Benton RSS Feed
Data from the Buzzfeed network has found many fewer page views are coming from e-mail than they used to, as other modes of sharing, like Facebook and Twitter have taken off. Since the beginning of this year, all the sites included in that network, including TMZ and the Daily Mail, have seen drop in e-mail shares, with a big drop-off in May 2012, as the chart below via Buzzfeed shows. We have a theory for why: People are emailing around links less because it takes too much effort. Think about the many steps it takes to compose an email, even from a news site, compared to social sharing it.
E-mail Is Getting Harder Because Everything Else Is So Much Easier
Just as social media heavily impacted this year’s London Summer Olympics, it’s also playing a very prominent part in this year’s U.S. presidential election.
In 2008, President Obama showed everyone just how powerful social media could be. Now, both sides are proving just how essential leveraging Facebook, Twitter, and other online platforms are to a successful run at the White House. The constant social media spotlight has meant several significant “campaign stops” for both candidates as unexpected Internet blowbacks forced them to pause and take stock of how the ongoing onslaught of online scrutiny has suddenly turned conventional politics upside down.
Here are three of the most significant ones:
- Campaign Stop #1: Fact-Checking Is Now an Amateur Sport
- Campaign Stop #2: The Speed of Social Media Is a Double-Edged Sword
- Campaign Stop #3: Social Media Knows Where You’re Hiding
Obama And Romney's Biggest Social-Media Fails
Are you sitting somewhere comfy? Because right at this moment, your smartphone is likely calculating and then sharing your seated location. But don't worry: You are far from alone. Location-sharing services are on the rise. Here, the big reasons for the trend in personal placement.
- Facebook's Ads
- Weasley's Family Locator
- Navigator Ads
- Google's Siri, Apple's Siri
- The Foursquare Effect
5 Reasons Location Is The Smartphone's Killer Map
Electronic billing has been promoted as a big cost savings for healthcare. But is it? The Center for Public Integrity has challenged the conventional wisdom, and the rest of us would do well to pay attention. For 20 months, CPI combed Medicare records and talked to providers, billing consultants, and others to document one big reason for the growth in Medicare spending over the last decade: Doctors and hospitals are sometimes “upcoding,” or charging Medicare for higher levels of services when they didn’t provide it, while hospital emergency departments too are grabbing billions in extra fees for their services.
A couple of startling findings: 1) “More than 7,500 physicians billed the two top-paying codes for three out of four office visits in 2008, a sharp rise from the numbers of doctors who did so at the start of the decade.” 2) “Use of the top two most expensive codes for emergency room care nationwide nearly doubled from 25 percent to 45 percent of all claims during the time period examined. In many cases these claims were not for treating patients with life-threatening injuries. Often they (patients) were treated for seemingly minor injuries and complaints.”
In response to the CPI investigation and the Times story, Attorney General Eric Holder and Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius sent a letter to five major hospital trade groups, warning about fraudulent use of electronic medical records to inflate Medicare bills. The move strikes me as slap-on-the-wrist response to a significant and costly problem, and it certainly bears follow-up from the media.
Medicare costs: Are electronic records the solution—or the problem?
The Department of Justice has granted more than $2.4 million to 13 local law enforcement agencies around the country to crack down on online piracy.
The funding was secured through the Prioritizing Resources and Organization for Intellectual Property Act, signed in 2008, to curb copyright infringement. Attorney General Eric Holder awarded the grants on Wednesday at a ceremony at Towson University in Maryland. "Without question, these new investments are coming at a critical time," Holder said in a prepared statement. "As our country continues to recover from once-in-a-generation economic challenges, the need to defend IP rights -- and to protect Americans from IP theft -- has never been more urgent."
Justice Department Grants $2.4M to Local Police for IP Theft Crackdowns
Deutsche Telekom and MetroPCS have signed a definitive agreement to combine T-Mobile USA and MetroPCS.
This transaction will create the leading value carrier in the U.S. wireless marketplace, which will deliver an enhanced customer experience through a wider selection of affordable products and services, deeper network coverage and a clear-cut technology path to one common LTE network. The combined company, which will retain the T-Mobile name, will have the expanded scale, spectrum and financial resources to aggressively compete with the other national U.S. wireless carriers. Deutsche Telekom’s supervisory board and MetroPCS’ board of directors unanimously approved the transaction. The transaction is structured as a recapitalization, in which MetroPCS will declare a 1 for 2 reverse stock split, make a cash payment of $1.5 billion to its shareholders (approximately $4.09 per share prior to the reverse stock split) and acquire all of T-Mobile’s capital stock by issuing to Deutsche Telekom 74% of MetroPCS’ common stock on a pro forma basis. Deutsche Telekom has also agreed to roll its existing intercompany debt into new $15 billion senior unsecured notes of the combined company, provide the combined company with a $500 million unsecured revolving credit facility and provide a $5.5 billion backstop commitment for certain MetroPCS third-party financing transactions.
The combined company will be a stronger competitor and will be well-positioned to drive future growth. Based on analyst consensus estimates for 2012, the combined company is expected to have approximately 42.5 million subscribers, $24.8 billion of revenue, $6.3 billion of adjusted EBITDA, $4.2 billion of capital expenditures and $2.1 billion of free cash flow (defined as EBITDA less capital expenditures) in 2012. After closing, the company’s headquarters will be in Bellevue, Washington and it will retain a significant presence in Dallas, Texas. The combined company will have an 11-member board of directors, including a number of members appointed by Deutsche Telekom consistent with its equity ownership. The transaction is subject to MetroPCS shareholder approval, regulatory approvals and other customary closing conditions. The transaction is expected to close in the first half of 2013.
