Benton RSS Feed

Source 
Author 
Coverage Type 

More than 80 civil liberties group and companies urged Congress to investigate and restrict the National Security Agency's electronic surveillance programs.

The letter was signed by the American Civil Liberties Union, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, Public Knowledge, the Sunlight Foundation and the Center for Democracy and Technology, as well as conservative groups such as FreedomWorks and TechFreedom. Internet companies signing the letter included reddit, Mozilla, BoingBoing and DuckDuckGo. The groups called on Congress to create a special committee to investigate the extent of domestic spying operations. The committee should issue recommendations on how to end unconstitutional surveillance, the groups said. The letter urged Congress to revise the Patriot Act and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act to outlaw blanket surveillance of any people in the United States. The groups also said that any public officials who authorized unconstitutional surveillance should be held accountable.


Advocacy groups, companies urge Congress to rein in NSA spying
Source 
Author 
Coverage Type 

Rep. Steny Hoyer (D-MD) defended the Obama Administration's domestic spying programs, arguing that, unlike the secret surveillance under President George W. Bush, the current programs appear legal.

"The difference between this program and the Bush program [is that] the Bush program was not sanctioned by law; this is pursuant to law," Rep Hoyer told reporters in the Capitol. "I think that's a very important distinction that some people don't draw, but they ought to draw." Rep Hoyer, the Democratic whip, joined a growing list of congressional leaders from both parties in arguing that Edward Snowden, a former CIA contractor who leaked information about the spying programs, has jeopardized national security.


Rep Hoyer: No comparison between Obama, Bush secret surveillance
Source 
Author 
Coverage Type 

[Commentary] A poll released by the Pew Research Center and The Washington Post found a partisan shift in the way Americans view the National Security Agency’s domestic surveillance programs. In the survey, slightly more Democrats than Republicans said they found it acceptable for the N.S.A. to track Americans’ phone records and e-mails if the goal is to prevent terrorism. By comparison, when Pew Research asked a similar question in 2006, Republicans were about twice as likely as Democrats to support the N.S.A.’s activities.

The poll is a reminder that many Americans do not hold especially firm views on some issues and instead may adapt them depending on which party controls the executive branch. When it comes to domestic surveillance, a considerable number of Democrats seem willing to support actions under President Obama that they deemed unacceptable under George W. Bush, while some Republicans have shifted in the opposite direction. What may be just as significant is the way in which attitudes toward the security state could split voters and elected officials within each party — possibly creating a wedge issue in both party primaries in 2016. Politicians who are normally associated with being on the far left and the far right may find common cause with grass-roots voters in their objection to domestic surveillance programs, fighting against a party establishment that is inclined to support them.


Domestic Surveillance Could Create a Divide in the 2016 Primaries
Author 
Coverage Type 

Google’s chief legal officer has asked U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder and FBI Director Robert Mueller for permission to disclose the number of requests for information it has received from federal agencies under the auspices of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

In a corporate blog post, Google’s David Drummond published the text of a letter to AG Holder seeking clearance to add data on FISA requests that Google receives to its Transparency Report. Being allowed to disclose aggregate numbers would, Drummond writes, “clearly show that our compliance with these requests falls far short of the claims being made.”


Google Wants Permission to Disclose How Many National Security Requests It Gets Asking the U.S. government to allow Google to publish more national security request data (Google blog) NSA Secrecy Prompts a Pushback (Wall Street Journal) 3 Tech Giants Want to Reveal Data Requests (New York Times) Google, Facebook and Microsoft want feds to release more data about spying (San Jose Mercury) Tech titans go on NSA offensive (Politico)
Author 
Coverage Type 

Google acquired mapping startup Waze. The deal was worth $1 billion in cash, plus $100 million in performance payouts in cash and possibly stock to the Waze staff, said people familiar with the deal.

Waze is a social mapping start-up that features real-time traffic data provided by users to help drivers find the fastest route to a destination. The deal highlights the increasing importance of location data in our on-the-go lives, whether it is finding a place to eat or navigating an unfamiliar road. Google said that Waze, which has nearly 50 million users, will remain a separate service. Some of Waze’s real-time traffic data will feed into Google Maps, and Google plans to incorporate its powerful search capabilities into Waze.


Google Officially Buys Waze in a $1 Billion-Plus Deal, Will Keep It Independent Google Maps and Waze, outsmarting traffic together (Google) Google Expands Its Boundaries, Buying Waze for $1 Billion (NYTimes) Google, Waze make it official with acquisition announcement (Washington Post) Google wants to show drivers the Waze, buys Israeli maps startup (LA Times)
Source 
Author 
Coverage Type 

News Corp. shareholders overwhelmingly approved measures to carve Rupert Murdoch's sprawling media empire into two separate publicly traded media companies. The corporate split is on track to occur June 28.

