, which commercials people are
skipping. This raises a pair of troubling questions: Is TiVo, which
revolutionized TV viewing with its digital video recording
technology, now watching what people watch? And is it selling that
sensitive info to advertisers and others? The answers, apparently,
are no and no. "I promise with my hand on a Bible that your data is
not being archived and sold," said Todd Juenger, TiVo's vice
president and general manager of audience research and measurement.
"We don't know what any particular person is watching," he said. "We
only know what a random, anonymous sampling of our user base is
watching." Still, privacy advocates say TiVo's new data service --
dubbed StopWatch -- reflects the growing ease with which companies
could, if they so choose, collect and exploit vast amounts of
information about consumers' everyday habits.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2007/0...

INTERNET/TELECOM

LIGHTSPEED'S SLOW START
[SOURCE: BusinessWeek]
With completion of the deal to purchase BellSouth, AT&T is on top of
the telecom world. The company has virtually remade the old "Ma Bell"
through the acquisition of 13 companies over the last decade --
spending $285 billion to do it. Now AT&T is gearing up for the next
big telecom battle -- for the supremacy of the Internet. AT&T's
weapon of choice is Project Lightspeed, a new Internet network that
sends bits of data through copper and fiber-optic cables buried in
the ground. The high-speed network and its Internet-protocol
television (IPTV) technology are crucial to AT&T's plan to bundle
phone service, Net connections, and TV. In theory, the system will
let AT&T steal customers from rival phone giant Verizon
Communications and cable companies such as Comcast and Time Warner.
AT&T says it will pump $4.6 billion into building enough fiber-optic
cable and supporting technology to reach 19 million homes by the end
of 2008. But despite AT&T's stellar performance of late, the company
faces serious questions about whether Project Lightspeed can deliver
on its promise. Technology glitches hobbled the rollout last year.
And though the TV service is up and running in fewer than a dozen
markets with prices that undercut cable bills, a growing chorus of
rivals, analysts, and engineers are skeptical that the network will
offer enough bandwidth a few years from now to handle phone service,
high-speed Internet, and multiple streams of high-definition TV.
Cable operators have taken full advantage of AT&T's slow start,
gleefully swiping phone customers with their own triple-play
offerings. Having invested more than $110 billion in network upgrades
over the last decade to provide Internet and digital video, cable
companies only have to tweak their networks to offer phone service.
As of the third quarter, the five largest U.S. cable operators have
signed up about 6 million new Net-based phone customers. By contrast,
AT&T and Verizon have swiped a combined 222,000 TV customers.
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_07/b4021067.htm?chan=tec...

FIVE QUESTIONS FOR JEFF CHESTER
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: Kent Gibbons]
A Q&A with Jeff Chester, Executive Director of the Center for Digital
Democracy and author of Digital Destiny. "The biggest fear [about the
future of the Internet] is that it's being transformed into a
perpetual, virtual Madison Avenue machine. That we will be bombarded
with precision ads that will make us better consumers and not
citizens." The solution: "There needs to be national legislation so
that people can control all their information." See more at the URL below.
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6413144.html?display=Opinion

QUICKLY

CONFLICT IN PLANE SIGHT
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: Editorial Staff]
[Commentary] Many journalists face less-exciting ethical crises than
the one that confronted Maria Bartiromo. But at the bottom line, the
problem is the same: Can reporters accept gifts or special kindnesses
from sources and still cover them objectively? And even if they can,
doesn't such largess leave the appearance of conflict, which can be
just as damaging?
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6413191.html?display=Opinion

TEEN EXPOSURE TO ONLINE PORNOGRAPHY COMMON
[SOURCE: Reuters, AUTHOR: Michael Conlon]
About four in every 10 U.S. youngsters age 10 to 17 report they've
seen pornography while on the Internet, two-thirds of them saying it
was uninvited. Many of the encounters with online pornography, both
sought-out and accidental, were related to use of file-sharing
programs to download images, a report from the University of New
Hampshire in Durham says.
http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=internetNews&storyID...
--------------------------------------------------------------
There is no joy in Bearville.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Communications-related Headlines is a free online news summary
service provided by the Benton Foundation (www.benton.org). Posted
Monday through Friday, this service provides updates on important
industry developments, policy issues, and other related news events.
While the summaries are factually accurate, their often informal tone
does not always represent the tone of the original articles.
Headlines are compiled by Kevin Taglang headlines( at )benton.org -- we
welcome your comments.
--------------------------------------------------------------

