Friday, September 28, 2018
Headlines Daily Digest
What's Next for Unserved Rural Areas?
Don't Miss:
Susan Crawford: Cities Are Teaming Up to Offer Broadband, and the FCC Is Mad
Obama to companies: Engage governments to avoid the Facebook fate
Mignon Clyburn: You must be the change you want to see in the world
Broadband



Wireless







Platforms

Ownership

Radio


Health



Journalism




Advertising


Elections


Privacy


Policymakers

Stories From Abroad









Company News



Broadband/Internet
The CAF II Auction is Over, But Commissioner O'Rielly Adds Confusion As to What Happens Next For Rural Areas That Aren't Covered

With the Connect America Fund (CAF) Phase II auction completed, the Federal Communications Commission’s next CAF responsibility will be to establish plans for the CAF remote area auction, which aims to help bring broadband to remote areas not currently addressed through the CAF program. And FCC Commissioner Michael O'Rielly is questioning whether there is sufficient funding for that auction. He said at the Sept 26 FCC meeting that the CAF II auction results suggest that $5-7 billion dollars would be needed to bring broadband to locations that will remain unserved after the CAF II auction. But he noted that only about $500 million remains available for the remote area auction.
However, it is unclear how Commissioner O’Rielly arrived at his estimated deployment cost. He said 12 million people or 12 million locations in the US will still be without broadband. It’s not clear where the 12 million number came from or how he used it, in combination with the $2,000 average winning bid, to arrive at the estimate of $5-7 billion to reach the unserved locations. Additionally, his number differs dramatically from the official FCC line, at least regarding the CAF program, who said there are now 261,047 locations without a winning bid. The 261,047-location number is a lot lower than 12 million — or even 4.6 million (if Commissioner O’Rielly meant 12 million people, not 12 million locations.) A possible explanation relates to ongoing concerns that some stakeholders have expressed about the FCC’s data about served and unserved areas. Even if the numbers presented by FCC staffers Sept 26 are correct and there really are only 261,047 locations to which no one is on tap to bring broadband, it’s not yet possible to say if there will be sufficient funding for the CAF remote area auction.

Creditworthy consumers can face difficulties accessing credit if they lack a credit record that is treated as "scorable" by widely used credit scoring models. These consumers include those who are "credit invisible," meaning that they do not have a credit record maintained by one of the nationwide consumer reporting agencies (NCRAs). They also include those who have a credit record that contains either too little information or information that is deemed too old to be reliable.
Lack of internet access appears to have a stronger relationship to credit invisibility than does the presence of a bank branch: While younger adults residing near bank branches in highly urban areas used credit cards as entry products more often than those residing further away, overall we found little relationship between distance to the nearest branch and the incidence of credit invisibility. In contrast, our research did find that many credit products are originated through online means, causing credit invisibility to be more prevalent in areas with less internet access.

This is a story that defies two strongly held beliefs. The first—embraced fervently by today's Federal Communications Commission—is that the private marketplace is delivering world-class internet access infrastructure at low prices to all Americans, particularly in urban areas. The second is that cities are so busy competing that they are incapable of cooperating with one another, particularly when they have little in common save proximity. These two beliefs aren’t necessarily true. Right now, the 16 very different cities that make up the South Bay region of Southern California have gotten fed up with their internet access situation: They’re paying too much for too little. So they are working together to collectively lower the amounts they pay for city communications by at least a third. It's the first step along a path that, ultimately, will bring far cheaper internet access services to the 1.1 million people who live in the region.
[Susan Crawford is a professor at Harvard Law School]

Another Federal Communications Commission meeting is in the books with no final decisions on the 3.5 GHz Citizens Broadband Radio Services (CBRS) band. When asked about the timing of the 3.5 GHz item, FCC Commissioner Michael O’Rielly deferred to the chairman, who determines those things. Separately during Sept 26's press briefing, FCC Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel answered the same reporter’s question with a decidedly different tone, but one that reiterated her previous level of frustration at the lack of movement on the issue. "We have a serious deficit of midband spectrum in the United States. South Korea, Italy, the United Kingdom, Spain have already set out midband spectrum for auction. China has already cleared airwaves as well,” she said. “But somehow, we are sitting here many years after our initial proposal in the 3.5 GHz band and we’re stuck in some kind of bureaucratic quagmire,” she said. “I do not understand. We should have moved ahead a long time ago. I don’t have any insight, but I am exasperated. We should have done this a long time ago.”

