Wednesday, September 22, 2021
Headlines Daily Digest
Don't Miss:
Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund Guidance Now Available
Broadband Infrastructure
Digital Inclusion
Spectrum/Wireless
Education
Platforms/Social Media
Privacy
Diversity
Labor
Security
Devices
Content
Policymakers
Stories From Abroad
Broadband Infrastructure
The Department of the Treasury released guidance for the Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund program established by the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021. The program allocates $10 billion for eligible governments to carry out critical capital projects that directly enable work, education, and health monitoring, including remote options, in response to the COVID-19 public health emergency. The Capital Projects Fund Guidance for States, Territories, and Freely Associated States describes in detail how your government may obtain and use these funds. A key priority of this program is to make funds available to recipients that would like to make investments in high-quality, affordable broadband infrastructure and other digital connectivity technologies. This pandemic has shown us that broadband infrastructure is indispensable for access to critical services and participation in aspects of daily life, including remote work, telehealth, and distance learning. At the same time, recipients have flexibility to use funds for certain capital projects other than broadband infrastructure that enable work, education, and health monitoring, including remote options. The guidance provides information about eligible areas for investment and technical standards, and encourages projects in economically distressed areas, supports community empowerment, and encourages strong labor practices. Although this is not a competitive grant program, states, territories, and freely associated states must first submit a simple application establishing recipient eligibility. The Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund application portal will open on September 24, 2021.
With the federal government slow to produce better maps of broadband internet coverage, state leaders are stepping up with their own efforts that they say will yield more granular information that leads to better decisions on the infrastructure buildout. Virginia became the latest state to unveil an effort to revamp its statewide broadband map in summer 2021, following Georgia's map launched in 2020. New York has proposed a similar effort but is stuck in legislative limbo, while most others rely on federal data for their existing state-level maps. This new state push comes with the Federal Communications Commission under fire for the inadequacy of its national maps. For state officials, putting together their own broadband maps with more granular data is most beneficial when distributing grant money to extend service to underserved or unserved areas. But while the new maps can help states better direct funds, there are concerns they still might be inadequate and lead to disparities in infrastructure, even as there is recognition that the current model isn’t working. Observers worry about a “patchwork” of data that is not nationally standardized.
Private organizations, state legislatures and the federal government are trying to address the digital divide with funding. The infrastructure bill moving through Congress promises $65 billion for broadband development, but obstacles will remain after the money is made available. One problem with converting the money into broadband access is the classic divide in government philosophy: Whether the federal government or individual states should make the decisions. A further complication with federal funding is that the FCC’s maps, which theoretically show which areas have high-speed internet access and which still need it, aren’t specific enough to be accurate. Both the ends and means of broadband technology are contentious issues; experts disagree over symmetrical speeds and the value of future-proof systems over immediate connectivity availability. Likewise, which technologies work best and for which values of “best” - whether it is satellite, fixed wireless access or fiber - is a subject that inspires strong feelings on all sides. Every form of broadband technology still runs into potential problems when it comes to setting up the equipment and infrastructure. Ultimately, improved connectivity has become a priority and state, local and federal governments are taking steps to make sure everyone has access to high-speed internet. Yet between intention and the execution, these logistic issues remain unsolved.
[Isabel Kunkle is editor of WISPA, CTAM and Wireless SmartBriefs.]
An analysis of the failure of US broadband policy to solve the rural–urban digital divide, with a proposal for a new national rural broadband plan. As much of daily life migrates online, broadband—high-speed internet connectivity—has become a necessity. The widespread lack of broadband in rural America has created a stark urban–rural digital divide. In Farm Fresh Broadband, Christopher Ali analyzes the promise and the failure of national rural broadband policy in the United States and proposes a new national broadband plan. He examines how broadband policies are enacted and implemented, explores business models for broadband providers, surveys the technologies of rural broadband, and offers case studies of broadband use in the rural Midwest. Ali argues that rural broadband policy is both broken and incomplete: broken because it lacks coordinated federal leadership and incomplete because it fails to recognize the important roles of communities, cooperatives, and local providers in broadband access. For example, existing policies favor large telecommunication companies, crowding out smaller, nimbler providers. Lack of competition drives prices up—rural broadband can cost 37 percent more than urban broadband. The federal government subsidizes rural broadband by approximately $6 billion. Where does the money go?Ali proposes democratizing policy architecture for rural broadband, modeling it after the wiring of rural America for electricity and telephony. Subsidies should be equalized, not just going to big companies. The result would be a multistakeholder system, guided by thoughtful public policy and funded by public and private support.