Coverage Type 

"[T]he overarching goal of the Subcommittee's agenda is to fashion together a policy blueprint to make broadband service ubiquitous and affordable broadband for every American. Our end goal will be consumer choice, affordability, high bandwidth speeds, full build-out, high quality of service, and an open architecture that supports Internet freedom -- in short, an infrastructure for the 21st Century."
-- House Telecom Subcommittee Chairman Ed Markey (D-MA)
http://www.benton.org/index.php?q=node/4715

"The change of this last election is that there's going to be a lot more attention on the FCC. . . . It has abandoned its core responsibility to the public interest."
-- Sen. John D. Rockefeller IV (D-WV)
http://www.benton.org/index.php?q=node/4713



Coverage Type 

MARKEY ADDRESSES CONSUMER FEDERATION OF AMERICA ON BROADBAND AND INTERNET POLICY
[SOURCE: Rep Ed Markey (D-MA)]
Rep. Edward J. Markey (D-MA), Chairman of the House Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet, delivered the keynote address at Consumer Federation of America's Consumer Assembly in Washington, D.C. Chairman Markey said, "[T]he overarching goal of the Subcommittee's agenda is to fashion together a policy blueprint to make broadband service ubiquitous and affordable broadband for every American. Our end goal will be consumer choice, affordability, high bandwidth speeds, full build-out, high quality of service, and an open architecture that supports Internet freedom -- in short, an infrastructure for the 21st Century." He indicated the plan with include a mix of solutions including competitive policies, universal service, targeted grants, wireless policy, network neutrality provisions, and municipal offering of broadband service. "It is clear, however," Chairman Markey said, "that relying solely upon market forces isn't delivering what consumers need."
http://markey.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2577&I...


http://markey.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2577&Itemid=14…
Coverage Type 

BREAKING DOWN THE NETWORK NEUTRALITY DEBATE
[SOURCE: internetnews.com, AUTHOR: Roy Mark]
In the inflamed rhetoric of network neutrality, the debates are often cast as broadband providers versus content providers, big companies versus even larger companies and regulation of the Internet versus non-regulation. For Rep. Rick Boucher, these arguments oversimplify the issue. Speaking at the Third Annual State of the Internet Conference Wednesday, the Virginia Democrat told a packed Capitol Hill hotel meeting room, "We can't advance content innovation at the expense of network innovation. We need both kinds of innovation." The conference, sponsored by the Congressional Internet Caucus, brought together policy makers, think-tank mavens, academics and Capitol Hill staffers for a one-day conference on technology issues facing the new 110th Congress. The top issue: network neutrality. "It is a large, unresolved debate," said Boucher, who supported a defeated network neutrality amendment to a telecom reform bill approved by the House of Representatives last year. "The Internet must remain open and accessible to all, but we don't want to hobble innovation within the network."
http://www.internetnews.com/infra/article.php/3657341


Breaking Down The Network Neutrality Debate
Coverage Type 

DEMOCRATS PRESS FCC CHIEF ON ENFORCEMENT
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Stephen Labaton]
Signaling tougher oversight, Democrats who recently took control of the Senate urged the head of the Federal Communications Commission to take a more challenging approach to the industries he oversees. In their first appearance before a Senate Commerce Committee under Democratic leadership, Kevin J. Martin, the commission’s chairman, and the other commissioners faced sharp criticism from some of the committee’s senior Democrats on their handling of the recent acquisition of BellSouth by AT&T. The lawmakers also questioned the agency’s recent practice of not thoroughly reviewing applications by radio and television stations to renew their broadcast licenses. Chairman Martin yielded no policy ground, saying, for example, that the conditions that the Democratic members of the commission managed to impose on AT&T’s acquisition of BellSouth would not be applied to the rest of the industry. The renewed oversight of the FCC could, at the very least, temper any deregulatory action that Chairman Martin and his fellow Republican commissioners have been contemplating, particularly as they prepare to consider measures that would make it easier for media conglomerates to own newspapers and television stations in the same cities.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/01/business/media/01cnd-fcc.html?hp&ex=11...
(requires registration)

See also --
* Senators press FCC chair on AT&T merger
[SOURCE: Associated Press, AUTHOR: John Dunbar]
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070201/ap_on_go_co/fcc_senate

* Senators bristle at FCC chief's enforcement of AT& T-BellSouth merger
http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/money/20070202/fcc02.art.htm

* Democrats Urge Tighter FCC Rules
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/01/AR200702...