Sprint is unable to recover from crippling losses and has told regulators its purchase by T-Mobile would set up a stronger competitor to wireless leaders AT&T and Verizon. Customers are fleeing the smallest of the big four US nationwide providers at an increasing rate, Sprint told the Federal Communications Commission in a Sept. 21 meeting. Revenue is dropping and the company can’t cut much more after eliminating about $10 billion in annual costs. The decline means Sprint can’t afford needed investments, according to the filing. Sprint’s commentary is at odds with the brighter picture the company described in Aug. The company posted its 12th straight quarter of growth in phone subscribers, a winning streak AT&T can’t match. There’s a “tension” between what the company is telling regulators in Washington and what it is telling Wall Street, said Blair Levin, a Washington-based adviser to New Street Research. This tactic isn’t unheard of, he said. As a strategy, presenting a dire picture doesn’t carry any real legal weight in this case, Levin says. “But as a practical matter, this kind of argument is helpful in moving officials toward a yes.”

Former President Barack Obama urged private businesses to come out of “isolation” and to engage more with governments when developing new products and services to avoid problems like those challenging Facebook. Obama told business leaders that “you cannot separate the business environment from the political and social environment.” “A good example is Facebook,” Obama said, referring to the public relations pummeling the social media company has received following US intelligence service reports that Facebook was a conduit for Russian election meddling in 2016. He said he genuinely believed the power of social media to connect people “is something that is potentially extraordinarily valuable and can be positive.” “But what is also true is that those systems were built in isolation (by private companies) detached from potential social consequences,” he added.
Obama said he hoped to see business leaders engaging “more directly” with governments to keep politicians posted on new products and applications, but also as an acknowledgment that “there’s going to be issues involved” with technological innovations. “Too often, at least in the United States, there’s a tendency for business leaders to say, ‘Let’s just avoid the government as much as we can.’” “That strategy can work for a time, but eventually — as I think Facebook has now discovered — you’re going to have to engage,” the former president said.

A group of nine state attorneys general backed AT&T as the Justice Department asks a federal appeals court to reverse approval of the company’s $85.4 billion acquisition of Time Warner. It “is rare for the federal government to pursue an antitrust case involving major, national companies without any state joining the effort,” the nine state officials said in a court filing, noting that no states have filed briefs supporting the Justice Department’s appeal. “It is notable that the district court - after a six-week trial, during which it heard numerous witnesses and reviewed thousands of pages of exhibits - found the federal government’s case to be without merit. That determination validates the States’ decision and is entitled to substantial deference,” the brief said. The nine attorneys general are from AL, GA, KY, LA, NM, OK, SC, UT, and WI.

The Multicultural Media, Telecom and Internet Council (MMTC) and the National Association of Black Owned Broadcasters (NABOB) are challenging the Federal Communications Commission's proposed incubator program, petitioning the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia to review one element of the program—its comparability standards of ownership rule waivers—which they said was arbitrary and capricious and an abuse of discretion, and thus illegal. MMTC and NABOB support the underlying goal of helping diversify media ownership and the incubator program specifically. But they have problems with the FCC's definition of "comparable" radio market. A "small" market with 45-plus full power radio stations qualifies for incubation, while a "comparable" market could be New York because it also has 45-plus stations, a point MMTC and NABOB also made in their filing.

Thank you for the opportunity to join your esteemed industry in Orlando (FL) to discuss radio policy issues. As we head into our next Quadrennial Review, more work remains, which I would like to spend my time discussing with you today:
Updating Our Media Market Definition: All relevant participants must be included in any media market definition. When I talk to existing providers in this space, they explain quite clearly how they compete directly against all of those operating in the market, especially given the development and scale of two large Internet companies: Facebook and Google.
AM/FM Subcaps: [We] need to both raise the overall radio ownership caps within a market and eliminate the current AM/FM subcaps.
Incubator Program: I want to commend Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai for his leadership in both proposing and carrying out this ideaI...Unfortunately, it appears that some are still trying to alter our comparable markets algorithm to disallow comparability more than five market rank sizes removed in either direction from the incubated station’s market. As I stated in August, this is an overly complex alternative that I fear will restrict participation in our program. I will continue to object to any changes in this area.

