Benton RSS Feed
MORE AMERICANS GO FOR CELL PHONES, DROP LANDLINES
[SOURCE: San Francisco Chronicle, AUTHOR: Ryan Kim]
Not so many years ago, the cell phone was considered a luxury item while the landline was standard in every household. My, how times have changed. Today, the cell phone is regarded as a necessity by a growing number of Americans -- especially the young and the poor -- while the residential phone is becoming optional. The trend, according to a new survey by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, is not limited to just one or two demographic groups but is slowly expanding to include all age and income groups. According to the survey of 13,056 households across the nation, 29.1 percent of people ages 25 to 29 and 25.2 percent of the respondents ages 18 to 24 have abandoned residential phones and rely solely on cell phones. Among poor households, more than 1 in 5 (22.4 percent) have cut the cord, about twice the rate of other respondents. The survey says 12.8 percent of households rely solely on cell phones for communication, up from 3.2 percent in the beginning of 2003, when the semi-annual survey began.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/05/15/PHONES.TMP
* Disaster alert? Check your cellphone.
California weighs using text messages to warn residents during emergencies.
http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0515/p02s01-ussc.html
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/05/15/PHONES.TMP
FCC SEEKS COMMENT ON RECOMMENDATION TO CAP HIGH-COST FUND
[SOURCE: Federal Communications Commission]
The Federal Communications Commission is seeking prompt comment on a recommendation by the Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service that the Commission take immediate action to rein in the explosive growth in high-cost universal service support disbursements. Comments and replies on the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) released Monday May 14 will be due 14 and 21 days after publication of the NPRM in the Federal Register. High-cost support helps make phone service affordable for consumers in rural and other high-cost areas.
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273027A1.doc
NPRM: http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-88A1.doc
FCC Seeks Comment on Recommendation to Cap High-Cost Fund
CLECs ALARMED BY THREAT OF ILEC COPPER RETIREMENT
[SOURCE: CedMagazine.com, AUTHOR: Brian Santo]
Don't be scared off by this article's alphabet soup... The Office of Advocacy of the U.S. Small Business Administration has asked the FCC to open a rulemaking on the way incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs -- think AT&T, Verizon, etc) retire their copper infrastructure. The move may help competitive carriers (CLECs -- think XO Communications) who lease those lines. The Office of Advocacy has sent a letter with that request to FCC Chairman Kevin Martin. In it, the Office asserts that CLECs are developing competitive new services that ultimately benefit consumers. A rulemaking, the Office said, will give these companies a formal venue for discussing the issue. ILECs don't rip out their copper when they install fiber. The procedure, as they install more and more fiber, is to send a copper retirement petition to the FCC. These are granted in as few as seven business days. Once approved, the ILECs no longer have to support those lines, although apparently, they typically still do. CLECs who may be using those lines (or who had planned to) remain concerned, however, that the ILECs could entirely shut down their retired copper loops. Recall, too, that the FCC has determined that ILECs do not have to lease fiber loops to CLECs. In essence, the CLECs see a threat that as ILECs are increasing their potential fiber markets, they could simultaneously shrink the CLECs’ potential markets. Meanwhile, the pace at which the ILECs file petitions for copper retirement is accelerating as the pace of their fiber installations increases.
http://www.cedmagazine.com/article.aspx?id=147700
http://www.cedmagazine.com/article.aspx?id=147700
MARTIN: FCC MAY NEED TO REGULATE FOOD ADS
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
In a letter to House Telecommunications And Internet Subcommittee Chairman Ed Markey (D-MA), Federal Communications Commission Chairman Kevin Martin and Commissioner Deborah Tate say the FCC may have to take steps to put additional restrictions on TV food advertising to kids. These restrictions could include limiting or eliminating the advertisements if the government/industry task force does not come up with sufficient self-regulation. They also said that any such regulation should target cable, where they argue the marketing of snack foods that "exacerbates the problems of childhood obesity and poor nutrition." They added that any proposed solution that does not include cable regulations "would be inappropriate and ineffective." They also said that the FCC would consider Chairman Markey's proposal to disqualify shows that air "junk food" ads from meeting the FCC's three-hour weekly educational programming minimum if the Task Force on Media and Childhood Obesity -- of which Martin and Tate are members -- did not come up with sufficient self-regulation.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6442041.html?rssid=193
* See Chairman Markey's letter and responses from Martin/Tate and fellow FCC Commissioner Michael Copps
http://markey.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2821&I...
* Martin: Cable Part of Junk-Food Problem
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6442081.html?rssid=196
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6442041.html?rssid=193
THE STABLE OF CABLE AS A POSTER CHILD
[SOURCE: MediaChannel.org, AUTHOR: Danny Schechter]
The market is our icon and fetish built on the assumption that it acts freely, guided by an “invisible hand†in Adam Smith’s phrase, and always clear of external pressures except the occasionalÂand I would say systematicÂacts of corruption. No one talks about what this word market really means or what its impact is. In theory, we have a market system that reflects the democratic impulses of buyers and sellers. In practice, there is nothing free about it. It is dominated and monopolized by a handful of companies who choke off real competition and exclude players who challenge their dominance. A “deregulated regime†guarantees market failure and all the problems that go along with it. Cable execs “understand†the concerns of their viewers and critics but please, they implore, Congress and the FCC don't regulate, don't impose public interest obligations, don't insist on more diversity or kids fare or honest news, don't assure the continuing presence of public access programming, and most of all, don't do anything that will stop the revenues flowing into huge media combines as Americans pay more and more for cable and entertainment and often get less and less. What we need is more regulation in the public interest and rules to insure that the needs of viewers come before the needs of advertisers and highly paid cable executives.
http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2007/05/14/the-stable-of-cable-as-...