* FCC hears wrath of Senate Dems
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/television/news/e3ic...

* Democrats Criticize Martin On Merger, TV, Web And Style
http://www.njtelecomupdate.com/lenya/telco/live/tb-NHRS1170361978393.html

SENATORS BADGER FCC BOSS ON NET NEUTRALITY
[SOURCE: C-Net|News.com, AUTHOR: Anne Broache]
For the first time since 2004, all five FCC Commissioners appeared before the Senate Commerce Committee. But the hearing, billed as pitting newly-empowered Congressional Democrats vs the Republican-controlled FCC, produced little fireworks. Committee Chairman Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii) used his allotment to focus on the FCC's handling of what became a contentious decision over which merger conditions to place on AT&T and BellSouth. Chairman Martin's well-known aversion to Net neutrality regulations drew sharp questions from Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-ND), one of the chief sponsors of a bill that would require network operators to follow nondiscrimination rules. By failing to include network operators in the scope of nondiscrimination requirements traditionally placed on telephone companies, "does that mean you favor discrimination?" he asked. Chairman Martin said he might be able to handle such a requirement if nondiscrimination meant, "if you offer a service to one, you have to offer that same service to all." But the idea of prohibiting "any carrier who owns an underlying infrastructure from charging any content provider (extra fees)...could deter some investment in the underlying infrastructure," he said, echoing arguments made by the likes of AT&T and Verizon. Sen Dorgan and several of the Democratic senators present indicated they were still incensed about the FCC's decision to relax its media ownership rules years ago. Some asked what the regulators planned to do about what they consider to be dwindling local news content on the broadcast airwaves. Chairman Martin said he wasn't opposed to considering making rules regarding "public interest" requirements for broadcasters, but said he was hesitant to pursue rules forcing them "to put on certain kinds of programming."
http://news.com.com/Senate+Democrats+badger+FCC+boss+on+Net+neutrality/2...

See also --

* MARTIN SAYS FCC WILL ENFORCE NET-NEUTRALITY CONDITIONS
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
FCC Chairman Kevin Martin told the Senate Commerce Committee Thursday that he did not undercut the AT&T/Bell South merger with a statement he issued at the time. He said the FCC would enforce conditions, like network neutrality, which the companies volunteered to accept, but that that enforcement would not change commission rules, and that the commission would not then necessarily apply, as a matter of policy, those conditions to others.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6412433?title=Article&spacede...

SENATE COMMITTEE GRILLS FULL FCC PANEL
[SOURCE: TelecomWeb]
Sen. Amy Klobucher (D-MN) brought up the digital divide, asking commissioners when there would be broadband parity for urban and rural areas. FCC Commissioner Adelstein took this on first, saying, "We need to undertake a multipronged approach, because we have terrible data. We need a national broadband strategy with thresholds, and we need to create incentives for innovation and competition. We also need to commit some USF (funding) for this as well." Added Commissioner Copps, "I am really worried that we can go into 21st century with such a divide, with all of these wonderful services. If we don't get broadband out there, kids can't compete. And it has a business application, too. What if you want to start a business in a rural area and you don't have high-speed Internet, but your competitors do?" And regarding the USF, Chairman Martin was asked by Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-ND) about ways to get high-speed Internet into rural or underserved areas. "There has been extraordinary growth of other companies coming in to serve rural areas, and they will receive about $1 billion in USF support," Chairman Martin answered. "The problem is that (financial support of) such continued growth isn't sustainable. We need to have a mechanism to choose carriers that can serve areas without depending on the USF, possibly more wireless. And we need a more efficient means of distributing USF funds." To that end, Commissioner Copps told the senators an en banc hearing on this topic will be held at the FCC soon.
http://www.telecomweb.com/tnd/21518.html