Among the hundreds of people waiting to visit Mahatma Gandhi one day was a mother who sought help in battling her son’s obsession with eating sugar. When it was their turn in line, instead of immediately counseling the boy, Gandhi asked the pair to come back in two weeks. Following a two-hour wait on the day of their return, the anxious mother repeated her request. Gandhi promptly spoke with her son and the boy agreed to work on breaking his sugar fixation. The mother expressed her gratitude, of course, but remained puzzled as to why Gandhi refused to counsel her son during their first visit. His response, for me, represents one of the most teachable moments in world history. Gandhi shared that he could not initially talk to the boy about his sugar habit because Gandhi himself was eating sugar at that time. How could he legitimately speak to her son about not eating sugar, Gandhi reportedly asked, if he had yet to ‘take the journey himself ’? This powerful lesson, from an encounter many years ago and thousands of miles away, aligns so well with my belief that the best advice comes from people who themselves have walked the path one is about to take. The Media Democracy Agenda: The Strategy and Legacy of FCC Commissioner Michael J. Copps appraises the strategies and priorities of one of the Federal Communications Commission’s most consequential members, a commissioner who sought to change the agency by making it more accountable to the American people.
[Mignon L. Clyburn served as a commissioner on the Federal Communications Commission]
Stories from Abroad
China is Using Tech to ‘Reset the Global Balance of Power,’ Experts Tell Congress

The government needs to diversify and strengthen its efforts to stop China from co-opting the US innovation economy to support its own global ambitions, industry experts told the House Oversight IT Subcommittee on Sept 26. And tariffs probably aren’t the best way to do it, they said. “For more than 40 years, the US has encouraged China to develop its own economy and take its place alongside the US as a central and responsible player on the world stage,” said House Oversight IT subcommittee Chairman Will Hurd (R-TX). “China does not want to join us, they want to replace us. More importantly, China has not been playing fair.” At the hearing, panelists described the many measures China has taken to protect its domestic tech sector while exploiting foreign countries’ research and development efforts. The Chinese government views information and communications technology as “the basic metric for future power,” said Dean Cheng, a Heritage Foundation senior research fellow. As such, dominance in artificial intelligence, quantum technology, cloud computing and other sectors “presents an opportunity to reset the global balance of power,” he said. China’s booming tech industry not only presents economic and national security threats to the US, witnesses said, but it often comes at the expense of its own citizens.

As Google marks its 20th anniversary, our relationship with it isn’t quite as uncomplicated as it used to be. In the wake of Facebook’s Cambridge Analytica scandal, and fears that the Russians exploited Facebook and YouTube to influence the 2016 presidential election, people are more wary of tech companies these days–especially ones that harvest personal data. This trend won’t reverse itself anytime soon. Google, given the enormity of its presence in our lives, will bear that brunt more than almost anyone else. Over the years, consumers have grown more aware–in part because of Facebook’s privacy gaffes–that the reason those cool-and-free Google services exist is because of Google’s massive advertising business, which is fueled in large part by the personal information of users. Given the anxiety we already have about where AI will land on the benevolent/dystopic scale in the future, Google will need all the trust it can get if it wants to matter as much in 2038–and beyond—as it does today.
Benton (www.benton.org) provides the only free, reliable, and non-partisan daily digest that curates and distributes news related to universal broadband, while connecting communications, democracy, and public interest issues. Posted Monday through Friday, this service provides updates on important industry developments, policy issues, and other related news events. While the summaries are factually accurate, their sometimes informal tone may not always represent the tone of the original articles. Headlines are compiled by Kevin Taglang (headlines AT benton DOT org) and Robbie McBeath (rmcbeath AT benton DOT org) — we welcome your comments.
© Benton Foundation 2018. Redistribution of this email publication — both internally and externally — is encouraged if it includes this message. For subscribe/unsubscribe info email: headlines AT benton DOT org
Kevin Taglang
Executive Editor, Communications-related Headlines
Benton Foundation
727 Chicago Avenue
Evanston, IL 60202
847-328-3049
headlines AT benton DOT org

The Benton Foundation All Rights Reserved © 2018