The Stable Of Cable As A Poster Child
NAB CONCERNED ABOUT DTV-BOX SHORTAGE
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: Ted Hearn]
The National Association of Broadcasters is concerned that millions of digital converter boxes won't be widely available Jan. 1, 2008, for consumers who want to keep using analog TV sets many years into the future. In a letter to leaders of the Consumer Electronics Association and the Consumer Electronics Retailers Coalition Monday, NAB President David Rehr said, “It is critical to our collective success that manufacturers build, and retailers have available for sale, digital-to-analog converter boxes by [Jan. 1, 2008]. As I am sure you are aware, if boxes are not produced and on store shelves on Jan. 1, 2008, significant consumer confusion will result and could negatively impact the overall success of the transition.†Ironically, the NAB, CEA and National Cable & Telecommunications Association are leading partners in a coalition designed to prepare the public for the government mandated cutoff of analog TV on Feb. 17, 2009.
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6442082.html?rssid=196
* NAB Warns Of Digital TV Box Shortage
http://www.tvpredictions.com/dtv051507.htm
* Text of letter
http://www.nab.org/xert/corpcomm/pressrel/releases/051407_DKR_to_CEA_CER...
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6442082.html?rssid=196
SELLING SPANISH TV TO AD BUYERS
[SOURCE: Los Angeles Times, AUTHOR: Lorenza Muñoz]
Considering that Latinos make up the largest ethnic group in the United States and Latino buying power is on an upward march, you'd figure Spanish-language networks would be fighting advertisers off. They aren't. This week in New York, where the bulk of the commercial time for the upcoming television season will be sold at what's called the upfront market, Univision and Telemundo will need to make hard sells. Advertising spending on Spanish-language media has been growing, rising more than 14% last year from 2005, according to Nielsen Co. But only 3.2% of total national television and print advertising is directed at Spanish markets in the Spanish language, TNS Media Intelligence has found. What's more, recent research by the Assn. of Hispanic Advertising Agencies determined that of the country's top 250 advertisers, about 100 don't market in Spanish at all, and many of those that do aim less than 1% of their promotional budgets at Latinos. A large group of advertisers — mainly in the banking, investment and technology industries — question whether they need to reach out to Latinos en español or whether their messages are getting across in English.
http://www.latimes.com/business/printedition/la-fi-spanishads15may15,1,2...
(requires registration)
Selling Spanish TV to ad buyers
NEWS CORP TO OFFER BOARD SEAT TO BANCROFTS
[SOURCE: Reuters]
Media conglomerate News Corp. said on Monday it will offer members of Dow Jones & Co. Inc.'s controlling family, the Bancrofts, a seat on News Corp.'s board if they approve a $5 billion buyout offer. In a letter sent to members of the family on Friday, News Corp. Chief Executive Rupert Murdoch promised to preserve the journalistic integrity of Dow Jones' flagship newspaper, The Wall Street Journal, and said he would establish an editorial board to oversee the news pages. Murdoch also said he would retain current management.
http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=industryNews&storyID...
* 'WSJ' Report: Murdoch Offers Board Seat to Bancrofts in Bid for Dow Jones
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_con...
* In Letter, Murdoch Offers a Seat On Board to Dow Jones Owners
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/14/AR200705...
* Murdoch: 'Journal' would be untouched
http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/money/20070515/2b_dowjones15.art.htm
* Dow Jones bid is defended by Murdoch
http://www.latimes.com/business/printedition/la-fi-dowjones15may15,1,310...
* Wall Street Journal's Pulitzer Prize-Winning China Reporters Write Letter Blasting Murdoch Takeover Bid
The paper's China-based reporters -- whose coverage won a Pulitzer this year -- have now sent a powerful letter to three key members of the Bancroft family, the Dow Jones Company's controlling shareholder. The letter -- to family members Leslie Hill, Elizabeth Steele and Christopher Bancroft, and to trustee Michael Elefante, all of whom are on Dow Jones' board -- warns that Murdoch could use the Journal as a tool to advance his business interests in China.
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/horsesmouth/2007/05/wall_street_jou.php
PENTAGON BLOCKS 13 WEB SITES FROM MILITARY COMPUTERS
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Dan Frosch]
Members of the military will not be allowed to use military computers to communicate through Web sites like YouTube and MySpace under restrictions that the Pentagon imposed yesterday. The rule bans 13 sites, many of them networking, music or photo-sharing sites, because they have slowed the Internet network of the Defense Department, military officials said. Critics said the policy represented the latest effort to control the deluge of information flowing from soldiers on the battlefield.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/15/washington/15block.html
(requires registration)
* A Casualty Of War: MySpace
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/14/AR200705...
Pentagon Blocks 13 Web Sites From Military Computers
CAMPAIGNS EMBRACE USE OF TEXT MESSAGES
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Amy Schatz Amy.Schatz@wsj.com]
Text messaging went mainstream as a political tool yesterday as Democratic candidate Sen. Hillary Clinton launched a service asking supporters to sign up for regular text-messaged campaign updates. Sen Clinton isn't the first 2008 presidential candidate to embrace text messaging -- rival John Edwards began in December and Illinois Sen. Barack Obama plans to start soon -- but her use of it signals how widespread the technology is becoming for political campaigns. Many presidential campaigns are now experimenting with how to use the service. Political campaigns generally lag in adopting new types of advertising or technology, but with so many candidates vying for the presidency, all of the top-tier aspirants are elbowing each other to get ahead -- or at least not get left behind. They're posting videos on YouTube, creating profiles on social-networking sites like MySpace and Facebook and posting messages on blogs.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117918406231802526.html?mod=todays_us_pa...
(requires subscription)
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117918406231802526.html?mod=todays_us_page_one