The television networks, television production and movie studio operations will form the newly named 21st Century Fox Inc. The publishing assets, including the Wall Street Journal, Times of London, New York Post, the Australian and the HarperCollins book publishing house, will take the name News Corp.

During the meeting, two corporate governance activists raised questions about the structure of the companies, including the two classes of stock, which allow Murdoch to control the company with nearly 40% of the voting stock. Most shareholders have non-voting stock. Julie Tanner, assistant director of socially responsible investing for Christian Brothers Investment Services, challenged News Corp. executives over the decision to allow Murdoch to wear three hats in the two companies: Murdoch will serve as chairman and chief executive of 21st Century Fox and he will be chairman of the new News Corp.


News Corp. shareholders approve company split Shareholders Approve Plan to Split News Corp. (NYTimes)
Source 
Author 
Coverage Type 

In private conversations, executives at Rupert Murdoch's News Corp are acknowledging ongoing discussions with the US Justice Department about a possible settlement of alleged violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act that took place in Britain.

Speculation by one knowledgeable News Corp source puts the size of the settlement as high as $850 million; other sources say that it could go as high as billions. The primary charges involve the activities of News Corp's newspapers in London – principally, the Sun and the defunct News of the World – and allegations of bribes paid to the London police for information, which emerged during investigations begun two summers ago into phone-hacking. The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) prohibits US companies from making undisclosed payments to government officials in foreign countries in order to gain favorable treatment. From the company's point of view, the most favorable timetable for a settlement will occur after 28 June, when News Corp will be split into two distinct entities, a smaller newspaper-focused group, which will retain the name News Corp, and a much larger group, which will retain all of the present company's entertainment assets, to be called 21st Century Fox. But the company would also prefer that a settlement come before the September trial date of several of its once high-ranking executives, including its former chief Rebekah Brooks, the executive who is allegedly tied to the police payments.


Murdoch's News Corp mulls FCPA deal with US Justice Department
Author 
Coverage Type 

Pivot, the upcoming millennial skewing network from Participant Media that will launch Aug. 1 in over 40 million homes, released its first annual industry report about millennials' consumption of TV content. The report found that 13% of 18-34-year-olds (8.6 million) who already have broadband service are committed to a broadband-only existence, higher than in previous reports.

The study, which was led by Karen Ramspacher, senior VP of research and insights for Pivot, and conducted by Miner & Co. Studio, in association with Beagle Insight, profiled two newly-defined consumer-focused categories: broadband only ("broadbanders") vs. broadband-plus-pay TV ("cross-platformers"). When it launches, Pivot's linear feed and on-demand content will be available to pay-TV subscribers on any device, anywhere, through the Pivot app. In a cable first, Pivot will also offer a broadband-only subscription, providing live and on-demand access to its programming without a pay-TV package.


Pivot Study: 13% of Millennials Are 'Broadband Only' Customers
Source 
Coverage Type 

Cable executives face two big threats to their core lines of business. One involves the nature of pay television in an age of over-the-top content, and the other, the rise of gigabit networks.

In many ways it would seem that the rise of gigabit networks would crush the business of providing pay TV, but in fact, if cable companies play it smart, they may find a way to walk the line as their industry transitions to all-IP content delivery over broadband networks. They may even find new sources of revenue by offering IP services such as home security and automation.

Phil McKinney is the president of CableLabs, the industry standards setting body that is responsible for pushing cable’s access technologies. CableLabs is the organization behind the DOCSIS 3.0 standard, which has helped cable companies roll out 100 Mbps and faster speeds. Unfortunately, those speeds have a practical limit that won’t help cable providers like Comcast or Time Warner Cable compete with Google’s gigabit networks. And if AT&T or municipalities get aggressive about deploying such networks, cable providers might find themselves selling the equivalent of feature phones in a smartphone world. Enter DOCSIS 3.1, the next generation of the cable access technologies. The new standard will allow cable firms deploying D3.1 equipment to deliver up to 10 gigabits per second down and 1 gigabit up.


Here’s how cable will hit gigabit speeds and create a tricky business problem in the process
Source 
Author 
Coverage Type 

Apple’s iTunes radio will work a lot like Pandora, but is the company too late to the big music party in the cloud? The short answer to the question is no, the longer answer is maybe, and — if you really want to speculate and think long-term — the ultimate answer may be that iTunes, in terms of music listening, is irrelevant.


Apple enters the streaming music game