T-Mobile USA and MetroPCS to Combine, Creating Value Leader in US Wireless Marketplace T-Mobile USA, MetroPCS to Merge (Wall Street Journal) T-Mobile USA, MetroPCS to Combine in Cash and Stock Deal (All Things D) T-Mobile and MetroPCS to merge (CNNMoney) T-Mobile Seals Deal With MetroPCS (NYTimes) T-Mobile, Metro PCS announce merger (Washington Post) T-Mobile's parent makes it official, announces merger with MetroPCS (LA Times) T-Mobile USA merging with MetroPCS (AP) T-Mobile, MetroPCS agree to merger (The Hill) T-Mobile, MetroPCS to merge, target no-contract customers (ars technica) T-Mobile, MetroPCS to Merge (National Journal) T-Mobile and MetroPCS agree to merge (GigaOm)
Within hours of making their merger plans official, T-Mobile and MetroPCS started selling their grand plan to investors, customers, the media and the world. On a conference call with analysts and press, T-Mobile’s new CEO John Legere painted a picture of a new hyper-competitive carrier that would dominate the prepaid and budget mobile markets and offer the country’s most powerful 4G network in the biggest metro markets.
In short, the new carrier – which the companies are referring to as NewCo while waiting for regulatory approval – would be much greater than the sum of its parts, according to Legere, who would take over the helm of the new carrier. “When you add MetroPCS to an already aggressive challenger strategy, it acts as an accelerant,” he said. From a consumer’s perspective, there’s a lot to like in combined T-Mobile and MetroPCS assuming they can pull their complex transition plan off. Its 42 million subscribers would still leave it the No. 4 carrier in the U.S. rankings, but it will have closed considerable distance with No. 3 Sprint. What’s more, those two subscriber bases would match up almost perfectly, Legere said.
What T-Mobile gains from a MetroPCS merger: Surgical spectrum
Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski announced the winners of America’s first ‘Mobility Fund’ auction.
This market-based policy innovation was part of the Commission’s once-in-a-generation reform of the Universal Service Program last year, which allocated $300 million in savings from cutting waste and inefficiency, to a new Mobility Fund aimed at closing gaps in mobile coverage across the U.S. The effort marks the first time in history the Commission has made universal mobile service an express universal service goal. As a result of the auction, new mobile infrastructure deployment will begin in 31 states with areas that currently lack access to 3G or 4G mobile service. In total, up to 83,000 new U.S. road miles on which millions of Americans live, work, or travel will gain access to advanced mobile networks that significantly enhance opportunities for jobs, education, healthcare and public safety. As part of the auction rules, winning companies must complete projects within three years. They must also make their networks available to other providers for roaming so that as many consumers as possible can benefit from the new networks.
Thirty-eight companies and subsidiaries participated in the auction, submitting nearly 900 bids. Winners ranged from larger national carriers like T-Mobile and U.S. Cellular to smaller carriers like Pine Belt Cellular, Inc. in Alabama, and VTel Wireless, Inc. in Vermont. The Commission expects millions more in private investment to complement the auction funding.
FCC Announces Winners of America's First "Mobility Fund" Auction Mobility Fund Phase I Auction Closes; Winning Bidders Announced for Auction 901 (Public Notice) FCC (Bidder Summary) FCC (Long-Form Application Filing Instructions) FCC Commits $300 Million to Close Gaps in Mobile Coverage (National Journal)
The cost of local access to the Internet is disproportionately higher than the cost of sending the same bits over long haul networks, but the price difference is far from random. A study of access prices on long haul and local transit found that the technology used and local competition were likely to determine how much higher the cost would be.
The study, by analyst firm TeleGeography isn’t really a surprise, but it’s a nice, thorough look at the difference in transmission costs for bits under the ocean as compared to transmission into a business park or corporate campus. TeleGeography focused on corporate connections back to a local point of presence, so it’s not the same as your Comcast or BT connection to the home, but many of the same conditions apply. The review of prices found that Ethernet is cheaper than a T-1 line and that Mumbai has the cheapest local access prices. It also noted the disproportionate costs of shorter local access compared to long haul. For example the report notes, “the average annual price of a 2 Mbps E-1 local loop within central London is $6,823 — nearly 30 percent more than that of a 5,500-kilometer E-1 circuit from New York to London.”
Econ 101: Competition lowers broadband costs
If you were tuned in to Fox News last night, you may now believe in a grand media conspiracy to cover up the “inflammatory” things that then-U.S. Sen. Barack Obama said about race relations in a June 2007 speech before a conference of black clergy at Hampton University in Virginia.
Sean Hannity, on his eponymous program, aired an “exclusive” broken by the Daily Caller exposing these most “outrageous” passages. That we somehow didn’t know about these passages, says Hannity, provides “further proof that the mainstream media has been in the pocket of Barack Obama since the day that he arrived at the national stage.” Now, in one of these “outrageous” passages ignored by the “left-wing press,” Obama noted how aggressively the federal government handled disaster relief in New York City following the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks and in Florida after Hurricane Andrew. Yet New Orleans, victim of Hurricane Katrina, didn’t get the same generosity from the feds. If you’re upset that you didn’t know about this particular talking point, you may heed Hannity’s call to blame the left-wing media. The speech, after all, wasn’t a secret, as Hannity points out in his broadcast. The Associated Press, local television stations and the Daily Press, Hannity notes, covered the event.
Fox News exposes itself