Frontier Communications is on track to beat its goal of building fiber to 495,000 homes in 2021. CEO Nick Jeffery stated that Frontier will hit 600,000 homes passed in 2021, which is 105,000 more homes than planned. When asked about supply chain issues, Jeffery said that the company hasn’t experienced any issues yet and he is confident that it won’t because Frontier announced its accelerated fiber build before many other fiber providers announced their plans. This allowed the company to get contracts with vendors before many others. In addition, the CEO said that Frontier has secured multi-year agreements with vendors and has a lot of vendor diversity. Jeffery's comments about the company exceeding its 2021 fiber expansion plan follow Frontier’s announcement in August 2021 that it was raising its fiber rollout goal from 6 million to 10 million locations by the end of 2025. The company said, at the time, that it had 2.8 million total broadband customers, including both fiber and DSL. Jeffery also stated he believes that Frontier can succeed in its turnaround strategy if it focuses on four goals: building fiber as fast as it can; launching compelling customer offers; improving its customer care; and streamlining its costs.
Digital Inclusion
Comcast Expands Internet Essentials Eligibility and Pledges $15 Million to US Connectivity
Comcast announced new steps to help advance digital equity for even more students and families. Internet Essentials – Comcast's comprehensive broadband adoption program for low-income households – will now expand eligibility to Federal Pell Grant recipients. The expanded eligibility for Internet Essentials will enable even more students to stay connected as they continue to pursue degrees at colleges, universities, and technical schools. In addition, Comcast pledged to donate $15 million worth of Internet service and equipment, including more than 25,000 laptops, to low-income students, seniors, veterans, and adults. The announcement is part of Project UP, Comcast’s $1 billion commitment to reach 50 million people with the tools, resources, and skills needed to succeed in a digital world.
Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo redoubles her call for the Biden administration to develop a national spectrum strategy in remarks before the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA)'s annual Spectrum Symposium. Putting together such a strategy was a priority for former President Donald Trump, but one that was never fully developed. Raimondo clamored for one as a potential solution to 5G spectrum chaos during her confirmation hearings in January 2021. “Because of spectrum’s strategic importance across the board, we need a national spectrum strategy that involves all major governmental stakeholders,” says Raimondo, according to prepared remarks shared with Politico. Raimondo adds that her department “has been working closely with the [Federal Communications Commission] to ensure that the wireless industry has the spectrum it needs to fully deploy 5G across the country.” Agencies like the Department of Commerce, the FCC, the Pentagon and the Department of Transportation frequently feuded during the Trump era over various slices of the airwaves, and Raimondo hopes to help smooth over some of these frictions. She also plans to hail the ongoing cooperation between Commerce, Pentagon, the FCC and the wireless industry in advance of the October 2021 5G airwaves sale.
Verizon CEO Hans Vestberg highlighted continued momentum in its Fios business but pointed to fixed wireless access as a key tool in its quest to expand its broadband reach further and faster. Vestberg explained that Fios and its 4G and 5G fixed wireless products are part of a patchwork of solutions the operator is leveraging to deliver a “full nationwide broadband offering.” He added fixed wireless gives the operator an opportunity to serve up broadband to its sprawling base of wireless customers outside its ILEC footprint. Earlier this month, Verizon announced its 5G Home internet service is now live in parts of 57 cities. Its 4G fixed wireless offering is much more broadly available, covering 48 states. The operator previously outlined plans to reach 15 million homes with fixed wireless by the end of 2021, nearly 30 million by 2023 and 50 million by 2025. For comparison, its Fios service is available to roughly 15 million locations across eight states in New England and the Mid-Atlantic regions. As of the end of Q2 2021, Verizon had approximately 6.7 million Fios subscribers. Vestberg added Verizon sees an opportunity to continue to differentiate and grow revenue from its broadband offerings by bundling various offers from partners, as it’s already done with content from Disney +.
