Connecting Anchor Institutions: A Broadband Action Plan
The future belongs to those with access to high-speed broadband. In the 21st century, anyone seeking to launch a business, exchange medical records, conduct a research project, obtain a college degree, engage in community activities, or create his or her own path will need both a high-capacity Internet connection and the digital skills necessary to navigate the online world. Community anchor institutions (CAIs) – schools, libraries, healthcare providers, community colleges, public media, public housing, and other community organizations – are the key institutions that enable universal access to broadband. CAIs make essential broadband Internet services available to those who are most in need and ensure that the benefits of the Internet are widely available to everyone—promoting digital equity and opportunity for all.
Deploying high-capacity broadband to community anchor institutions will ensure the United States improves its broadband ecosystem and remains globally competitive and economically vibrant.
To fulfill this mission, every anchor institution needs to have open, affordable, high-capacity broadband that is scalable and adaptable to the growing information needs of the 21st century. Many broadband policies and plans focus on the needs of business or residential consumers without recognizing the significant, and sometimes unique, broadband needs of anchor institutions. Anchor institutions are the third leg of the stool for a healthy community. Connecting every anchor institution to a high-capacity broadband network is a cost-effective way to ensure that every community and every individual has high-speed access to the Internet.
Providing CAIs with high-capacity broadband – wireline and wireless – has many benefits: it stimulates economic growth, promotes individualized learning and STEM education, reduces the cost of healthcare through telemedicine, and expands community services. CAI broadband also promotes residential broadband adoption. Libraries and schools, for instance, offer digital literacy training for students, parents, and community members. Including CAIs in network deployment plans can improve the long-term economic viability of the network because CAIs serve as “anchor tenants.” Building open, middle-mile networks to anchor institutions also promotes competition. Networks built to CAIs with open interconnection policies provide “jumping off” points that allow competitive broadband providers to extend service to the surrounding community.
The Broadband Action Plan offers policymakers at all levels of government – as well as those directly involved in the adoption and deployment of broadband – a roadmap for improving the broadband connectivity of anchor institutions. The opening paper, A Vision of Our Future, describes the critical importance of high-capacity broadband to education, community services, health, civic engagement, digital equity, and economic growth. It also identifies key data points showing that many CAIs lack adequate broadband today and explains why improving anchor institution broadband is an urgent national priority. The Action Plan then provides ten policy papers, written by a variety of experts, focusing on key issues that must be addressed to ensure that anchor institutions have the open, affordable, high-capacity broadband they need to serve their communities. Each policy paper summarizes the issue, provides examples, recommends steps that policymakers can take to address the problem, and provides resources for further research. In other words, the policy papers provide a playbook for achieving the goals set forth in the introductory vision paper.
While the papers address ten different topics, three common themes emerge from our analysis:
Sharing, aggregation, partnerships, and collaboration were common solutions identified by several of the papers. Public-private partnerships are often the best model to bring parties together behind a comprehensive broadband strategy. Eliminating silos and aggregating many users on a single network reduces per-unit costs and makes network deployment and use more affordable.
Promoting a variety of technological and competitive options can provide enormous benefits to anchor institutions. Because CAIs come in all shapes and sizes and are located in all types of environments, policymakers need to be careful not to adopt a “one-size-fits-all” strategy. Some CAIs may choose to purchase lit fiber, dark fiber, Wi-Fi, cellular, cable, or other technologies. Some may prefer to engage a traditional broadband provider, a competitive provider, a municipality, or a research and education network, and others may choose to build their own broadband networks. It is important for CAIs to have the opportunity to choose the technologies and providers that best meet their particular needs, even if that means self-provisioning.
Deploying broadband networks can be expensive, and additional investment from both the private and public sectors will be needed to meet anchor institutions’ connectivity goals. Funding can be provided in a variety of ways – directly to CAIs, to network providers, or to non-profit organizations that redistribute the funding to others. Often, the biggest barrier to acquiring high-capacity broadband can be the up-front deployment costs. Grants, loans, and private sector capital can be important tools to fund network build-out and also reduce ongoing monthly service charges.
Each of the ten policy papers is summarized briefly below.
1. Broadband Needs Assessment and Planning for Community Anchor Institutions: Governments should identify anchor institution broadband needs and develop plans with stakeholders, broadband providers, and other partners to attract additional investment to fill broadband gaps. By Kelleigh Cole
Conducting an inventory of the locations and speeds of existing broadband networks for CAIs – and identifying gaps in broadband coverage – can help target investments to areas most in need. This paper urges policymakers to gather detailed, granular information about the availability and use of high-capacity broadband services needed by CAIs, rather than relying on outdated or generic claims that an area is already served by existing providers.
2. Wi-Fi and Wireless Networking for Community Anchor Institutions: By supporting robust Wi-Fi and wireless networking for community anchor institutions, policymakers can help enable a wide range of 21st
century Internet applications for improved education, learning, and medical care. By Amelia Bryne
Because of surging demand for Wi-Fi connectivity, many CAIs do not have the capacity and coverage to offer enterprise-grade, ubiquitous Wi-Fi access. Emerging technologies can provide new kinds of wireless connectivity between buildings and to communities. Recommendations include continuing E-rate support for internal connections, making more unlicensed spectrum available, sharing CAI wireless networks with the surrounding community, and providing CAIs with technical advice to ensure they are using wireless most efficiently.