MARTIN BEEFS TO SENATE PANEL ABOUT CABLE
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: Ted Hearn]
Taking another swipe at the country’s top pay TV provider, Federal Communications Commission Chairman Kevin Martin complained about cable industry rates and packages in testimony Thursday before the Senate Commerce Committee. The FCC leader told lawmakers that cable rates had jumped 38% from 2000-05 and 93% from 1995-2005, while the price of other communications products -- local and long -distance telephone and wireless phone service -- had “decreased dramatically.” Chairman Martin, who supports the a la carte sale of cable networks and cash back for parents who block indecent cable content, went on to complain that cable program tiers represented a flawed case of one-size-fits-all marketing. “For those who want to receive 100 channels or more, today’s most popular cable packages may be a good value,” Chairman Martin said. “But according to Nielsen, most viewers watch fewer than two-dozen channels. For them, the deal isn't as good.”
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6412828.html?display=Breaking+News

* LULAC Criticizes Martin on À La Carte
The League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) was quick to criticize FCC Chairman Kevin Martin for his continued advocacy of cable à la carte, in this case during a Senate Commerce Committee oversight hearing Thursday, saying his "dogmatic pursuit" of the issue could be disastrous.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6412790.html?display=Breaking...

* Martin Backs Media Bureau on Retrans Call
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
Apparently FCC Chairman Kevin Martin is circulating a proposal among the other commissioners that supports the Media Bureau's decision that Sinclair has not been bargaining in bad faith and that the FCC doesn't have the authority to referee the broadcaster's retransmission consent impasse with cable operator Mediacom. Recently the top ranking members of the Senate Commerce Committee asked the FCC to urge Sinclair and cable operator Mediacom to submit to arbitration. The chairman has said he doesn't think the commission has that authority, even during an appeal, though he has urged the parties to submit voluntarily to arbitration. Mediacom has said it would. Sinclair has declined in no uncertain terms.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6412801.html?display=Breaking...

INOUYE WANTS COMMISSIONERS TO TALK
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii) said Thursday he would reintroduce a bill to allow more than two commissioners to meet outside of the public meetings. All the commissioners are agreed that those "sunshine" rules, which are meant to prevent back-room dealing, instead make it harder to come to consensus.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6412613?title=Article&spacede...

ROCKEFELLER ON TV: "JUNK, SEX, SCANDAL"
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
Senator Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) took dead aim at TV violence and sex Thursday, saying TV was in the worst state ever. FCC Chairman Kevin Martin did not argue, agreeing with Sen Rockefeller that the industry's public-information campaign on the V-Chip/ratings system was insufficient. Sen Rockefeller said he barely watched TV and hoped his grown kids don't. Addressing FCC Chairman Kevin Martin, he said that nobody watches news anymore because there isn't any, except on cable where it was a case of who can report the latest murder first. Sen Rockefeller is reintroducing a bill that would allow the FCC to regulate violence as well as indecency. He cited Parents Television Council statistics on the rise in TV violence, then asked Chairman Martin if the industry educational take on self-regulation was working. No, said Martin, saying he continued to have concerns about both broadcast and cable content and said that industry educational efforts were insufficient.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6412513?title=Article&spacede...

FCC REITERATES PREFERENCE FOR UNLICENSED WIRELESS
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
The FCC reiterated Thursday its preference to open up so-called white spaces in the broadcast band to unlicensed advanced wireless devices. It has begun the process of opening up the space between TV station frequencies for advanced wireless services, but has not decided whether those should be licensed or unlicensed. In a Senate Commerce Committee oversight hearing Thursday, FCC Chairman Kevin Martin said there was a presumptive preference for unlicensed because it would allow for the new devices, and thus the more efficient use of the spectrum more quickly. Asked by Sen. John Sununu (R-NH) about the white spaces issue, Chairman Martin explained that if the FCC had to first license the new uses, it would first have to identify just where the spaces were, which could potentially delay the process. Instead, he said, the preferable approach would be to insure against interference and then let the devices operate, allowing the government to more quickly and fully tap into new uses of the spectrum. Rolling out advanced broadband, including wireless delivery, is a priority for the Commission.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6412498?title=Article&spacede...

* Broadcasters Weigh In On White Spaces
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6412804?title=Article&spacede...