Spectrum policy leadership and planning are critical to complete the US 5G ecosystem while planning for the next-generation wireless technology, 6G. It’s also essential to shed some mistakes of the past. Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo has indicated that a “whole of government” effort is critical to 5G leadership, and she’s right. She’s also right on the need to avoid 5G pretenders which will negatively undermine national security; Exhibit A is Ligado Networks. During the last administration, the Federal Communications Commission made a big mistake by approving an application by Ligado to let it “rezone” its satellite spectrum licenses for terrestrial use. Extensive testing from the private and public sectors has shown Ligado’s operations could cause harmful interference to the satellite communications and GPS services. After years of silence, the FCC suddenly granted Ligado’s petition, but the stark reality is that Ligado’s spectrum is poorly suited for 5G and it cannot become a real 5G company with it. The Biden FCC could help protect the integrity of America’s vital satellite communications and GPS services by freezing the 2020 Ligado order while it reconsiders this profound mistake. Even though the FCC is divided between two Democrats and two Republicans, the four commissioners could turn a new page to fix the Ligado mess while working on priorities that could actually help 5G.
[Robert McDowell served as a commissioner of the Federal Communications Commission from 2006 to 2013. He is a partner at Cooley LLP, which has clients with an interest in the Ligado matter.]
Do you have concerns about whether students and families in your community or school have adequate, consistent access to the internet and digital devices? A new resource, Learning at Home While Under-Connected: A Toolkit for Parent Discussions and Data Collection in Your Community, is now available to help organizations get beyond the simple “yes or no” answers that come with typical surveys of internet access. This toolkit is designed for community leaders who are interested in gathering parent data and insights using research methods similar to those used in the Learning at Home While Under-Connected project, and is part of a project focusing on the needs of lower-income families who seek resources for learning at home during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. The toolkit includes sample outreach flyers, survey questions, links to ready-made SurveyMonkey forms, and scripts and protocols for setting up discussion groups—all in Spanish and English. It also includes a quick three-page question set (also available here) that can be printed or distributed online. We hope this resource will ultimately help organizations to build partnerships that improve ecosystems of learning for today’s children and families.
Platforms/Social Media
Facebook paid billions extra to the FTC to spare Zuckerberg in data suit, shareholders allege
Facebook conditioned its $5 billion payment to the Federal Trade Commission to resolve the Cambridge Analytica data leak probe on the agency dropping plans to sue Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg individually, shareholders allege in a lawsuit. Two groups of shareholders claimed that members of Facebook’s board allowed the company to overpay on its fine in order to protect Zuckerberg, the company’s founder and largest shareholder. The complaints, which cite internal discussions among Facebook’s board members, were filed in Delaware Court of Chancery. The FTC has never disclosed that it originally planned to name Zuckerberg personally in the lawsuit, and the agency's two Democrats at the time voted against the settlement in part because of the lack of personal liability for the CEO.
Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook’s chief executive, signed off in August 2021 on a new initiative code-named Project Amplify. The effort, which was hatched at an internal meeting months before in January, had a specific purpose: to use Facebook’s News Feed, the site’s most important digital real estate, to show people positive stories about the social network. The idea was that pushing pro-Facebook news items — some of them written by the company — would improve its image in the eyes of its users. But the move was sensitive because Facebook had not previously positioned the News Feed as a place where it burnished its own reputation. Several executives at the meeting were shocked by the proposal. Project Amplify punctuated a series of decisions that Facebook has made to aggressively reshape its image. Since that January internal meeting, the company has begun a multipronged effort to change its narrative by distancing Mr. Zuckerberg from scandals, reducing outsiders’ access to internal data, burying a potentially negative report about its content and increasing its own advertising to showcase its brand.