3. Partnerships, Sharing, and Community Anchor Institution Broadband: Joint procurement, aggregated purchasing, and coordinated planning can significantly reduce the costs of providing high-quality broadband to anchor institutions. By Joanne Hovis
Aggregating the buying power of different types of CAIs through statewide or regional procurement is a tested best practice that can enable anchor institutions to achieve lower per unit pricing, higher bandwidth, and better service quality. Broadband policies and programs should promote, rather than limit, cross-sector, aggregated purchase of high-capacity broadband.
4. Promoting Competition for Community Anchor Institution Broadband Services: Policymakers can improve anchor institution broadband by fostering competition, lowering prices, and promoting open interconnection and shared use of broadband networks. By John Windhausen, Jr.
Competition breeds greater investment, more jobs, lower prices, and higher quality customer service. Yet many CAIs still only receive one or no responses after issuing a request for service. Policymakers can promote competition for CAI broadband by ensuring that broadband networks are open to interconnection, reducing prices of wholesale services, and promoting network sharing.
5. Broadband Infrastructure Policy and Community Anchor Institutions: Streamlining access to rights-of-way and effectively managing public land can expedite the deployment of high-capacity broadband to anchor institutions. By Tom Koutsky
Numerous studies document that rights-of-way management policies can dramatically impact the cost and speed of broadband deployment. This paper recommends “dig once” policies, installing empty conduit for competitive providers, permitting CAIs to use dark fiber, standardizing lease agreements for all providers, implementing asset inventory databases, improving wireless tower siting policies, and simplifying rights-of-way approval processes.
6. Community Anchor Institutions Served by Government and Non-Profit Fiber Networks: State and local government networks can often provide anchors with high-quality bandwidth at affordable rates. By Joanne Hovis
Local governments, research and education networks, and other non-profit providers have been serving anchor institutions for decades. Because of their non-profit status, these providers often focus on long-term and community-based goals and can pass through cost savings to their CAI customers. Key recommendations include expanding the availability of municipal and non-profit networks, promoting the use of shared networks to serve multiple CAI sectors, and allowing municipal and non-profit providers to build excess capacity for use by commercial companies.
7. Broadband Subsidies for Community Anchor Institutions: Community anchor institutions need financial support so they can afford to purchase high-capacity broadband services. By Gina Spade
Studies show that CAIs often cannot afford to purchase the broadband capacity they need to serve their communities. Policymakers can address CAIs’ financial constraints with direct subsidies to CAIs, encouraging them to work together in planning joint procurement of broadband services, and expediting review of consortium applications for funding that can yield cost savings.
8. Government Funding for Broadband Network Providers Serving Community Anchor Institutions:
Providing government funding to broadband network providers serving CAIs encourages economic development, expands educational opportunity, improves health care services, and promotes digital equity. By Amelia Bryne
Governments can provide funding directly to broadband providers to deploy robust broadband networks for anchor institutions when the commercial market is not able to do so. Recommendations include creating competitive grant programs, promoting public-private partnerships, considering non-traditional financing such as preferential tax treatment and loan guarantees, and allowing non-traditional providers to participate in broadband funding programs.
9. Rural Broadband Programs and Community Anchor Institutions: Governments should explore funding, network sharing, and service obligations to ensure that rural and tribal community anchor institutions have affordable, high-capacity broadband. By Tom Koutsky
Rural broadband networks require significant investment to cover high deployment costs and ongoing operations. More than 39 percent of rural Americans lack adequate access to broadband service, compared to only 4 percent in urban areas. In the absence of a sustainable business model for rural broadband deployment, policymakers should provide enhanced financial incentives to attract private sector investment. Policymakers should permit open access and interconnection to facilitate the entry of new providers and implement service obligations to ensure recipients of government funding provide CAIs with high-capacity broadband.
10. Community Anchor Institutions and Residential Broadband Adoption: Community anchor institutions are essential partners to increasing broadband adoption. By Angela Siefer
Residential broadband adoption has stalled – about one-third of American homes still do not subscribe to landline broadband service. CAIs can help increase residential broadband adoption in many ways. CAIs can provide digital literacy training, educate consumers about government programs to promote broadband adoption, lead community planning efforts, and, in some cases, provide wireless broadband services directly to consumers. For these efforts to succeed, however, policymakers must provide CAIs and their community partners with locally customized resources to meet the needs of specific populations.
This Action Plan does not contain all the answers, but offers a menu of ideas and seeks to stimulate greater
discussion, research, and most importantly, action.
Over the next few years, policymakers and influencers at all levels will determine whether the country will be divided between digital “haves” and “have-nots,” or whether we capture the benefits of the Internet for all. Open, affordable, high-capacity broadband enables CAIs to do what they do best—allow every student, patient, patron, and person to reach their potential in our increasingly digital world. It’s time for action.
Grow2Gig+: Anchors Advance Communities is the SHLB Coalition campaign to make gigabit speeds for anchor institutions a national priority.
high-capacity broadband for
community anchor institutions
is an attainable goal,
but only if we reach together.