PROTECTING THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND CONSUMERS
[SOURCE: US Senate Commerce Committee]
Opening statement of Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii): "In three years, we have seen the mergers of the two largest Bell companies with the two largest long-distance companies. This was immediately followed by AT&T's acquisition of BellSouth. Meanwhile, technology has fueled change, and single-purpose networks have given way to new multi-purpose platforms that can support all measures of applications and services, including voice, video, and email service. But the communications revolution does not come without risk. As public servants, both here in Congress and on the Commission, we must be vigilant in our oversight to ensure that the communications industry evolves in a manner that does not harm consumers."
http://commerce.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Statemen...

Additional opening statements --

* Sen John Kerry (D-MA): "Despite President Bush’s promise of ubiquitous broadband by 2007 -- we remain well short of that goal. I don't see much of an Administration strategy at all. And I am concerned about it."
http://commerce.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Statemen...

* FCC Chairman Martin: "Faced with such fast-paced technological change, the Commission has tried to make decisions based on a fundamental belief that a robust, competitive marketplace, not regulation, is ultimately the greatest protector of the public interest. Competition is the best method of delivering the benefits of choice, innovation, and affordability to American consumers. Competition drives prices down and spurs providers to improve service and create new products." he identified four priorities for the Commission: 1) Increasing access to communications services. 2) Promote real choice for consumers. 3) Protect consumers. 4) Enhance public safety.
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270192A1.doc

* Commissioner Copps: "I know that many local broadcasters strive mightily to serve the public interest. But increasingly the public-spirited part of the profession is being squeezed out. Too much of TV and radio today is homogenized, often gratuitously violent programming. Even worse is what we don't see enough of-the community and civic affairs coverage that is democracy's lifeblood. I've traveled all across the country-to a dozen media hearings just in the last year-and I've seen people's impatience with the status quo. It is time for the FCC to focus not only on avoiding bad new rules, but to revisit the bad old rules that got us here in the first place. I am very pleased the Chairman has committed to complete our long-dormant localism proceeding before moving forward on media ownership. Going beyond that, we need to find a way to bring basic public interest standards back to broadcasting and the spirit of public interest to other media, too."
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270194A1.doc

* Commissioner Adelstein: "We must upgrade our communications infrastructure in every corner of this country. And we must do a better job of making innovative communications technologies more widely available and affordable to everyone. All of our citizens should have the opportunity to maximize their potential through communications, no matter where they live or what challenges they face. To promote the communications needs of everyone in this country, we should focus on improving access to broadband services, modernizing universal service, and protecting diversity, competition, and localism in our media. "
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270200A1.doc

* Commissioner Tate: "The communications marketplace continues to evolve daily, as convergence shakes the foundations of the old order for industry, for government, and for consumers alike. Converging technologies are blurring the lines between traditional communications platforms."
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270198A1.doc

* Commissioner McDowell: "While advances in technology and competitiveness defy labeling under the regulatory stove pipes of old, I endeavor to approach each issue with a consistent regulatory philosophy; one that has served our nation well since its inception; one that trusts competitive free enterprise to serve consumers the best."
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270199A1.doc



Coverage Type 

INTERNET CAPACITY WOES: REACHING LIMITS IN CYBERSPACE
[SOURCE: CIO Update 12/29, AUTHOR: Allen Bernard]
Over the past year or so, the partners, researchers and senior managers in Deloitte & Touche's Technology, Media & Telecommunications (TMT) practice have been brainstorming about 2007 and beyond. Here's one prediction -- The unrelenting growth in Internet traffic in 2007 may overwhelm the Internet's backbone; the terabit-cable pipes connecting continents will reach capacity and ISPs will not be prepared to pay for extra bandwidth because consumers will be unwilling to pay increased costs. The threat to available capacity will be driven by the number of Internet users continuing to grow, and the exponential increase in the transmission of video files. This threat could raise questions about the long-term commercial viability of broadband provision, unless a satisfactory solution can be found to the issues of monetizing the growing usage to fund future growth, without disenfranchising customers. While this is probably not going to come to a head in 2007, these issues loom on the horizon because the investment in core infrastructure is not keeping pace with the usage and demand, said Eric Openshaw, principal and leader of Deloitte's America's TMT practice. The growth in demand for video delivered over the Internet in particular, one of Deloitte's other predictions, as well as IPTV, will be a major contributor to excess capacity being absorbed. "At the rate of growth of consumption at some point in time in the not too distant future, maybe it's not this year, but it's not in the too distant future, the excess capacity is gone," said Openshaw. "So somebody's got to step up and decide who is going to make the investments and who is going to pay for them."
http://www.cioupdate.com/trends/article.php/3651416