Leaders of the Stop Hate For Profit social media boycott group are discussing whether to organize another campaign against Facebook in light of an explosive investigative series from the Wall Street Journal. The Stop Hate For Profit advertising boycott campaign against Facebook launched in 2020 in response to controversy over the company's refusal to censor a post from then-President Trump that many argued incited violence. The groups that organized the campaign were Common Sense, a children's online safety group; The Anti-Defamation League; Color for Change; NAACP; Free Press; and Sleeping Giants, an advertising accountability group. "The founders of that campaign are discussing new efforts we should do," said Common Sense CEO Jim Steyer said. "We are considering the idea of a major consumer effort and if we did, it would be similar to what we did last time with Stop Hate For Profit. It would have the same kind of elements." Stop Hate For Profit focused on Facebook advertisers in 2020. This time, Steyer says, they've been discussing actions that might target consumers, as well as Facebook employees and board members.
Nearly eight months into his presidency, President Biden has yet to pick permanent leaders for the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), which together oversee and set policy for the broadcast and Internet service industries. Pivotally, Biden has yet to nominate a fifth commissioner at the FCC, a set that would give Democrats a 3-2 majority on the five-seat commission and enable them to advance more controversial items with a party-line vote. That includes a surefire Democratic effort to reinstate the Obama-era net neutrality rules, which dictate that Internet providers should treat all Web traffic equally. "At the FCC, the chair really has the predominant role in setting the agenda, setting priorities, and while an acting chair can do that to some degree, over the long term, you don't know the priorities of whoever the permanent chair is going to be,” said Samir Jain, director of policy at the nonprofit Center for Democracy and Technology. The vacancies are likely to hamper the agencies as they prepare to disburse funding aimed at boosting Internet connectivity nationwide that is expected to come from the bipartisan infrastructure package making its way through Congress. And they could bog down initiatives to make broadband more affordable and expand subsidies at a time when the pandemic has laid bare the US's connectivity gaps.
Global internet freedom declined for the 11th consecutive year. The greatest deteriorations were documented in Myanmar, Belarus, and Uganda, where state forces cracked down amid electoral and constitutional crises. Myanmar’s 14-point score decline is the largest registered since the Freedom on the Net project began. Governments clashed with technology companies on users’ rights. Authorities in at least 48 countries pursued new rules for tech companies on content, data, and competition over the past year. With a few positive exceptions, the push to regulate the tech industry, which stems in some cases from genuine problems like online harassment and manipulative market practices, is being exploited to subdue free expression and gain greater access to private data. Free expression online is under unprecedented strain. More governments arrested users for nonviolent political, social, or religious speech than ever before. Officials suspended internet access in at least 20 countries, and 21 states blocked access to social media platforms. Authorities in at least 45 countries are suspected of obtaining sophisticated spyware or data-extraction technology from private vendors. China ranks as the worst environment for internet freedom for the seventh year in a row. Chinese authorities imposed draconian prison terms for online dissent, independent reporting, and mundane daily communications. The COVID-19 pandemic remains one of the most heavily censored topics. Officials also cracked down on the country’s tech giants, citing their abuses related to competition and data protection, though the campaign further concentrated power in the hands of the authoritarian state. The United States’ score declined for the fifth consecutive year. False, misleading, and manipulated information continued to proliferate online, even affecting public acceptance of the 2020 presidential election results. The new administration took promising steps to enforce stronger protections for internet users. State intervention must protect human rights online and preserve an open internet. The emancipatory power of the internet depends on its egalitarian nature. To counter digital authoritarianism, democracies should ensure that regulations enable users to express themselves freely, share information across borders, and hold the powerful to account.
Benton (www.benton.org) provides the only free, reliable, and non-partisan daily digest that curates and distributes news related to universal broadband, while connecting communications, democracy, and public interest issues. Posted Monday through Friday, this service provides updates on important industry developments, policy issues, and other related news events. While the summaries are factually accurate, their sometimes informal tone may not always represent the tone of the original articles. Headlines are compiled by Kevin Taglang (headlines AT benton DOT org) and Grace Tepper (grace AT benton DOT org) — we welcome your comments.
© Benton Institute for Broadband & Society 2021. Redistribution of this email publication — both internally and externally — is encouraged if it includes this message. For subscribe/unsubscribe info email: headlines AT benton DOT org
Kevin Taglang
Executive Editor, Communications-related Headlines
Benton Institute
for Broadband & Society
727 Chicago Avenue
Evanston, IL 60202
847-328-3040
headlines AT benton DOT org
The Benton Institute for Broadband & Society All Rights Reserved © 2021