Internet Capacity Woes: Reaching the limits of cyberspace
Coverage Type 

US BROADBAND MARKET STILL COMING UP SHORT
[SOURCE: savetheinternet.com]
A critical look at the broadband penetration numbers released by the FCC this week:

1) The FCC still uses an absurd standard of “broadband” -- 200 kilobits per second -- that was barely fast enough to surf in 1999 but is far below what’s needed to enjoy streaming video, VoIP, flash animation or other common Internet applications.

2) Speeds in the US are much slower than what’s available in the rest of the world. According to the FCC, half of all U.S. broadband connections are slower than 2.5 megabits per second -- yet in countries like Japan and South Korea, they’re rolling out 100 megabit service.

3) The FCC still uses a discredited measure of broadband availability. Using ZIP codes alone vastly overstates the availability and competition for broadband services.

4) There’s no competition. Ninety-eight percent of high-speed residential lines are provided by incumbent cable or telecom companies. 5) The numbers are inflated by cell phones. In fact, 60 percent of the increase in broadband connections over the past six months is due to mobile cellular wireless connections. A cell phone or Blackberry is no substitute or viable competitor for always-on cable, DSL or fiber connections. These connections are very slow, have strict bandwidth caps, and restrict users so they can't use Internet phone service or other applications.
http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/02/01/us-broadband-market-still...


U.S. Broadband Market Still Coming Up Short
Coverage Type 

VERMONT'S GOVERNOR WANTS ENTIRE STATE TO OFFER FREE WI-FI BY 2010
[SOURCE: All Headline News, AUTHOR: Matthew Borghese]
In his annual speech to the state legislature, Vermont Governor Jim Douglas has called upon lawmakers to turn the Green Mountain State into one giant wireless Internet network. Governor Douglas says, "By 2010 Vermont [should] become the nation's first 'e-state' - the first state to offer universal access to broadband and wireless technology everywhere within its borders... The infrastructure that we build will form a foundation for economic growth and job creation that is second to none." "To spearhead this important effort, I have called for the creation of a Vermont Telecommunications Authority that would partner with private enterprise to build a next generation infrastructure... This is an unprecedented opportunity to leap far ahead of the leading telecommunications systems available today. This is no time for mediocrity. If we're serious about making Vermont a leader in the 21st Century economy, we must act now."
http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7006254687

* For more see "The Vermont Way Forward"
http://www.vermont.gov/governor/priorities/e-state_Initiative_VTA_Briefi...


Vermont's Governor Wants Entire State To Offer Free Wi-Fi By 2010
Coverage Type 

COMMUNITY TV: IF CABLE CHANGES, WHAT WOULD HAPPEN TO PUBLIC PROGRAMMING?
[SOURCE: Schaumburg (IL) Review, AUTHOR: Patrick Corcoran]
Public access television providers are worried they'll be lost in the shuffle stemming from AT&T's video network proposal. AT&T is proposing in some Chicago markets to provide phone, Internet and television service, similar to cable franchises. But since AT&T's services will be offered via telephone and not cable lines, AT&T asserts it should not be held to long-standing cable franchise agreements. It's these agreements that, among other guarantees, provide public access programs such as local calendar listings, the village's Fourth of July parade coverage, broadcasts of public meetings, and original programming. Barbara Popovic, executive director of Chicago Access Network Television (CAN-TV), Chicago's public access network, says that AT&T is attempting an end run around the rules that protect public access networks. "The implications of this are far-reaching. At the heart of it, they want to find a way to dismantle the existing franchise agreements," she said. "What they are saying is, 'We want it our way or the highway,' and you're seeing that played out with these lawsuits they are filing against municipalities who refuse to cooperate with them."
http://www.pioneerlocal.com/schaumburg/news/228775,sc-attcantv-012507-s1...


Community TV: If cable changes, what would happen to public programming?